Use of incisional preventive negative pressure wound therapy in open incisional hernia repair: Who benefits?

Efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy after open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The susceptibility to surgical site occurrence (SSO) is high following ventral hernia repair (VHR) surgery. SSO severely increases the physical and mental burden on patients. The main purpose of this review was to analyze the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) after open VHR(OVHR) and explore benefits to patients.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched from the date of establishment to 15 October 2022. All randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies comparing NPWT with standard dressings after OVHR were included. The Revman 5.4 software recommended by Cochrane and the STATA16 software were used in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (involving 1666 patients) were identified and included in the meta-analysis, with 821 patients receiving NPWT. Overall, the incidence rate of SSO in the NPWT group was lower compared to the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-0.93; I2 = 86%; P = 0.03). The occurrence rate of surgical site infection (SSI; OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.38-0.68, P < 0.001), wound dehiscence (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0. 43-0.96; P = 0.03), and hernia recurrence (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.28-0.91, P = 0.02) was also lowered. There was no significant difference in seroma (OR = 0.76; 95% CI = 0.54-1.06; P = 0.11), hematoma (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.25-1.11; P = 0.09), or skin necrosis (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.47-1.46; P = 0.52).

CONCLUSION

NPWT can effectively decrease the occurrence of SSO, SSI wound dehiscence and hernia recurrence and should be considered following OVHR.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy versus Standard of Care in Reduction of Surgical Site Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been utilized to help manage closed incisions across many surgical specialties. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect of ciNPT on postsurgical and health economic outcomes.

Methods

A systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, and QUOSA was performed for publications written in English, comparing ciNPT to standard-of-care dressings between January 2005 and August 2021. Study participant characteristics, surgical procedure, dressings used, treatment duration, postsurgical outcomes, and follow-up data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Risk ratios summarized dichotomous outcomes. Difference in means or standardized difference in means was used to assess continuous variables reported on the same scale or outcomes reported on different scales/measurement instruments.

Results

The literature search identified 84 studies for analysis. Significant reductions in surgical site complication (SSC), surgical site infection (SSI), superficial SSI, deep SSI, seroma, dehiscence, skin necrosis, and prolonged incisional drainage were associated with ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Reduced readmissions and reoperations were significant in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05). Patients receiving ciNPT had a 0.9-day shorter hospital stay (P < 0.0001). Differences in postoperative pain scores and reported amounts of opioid usage were significant in favor of ciNPT use (P < 0.05). Scar evaluations demonstrated improved scarring in favor of ciNPT (P < 0.05).

Discussion

For these meta-analyses, ciNPT use was associated with statistically significant reduction in SSCs, SSIs, seroma, dehiscence, and skin necrosis incidence. Reduced readmissions, reoperation, length of hospital stay, decreased pain scores and opioid use, and improved scarring were also observed in ciNPT patients.

Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy incisions after ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) in preventing surgical site infection (SSI), hernia recurrence and other wound complications following closed laparotomy incisions following ventral hernia repair (VHR).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed from inception until June 30, 2021, to identify all online English publications comparing the use of pNPWT with standard dressing for closed laparotomy incision following VHR.

RESULTS

One RCT and eleven retrospective cohort studies involving 1355 patients satisfied the basic inclusion criteria. The use of pNPWT reduced SSI (OR = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.24-0.62] P < 0.0001) and surgical site occurrence (SSO) (OR = 0.51 [95% CI: 0.27-0.98] P = 0.04). No statistically significant difference was detected in the incidence of hernia recurrence (OR = 0.61 [95% CI: 0.30-1.26] P = 0.18), seroma (OR = 0.70 [95% CI: 0.48-1.03]P = 0.07), hematoma (OR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.33-1.81]P = 0.55) and wound dehiscence (OR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.43-1.08]P = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Use of pNPWT for closed laparotomy incisions following ventral hernia repair can significantly reduce the rate of postoperative surgical site infection (especially for superficial SIS) and surgical site occurrences. The number needed to treat (NNT) for preventing one occurrence of SSI is 9 patients. However, further research and more high quality studies are required to assess the effectiveness and assist in clarifying the role of pNPWT for closed laparotomy incisions following ventral hernia repair, preferentially in high-risk populations of developing SSI.