Effect of TNF-alpha blockade on coagulopathy and endothelial cell activation in xenoperfused porcine kidneys

Expression of human thrombomodulin on porcine endothelial cells can reduce platelet aggregation but did not reduce activation of complement or endothelium - an experimental study

Clinical xenotransplantation will only be feasible when present limitations can be controlled sufficiently. Activation of endothelium and complement as well as coagulopathy and thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is important barriers. Transgenic expression of hTBM on porcine endothelial cells is a reasonable approach to reduce activation of haemostasis. Endothelial cells from wild-type pigs as well from pigs expressing hTBM alone or in combination with hCD46 and knockout of the alpha-1,3,-galactosyltransferase (GTKO) were perfused with platelet-rich plasma in a microfluidic flow chamber. Platelet aggregation and activation, coagulation, complement and endothelial cell activation were assessed. Perfusion of wild-type porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) resulted in distinct platelet aggregation. Expression of hTBM in either mono-transgenic or triple-transgenic (GTKO/hCD46/hTBM) PAEC showed significantly reduced or absent platelet aggregation. Flow cytometric analysis of platelets showed an increased CD62P expression in wild-type PAEC and significantly reduced expression in mono- or triple-transgenic PAEC. Activation of coagulation measured by TAT occured in WT PAEC and was clearly reduced in hTBM and GTKO/hCD46/hTBM PAEC. Activation of complement and endothelial cells was only reduced in GTKO/hCD46/hTBM but not in PAEC expressing hTBM alone. Expression of hTBM was able to prevent activation of coagulation and platelet aggregation in mono- and triple-transgenic PAEC, while activation of complement and endothelial cells was not reduced in mono-transgenic PAEC.

Preservation Solutions for Kidney Transplantation: History, Advances and Mechanisms

Solid organ transplantation was one of the greatest medical advances during the past few decades. Organ preservation solutions have been applied to diminish ischemic/hypoxic injury during cold storage and improve graft survival. In this article, we provide a general review of the history and advances of preservation solutions for kidney transplantation. Key components of commonly used solutions are listed, and effective supplementations for current available preservation solutions are discussed. At cellular and molecular levels, further insights were provided into the pathophysiological mechanisms of effective ingredients against ischemic/hypoxic renal injury during cold storage. We pay special attention to the cellular and molecular events during transplantation, including ATP depletion, acidosis, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, and other intracellular mechanisms.

Evidence for the important role of inflammation in xenotransplantation

There is increasing evidence of a sustained state of systemic inflammation after pig-to-nonhuman primate (NHP) xenotransplantation (that has been termed systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients [SIXR]). Increases in inflammatory markers, e.g., C-reactive protein, histones, serum amyloid A, D-dimer, cytokines, chemokines, and a decrease in free triiodothyronine, have been demonstrated in the recipient NHPs. The complex interactions between inflammation, coagulation, and the immune response are well-recognized, but the role of inflammation in xenograft recipients is not fully understood. The evidence suggests that inflammation can promote the activation of coagulation and the adaptive immune response, but the exact mechanisms remain uncertain. If prolonged xenograft survival is to be achieved, anti-inflammatory strategies (e.g., the administration of anti-inflammatory agents, and/or the generation of genetically-engineered organ-source pigs that are protected from the effect of inflammation) may be necessary to prevent, control, or negate the effect of the systemic inflammation that develops in xenograft recipients. This may allow for a reduction in the intensity of exogenous immunosuppressive therapy. If immunological tolerance to a xenograft is to be obtained, then control of inflammation may be essential.

Potential pathological role of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17) in xenotransplantation

The major limitation of organ transplantation is the shortage of available organs from deceased human donors which leads to the deaths of thousands of patients each year. Xenotransplantation is considered to be an effective way to resolve the problem. Immune rejection and coagulation dysfunction are two major hurdles for the successful survival of pig xenografts in primate recipients. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17, play important roles in many diseases and in allotransplantation. However, the pathological roles of these pro-inflammatory cytokines in xenotransplantation remain unclear. Here, we briefly review the signaling transduction and expression regulation of IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 and evaluate their potential pathological roles in in vitro and in vivo models of xenotransplantation. We found that IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-17 were induced in most in vitro or in vivo xenotransplantation model. Blockade of these cytokines using gene modification, antibody, or inhibitor had different effects in xenotransplantation. Inhibition of IL-6 signaling with tocilizumab decreased CRP but did not increase xenograft survival. The one possible reason is that tocilizumab can not suppress IL-6 signaling in porcine cells or organs. Other drugs which inhibit IL-6 signaling need to be investigated in xenotransplantation model. Inhibition of TNF-α was beneficial for the survival of xenografts in pig-to-mouse, rat, or NHP models. Blockade of IL-17 using a neutralizing antibody also increased xenograft survival in several animal models. However, the role of IL-17 in the pig-to-NHP xenotransplantation model remains unclear and needs to be further investigated. Moreover, blockade of TNF-α and IL-6 together has got a better effect in pig-to-baboon kidney xenotransplantation. Blockade two or even more cytokines together might get better effect in suppressing xenograft rejection. Better understanding the role of these cytokines in xenotransplantation will be beneficial for choosing better immunosuppressive strategy or producing genetic modification pig.

Cytokine profiles in Tibetan macaques following α-1,3-galactosyltransferase-knockout pig liver xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Pig-to-nonhuman primate orthotopic liver xenotransplantation is often accompanied by thrombocytopenia and coagulation disorders. Furthermore, the release of cytokines can trigger cascade reactions of coagulation and immune attacks within transplant recipients. To better elucidate the process of inflammation in liver xenograft recipients, we utilized a modified heterotopic auxiliary liver xenotransplantation model for xeno-immunological research. We studied the cytokine profiles and the relationship between cytokine levels and xenograft function after liver xenotransplantation.

METHODS

Appropriate donor and recipient matches were screened using complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays. Donor liver grafts from α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pigs or GTKO pigs additionally transgenic for human CD47 (GTKO/CD47) were transplanted into Tibetan macaques via two different heterotrophic auxiliary liver xenotransplantation procedures. The cytokine profiles, hepatic function, and coagulation parameters were monitored during the clinical course of xenotransplantation.

RESULTS

Xenograft blood flow was stable in recipients after heterotopic auxiliary transplantation. A Doppler examination indicated that the blood flow speed was faster in the hepatic artery (HA) and hepatic vein (HV) of xenografts subjected to the modified Sur II (HA-abdominal aorta+HV-inferior vena cava) procedure than in those subjected to our previously reported Sur I (HA-splenic artery+HV-left renal vein) procedure. Tibetan macaques receiving liver xenografts did not exhibit severe coagulation disorders or immune rejection. Although the recipients did suffer from a rapid loss of platelets, this loss was mild. In blood samples dynamically collected after xenotransplantation (post-Tx), dramatic increases in the levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, interleukin (IL)-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IL-6, and interferon gamma-induced protein 10 were observed at 1 hour post-Tx, even under immunosuppression. We further confirmed that the elevation in individual cytokine levels was correlated with the onset of graft damage. Finally, the release of cytokines might contribute to leukocyte infiltration in the xenografts.

CONCLUSION

Here, we established a modified auxiliary liver xenotransplantation model resulting in near-normal hepatic function. Inflammatory cytokines might contribute to early damage in liver xenografts. Controlling the systemic inflammatory response of recipients might prevent early post-Tx graft dysfunction.