Genioglossus muscle activity during sniff and reverse sniff in healthy men

Sniff and reverse-sniff nasal respiratory pressures after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A single-center prospective study

BACKGROUND

and objective: This study examined the validity of sniff nasal inspiratory (SNIP) and reverse-sniff nasal expiratory pressures (RSNEP) for estimating respiratory muscle strength and for predicting poor life expectancy following exacerbation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

This prospective study included patients who were admitted for COPD exacerbation and underwent rehabilitation. At hospital discharge, SNIP, RSNEP, and maximum mouth inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory pressures (MEP) were measured, and the body mass index, degree of airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index was calculated by evaluating body mass index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, and 6-min walk distance.

RESULTS

Data from 43 patients (mean age 76.8 years, FEV1 42.8 % predicted) were analyzed. SNIP and RSNEP were moderately correlated with MIP and MEP, respectively. Bland-Altman plot means of SNIP (48.3 ± 17.5) and RSNEP (44.7 ± 23.8 cmH2O) were lower than those of MIP (54.8 ± 19.9) and MEP (76.4 ± 31.2 cmH2O), respectively, and the SNIP-MIP and RSNEP-MEP 95 % limits of agreement were wide. Logistic regression showed that SNIP and RSNEP were significantly associated with BODE score ≥7 (poor life expectancy), and predictive accuracy was 81.4 % when combining SNIP ≤49 and RSNEP ≤42 cmH2O.

CONCLUSION

After exacerbation in patients with COPD, SNIP and RSNEP are useful indicators that complement MIP and MEP. Furthermore, a combined SNIP and RSNEP test may be beneficial in predicting poor life expectancy.

Effects of an optimised approach to home-based respiratory care in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to investigate the effects of an optimal home-based respiratory care protocol in individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised, blinded controlled trial involving patients diagnosed with ALS, both sexes, age between 18 and 80 years. Patients will be randomly allocated into the conventional respiratory care (CRC) group and the optimised respiratory care home-based (ORC) group. Primary outcomes will be peak cough flow, the number of exacerbations and ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised. Secondary outcomes will include chest wall volumes, maximal respiratory pressures, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure, nasal expiratory pressure and forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) and FEV1/FVC. The CRC group will receive educational information about respiratory care at the clinic. The ORC group will receive conventional care and home-based care. The clinical status of all individuals will be monitored weekly through telephone calls. A 6-month intervention is planned, the outcomes will be assessed every 3 months and 3 and 6 months follow-up after final evaluation. The primary and secondary results will be described as average or median for continuous variables and absolute and relative frequencies for qualitative variables. Treatment effects or differences between the outcomes (baseline, 3 months and 6 months) of the study groups will be analysed using an analysis of variance. The level of significance will be set as p≤0.05.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The research ethics committee approved the study. It is expected to evaluate respiratory function in patients with ALS in the short, medium and long terms with home-based care protocol applied. The disease's rapid progression is a limitation for performing a long-term clinical study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

RBR-3z23ts; Pre-results.