Is it possible to compare inhibitory and excitatory intracortical circuits in face and hand primary motor cortex?

Sensorimotor regulation of facial expression - An untouched frontier

Facial expression is a critical form of nonverbal social communication which promotes emotional exchange and affiliation among humans. Facial expressions are generated via precise contraction of the facial muscles, guided by sensory feedback. While the neural pathways underlying facial motor control are well characterized in humans and primates, it remains unknown how tactile and proprioceptive information reaches these pathways to guide facial muscle contraction. Thus, despite the importance of facial expressions for social functioning, little is known about how they are generated as a unique sensorimotor behavior. In this review, we highlight current knowledge about sensory feedback from the face and how it is distinct from other body regions. We describe connectivity between the facial sensory and motor brain systems, and call attention to the other brain systems which influence facial expression behavior, including vision, gustation, emotion, and interoception. Finally, we petition for more research on the sensory basis of facial expressions, asserting that incomplete understanding of sensorimotor mechanisms is a barrier to addressing atypical facial expressivity in clinical populations.

A Novel Paired Somatosensory-Cerebellar Stimulation Induces Plasticity on Cerebellar-Brain Connectivity

The cerebellum receives and integrates a large amount of sensory information that is important for motor coordination and learning. The aim of the present work was to investigate whether peripheral nerve and cerebellum paired associative stimulation (cPAS) could induce plasticity in both the cerebellum and the cortex. In a cross-over design, we delivered right median nerve electrical stimulation 25 or 10 ms before applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum. We assessed changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), short-afferent inhibition (SAI), and cerebellum-brain inhibition (CBI) immediately, and 30 min after cPAS. Our results showed a significant reduction in CBI 30 minutes after cPAS, with no discernible changes in MEP, SEP, and SAI. Notably, cPAS10 did not produce any modulatory effects on these parameters. In summary, cPAS25 demonstrated the capacity to induce plasticity effects in the cerebellar cortex, leading to a reduction in CBI. This novel intervention may be used to modulate plasticity mechanisms and motor learning in healthy individuals and patients with neurological conditions.

Sensorimotor integration in cranial muscles tested by short- and long-latency afferent inhibition

OBJECTIVE

To compressively investigate sensorimotor integration in the cranial-cervical muscles in healthy adults.

METHODS

Short- (SAI) and long-latency afferent (LAI) inhibition were probed in the anterior digastric (AD), the depressor anguli oris (DAO) and upper trapezius (UT) muscles. A transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse over primary motor cortex was preceded by peripheral stimulation delivered to the trigeminal, facial and accessory nerves using interstimulus intervals of 15-25 ms and 100-200 ms for SAI and LAI respectively.

RESULTS

In the AD, both SAI and LAI were detected following trigeminal nerve stimulation, but not following facial nerve stimulation. In the DAO, SAI was observed only following trigeminal nerve stimulation, while LAI depended only on facial nerve stimulation, only at an intensity suprathreshold for the compound motor action potential (cMAP). In the UT we could only detect LAI following accessory nerve stimulation at an intensity suprathreshold for a cMAP.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that integration of sensory inputs with motor output is profoundly influenced by the type of sensory afferent involved and by the functional role played by the target muscle.

SIGNIFICANCE

Data indicate the importance of taking into account the sensory receptors involved as well as the function of the target muscle when studying sensorimotor integration, both in physiological and neurological conditions.

Females with painful temporomandibular disorders present higher intracortical facilitation relative to pain-free controls

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate cortical excitability differences in the primary motor cortex (M1) hand representation between individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and healthy controls. We assessed resting motor thresholds, motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), intracortical inhibition, and intracortical facilitation and explored potential associations with clinical and psychosocial characteristics in the TMD group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited 36 female participants with TMD and 17 pain-free controls. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to assess M1 cortical excitability. Correlations between clinical and psychosocial factors and cortical excitability measures were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with TMD showed significantly higher intracortical facilitation at 12 ms (z = 1.98, p = 0.048) and 15 ms (z = 2.65, p = 0.008) when compared to controls. Correlations revealed associations between intracortical facilitation and pain interference, sleep quality, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing in the TMD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Females with TMD exhibit heightened motor cortex intracortical facilitation in the hand representation, potentially indicating altered cortical excitability beyond the motor face area. This suggests a role for cortical excitability in TMD pathophysiology, influenced by psychosocial factors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding cortical excitability in TMD may inform targeted interventions. Psychosocial variables may play a role in cortical excitability, emphasizing the multidimensional nature of TMD-related pain. Further research is needed to confirm and expand upon these findings, with potential implications for the management of TMD and related pain conditions.

Abnormalities in the face primary motor cortex in oromandibular dystonia

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively investigate excitability in face and hand M1 and sensorimotor integration in oromandibular dystonia (OMD) patients.

METHODS

Short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), intracortical facilitation (ICF), short (SAI) and long (LAI) afferent inhibition were investigated in face and hand M1 using transcranial magnetic stimulation protocols in 10 OMD patients. Data were compared with those obtained in 10 patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD), in 10 patients with blepharospasm (BSP), and 10 matched healthy subjects (HS).

RESULTS

Results demonstrated that in OMD patients SICI was reduced in face M1 (p < 0.001), but not in hand M1, compared to HS. In FHD, SICI was significantly impaired in hand M1 (p = 0.029), but not in face M1. In BSP, SICI was normal in both face and hand M1 while ICF and LAI were normal in all patient groups and cortical area tested. SAI was significantly reduced (p = 0.003) only in the face M1 of OMD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In OMD, SICI and SAI were significantly reduced. These abnormalities are specific to the motor cortical area innervating the muscular district involved in focal dystonia.

SIGNIFICANCE

In OMD, the integration between sensory inflow and motor output seem to be disrupted at cortical level with topographic specificity.