Post-spike facilitation of neck EMG by cat tectoreticulospinal neurones during orienting movements

Perspectives on classical controversies about the motor cortex

Primary motor cortex has been studied for more than a century, yet a consensus on its functional contribution to movement control is still out of reach. In particular, there remains controversy as to the level of control produced by motor cortex ("low-level" movement dynamics vs. "high-level" movement kinematics) and the role of sensory feedback. In this review, we present different perspectives on the two following questions: What does activity in motor cortex reflect? and How do planned motor commands interact with incoming sensory feedback during movement? The four authors each present their independent views on how they think the primary motor cortex (M1) controls movement. At the end, we present a dialogue in which the authors synthesize their views and suggest possibilities for moving the field forward. While there is not yet a consensus on the role of M1 or sensory feedback in the control of upper limb movements, such dialogues are essential to take us closer to one.

Electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus induces non-topographically organized perturbation of reaching movements in cats

Besides its well-known contribution to orienting behaviors, the superior colliculus (SC) might also play a role in controlling visually guided reaching movements. This view has been inferred from studies in monkeys showing that some tectal cells located in the deep layers are active prior to reaching movements; it was corroborated by functional imaging studies performed in humans. Likewise, our group has already demonstrated that, in cats, SC electrical stimulation can modify the trajectory of goal-directed forelimb movements without necessarily affecting the gaze position. However, as in monkeys, we could not establish any congruence between the usual retinotopic SC map and direction of evoked forelimb movements, albeit only a small portion of the collicular map was investigated. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to further ascertain the causal contribution of SC to reaching movement by exploring the whole collicular map. Our results confirmed that SC electrical stimulation deflected the trajectory of reaching movements, but this deviation was always directed downward and backward, irrespective of the location of the stimulation site. The lack of a complete map of reach directions in the SC and the absence of congruence between the direction of evoked forelimb movements and the collicular oculomotor map challenge the view that, in the cat, the SC causally contributes to coding forelimb movements. Interestingly, the very short latencies of the effect argue also against the interruption of reaching movements being driven by a disruption of the early visual processing. Our results rather suggest that the SC might contribute to the reach target selection process. Alternatively, SC stimulation might have triggered a postural adjustment anticipating an upcoming orienting reaction, leading to an interruption of the on-going reaching movement.

Eye position modulates the electromyographic responses of neck muscles to electrical stimulation of the superior colliculus in the alert cat

Rapid gaze shifts are often accomplished with coordinated movements of the eyes and head, the relative amplitude of which depends on the starting position of the eyes. The size of gaze shifts is determined by the superior colliculus (SC) but additional processing in the lower brain stem is needed to determine the relative contributions of eye and head components. Models of eye-head coordination often assume that the strength of the command sent to the head controllers is modified by a signal indicative of the eye position. Evidence in favor of this hypothesis has been recently obtained in a study of phasic electromyographic (EMG) responses to stimulation of the SC in head-restrained monkeys (Corneil et al. in J Neurophysiol 88:2000-2018, 2002b). Bearing in mind that the patterns of eye-head coordination are not the same in all species and because the eye position sensitivity of phasic EMG responses has not been systematically investigated in cats, in the present study we used cats to address this issue. We stimulated electrically the intermediate and deep layers of the caudal SC in alert cats and recorded the EMG responses of neck muscles with horizontal and vertical pulling directions. Our data demonstrate that phasic, short latency EMG responses can be modulated by the eye position such that they increase as the eye occupies more and more eccentric positions in the pulling direction of the muscle tested. However, the influence of the eye position is rather modest, typically accounting for only 10-50% of the variance of EMG response amplitude. Responses evoked from several SC sites were not modulated by the eye position.

Neck muscle responses to stimulation of monkey superior colliculus. I. Topography and manipulation of stimulation parameters

The role of the primate superior colliculus (SC) in orienting head movements was studied by recording electromyographic (EMG) activity from multiple neck muscles following electrical stimulation of the SC. Combining SC stimulation with neck EMG recordings provides an objective and sensitive measure of the SC drive onto neck muscle motoneurons, particularly in relation to evoked gaze shifts. In this paper, we address how neck EMG responses to SC stimulation in head-restrained monkeys depend on the rostrocaudal, mediolateral, and dorsoventral location of the stimulating electrode within the SC and vary with manipulations of the eye position prior to stimulation onset and changes in stimulation current and duration. Stimulation predominantly evoked EMG responses on the muscles obliquus capitis inferior, rectus capitis posterior major, and splenius capitis. These responses became larger in magnitude and shorter in onset latency for progressively more caudal stimulation locations, consistent with turning the head. However, evoked responses persisted even for more rostral stimulation locations usually not associated with head movements. Manipulating initial eye position revealed that the magnitude of evoked responses became stronger as the eyes attained positions contralateral to the side of stimulation, consistent with a summation between a generic command evoked by SC stimulation and the influence of eye position on tonic neck EMG. Manipulating stimulation current and duration revealed that the relationship between gaze shifts and evoked EMG responses is not obligatory: short-duration (<20 ms) or low-current stimulation evoked neck EMG responses in the absence of gaze shifts. However, long-duration stimulation (>150 ms) occasionally revealed a transient neck EMG response aligned on the onset of sequential gaze shifts. We conclude that the SC drive to neck muscle motoneurons is far more widespread than traditionally supposed and is relayed through intervening elements which may or may not be activated in association with gaze shifts.

Brainstem control of head movements during orienting; organization of the premotor circuits

When an object appears in the visual field, animals orient their head, eyes, and body toward it in a well-coordinated manner (orienting movement). The head movement is a major portion of the orienting movement. Interest in the neural control of head movements in the monkey and human have increased in the 1990's, however, fundamental knowledge about the neural circuits controlling the orienting head movement continues to be based on a large number of experimental studies performed in the cat. Thus, it is crucial now to summarize information that has been clarified in the cat for further advancement in understanding the neural control of head movements in different animal species. The superior colliculus (SC) has been identified as the primary brainstem center controlling the orienting. Its output signal is transmitted to neck motoneurons via two major separate pathways: one through the reticulospinal neurons (RSNs) in the pons and medulla and the other through neurons in Forel's field H (FFH) in the mesodiencephalic junction. The tecto-reticulo-spinal pathway controls orienting chiefly in the horizontal direction, while the tecto-FFH-spinal pathway controls orienting in the vertical direction. In each pathway, a subgroup of neurons functions as premotor neurons for both extraocular and neck motoneurons, while others are specified for each, which allows both coordinated and separate control of eye and head movements. Head movements almost always produce shifts in the center of gravity that might cause postural disturbances. The postural equilibrium may be maintained by transmitting the orienting command to the limb segments via descending axons of the reticulospinal and long propriospinal neurons. The SC and brainstem relay neurons receive descending inputs from higher order structures such as the cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. These inputs may serve context-dependent control of orienting by modulating the activities of the primary brainstem pathways.

Morphology of single axons of tectospinal neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord

Morphology of single axons of tectospinal (TS) neurons was investigated by intraaxonal injection of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) at the upper cervical spinal cord of the cat. TS axons were electrophysiologically identified by their direct responses to stimulation of the contralateral superior colliculus (SC). None of these axons responded to thoracic stimulation at Th2. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the axonal trajectories were made from 20 well-stained TS axons at C1-C3. Cell bodies of these axons were located in the intermediate or deep layers of the caudal two-thirds of the SC. Usually, TS axons had multiple axon collaterals, and up to seven collaterals were given off per stem axon [2.7 +/- 1.6 (mean +/- S.D.); n = 20]. Collaterals had simple structures and ramified a few times mainly in the transverse plane. The number of terminals for each collateral was small. These collaterals terminated in the lateral parts of laminae V-IX, mainly in laminae VI, VII, and VIII. There were usually gaps free from terminal arborizations between adjacent collaterals, because the rostrocaudal spread of each collateral (mean = 700 microns) was narrower than the intercollateral interval (mean = 2,500 microns). Seven of the 19 TS axons had terminals in the lateral parts of laminae V-VIII, with little projection to lamina IX, and the other 12 axons had terminals in lamina IX besides the projection to the lateral parts of laminae V-VIII. Axon terminals in lamina IX did not appear to make contacts with the somata or proximal dendrites of retrogradely labeled motoneurons, but contacts were found with the somata of counterstained interneurons in the lateral parts of laminae V-VIII. Three spinal interneurons (two in lamina VIII and one in lamina V at C1) that received monosynaptic excitation from the SC were stained, and their axonal trajectories were reconstructed. They had multiple axon collaterals at C1-C2 and mainly projected to laminae VIII and IX, with smaller projections to lamina VII. Many axon terminals of the interneurons were found in multiple neck motor nuclei, where some of them made contacts with retrogradely labeled motoneurons. The present finding provides evidence that the direct TS projection to the spinal cord may influence activities of multiple neck muscles, mainly via spinal interneurons, and may play an important role in control of head movement in parallel with the tectoreticulospinal system.

Morphology of single axons of tectospinal and reticulospinal neurons in the upper cervical spinal cord

Single axons of tectospinal (TS) and reticulospinal (RS) neurons were stained with intraaxonal injection of HRP after electrophysiological identification, and their axonal trajectory was reconstructed at C1-C3 of the cat. TS neurons were located in the intermediate or deep layers of the caudal two-thirds of the superior colliculus (SC) and had multiple axon collaterals (up to seven collaterals) per stem axon). Collaterals had a simple structure, ramified several times mainly in the transverse plane, and terminated in the lateral parts of laminae V-VIII. More than half also had terminals in lamina IX. Terminals of TS neurons did not appear to make contacts with either the somas or proximal dendrites of retrogradely-labeled motoneurons in lamina IX, but clear contacts were found on counterstained interneurons in the lateral part of laminae V-VIII. Here, we examined three stained spinal interneurons receiving monosynaptic excitation from the SC. These interneurons had multiple axon collaterals mainly in laminae VII-IX, and made extensive contacts with retrogradely-labeled motoneurons of multiple neck muscles. Stem axons of single RS neurons receiving input from the contralateral SC ran in the ventromedial funiculus and gave off multiple axon collaterals to laminae VII-IX over at least several cervical segments. Their terminal boutons appeared to make contact with both the somas and proximal dendrites of retrogradely-labeled neck motoneurons. Single RS neurons made contacts with motoneurons of different neck muscles. These results provide evidence for functional synergies at the level of single RS neurons and spinal interneurons for neck movements. The present finding indicates that the direct TS projection to the spinal cord may influence the activity of multiple neck muscles mainly via spinal interneurons, and plays an important role in control of head movement in parallel with the tecto-reticulospinal system.