Repeatability of a Dislocation Spinal Cord Injury Model in a Rat-A High-Speed Biomechanical Analysis

Rodent Models of Spinal Cord Injury: From Pathology to Application

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often has devastating consequences for the patient's physical, mental and occupational health. At present, there is no effective treatment for SCI, and appropriate animal models are very important for studying the pathological manifestations, injury mechanisms, and corresponding treatment. However, the pathological changes in each injury model are different, which creates difficulties in selecting appropriate models for different research purposes. In this article, we analyze various SCI models and introduce their pathological features, including inflammation, glial scar formation, axon regeneration, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and oxidative stress, and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each model, which is convenient for selecting suitable models for different injury mechanisms to study therapeutic methods.

Effect of Velocity and Duration of Residual Compression in a Rat Dislocation Spinal Cord Injury Model

Early decompression of the traumatically injured and persistently compressed spinal cord is intuitively beneficial for neurological outcome. Despite considerable pre-clinical evidence of a neurological benefit to early decompression, the effect of early surgical decompression in clinical spinal cord injury (SCI) remains less clear. The discrepancy between pre-clinical and clinical results may be due to differences between the biomechanical variables used in pre-clinical animal models and the biomechanical conditions occurring in clinical injuries. These pre-clinical variables include region of spinal cord, velocity of impact, and injury mechanism. In this study, the effect of velocity and duration of residual compression on injury severity were evaluated using a novel, rodent model of cervical dislocation SCI. Fifty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were included in five groups: two timings of decompression (24 min, 240 min), two velocities (10 mm/sec, 500 mm/sec), and a sham group. All injuries involved a 1.45-mm dorsal dislocation of the C6 vertebra relative to C5 with subsequent residual compression of 0.8 mm. Animals were evaluated for motor function using the Martinez open field, grip strength, and grooming tests for 6 weeks post-injury. Immunohistochemistry and histology following sacrifice were conducted with counts for NeuN- and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive neurons, and length of cavitation. Behavioral testing and histological analysis revealed that injuries induced by the high velocity were consistently more severe than those induced by the low velocity, with behavioral correlations ranging between 0.46 and 0.58 (p < 0.05). Longer duration of residual compression did not produce significantly more severe injuries as measured by functional tests and histology. These findings demonstrate that the velocity of the initial traumatic impact may be a more important factor than duration of residual compression in determining SCI severity in a dislocation model of SCI.

Development of a traumatic cervical dislocation spinal cord injury model with residual compression in the rat

BACKGROUND

Preclinical spinal cord injury models do not represent the wide range of biomechanical factors seen in human injuries, such as spinal level, injury mechanism, velocity of spinal cord impact, and residual compression. These factors may be responsible for differences observed between experimental and clinical study results, especially related to the controversial issue of timing of surgical decompression.

NEW METHOD

Somatosensory Evoked Potentials were used to: a) characterize residual compression depths in a dislocation model, and b) evaluate the physiological effect of whether or not the spinal cord was decompressed following the initial injury, prior to the application of residual compression. Modifications to vertebral clamps and the development of a novel surgical frame allowed us to conduct surgical and injury procedures in a controlled manner without the risk of additional damage to the spinal cord. Behavioural outcomes were evaluated following varying dislocation displacements, in addition to the survivability of 4 h of residual compression following a traumatic injury.

RESULTS

Residual compression immediately following the initial dislocation demonstrated significantly different electrophysiological response compared to when the residual compression was delayed.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

There are currently no other residual compression models that utilize a dislocation injury mechanism. Many residual compression studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of early decompression, however the compression of the spinal cord is often not representative of clinical traumatic injuries. Preclinical studies typically model residual compression using a sustained force through quasi-static application, when human injuries often occur at high velocities, followed by a sustained displacement occlusion of the spinal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has validated several novel procedural approaches and injury parameters, and provided critical details to implement in the development of a traumatic cervical dislocation SCI model with residual compression.

Basic biomechanics of spinal cord injury - How injuries happen in people and how animal models have informed our understanding

The wide variability, or heterogeneity, in human spinal cord injury is due partially to biomechanical factors. This review summarizes our current knowledge surrounding the patterns of human spinal column injury and the biomechanical factors affecting injury. The biomechanics of human spinal injury is studied most frequently with human cadaveric models and the features of the two most common injury patterns, burst fracture and fracture dislocation, are outlined. The biology of spinal cord injury is typically studied with animal models and the effects of the most relevant biomechanical factors - injury mechanism, injury velocity, and residual compression, are described. Tissue damage patterns and behavioural outcomes following dislocation or distraction injury mechanisms differ from the more commonly used contusion mechanism. The velocity of injury affects spinal cord damage, principally in the white matter. Ongoing, or residual compression after the initial impact does affect spinal cord damage, but few models exist that replicate the clinical scenario. Future research should focus on the effects of these biomechanical factors in different preclinical animal models as recent data suggests that treatment outcomes may vary between models.