The prediction of myometrial infiltration by three-dimensional ultrasonography in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a validation study from Ege University Hospital

Tumor free distance from serosa and survival rates of endometrial cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Myometrial invasion and its extent have been directly associated with the risk of relapse as well as the overall survival of endometrial cancer patients. Tumor free distance from the serosal surface of the uterine wall has been investigated the last years by several studies, however, to date, its importance remains unknown. The present meta-analysis is based on a systematic search of the Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases and has been designed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Nine studies were included in the present systematic review that recruited pathology slides from 1,598 endometrial cancer patients and their meta-analysis indicated that TFD was significantly associated with the progression free survival of patients with endometrial cancer (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.20, 0.65). The disease specific survival was not affected by the TFD (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09, 1.01). Sensitivity analyses revealed, however, that both the progression free and overall survival rates were associated with TFD. Significant discrepancies were observed in terms of histological subtypes and stage of the disease among included patients, hence, the actual importance of TFD in specific subgroups remains unknown. Future studies must evaluate the importance of this pathology marker particularly in patients with endometrioid subtypes and early-stage disease, as it is believed that in this group its importance will be more predictive as it will not be skewed by the presence of more important factors such as more aggressive histology and advanced stage disease.

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of deep myometrial and cervical invasion in patients with endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound (3D-TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for deep myometrial infiltration (DMI) and cervical invasion for preoperative staging and surgery planning in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the DTA of MRI and 3D-TVS for DMI and cervical invasion in patients with EC. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, The Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EU Clinical Trials Register and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to identify relevant studies published between January 2000 and December 2021. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

Five studies, including a total of 450 patients, were included in the systematic review. All five studies compared the DTA of 3D-TVS vs MRI for DMI, and three studies compared the DTA of 3D-TVS vs MRI for cervical invasion. Pooled sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio for detecting DMI using 3D-TVS were 77% (95% CI, 66-85%), 4.57 and 0.31, respectively. The respective values for detecting DMI on MRI were 80% (95% CI, 73-86%), 4.22 and 0.24. Bivariate metaregression indicated a similar DTA of 3D-TVS and MRI (P = 0.80) for the correct identification of DMI. Pooled ln diagnostic odds ratio for detecting cervical invasion was 3.11 (95% CI, 2.09-4.14) for 3D-TVS and 2.36 (95% CI, 0.90-3.83) for MRI. The risk of bias was low for most of the four domains assessed in QUADAS-2.

CONCLUSION

3D-TVS demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the evaluation of DMI and cervical invasion, with results comparable with those of MRI. Thus, we confirmed the potential role of 3D-TVS in the preoperative staging and surgery planning in patients with EC. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.