Assessment of patient selection criteria for quantitative imaging with respiratory-gated positron emission tomography

Characterization of continuous bed motion effects on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging

Continuous bed motion (CBM) was recently introduced as an alternative to step‐and‐shoot (SS) mode for PET/CT data acquisition. In CBM, the patient is continuously advanced into the scanner at a preset speed, whereas in SS, the patient is imaged in overlapping bed positions. Previous investigations have shown that patients preferred CBM over SS for PET data acquisition. In this study, we investigated the effect of CBM versus SS on patient breathing and respiratory motion correction. One hundred patients referred for PET/CT were scanned using a Siemens mCT scanner. Patient respiratory waveforms were recorded using an Anzai system and analyzed using four methods: Methods 1 and 2 measured the coefficient of variation (COV) of the respiratory cycle duration (RCD) and amplitude (RCA). Method 3 measured the respiratory frequency signal prominence (RSP) and method 4 measured the width of the HDChest optimal gate (OG) window when using a 35% duty cycle. Waveform analysis was performed over the abdominothoracic region which exhibited the greatest respiratory motion and the results were compared between CBM and SS. Respiratory motion correction was assessed by comparing the ratios of SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR of focal FDG uptake, as well as Radiologists’ visual assessment of corresponding image quality of motion corrected and uncorrected images for both acquisition modes. The respiratory waveforms analysis showed that the RCD and RCA COV were 3.7% and 33.3% lower for CBM compared to SS, respectively, while the RSP and OG were 30.5% and 2.0% higher, respectively. Image analysis on the other hand showed that SUVmax, SUVpeak, and CNR were 8.5%, 4.5%, and 3.4% higher for SS compared to CBM, respectively, while the Radiologists’ visual comparison showed similar image quality between acquisition modes. However, none of the results showed statistically significant differences between SS and CBM, suggesting that motion correction is not impacted by acquisition mode.

Frequency based gating: An alternative, conformal, approach to 4D PET data utilization

PURPOSE

Respiratory gating is a strategy for overcoming image degradation caused by patient motion in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging. Traditional methods for sorting data, namely, phase-based gating or amplitude-based gating, come with an inherent trade-off between resolution improvements and added noise present in the subjugated data. If the goal of motion correction in PET is realigned from creating 4D images that attempt to mimic nongated images, towards ideal utilization of the information available, then new paths for data management emerge. In this work, the authors examine the application of a method in a new class of frequency based data subjugation algorithms, termed gating +. This strategy utilizes data driven information to locally adapt signal to its optimal segregation, thereby creating a new approach to 4D data utilization PET.

METHODS

189 (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans were acquired at a single bed position centered on the thorax region. 4D gated image sets were reconstructed using data driven gating. The gating+ signal optimization algorithm, previously presented in small animal PET images and simulations, was used to segregate data in frequency space to generate optimized 4D images in the population-the first application and analysis of gating+ in human PET scans. The nongated, phase gated, and gating+ representations of the data were compared using FDG uptake analysis in the identified lesions and noise measurements from background regions.

RESULTS

Optimized processing required less than 1 min per scan on a standard PC (plus standard reconstruction time), and yielded entire 4D optimized volumes plus motion maps. Optimized scans had noise characteristics similar to nongated images, yet also contained much of the resolution and motion information found in the gated images. The average SUVmax increase in the lesion sample between gated/nongated and gating+/nongated (±SD in population) was 35.8% ± 34.6% and 28.6% ± 27.9%, respectively. The average percent standard deviation (%SD ± SD in population) in liver volumes of interest (VOIs) across the sample for the nongated, gated, and gating+ scans was 6.7% ± 2.4%, 13.6% ± 3.3%, and 7.1% ± 2.5%, respectively. In all cases, the noise in the gating+ liver VOIs was closer to the nongated measurements than to the gated.

CONCLUSIONS

The gating+ algorithm introduces the notion of conforming 4D data segregation to the local information and statistics that support it. By segregating data in frequency space, the authors are able to generate low noise motion information rich image sets, derived solely from selective use of raw data. Their work shows that the gating+ algorithm can be robustly applied in populations, and across varying qualities of motion and scans statistics, and be integrated as part of a fully automated motion correction workflow. Furthermore, the idea of smart signal utilization underpins a new concept of low risk or even risk-free motion correction application in PET.