Impact of prior information on material decomposition in dual- and multienergy computed tomography

Energy-integrating-detector multi-energy CT: Implementation and a phantom study

PURPOSE

Multi-energy computed tomography (MECT) has a great potential to enable many novel clinical applications such as simultaneous multi-contrast imaging. The purpose of this study was to implement triple-beam MECT on a traditional energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT platform (EID-MECT).

METHODS

This was accomplished by mounting a z-axis split-filter (0.05 mm Au, 0.6 mm Sn) on Tube A of a dual-source EID CT scanner. With the two split x-ray beams from Tube A and the third beam from Tube B, three beams with different x-ray spectra can be simultaneously acquired. With Tube B operated at 70 or 80 kV and Tube A at 120 or 140 kV, four different triple-beam configurations were calibrated for MECT measurements: 70/Au120/Sn120, 80/Au120/Sn120, 70/Au140/Sn140, and 80/Au140/Sn140 kV. Iodine (I), gadolinium (Gd), bismuth (Bi) samples, and their mixtures were prepared for 2 three-material-decomposition tasks and 1 four-material-decomposition task. For each task, samples were placed in a water phantom and scanned using each of the four triple-beam configurations. For comparison, the same phantom was also scanned using three other dual-energy CT (DECT) or MECT technologies: twin-beam DECT (TB-DECT), dual-source DECT (DS-DECT), and photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT), all with optimal x-ray spectrum settings and at equal volume CT dose index (CTDIvol). The phantom for four-material decomposition (I/Gd/Bi/Water imaging) was scanned using the PCD-CT only (140 kV with 25, 50, 75, and 90 keV). Image-based material decomposition was performed to acquire material-specific images, on which the mean basis material concentrations and noise levels were measured and compared across all triple-beam configurations in EID-MECT and various DECT/MECT systems.

RESULTS

The optimal triple-beam configuration was task-dependent with 70/Au120/Sn120, 70/Au140/Sn140, and 70/Au120/Sn120 kV for I/Gd/Water, I/Bi/Water, and I/Gd/Bi/Water material decomposition tasks, respectively. At equal radiation dose level, EID-MECT provided comparable or better quantification accuracy in material-specific images for all three material decomposition tasks, compared to EID-based DECT and PCD-CT systems. In terms of noise level comparison, EID-MECT-derived material-specific images showed lower noise levels than TB-DECT and DS-DECT, but slightly higher than that from PCD-CT in I/Gd/Water imaging. For I/Bi/Water imaging, EID-MECT showed a comparable noise level to DS-DECT, and a much lower noise level than TB-DECT and PCD-CT in all material-specific images. For the four-material decomposition task involving I/Gd/Bi/Water, the bismuth-specific image derived from EID-MECT was slightly noisier, but both iodine- and gadolinium-specific images showed much lower noise levels in comparison to PCD-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

For the first time, an EID-based MECT system that can simultaneously acquire three x-ray spectra measurements was implemented on a clinical scanner, which demonstrated comparable or better imaging performance than existing DECT and MECT systems.

Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment

Photon counting x-ray detectors (PCDs) with spectral capabilities have the potential to revolutionize computed tomography (CT) for medical imaging. The ideal PCD provides accurate energy information for each incident x-ray, and at high spatial resolution. This information enables material-specific imaging, enhanced radiation dose efficiency, and improved spatial resolution in CT images. In practice, PCDs are affected by non-idealities, including limited energy resolution, pulse pileup, and cross talk due to charge sharing, K-fluorescence, and Compton scattering. In order to maximize their performance, PCDs must be carefully designed to reduce these effects and then later account for them during correction and post-acquisition steps. This review article examines algorithms for using PCDs in spectral CT applications, including how non-idealities impact image quality. Performance assessment metrics that account for spatial resolution and noise such as the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) can be used to compare different PCD designs, as well as compare PCDs with conventional energy integrating detectors (EIDs). These methods play an important role in enhancing spectral CT images and assessing the overall performance of PCDs.

Photon-counting x-ray detectors for CT

The introduction of photon-counting detectors is expected to be the next major breakthrough in clinical x-ray computed tomography (CT). During the last decade, there has been considerable research activity in the field of photon-counting CT, in terms of both hardware development and theoretical understanding of the factors affecting image quality. In this article, we review the recent progress in this field with the intent of highlighting the relationship between detector design considerations and the resulting image quality. We discuss detector design choices such as converter material, pixel size, and readout electronics design, and then elucidate their impact on detector performance in terms of dose efficiency, spatial resolution, and energy resolution. Furthermore, we give an overview of data processing, reconstruction methods and metrics of imaging performance; outline clinical applications; and discuss potential future developments.

Radiation dose efficiency of multi-energy photon-counting-detector CT for dual-contrast imaging

Compared to traditional multi-scan single-energy CT (SECT), one potential advantage of single-scan multi-energy CT (MECT) proposed for simultaneous imaging of multiple contrast agents is the radiation dose reduction. This phantom study aims to rigorously evaluate whether the radiation dose can truly be reduced in a single-scan MECT protocol (MECT_1s) in biphasic liver imaging with iodine and gadolinium, and small bowel imaging with iodine and bismuth, compared to traditional two-scan SECT protocols (SECT_2s). For MECT_1s, mixed iodine/gadolinium samples were prepared corresponding to late arterial/portal-venous phase for biphasic liver imaging. Mixed iodine/bismuth samples were prepared representing the arterial/enteric enhancement for small bowel imaging. For SECT_2s, separate contrast samples were prepared to mimic separate scans in arterial/venous phase and arterial/enteric enhancement. Samples were placed in a 35 cm wide water phantom and scanned by a research whole-body photon-counting-detector-CT (PCD-CT) system ('chess' mode). MECT images were acquired with optimized kV/threshold settings for each imaging task, and SECT images were acquired at 120 kV. Total CTDIvol was matched for the two protocols. Image-based three-material decomposition was employed in MECT_1s to determine the basis material concentration values, which were converted to CT numbers at 120 kV (i.e. virtual SECT images) to compare with the SECT images directly acquired with SECT_2s. The noise difference between the SECT and the virtual SECT images was compared to evaluate the dose efficiency of MECT_1s. Compared to SECT_2s, MECT_1s was not dose efficient for both imaging tasks. The amount of noise increase is highly task dependent, with noise increased by 203%/278% and 110%/82% in virtual SECT images for iodine/gadolinium and iodine/bismuth quantifications, respectively, corresponding to dose increase by 819%/1328% and 340%/230% in MECT_1s to achieve the same image noise level. MECT with the current PCD-CT technique requires higher radiation dose than SECT to achieve the same image quality.

Quantitative accuracy and dose efficiency of dual-contrast imaging using dual-energy CT: a phantom study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the quantitative accuracy and dose efficiency of simultaneous imaging of two contrast agents using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), two imaging tasks each representing one potential clinical application were investigated in a phantom study: biphasic liver imaging with iodine and gadolinium, and small bowel imaging with iodine and bismuth.

METHODS

To separate and quantify mixtures of two contrast agents using a single DECT scan, mixed iodine and gadolinium samples were prepared with the contrast enhancement values corresponding to the late arterial (iodine) and the portal-venous (gadolinium) phase for biphasic liver imaging. Mixed iodine and bismuth samples were prepared mimicking the arterial (iodine) and the enteric (bismuth) enhancement for small bowel imaging. For comparison to the reference condition of performing two single-energy CT (SECT) scans, contrast samples were prepared separately to mimic separate scans in the arterial/venous phase and arterial/enteric enhancement. Samples were placed in a 35 cm wide water tank and scanned using a third-generation dual-source DECT scanner with three tube potential pairs: 80/Sn150, 90/Sn150, and 100/Sn150 kV, all with default dose partitioning between two x-ray beams to acquire DECT data. The same scanner operated in a single-energy mode acquired SECT data (120 kV). Total radiation dose (CTDIvol) was matched for the single-scan DECT and the two-scan SECT protocols. The DECT protocol was followed by a generic image-based three-material decomposition method to determine the material-specific images, based on which concentrations of each basis material were quantified and noise levels were measured. To compare with the SECT images directly acquired with the SECT protocol, the concentration values in each contrast-specific image were converted to CT numbers at 120 kV (i.e., virtual SECT (vSECT) images). The noise level and noise power spectra differences between the SECT and vSECT images were compared to evaluate the dose efficiency of the single-scan DECT protocol. The impact of dose partitioning in the DECT protocol on quantitative dual-contrast imaging performance was also studied.

RESULTS

For each imaging task, contrast materials were accurately quantified against the nominal concentrations using the DECT data with strong correlation (R²  ≥ 0.98 for both imaging tasks). Compared to the SECT protocol, the DECT protocol was not dose efficient. With the optimal x-ray tube potential pair 80/Sn150 kV, the noise level in vSECT images increased by 401%/488% (arterial/portal-venous) for the biphasic liver imaging task and by 10%/41% (arterial/enteric) for the small bowel imaging task compared to that in SECT images. The corresponding radiation dose increase is 2410%/3357% for the biphasic liver imaging task and 21%/99% for the small bowel imaging task, respectively, to achieve the same noise as that in SECT images. This could be improved by adjusting the dose partitioning in DECT.

CONCLUSIONS

DECT can be used to simultaneously separate and quantify two contrast materials. However, compared to a two-scan SECT protocol, much higher radiation dose is needed in a single-scan DECT protocol to achieve the same image noise, especially for tasks involving the dual contrast of iodine and gadolinium.