Comparison of beam characteristics in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and those under normal treatment condition

Clinicopathologic characteristics of second primary squamous cell carcinoma in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy

To compare the clinicopathologic characteristics of second primary squamous cell carcinoma (SPSCC) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with that after radiotherapy (RT). From 49,021 patients with NPC who treated by definitive RT, we were able to identify 15 male patients with SPSCC after IMRT, and 23 male patients with SPSCC after RT. We examined the difference between groups. In IMRT group, 50.33% developed SPSCC within 3 years, whereas 56.52% developed SPSCC after more than 10 years in RT group. Receiving IMRT was related positively to an increased risk of SPSCC (HR = 4.25; P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between receiving IMRT and the survival of SPSCC (P = 0.051). Receiving IMRT was related positively to an increased risk of SPSCC, and the latency was much shorter. A follow-up protocol, especially in the first three years, should be designed for NPC patients with IMRT.

The quantification and potential impact of dark current on treatments with an MR‐guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system

Purpose

Dark current radiation produced during linac beam‐hold has the potential to lead to unplanned dose delivered to the patient. With the increased usage of motion management and step‐and‐shoot IMRT deliveries for MR‐guided systems leading to increased beam‐hold time, it is necessary to consider the impact of dark current radiation on patient treatments.

Methods

The relative dose rate due to dark current for the ViewRay MRIdian linac was measured longitudinally over 15 months (June 2018‐August 2019). Ion chamber measurements were acquired with the linac in the beam‐hold state and the beam‐on state, with the ratio representing the relative dark current dose rate. The potential contribution of the dark current dose to the overall prescription was retrospectively analyzed for 972 fractions from 83 patients over the same time period. The amount of time spent in the beam‐hold state was combined with the monthly measured relative dark current dose rate to estimate the dark current dose contribution.

Results

The relative dark current dose rate compared to the beam‐on dose rate was 0.12% ± 0.027%. In a near worst‐case estimation, the dark current dose contribution accounted for 0.90% ± 0.67% of the prescription dose across all fractions (3.61% maximum). Gantry and MLC motion between segments accounted for 87% of the dark current contribution, with the remaining 13% attributable to gating during segment delivery. The largest dark current contributions were associated with plans delivering a small dose per treatment segment.

Conclusions

The dark current associated with new clinical treatment units should be considered prior to treatment delivery to ensure it will not lead to dosimetric inaccuracies. For the MRIdian linac system investigated in this work, the contribution from dark current remained relatively low, though users should be cognizant of the larger potential dosimetric contribution for plans with small doses per segment.

The clinical characteristics of secondary primary tumors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy: A retrospective analysis

To investigate the clinical characteristics associated with the risk of developing secondary primary tumors (SPTs) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Data from 527 patients with biopsy-proven nonmetastatic NPC who were treated with IMRT between January 2007 and December 2011 were analyzed retrospectively. The cumulative incidence of SPTs after IMRT completion was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Intergroup differences in the cumulative incidence were determined using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to confirm the risk factors associated with IMRT-induced SPTs.The median follow-up duration was 45.5 months (range, 4-97 months). Of the 527 patients, 12 (2.3%) developed posttreatment SPTs (9 men, 3 women), 6 of which were located in the irradiation field. SPTs were mostly located in the upper aerodigestive tract (n = 7), head and neck (n = 6), lungs (n = 3), and tongue (n = 2). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative SPT risk rates were 0.4%, 1.4%, and 3.1%, respectively, and the mean annual growth in cumulative incidence was approximately 0.6%. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative in-field SPT risk rates were 0.4%, 0.8%, and 1.5%, respectively, and the mean annual growth in the in-field cumulative incidence was approximately 0.3%. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that sex, age, clinical stage, chemotherapy, and overall IMRT duration did not significantly affect SPT risk. However, the history of smoking was the independent risk factor associated with SPT.The 5-year SPT incidence among patients with NPC after IMRT is concordant with or lower than that in previous 2-dimensional radiotherapy studies study. Among patients with NPC who underwent IMRT, the upper aerodigestive tract was the most common SPT site, and lung cancer was the most common pathology. Smoking history, but not sex, age, clinical stage, chemotherapy, and overall IMRT duration is the independent risk factor associated with SPT. Additional large-scale studies with longer-term follow-ups are needed to determine risk factors associated with SPT development after IMRT.

Characteristics of flattening filter free beams at low monitor unit settings

PURPOSE

Newer linear accelerators (linacs) have been equipped to deliver flattening filter free (FFF) beams. When FFF beams are used for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the stability of delivery of small numbers of monitor units (MU) is important. The authors developed automatic measurement techniques to evaluate the stability of the dose profile, dose linearity, and consistency. Here, the authors report the performance of the Artiste™ accelerator (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) in delivering low-MU FFF beams.

METHODS

A 6 MV flattened beam (6X) with 300 MU/min dose rate and FFF beams of 7 (7XU) and 11 MV (11XU), each with a 500 MU/min dose rate, were measured at 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 10, and 20 MU settings. For the 2000 MU/min dose rate, the 7 (7XUH) and 11 MV (11XUH) beams were set at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 MU because of the limits of the minimum MU settings. Beams with 20 × 20 and 10 × 10 cm(2) field sizes were alternately measured ten times in intensity modulated (IM) mode, with which Siemens linacs regulate beam delivery for step-and-shoot IMRT. The in- and crossplane beam profiles were measured using a Profiler™ Model 1170 (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, FL) in multiframe mode. The frames of 20 × 20 cm(2) beams were identified at the off-axis profile. The 6X beam profile was normalized at the central axis. The 7 and 11 MV FFF beam profiles were rescaled to set the dose at the central axis at 145% and 170%, respectively. Point doses were also measured using a Farmer-type ionization chamber and water-equivalent solid phantom to evaluate the linearity and consistency of low-MU beam delivery. The values displayed on the electrometer were recognized with a USB-type camera and read with open-source optical character recognition software.

RESULTS

The symmetry measurements of the 6X, 7XU, and 11XU beam profiles were better than 2% for beams ≥ 2 MU and improved with increasing MU. The variations in flatness of FFF beams ≥ 2 MU were ± 5%. The standard deviation of the symmetry and flatness also decreased with increasing MU. The linearity of the 6X beam was ± 1% and ± 2% for the beams of ≥ 5 and ≥ 3 MU, respectively. The 7XU and 11XU beams of ≥ 2 MU showed linearity with ± 2% except the 7XU beam of 8 MU (+2.9%). The profiles of the FFF beams with 2000 and 500 MU/min dose rate were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of low-MU beams delivered in IM mode were evaluated using an automatic measurement system developed in this study. The authors demonstrated that the profiles of FFF beams of the Artiste™ linac were highly stable, even at low MU. The linearity of dose output was also stable for beams ≥ 2 MU.

Performance characterization of siemens primus linear accelerator under small monitor unit and small segments for the implementation of step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Implementation of step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) needs careful understanding of the accelerator start-up characteristic to ensure accurate and precise delivery of radiation dose to patient. The dosimetric characteristic of a Siemens Primus linear accelerator (LA) which delivers 6 and 18 MV x-rays at the dose rate of 300 and 500 monitor unit (MU) per minutes (min) respectively was studied under the condition of small MU ranging from 1 to 100. Dose monitor linearity was studied at different dose calibration parameter (D1_C0) by measuring ionization at 10 cm depth in a solid water phantom using a 0.6 cc ionization chamber. Monitor unit stability was studied from different intensity modulated (IM) groups comprising various combinations of MU per field and number of fields. Stability of beam flatness and symmetry was investigated under normal and IMRT mode for 20×20 cm² field under small MU using a 2D Profiler kept isocentrically at 5 cm depth. Inter segment response was investigated form 1 to 10 MU by measuring the dose per MU from various IM groups, each consisting of four segments with inter-segment separation of 2 cm.

In the range 1-4 MU, the dose linearity error was more than 5% (max −32% at 1 MU) for 6 MV x-rays at factory calibrated D1_C0 value of 6000. The dose linearity error was reduced to −10.95% at 1 MU, within −3% for 2 and 3 MU and ±1% for MU ≥4 when the D1_C0 was subsequently tuned at 4500. For 18 MV x-rays, the dose linearity error at factory calibrated D1_C0 value of 4400 was within ±1% for MU ≥3 with maximum of −13.5 observed at 1 MU. For both the beam energies and MU/field ≥4, the stability of monitor unit tested for different IM groups was within ±1% of the dose from the normal treatment field. This variation increases to −2.6% for 6 MV and −2.7% for 18 MV x-rays for 2 MU/field. No significant variation was observed in the stability of beam profile measured from normal and IMRT mode. The beam flatness was within 3% for 6 MV x-rays and more than 3% (Max 3.5%) for 18 MV x-rays at lesser irradiation time ≤3 MU. The beam stability improves with the increase in irradiation time. Both the beam energies show very good symmetry (≤2%) at all irradiation time.

For all the three segment sizes studied, the nonlinearity was observed at smaller MU/segment in both the energies. When the MU/segment is ≥4, all segment size shows fairly linear relation with dose/MU. The smaller segment size shows larger nonlinearity at smaller MU/segment and become more linear at larger MU/segment. Based on our study, we conclude that the Primus LA from Siemens installed at our hospital is ideally suited for step-and-shoot IMRT preferably for radiation ON time ≥4MU per segment.

Dose linearity and uniformity of Siemens ONCOR impression plus linear accelerator designed for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy

For step-and-shoot type delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), beam stability characteristics during the first few monitor units need to be investigated to ensure the planned dose delivery. This paper presents the study done for Siemens ONCOR impression plus linear accelerator before commissioning it for IMRT treatment. The beam stability for 6 and 15 MV in terms of dose monitor linearity, monitor unit stability and beam uniformity is investigated in this work. Monitor unit linearity is studied using FC65G chamber for the range 1-100 MU. The dose per MU is found to be linear for small monitor units down to 1 MU for both 6 and 15 MV beams. The monitor unit linearity is also studied with portal imaging device for the range 1-20 MU for 6 MV beam. The pixel values are within ±1σ confidence level up to 2 MU; for 1 MU, the values are within ±2σ confidence level. The flatness and symmetry analysis is done for both energies in the range of 1-10 MU with Kodak diagnostic films. The flatness and symmetry are found to be within ±3% up to 2 MU for 6 MV and up to 3 MU for 15 MV.

Beam characteristics of megavoltage beams at low monitor unit settings

Beam characteristics of a linear accelerator are of great importance for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to ensure precise and accurate dose delivery to patients. In step-and-shoot IMRT, each beam is delivered through a series of small, segmented fields at low monitor unit (MU) settings. In this study, the beam characteristics of both static (ST) and segmental intensity-modulated (IM) beams were investigated at various dose rates for 6 and 18 MV at low MU settings. Dose linearity was investigated for both the ST and the IM beams. For the ST beams, standard 10 × 10 cm(2) fields were irradiated with MU values ranging from 1 to 100. For the IM beams, 10 × 10 cm(2) and 15 × 15 cm(2) fields were used as subfields. The normalized dose (ND)/MU was obtained. Beam flatness and symmetry for 2 and 10 MU was measured by in-plane (G-T) and cross-plane (R-L) profiles using Kodak XV films. The largest dose/MU discrepancies were observed for 1 MU. For the ST beams, the beam output decreased up to 4.5% for 1 MU at the high dose rates of 6 and 18 MV. Dose variations were less than 1% for doses above 5 MU. No significant variation was observed in the beam profiles of the ST and the IM groups. Beam flatness and symmetry were close to 3% and 2% for 6 and 18 MV, respectively. Our results showed that dose linearity and delivery errors were close to 1% for doses above 5 MU, which is considered acceptable for both 6- and 18-MV ST and IM therapy.

Dose integration characteristics in normoxic polymer gel dosimetry investigated using sequential beam irradiation

Dose integration properties were investigated for normoxic polymer gels based on methacrylic acid (nMAG) and acrylamide/N, N'-methylenebisacrylamide (nPAG). The effect of sequential irradiation was studied for different fractionation schemes and varying amounts of methacrylic acid for the nMAG gels. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used for read out of the absorbed dose response. The investigated gels exhibited a dependence on the fractionation scheme. The response when the total dose was divided into fractions of 0.5 Gy was compared with the response when the total dose was delivered in a single fraction. The slope of the R2 versus the absorbed dose response decreased when the absorbed dose per fraction was increased. Also, for higher amounts of methacrylic acid in the nMAG system the difference in the response increased. For gels containing 2, 4, 6 and 8% methacrylic acid, the R2 versus the absorbed dose response increased by 35, 37, 63 and 93%, respectively. Furthermore, the effect of the fractionation was larger when a higher total absorbed dose was given. The effect was less pronounced for the investigated nPAG, containing 3% acrylamide and 3% N, N'-methylenebisacrylamide, than for the nMAG systems. Consequently, this study indicates that the nPAG system has preferable beam integration characteristics compared with the nMAG system.

Fast, daily linac verification for segmented IMRT using electronic portal imaging

PURPOSE

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) requires dedicated quality assurance (QA). Recently, we have published a method for fast (1-2 min) and accurate linac quality control for dynamic multileaf collimation, using a portal imaging device. This method is in routine use for daily leaf motion verification. The purpose of the present study was to develop an equivalent procedure for QA of IMRT with segmented (static) multileaf collimation (SMLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The QA procedure is based on measurements performed during 3- to 8-month periods at Elekta, Siemens and Varian accelerators. On each measurement day, images were acquired for a field consisting of five 3 x 22 cm(2) segments. These 10 monitor unit (MU) segments were delivered in SMLC mode, moving the leaves from left to right. Deviations of realized leaf gap widths from the prescribed width were analysed to study the leaf positioning accuracy. To assess hysteresis in leaf positioning, the sequential delivery of the SMLC segments was also inverted. A static 20 x 20 cm(2) field was delivered with exposures between 1 and 50 MU to study the beam output and beam profile at low exposures. Comparisons with an ionisation chamber were made to verify the EPID dose measurements at low MU. Dedicated software was developed to improve the signal-to-noise ratio and to correct for image distortion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The observed long-term leaf gap reproducibility (1 standard deviation) was 0.1 mm for the Varian, and 0.2 mm for the Siemens and the Elekta accelerators. In all cases the hysteresis was negligible. Down to the lowest MU, beam output measurements performed with the EPID agreed within 1+/-1% (1SD) with ionisation chamber measurements. These findings led to a fast (3-4 min) procedure for accurate, daily linac quality control for SMLC.

Improving delivery of segments with small MU in step-and-shoot IMRT

The purpose of this study is to describe four new delivery schemes for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). In the first two schemes the order in which segments are delivered is varied from fraction to fraction. The last two delivery schemes employ fixed order of segments. The obtained results indicate that the suggested approaches can significantly reduce the so-called "overshoot" and "undershoot" phenomena and the associated discrepancies between planned and delivered monitor units.

Dosimetric characteristics of a new linear accelerator under gated operation

Respiratory gated radiotherapy may allow reduction of the treatment margins, thus sparing healthy tissue and/or allowing dose escalation to the tumor. However, current commissioning and quality assurance of linear accelerators do not include evaluation of gated delivery. The purpose of this study is to test gated photon delivery of a Siemens ONCOR Avant‐Garde linear accelerator. Dosimetric characteristics for gated and nongated delivery of 6‐MV and 15‐MV photons were compared for the range of doses, dose rates, and for several gating regimes. Dose profiles were also compared using Kodak EDR2 and X‐Omat V films for 6‐MV and 15‐MV photons for several dose rates and gating regimes. Results showed that deviation is less than or equal to 0.6% for all dose levels evaluated with the exception of the lowest dose delivered at 25 MU at an unrealistically high gating frequency of 0.5 Hz. At 400 MU, dose profile deviations along the central axes in in‐plane and cross‐plane directions within 80% of the field size are below 0.7%. No unequivocally detectable dose profile deviation was observed for 50 MU. Based on the comparison with widely accepted standards for conventional delivery, our results indicate that this LINAC is well suited for gated delivery of nondynamic fields.

PACS numbers: 87.56‐By, 87.66‐Cd, 87.66‐Jj

Dosimetry limitations and a dose correction methodology for step-and-shoot IMRT

For the step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique, the combination of high dose rate, multiple beam segments and low dose per segment can lead to significant differences between the planned dose and the dose delivered to the patient. In this technique, a dose delivery inaccuracy known as the 'overshoot' effect is caused by the dose servo control system. This typically occurs in the first and last beam segments and causes an over- and underdose, respectively. Some dose positional error in the segment sequence is also possible there. Commercial ionization chambers (RK-type) and radiographic Kodak films were used for the measurements. The reported results were obtained using the Pinnacle(3)-V6.2 treatment planning system and a Varian Clinac 21 EX linear accelerator equipped with a 120-leaf Millennium MLC. The dose inaccuracy measurements were based on the comparison of the dose and profiles for reference fields and fields irradiated with the step-and-shoot technique. For our linear accelerators, an 'overshoot' effect ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 MU was found, corresponding to a dose rate from 100 to 600 MU min(-1), respectively. For segments with off-axis distances from 0 to 5.5 cm with >3.5 MU per segment and all dose rates, a MLC leaf-position error of <1 mm was measured. For segments with an off-axis distance of 9.5 cm, a positional error >2 mm was measured for 600 MU min(-1) and 1 MU per segment. The purpose of this study was to find a correction method for segmental dose errors caused by the 'overshoot' effect when small monitor unit and high dose rate are used. To better represent the fluctuation of the segment doses in the beam, a dose ratio between reference and step-and-shoot irradiated fields was defined. A method for the correction of segment dose inaccuracies and a quality assurance programme for the 'overshoot' effect were developed. The ordering of the biggest segment shape in the segment sequence was studied for ten randomly selected prostate patients planned for IMRT. The results of this work can be used to improve the agreement between the planned and delivered doses for IMRT.

Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: Delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units

The implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the clinic necessitates commissioning for all systems involved. This paper describes work carried out for the treatment planning system (Helax-TMS version 6.1) and the treatment delivery equipment (Siemens Primus) available at our center. Particular regard was paid to small monitor units (MUs) and small field segments typical of step-and-shoot IMRT plans. The beam profile stability of the Siemens Primus accelerators when delivering small MU was examined with a linear detector array. Dose monitor linearity and intersegment variations were measured with a 0.6-cm3 ionization chamber. Treatment planning system calculated total scatter factors (Scp) and beam profiles for symmetric and asymmetric small fields for 6- and 15MV beams were compared against measurements in water using a 0.125-cm3 ionization chamber and a diamond detector. The 6- and 15MV beams from the Primus accelerators were found to be stable at MUs less than 10. Dose monitor linearity for small exposures under 10 MU was within+/-2% for 6 MV, but found to be not so initially for 15 MV. This could be remedied by an adjustment of a soft spot on the Siemens Primus. The delivery of small MU segments as part of an IMRT sequence was found to be consistent down to segment sizes of 1 MU. The treatment planning system pencil-beam convolution model agreed with measurement within+/-5% for fields collimated down to 3x3 cm. The collapsed cone point-kernel model better predicted the output for the smallest field, but displayed some unpredictable shifts in the position of the penumbra. The startup characteristics of Siemens Primus accelerators were found suitable for step-and-shoot IMRT. The diminution in accuracy of Helax-TMS dose calculation models for multileaf collimated fields of less than 2x2 cm has led us to avoid these in IMRT treatments at our center.

Improving IMRT quality control efficiency using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imager

An amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (EPID) has been investigated to determine its usefulness and efficiency for performing linear accelerator quality control checks specific to step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Several dosimetric parameters were measured using the EPID: dose linearity and segment to segment reproducibility of low dose segments, and delivery accuracy of fractions of monitor units. Results were compared to ion chamber measurements. Low dose beam flatness and symmetry were tested by overlaying low dose beam profiles onto the profile from a stable high-dose exposure and visually checking for differences. Beam flatness and symmetry were also calculated and plotted against dose. Start-up reproducibility was tested by overlaying profiles from twenty successive two monitor unit segments. A method for checking the MLC leaf calibration was also tested, designed to be used on a daily or weekly basis, which consisted of summing the images from a series of matched fields. Daily images were coregistered with, then subtracted from, a reference image. A threshold image showing dose differences corresponding to > 0.5 mm positional errors was generated and the number of pixels with such dose differences used as numerical parameter to which a tolerance can be applied. The EPID was found to be a sensitive relative dosemeter, able to resolve dose differences of 0.01 cGy. However, at low absolute doses a reproducible dosimetric nonlinearity of up to 7% due to image lag/ghosting effects was measured. It was concluded that although the EPID is suitable to measure segment to segment reproducibility and fractional monitor unit delivery accuracy, it is still less useful than an ion chamber as a tool for dosimetric checks. The symmetry/flatness test proved to be an efficient method of checking low dose profiles, much faster than any of the alternative methods. The MLC test was found to be extremely sensitive to sudden changes in MLC calibration but works best with a composite reference image consisting of an average of five successive days' images. When used in this way it proved an effective and efficient daily check of MLC calibration. Overall, the amorphous silicon EPID was found to be a suitable device for IMRT QC although it is not recommended for dosimetric tests. Automatic procedures for low monitor unit profile analysis and MLC leaf positioning yield considerable time-savings over traditional film techniques.

Compensation for respiratory motion by gated radiotherapy: an experimental study

Respiratory organ motion is known to be one of the largest intrafractional organ motions. Therefore, it is important to investigate the potential benefit of gated dose delivery approaches which aim to account for the respective dose uncertainties. In this study respiration is simulated by a moving lung phantom; the movement is not restricted to a normal sinusoidal progression and simulates the one of the embedded lung tumour in the cranial-caudal direction. An IMRT plan with a total of 29 beam segments was designed for the treatment of this tumour. It was irradiated in its resting position-which is the position at exhalation-and during movement. Furthermore the irradiation was triggered using different amplitude thresholds, which means that the irradiation only proceeded if the deviation of the tumour's position from its resting position is smaller than the given threshold. We determined the gating-related increase of the treatment time for various gating procedures. We also measured the resulting dose distribution in specific slices of the phantom perpendicular to the direction of the movement using film dosimetry and compared it to the dose distribution of the static case. Since these film measurements cannot be done inside the whole tumour, additionally the movement and gating was simulated using the planning software to calculate the 3D dose distribution inside the tumour and to generate dose volume histograms for different treatment modalities. The total treatment time was observed to increase by 20%-100% depending on the individual gating threshold and can be calculated easily. The analysis of the films showed that irradiation without gating leads to significant underdosages up to 33%, especially at the edge of the tumour. With gating it is possible to considerably reduce this underdosage down to 9% depending on the trigger threshold. The calculation of the dose volume histograms makes it possible to find a reasonable compromise between the improvement of the dose distribution and the increase of the treatment time.

Lateral loss and dose discrepancies of multileaf collimator segments in intensity modulated radiation therapy

In the step-and-shoot technique delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), each static field consists of a number of beamlets, some of which may be very small. In this study, we measured the dose characteristics for a range of field sizes: 2 x 2 to 12 x 10 cm2 for 6 and 15 MV x rays. For a given field length, a number of treatment fields are set up by sequentially increasing the field width using a multi leaf collimator. A set of fields is delivered with the accelerator operated in the IMRT mode. Using an ion chamber, the output factors at 1 cm and 3 cm laterally from a field edge are measured at different depths in a solid water phantom. Our results show that with insufficient lateral distance in at least one direction, the absorbed dose never reaches the equilibrium values, and can be significantly lower for very small field sizes. For example, the output factor of the 2 x 2 cm2 field relative to 10 x 10 cm2 at d(max0 is 0.832 and 0.790 for 6 MV and 15 MV x rays, respectively. Multiple output factor curves are obtained for different field lengths and different buildup conditions. Thus under nonequilibrium conditions, output factors are critically dependent on the field size and the conventional method of determining the equivalent square does not apply. Comparison of output factors acquired in the commissioning of the accelerator with those measured in the present study under conditions of nonequilibrium shows large discrepancies between the two sets of measurements. Thus monitor units generated by a treatment planning system using beam data commissioned with symmetric fields may be underestimated by > 5%, depending on the size and shape of the segments. To facilitate manual MU calculation as an independent check in step-and-shoot IMRT, the concept of effective equivalent square (EES) is introduced. Using EES, output factors can be calculated using existing beam data for fields with asymmetric collimator settings and under conditions of lateral disequilibrium.

Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) represents one of the most significant technical advances in radiation therapy since the advent of the medical linear accelerator. It allows the clinical implementation of highly conformal nonconvex dose distributions. This complex but promising treatment modality is rapidly proliferating in both academic and community practice settings. However, these advances do not come without a risk. IMRT is not just an add-on to the current radiation therapy process; it represents a new paradigm that requires the knowledge of multimodality imaging, setup uncertainties and internal organ motion, tumor control probabilities, normal tissue complication probabilities, three-dimensional (3-D) dose calculation and optimization, and dynamic beam delivery of nonuniform beam intensities. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a viable and safe IMRT program. The scope of the IMRT program is quite broad, encompassing multileaf-collimator-based IMRT delivery systems, goal-based inverse treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT with patient-specific quality assurance. This report, while not prescribing specific procedures, provides the framework and guidance to allow clinical radiation oncology physicists to make judicious decisions in implementing a safe and efficient IMRT program in their clinics.

Dose linearity and uniformity of a linear accelerator designed for implementation of multileaf collimation system-based intensity modulated radiation therapy

The dose linearity and uniformity of a linear accelerator designed for multileaf collimation system-(MLC) based IMRT was studied as a part of commissioning and also in response to recently published data. The linear accelerator is equipped with a PRIMEVIEW, a graphical interface and a SIMTEC IM-MAXX, which is an enhanced autofield sequencer. The SIMTEC IM-MAXX sequencer permits the radiation beam to be " ON" continuously while delivering intensity modulated radiation therapy subfields at a defined gantry angle. The dose delivery is inhibited when the electron beam in the linear accelerator is forced out of phase with the microwave power while the MLC configures the field shape of a subfield. This beam switching mechanism reduces the overhead time and hence shortens the patient treatment time. The dose linearity, reproducibility, and uniformity were assessed for this type of dose delivery mechanism. The subfields with monitor units ranged from 1 MU to 100 MU were delivered using 6 MV and 23 MV photon beams. The doses were computed and converted to dose per monitor unit. The dose linearity was found to vary within 2% for both 6 MV and 23 MV photon beam using high dose rate setting (300 MU/min) except below 2 MU. The dose uniformity was assessed by delivering 4 subfields to a Kodak X-OMAT TL film using identical low monitor units. The optical density was converted to dose and found to show small variation within 3%. Our results indicate that this linear accelerator with SIMTEC IM-MAXX sequencer has better dose linearity, reproducibility, and uniformity than had been reported.

Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been increasingly used in radiotherapy departments during the last several years. A major advantage of IMRT in comparison to traditional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the higher capability in providing dose distributions that conform very tightly to the target even for very complex shapes such as, for instance, concave regions. This results in a significant sparing of adjacent normal tissues. Different types of algorithms are employed in the IMRT dose calculation, from the simple pencil beam method, such as the finite-size pencil beam algorithm, to the more sophisticated algorithms, such as the kernel-based convolution/superposition ones. With the latter ones, electronic disequilibrium and inhomogeneities are better dealt with in comparison to the correction-based models like pencil beam. Nevertheless, even these types of algorithms may have some approximations that can potentially affect the dose results, especially considering that in an IMRT plan small segments or beamlets may be present for which electronic disequilibrium and inhomogeneities effects are of paramount importance. The goal of this work was to determine the accuracy in monitor units (MU) and dose distribution calculation of the algorithm implemented in the commercial treatment planning system PINNACLE3 (P3), for two IMRT plans with 6 MV photon beams. This system is based on a convolution/superposition with the Collapsed Cone approximation algorithm. The "BEAM" Monte Carlo (MC) code was employed as a benchmark in comparing the MU calculation and the dose distribution of P3. The model used to calculate the MU, with the separation of collimator scatter from the phantom scatter, valid for broad beams, was verified for narrow and irregular segments. The attention was focused on the way P3 calculates output factors (OF). A difference of 8% compared to MC was found for a particularly narrow segment analyzed. A dependence of the results on field size was found. For the complete plan, the agreement of dose distribution and MU calculation with MC results (affected by a dose uncertainty less than 0.5%) is very good: the dose difference at isocenter is 2.1% (1 standard deviation) for a "Prostate" site and 2.9% (1 standard deviation) for the "Head and Neck" site.

Suppression of dark current radiation in step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy by the initial pulse-forming network

The effect of the initial pulse forming network (IPFN) on the suppression of dark current is investigated for a Siemens Primus accelerator. The dark current produces a spurious radiation, which is referred to as dark current radiation (DCR) in this study. In the step-and-shoot delivery of an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the DCR could be of some concern for whole body dose along with leakage radiation through collimator jaws or multileaf collimator. By adjusting the IPFN-to-PFN ratio to >0.8, the DCR can be measured with an ion chamber during the "PAUSE" state of the accelerator in the IMRT mode. For 15 MV x rays, the magnitude of the DCR is approximately equal to 0.7% of the dose at dmax for a 10 x 10 cm2 field. The DCR has a similar central axis depth dose as a 15 MV beam as determined from a water phantom scan. When the IPFN-to-PFN ratio is lowered to <0.8, no DCR is detected. For low energy x rays (6 MV), no DCR is detected regardless of the IPFN-to-PFN ratio. Although the DCR is studied only for the Siemens Primus model accelerator, the same precaution applies to other models of modern accelerators from other vendors. Due to the large number of field segments used in a step-and-shoot IMRT, it is imperative therefore, that dark current evaluation be part of machine commissioning and annual calibration for high-energy photon beams. Should DCR be detected, the medical physicist should work with a service engineer to rectify the problem. In view of DCR and whole body dose, low-energy photon beams are advisable for IMRT.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: the inverse, the converse, and the perverse

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is a refinement of current radiotherapy techniques rather than a major breakthrough. The term IMRT includes several different techniques that all share with classical arc therapy the principle of using multiple fields to reduce the dose to normal tissues, but integrating to a higher dose throughout the tumor volume itself. This paper reviews not only the putative upside but also the downside of the development of IMRT. Theoretical, practical, and cost considerations, both positive and negative, are discussed. There are several issues to be considered, but the most important perversely predict a significant increase in radiation-induced neoplasms, resulting not only from larger volumes of tissue exposed to more modest but still mutagenic doses, but also from a significant increase in total body dose from leakage, because the beam is typically on for a considerably longer period of time than is conventional. A plea is made for radiation oncologists to maintain a strong biologic and cellular orientation as oncology rapidly becomes more molecular in its orientation.