Design and dosimetric considerations of a modified COMS plaque: The reusable “seed-guide” insert

Retrospective analysis of secondary enucleation for uveal melanoma after plaque radiotherapy

Background

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Plaque brachytherapy (PRT) is widely accepted as an effective globe-conserving treatment modality for UM. However, local treatment failure and complications lead to the enucleation of irradiated eyes. We conducted this study to explore the causes and long-term prognosis for UM patients who accepted secondary enucleation after plaque radiotherapy.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Data of patients who underwent secondary enucleation for UM after plaque radiotherapy, from July 2007 to July 2019, at Beijing Tongren Hospital were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to assess the probability of indications, metastasis, and metastasis-related death. Cox regression analysis was used to analyze associations of the prognostic factors.

Results

Eight hundred and eighty patients were clinically diagnosed with uveal melanoma and initially treated by iodine-125 plaque radiotherapy, 132 of whom underwent secondary enucleation and pathological examination in the same hospital. Fifty-two (39.4%) eyes were enucleated simply because of uncontrollable neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Forty-four (33.3%) patients suffered from tumor recurrence. Tumor non-response occurred in 18 (13.6%) cases. Ten (7.6%) eyes received enucleation entirely due to other types of glaucoma. Failure to preserve the eyes for other reasons occurred in eight (6.1%) patients. At a median follow-up of 58.1 [IQR: 40.9–90.5] months, the systemic spread was detected in 45 (34.1%) patients, and 38 of them died. On multivariate analysis, tumor largest basal diameter (HR 1.15 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.31]), tumor non-response (HR 7.22 [95% CI: 2.63, 19.82]), and recurrence (HR 3.29 [95% CI: 1.54, 7.07]) were risk factors for metastasis. Increased age (HR 1.54 [95% CI: 1.07, 2.23]), tumor non-response (HR 7.91 [95% CI: 2.79, 22.48]), and recurrence (HR 3.08 [95% CI: 1.13, 7.23]) were risk factors for metastasis-related death.

Conclusions

NVG was the major reason for secondary enucleation for Chinese UM patients after PRT. Tumor non-response and recurrence were associated with a significantly higher risk of long-term metastasis and metastasis-related death.

Design and optimizing a novel ocular plaque brachytherapy with dual-core of 103Pd and 106Ru

In recent decades, eye plaques of brachytherapy have been extensively used as primary treatment as well as a complementary treatment for ocular cancer. The purpose of this study is the development of the eye plaque brachytherapy throughout a new design of eye plaque by combining the COMS plaque and the CCB BEBIG plaque loaded by IRA1-¹⁰³Pd and ¹⁰⁶Ru, respectively. A new dual-core plaque with a diameter of 20 mm was designed in the way that the BEBIG plaque with a diameter of 20 mm loaded by ¹⁰⁶Ru plate is attached to the COMS plaque with a diameter of 20 mm loaded by 24 of IRA1-¹⁰³Pd seeds. Dose calculations for the new plaque were performed by using the MCNP5 code. Dose calculations of dual-core plaque including ¹⁰³Pd seeds (gamma) and ¹⁰⁶Ru plate (beta) were separately done for the sake of MCNP constraints in gamma and beta particle transfer simultaneously. The new dual-core plaque delivers a much higher dose rate to the tumor compared with every single plaque, while the dose rate reached to healthy tissues is slightly higher than each plaque separately. Of course, this is acceptable because the treatment time reduces and subsequently the error in radiation therapy reduces.

AAPM recommendations on medical physics practices for ocular plaque brachytherapy: Report of task group 221

The American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) formed Task Group 221 (TG-221) to discuss a generalized commissioning process, quality management considerations, and clinical physics practice standards for ocular plaque brachytherapy. The purpose of this report is also, in part, to aid the clinician to implement recommendations of the AAPM TG-129 report, which placed emphasis on dosimetric considerations for ocular brachytherapy applicators used in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). This report is intended to assist medical physicists in establishing a new ocular brachytherapy program and, for existing programs, in reviewing and updating clinical practices. The report scope includes photon- and beta-emitting sources and source:applicator combinations. Dosimetric studies for photon and beta sources are reviewed to summarize the salient issues and provide references for additional study. The components of an ocular plaque brachytherapy quality management program are discussed, including radiation safety considerations, source calibration methodology, applicator commissioning, imaging quality assurance tests for treatment planning, treatment planning strategies, and treatment planning system commissioning. Finally, specific guidelines for commissioning an ocular plaque brachytherapy program, clinical physics practice standards in ocular plaque brachytherapy, and other areas reflecting the need for specialized treatment planning systems, measurement phantoms, and detectors (among other topics) to support the clinical practice of ocular brachytherapy are presented. Expected future advances and developments for ocular brachytherapy are discussed.

Initial evaluation of Advanced Collapsed cone Engine dose calculations in water medium for I-125 seeds and COMS eye plaques

PURPOSE

To investigate the dose calculation accuracy in water medium of the Advanced Collapsed cone Engine (ACE) for three sizes of COMS eye plaques loaded with low-energy I-125 seeds.

METHODS

A model of the Oncura 6711 I-125 seed was created for use with ACE in Oncentra^® Brachy (OcB) using primary-scatter separated (PSS) point dose kernel and Task Group (TG) 43 datasets. COMS eye plaque models of diameters 12, 16, and 20 mm were introduced into the OcB applicator library based on 3D CAD drawings of the plaques and Silastic inserts. To perform TG-186 level 1 commissioning, treatment plans were created in OcB for a single source in water and for each COMS plaque in water for two scenarios: with only one centrally loaded seed, or with all seed positions loaded. ACE dose calculations were performed in high accuracy mode with a 0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm³ calculation grid. The resulting dose data were evaluated against Monte Carlo (MC) calculated doses obtained with MCNP6, using both local and global percent differences.

RESULTS

ACE doses around the source for the single seed in water agreed with MC doses on average within < 5% inside a 6 × 6 × 6 cm³ region, and within < 1.5% inside a 2 × 2 × 2 cm³ region. The PSS data were generated at a higher resolution within 2 cm from the source, resulting in this improved agreement closer to the source due to fewer approximations in the ACE dose calculation. Average differences in both investigated plaque loading patterns in front of the plaques and on the plaque central axes were ≤ 2.5%, though larger differences (up to 12%) were found near the plaque lip.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, good agreement was found between ACE and MC dose calculations for a single I-125 seed and in front of the COMS plaques in water. More complex scenarios need to be investigated to determine how well ACE handles heterogeneous patient materials.

Monte Carlo dosimetry for 103Pd, 125I, and 131Cs ocular brachytherapy with various plaque models using an eye phantom

PURPOSE

To investigate dosimetry for ocular brachytherapy for a range of eye plaque models containing(103)Pd, (125)I, or (131)Cs seeds with model-based dose calculations.

METHODS

Five representative plaque models are developed based on a literature review and are compared to the standardized COMS plaque, including plaques consisting of a stainless steel backing and acrylic insert, and gold alloy backings with: short collimating lips and acrylic insert, no lips and silicone polymer insert, no lips and a thin acrylic layer, and individual collimating slots for each seed within the backing and no insert. Monte Carlo simulations are performed using the EGSnrc user-code BrachyDose for single and multiple seed configurations for the plaques in water and within an eye model (including nonwater media). Simulations under TG-43 assumptions are also performed, i.e., with the same seed configurations in water, neglecting interseed and plaque effects. Maximum and average doses to ocular structures as well as isodose contours are compared for simulations of each radionuclide within the plaque models.

RESULTS

The presence of the plaque affects the dose distribution substantially along the plaque axis for both single seed and multiseed simulations of each plaque design in water. Of all the plaque models, the COMS plaque generally has the largest effect on the dose distribution in water along the plaque axis. Differences between doses for single and multiple seed configurations vary between plaque models and radionuclides. Collimation is most substantial for the plaque with individual collimating slots. For plaques in the full eye model, average dose in the tumor region differs from those for the TG-43 simulations by up to 10% for(125)I and (131)Cs, and up to 17% for (103)Pd, and in the lens region by up to 29% for (125)I, 34% for (103)Pd, and 28% for (131)Cs. For the same prescription dose to the tumor apex, the lowest doses to critical ocular structures are generally delivered with plaques containing (103)Pd seeds.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined effects of ocular and plaque media on dose are significant and vary with plaque model and radionuclide, suggesting the importance of model-based dose calculations employing accurate ocular and plaque media and geometries for eye plaque brachytherapy.

103Pd versus 125I ophthalmic plaque brachytherapy: preoperative comparative radiation dosimetry for 319 uveal melanomas

Objective

This study was conducted to compare the relative, clinical intraocular dose distribution for palladium-103 (¹⁰³Pd) versus iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) ophthalmic plaque radiation therapy.

Methods

Preoperative comparative radiation dosimetry was performed to evaluate 319 consecutive uveal melanomas treated between 2006 and 2012.

Results

There were 68 (21.3 %) anterior (iris and/or ciliary body) and 251 (78.7 %) choroidal melanomas examined in this study. According to AJCC staging, 7th edition, 146 (45.8 %) were T1, 126 (39.5 %) T2, 40 (12.5 %) T3, and 7 (2.2 %) T4. All were prescribed an equivalent tumor-apex dose. When compared to ¹²⁵I, ¹⁰³Pd was associated with a mean 41.9 % lower radiation dose to the opposite eye wall (p < 0.001), 12.7 % to the lens center (p < 0.001), 7.5 % to the optic disc (p = 0.008), and a 3.8 % decrease to the fovea (p = 0.034). However, subgroup analysis of smaller (T1-staged) tumors showed greater dose reductions to normal ocular structures compared to larger (T4-staged) tumors. Tumor and therefore plaque location also affected intraocular dose distribution. For example, palladium-103-related dose reductions to the fovea, optic nerve, and opposite eye wall were significantly greater for iris and ciliary body tumors compared to posterior choroidal melanomas (p < 0.001). After comparative dosimetry, 98.7 % (n = 315/319) were treated with ¹⁰³Pd.

Conclusion

Preoperative comparative radiation dosimetry was performed for a large cohort of patients with uveal melanoma. It influenced radionuclide selection, offered an opportunity for radiation sparing of critical vision-related intraocular structures, and typically increased radiation within the tumors.

The retina dose-area histogram: a metric for quantitatively comparing rival eye plaque treatment options

PURPOSE

Episcleral plaques have a history of over a half century in the delivery of radiation therapy to intraocular tumors such as choroidal melanoma. Although the tumor control rate is high, vision-impairing complications subsequent to treatment remain an issue. Notable, late complications are radiation retinopathy and maculopathy. The obvious way to reduce the risk of radiation damage to the retina is to conform the prescribed isodose surface to the tumor base and to reduce the dose delivered to the surrounding healthy retina, especially the macula. Using a fusion of fundus photography, ultrasound and CT images, tumor size, shape and location within the eye can be accurately simulated as part of the radiation planning process. In this work an adaptation of the dose-volume histogram (DVH), the retina dose-area histogram (RDAH) is introduced as a metric to help compare rival plaque designs and conformal treatment planning options with the goal of reducing radiation retinopathy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The RDAH is calculated by transforming a digitized fundus-photo collage of the tumor into a rasterized polar map of the retinal surface known as a retinal diagram (RD). The perimeter of the tumor base is digitized on the RD and its area computed. Area and radiation dose are calculated for every pixel in the RD.

RESULTS

The areal resolution of the RDAH is a function of the pixel resolution of the raster image used to display the RD and the number of polygon edges used to digitize the perimeter of the tumor base. A practical demonstration is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The RDAH provides a quantitative metric by which episcleral plaque treatment plan options may be evaluated and compared in order to confirm adequate dosimetric coverage of the tumor and margin, and to help minimize dose to the macula and retina.

Dosimetry of (125)I and (103)Pd COMS eye plaques for intraocular tumors: report of Task Group 129 by the AAPM and ABS

Dosimetry of eye plaques for ocular tumors presents unique challenges in brachytherapy. The challenges in accurate dosimetry are in part related to the steep dose gradient in the tumor and critical structures that are within millimeters of radioactive sources. In most clinical applications, calculations of dose distributions around eye plaques assume a homogenous water medium and full scatter conditions. Recent Monte Carlo (MC)-based eye-plaque dosimetry simulations have demonstrated that the perturbation effects of heterogeneous materials in eye plaques, including the gold-alloy backing and Silastic insert, can be calculated with reasonable accuracy. Even additional levels of complexity introduced through the use of gold foil "seed-guides" and custom-designed plaques can be calculated accurately using modern MC techniques. Simulations accounting for the aforementioned complexities indicate dose discrepancies exceeding a factor of ten to selected critical structures compared to conventional dose calculations. Task Group 129 was formed to review the literature; re-examine the current dosimetry calculation formalism; and make recommendations for eye-plaque dosimetry, including evaluation of brachytherapy source dosimetry parameters and heterogeneity correction factors. A literature review identified modern assessments of dose calculations for Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) design plaques, including MC analyses and an intercomparison of treatment planning systems (TPS) detailing differences between homogeneous and heterogeneous plaque calculations using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) TG-43U1 brachytherapy dosimetry formalism and MC techniques. This review identified that a commonly used prescription dose of 85 Gy at 5 mm depth in homogeneous medium delivers about 75 Gy and 69 Gy at the same 5 mm depth for specific (125)I and (103)Pd sources, respectively, when accounting for COMS plaque heterogeneities. Thus, the adoption of heterogeneous dose calculation methods in clinical practice would result in dose differences >10% and warrant a careful evaluation of the corresponding changes in prescription doses. Doses to normal ocular structures vary with choice of radionuclide, plaque location, and prescription depth, such that further dosimetric evaluations of the adoption of MC-based dosimetry methods are needed. The AAPM and American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommend that clinical medical physicists should make concurrent estimates of heterogeneity-corrected delivered dose using the information in this report's tables to prepare for brachytherapy TPS that can account for material heterogeneities and for a transition to heterogeneity-corrected prescriptive goals. It is recommended that brachytherapy TPS vendors include material heterogeneity corrections in their systems and take steps to integrate planned plaque localization and image guidance. In the interim, before the availability of commercial MC-based brachytherapy TPS, it is recommended that clinical medical physicists use the line-source approximation in homogeneous water medium and the 2D AAPM TG-43U1 dosimetry formalism and brachytherapy source dosimetry parameter datasets for treatment planning calculations. Furthermore, this report includes quality management program recommendations for eye-plaque brachytherapy.

Comparison of 16 mm OSU-Nag and COMS eye plaques

OSU-NAG eye plaques use fewer sources than COMS-plaques of comparable size, and do not employ a Silastic seed carrier insert. Monte Carlo modeling was used to calculate 3D dose distributions for a 16 mm OSU-NAG eye plaque and a 16 mm COMS eye plaque loaded with either Iodine-125 or Cesium-131 brachytherapy sources. The OSU-NAG eye plaque was loaded with eight sources forming two squares, whereas the COMS eye plaque was loaded with thirteen sources approximating three isocentric circles. A spherical eyeball 24.6 mm in diameter and an ellipsoid-like tumor 6 mm in height and 12 mm in the major and minor axes were used to evaluate the doses delivered. To establish a fair comparison, a water seed carrier was used instead of the Silastic seed carrier designed for the traditional COMS eye plaque. Calculations were performed on the dose distributions along the eye plaque axis and the DVHs of the tumor, as well as the 3D distribution. Our results indicated that, to achieve a prescription dose of 85 Gy at 6 mm from the inner sclera edge for a six-day treatment, the OSU-NAG eye plaque will need 6.16 U/source and 6.82U/source for 125I and 131Cs, respectively. The COMS eye plaque will require 4.02 U/source and 4.43 U/source for the same source types. The dose profiles of the two types of eye plaques on their central axes are within 9% difference for all applicable distances. The OSU-NAG plaque delivers about 10% and 12% more dose than the COMS for 125I and 131Cs sources, respectively, at the inner sclera edge, but 6% and 3% less dose at the opposite retina. The DVHs of the tumor for two types of plaques were within 6% difference. In conclusion, the dosimetric quality of the OSU-NAG eye plaque used in eye plaque brachytherapy is comparable to the COMS eye plaque.

Risk factors for radiation maculopathy after ophthalmic plaque radiation for choroidal melanoma

PURPOSE

To determine how tumor characteristics and radiation dose affect the incidence of radiation maculopathy (RM).

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive case series.

METHODS

A consecutive case series of 384 uveal melanomas irradiated (mean apical dose, 71.2 Gy) were followed up for a mean 47.2 months. Tumor locations included: 122 (32%) centered anterior to the equator, 27 (7%) equatorial, and 235 (61%) posterior. Tumor sizes were American Joint Committee on Cancer class T1 (n = 180), T2 (n = 150), T3 (n = 47), and T4 (n = 7).

RESULTS

RM occurred in 8 (7%) eyes with anterior uveal melanomas. In contrast, it was found in 82 (41%) eyes with posterior tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed the risk related to posterior location was greater compared with anterior location with a hazard ratio of 6.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.94 to 22.50; P = .0001). Tumor height (> 6.0 mm) also demonstrated a high risk for RM (hazard ratio, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.68 to 10.17; P = .0001). A significant dose-response relationship was found between dose to fovea and RM (P = .0005, for trend). As compared with a dose of < 35 Gy, the risk of RM was 1.74 (95% CI, 0.98 to 3.1) for doses from 35 to 70 Gy, and the risk of RM was 2.43 (95% CI, 1.48 to 4.0) for doses of 70 Gy or more. Of interest, those anterior melanomas with RM had a mean apical height of 9.4 mm, as compared with a mean height of 3.3 mm for anterior tumors not associated with RM. Visual acuity was preserved if the fovea dose was less than 35 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that tumor location, tumor thickness, and radiation dose to the fovea are risk factors for the development of RM.

A comprehensive dosimetric comparison between (131)Cs and (125)I brachytherapy sources for COMS eye plaque implant

PURPOSE

To verify the dosimetric characteristics of (131)Cs source in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) eye plaque brachytherapy, to compare (131)Cs with (125)I in a sample implant, and to examine the accuracy of treatment planning system in dose calculation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Monte Carlo (MC) technique was used to generate three-dimensional dose distributions of a 16-mm COMS eye plaque loaded with (131)Cs and (125)I brachytherapy sources separately. A spherical eyeball, 24.6mm in diameter, and an ellipsoidal tumor, 6mm in height and 12mm in diameter, were used to evaluate the doses delivered. The simulations were carried out both with and without the gold and gold alloy plaque. A water-equivalent seed carrier was used instead of the silastic insert designed for the traditional COMS eye plaque. The 13 sources involved were also individually simulated to evaluate the intersource effect. In addition, a treatment planning system was used to calculate the doses at the central axis for comparison with MC data.

RESULTS

The gold plaque had significantly reduced the dose in the tumor volume; at the prescription point of this study, that is, 6mm from the edge of inner sclera, the gold plaque reduced the dose by about 7% for both types of (131)Cs and (125)I sources, but the gold alloy plaque reduced the dose only by 4% for both types of sources. The intersource effect reduced the dose by 2% for both types of sources. At the same prescription dose, the treatment with the gold plaque applicator tended to create more hot regions for either type of sources than were seen with the homogeneous water phantom. The doses of TPS agree with the MC.

CONCLUSION

The (131)Cs source is comparable to the (125)I source in the eye plaque brachytherapy. The TPS can provide accurate dose calculations for eye plaque implants with either type of sources.

Palladium-103 ophthalmic plaque radiation therapy for choroidal melanoma: 400 treated patients

PURPOSE

To describe 18 years of experience with palladium-103 ((103)Pd) ophthalmic plaque brachytherapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

From 1990 to 2007, 400 patients were diagnosed with uveal melanoma, found negative for metastatic disease, and treated. Episcleral (103)Pd radiation was delivered to a mean apical radiation dose of 73.3 Gy over 5 to 7 continuous days.

INTERVENTION

Palladium-103 ophthalmic plaque brachytherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were evaluated for local tumor control, visual acuity, radiation damage (retinopathy, optic neuropathy, cataract), and metastatic disease.

RESULTS

A total of 272 tumors (68%) were located at or posterior to the equator. There were 186 (46.5%) T1 tumors, 156 (39%) T2 tumors, 50 (12.5%) T3 tumors, and 8 (2%) T4 tumors. Patients were followed for a maximum of 205 months (mean, 51.1 months). Fourteen patients required secondary enucleation (5 for tumor growth and 9 for glaucoma pain control). The local control rate was 96.7%. Life table analysis of patients with 20/200 or better before treatment (n = 357) suggests that 79% and 69% are expected to retain that acuity for 5 and 10 years, respectively. Life table analysis demonstrates a probability that 92.7% and 86.6% of patients will be free of metastatic disease at 5 and 10 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nonrandomized phase I clinical evaluation, (103)Pd ophthalmic plaque radiotherapy was used to treat 400 patients with uveal melanoma. In this series, results after (103)Pd ophthalmic plaque radiotherapy were superior to those reported for alternative forms of radiation.

Considerações radiodosimétricas da braquiterapia ocular com iodo-125 e rutênio/ródio-106

OBJETIVO: Analisar, por meio de um modelo computacional da região ocular, as características da distribuição da dose utilizando placas contendo iodo-125 e rutênio/ródio-106. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi utilizado um modelo computacional de voxels da região ocular incluindo os diversos tecidos, com a placa posicionada sobre a esclera. O código Monte Carlo foi utilizado para simular a irradiação. A distribuição da dose é apresentada por curvas de isodoses. RESULTADOS: As simulações computacionais apresentam a distribuição da dose no interior do bulbo e nas estruturas externas. Os resultados permitem comparar a distribuição espacial das doses geradas por partículas beta e por fótons. As simulações mostram que a aplicação de sementes de iodo-125 implica alta dose no cristalino, enquanto o rutênio/ródio-106 produz alta dose na superfície da esclera. CONCLUSÃO: A dose no cristalino depende da espessura do tumor, da posição e do diâmetro da placa, e do radionuclídeo utilizado. No presente estudo, a fonte de rutênio/ródio-106 é recomendada para tumores de dimensões reduzidas. A irradiação com iodo-125 gera doses maiores no cristalino do que a irradiação com rutênio/ródio-106. O valor máximo de dose no cristalino corresponde a 12,75% do valor máximo de dose com iodo-125 e apenas 0,005% para rutênio/ródio-106.

Finger's "slotted" eye plaque for radiation therapy: treatment of juxtapapillary and circumpapillary intraocular tumours

AIM

To create "slotted eye plaques" for the treatment of juxtapapillary and circumpapillary intraocular tumours.

METHODS

Eye plaques were altered such that 8 mm-wide slots (variable length) were created to accommodate the orbital portion of the optic nerve. Thus, as the nerve entered the slot, the plaque's posterior margin extended beyond the optic disc. Radioactive seeds were affixed around the slot, surrounding the juxtapapillary and posterior tumour margins.

RESULTS

As proof of principle, three patients with choroidal melanomas that encircled or were in contact with the optic disc (considered untreatable with a notched eye plaque) were considered to be initial candidates for slotted-plaque radiotherapy. Preoperative three-dimensional C-scan imaging of their optic nerve sheath diameters insured that they would fit in the slotted plaque. Intraoperative ultrasound imaging was used to confirm proper plaque placement. Radiation dosimetry modelling showed that all tumour tissue received a minimum of 85 Gy (despite the gap created by the slot). With relatively short-term follow-up, there has been no evidence of ocular ischaemia, tumour growth or complications attributable to the use of slotted-plaque radiation therapy.

CONCLUSION

Slotted plaques accommodate the retrobulbar optic nerve into the device and thereby shift the treatment zone to improve coverage of both juxtapapillary and circumpapillary intraocular tumours.