1
|
Praveen Kumar C, Aggarwal LM, Bhasi S, Sharma N. A Monte Carlo simulation-based decision support system for radiation oncologists in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2024; 63:215-262. [PMID: 38664268 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-024-01065-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
In the present research, we have developed a model-based crisp logic function statistical classifier decision support system supplemented with treatment planning systems for radiation oncologists in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This system is based on Monte Carlo radiation transport simulation and it recreates visualization of treatment environments on mathematical anthropomorphic brain (MAB) phantoms. Energy deposition within tumour tissue and normal tissues are graded by quality audit factors which ensure planned dose delivery to tumour site thereby minimising damages to healthy tissues. The proposed novel methodology predicts tumour growth response to radiation therapy from a patient-specific medicine quality audit perspective. Validation of the study was achieved by recreating thirty-eight patient-specific mathematical anthropomorphic brain phantoms of treatment environments by taking into consideration density variation and composition of brain tissues. Dose computations accomplished through water phantom, tissue-equivalent head phantoms are neither cost-effective, nor patient-specific customized and is often less accurate. The above-highlighted drawbacks can be overcome by using open-source Electron Gamma Shower (EGSnrc) software and clinical case reports for MAB phantom synthesis which would result in accurate dosimetry with due consideration to the time factors. Considerable dose deviations occur at the tumour site for environments with intraventricular glioblastoma, haematoma, abscess, trapped air and cranial flaps leading to quality factors with a lower logic value of 0. Logic value of 1 depicts higher dose deposition within healthy tissues and also leptomeninges for majority of the environments which results in radiation-induced laceration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Praveen Kumar
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - BHU, Varanasi, India.
| | - Lalit M Aggarwal
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Medical Sciences - BHU, Varanasi, India
| | - Saju Bhasi
- Division of Radiation Physics, Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, India
| | - Neeraj Sharma
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology - BHU, Varanasi, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee JH, Chang LT, Shiau AC, Chen CW, Liao YJ, Li WJ, Lee MS, Hsu SM. A novel simple phantom for verifying the dose of radiation therapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2015; 2015:934387. [PMID: 25883980 PMCID: PMC4391650 DOI: 10.1155/2015/934387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Revised: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/22/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
A standard protocol of dosimetric measurements is used by the organizations responsible for verifying that the doses delivered in radiation-therapy institutions are within authorized limits. This study evaluated a self-designed simple auditing phantom for use in verifying the dose of radiation therapy; the phantom design, dose audit system, and clinical tests are described. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were used as postal dosimeters, and mailable phantoms were produced for use in postal audits. Correction factors are important for converting TLD readout values from phantoms into the absorbed dose in water. The phantom scatter correction factor was used to quantify the difference in the scattered dose between a solid water phantom and homemade phantoms; its value ranged from 1.084 to 1.031. The energy-dependence correction factor was used to compare the TLD readout of the unit dose irradiated by audit beam energies with (60)Co in the solid water phantom; its value was 0.99 to 1.01. The setup-condition factor was used to correct for differences in dose-output calibration conditions. Clinical tests of the device calibrating the dose output revealed that the dose deviation was within 3%. Therefore, our homemade phantoms and dosimetric system can be applied for accurately verifying the doses applied in radiation-therapy institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. H. Lee
- Health Physics Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan 325, Taiwan
| | - L. T. Chang
- Health Physics Division, Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Longtan 325, Taiwan
| | - A. C. Shiau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| | - C. W. Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - Y. J. Liao
- School of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | - W. J. Li
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 404, Taiwan
| | - M. S. Lee
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 970, Taiwan
| | - S. M. Hsu
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
- Biophotonics and Molecular Imaging Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A system for remote dosimetry audit of 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT based on lithium formate dosimetry. Radiother Oncol 2014; 113:279-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Revised: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
4
|
Photon dosimetry methods outside the target volume in radiation therapy: Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL), thermoluminescence (TL) and radiophotoluminescence (RPL) dosimetry. RADIAT MEAS 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2013.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
5
|
Espinosa MDM, Núñez L, Muñiz JL, Lagares JI, Embid M, Gómez-Ros JM. Postal dosimetry audit test for small photon beams. Radiother Oncol 2012; 102:135-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Revised: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/04/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Jeong HS, Han YY, Kum OY, Kim CH, Park JH. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF A PHANTOM FOR MULTI-PURPOSE DOSIMETRY IN INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY 2011. [DOI: 10.5516/net.2011.43.4.399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
7
|
In Regards to Dr. Eisbruch A et al. (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. Electronic Publication, June 17, 2009.). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76:639; author reply 639. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2009] [Accepted: 09/21/2009] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|