1
|
Vilotte F, Pasquier D, Blanchard P, Supiot S, Khalifa J, Schick U, Lacornerie T, Vieillevigne L, Marre D, Chapet O, Latorzeff I, Magne N, Meyer E, Cao K, Belkacemi Y, Bibault J, Berge-Lefranc M, Faivre J, Gnep K, Guimas V, Hasbini A, Langrand-Escure J, Hennequin C, Graff P. Recommendations for stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. A GETUG (French society of urological radiation oncolgists) consensus using a national two-round modified Delphi survey. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:33-40. [PMID: 36052019 PMCID: PMC9424259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The relevance of metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) remains to be demonstrated through phase III trials. Multiple SBRT procedures have been published potentially resulting in a disparity of practices. Therefore, the french society of urological radiation oncolgists (GETUG) recognized the need for joint expert consensus guidelines for metastasis-directed SBRT in order to standardize practice in trials carried out by the group. Materials and methods After a comprehensive literature review, 97 recommendation statements were created regarding planning and delivery of spine bone (SBM) and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) SBRT. These statements were then submitted to a national online two-round modified Delphi survey among main GETUG investigators. Consensus was achieved if a statement received ≥ 75 % agreements, a trend to consensus being defined as 65-74 % agreements. Any statement without consensus at round one was re-submitted in round two. Results Twenty-one out of 29 (72.4%) surveyed experts responded to both rounds. Seventy-five statements achieved consensus at round one leaving 22 statements needing a revote of which 16 achieved consensus and 5 a trend to consensus. The final rate of consensus was 91/97 (93.8%). Statements with no consensus concerned patient selection (3/19), dose and fractionation (1/11), prescription and dose objectives (1/9) and organs at risk delineation (1/15). The voting resulted in the writing of step-by-step consensus guidelines. Conclusion Consensus guidelines for SBM and NSBM SBRT were agreed upon using a validated modified Delphi approach. These guidelines will be used as per-protocole recommendations in ongoing and further GETUG clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Vilotte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - D. Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - P. Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - S. Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - J. Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 AV Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - U. Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, Hôpital Morvan, avenue Foch, 29200 Brest, France
| | - T. Lacornerie
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - L. Vieillevigne
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 AV Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - D. Marre
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Groupe ONCORAD Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Bât Atrium, 1 rue de la petite vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - O. Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CH Lyon Sud 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-bénite, France
| | - I. Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Groupe ONCORAD Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Bât Atrium, 1 rue de la petite vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - N. Magne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis AV Albert Raimond, 42270 Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - E. Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Av. du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K. Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y. Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - J.E. Bibault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M. Berge-Lefranc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Saint Michel, rue du Docteur Schweitzer, 17000 La Rochelle, France
| | - J.C. Faivre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Av. de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - K. Gnep
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, AV de la Bataille Flandres Dunkerque, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - V. Guimas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - A. Hasbini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, 32 r Auguste Kervern, 29200 Brest, France
| | - J. Langrand-Escure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis AV Albert Raimond, 42270 Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - C. Hennequin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P. Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Saint Cloud, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu J, Wu J, Ballangrud Å, Mechalakos J, Yamada J, Lovelock DM. Frequency of Large Intrafractional Target Motions During Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 10:e45-e49. [PMID: 31446148 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy frequently involves the delivery of high doses to targets in proximity to the spinal cord; thus, the radiation must be delivered with great spatial accuracy. Monitoring for large shifts in target and cord position that might occur during dose delivery is a challenge for clinics equipped with a conventional C-arm Linac. Treatment must be halted, then imaging and registration must be done to determine whether a significant shift has occurred. In this retrospective study of 1019 spine SBRT treatments, we investigated the number of target shifts >2 mm in any direction that occurred in carefully immobilized patients. Orthogonal kV images were acquired 3 to 5 times during each session using in an in-room imaging system. Although the likelihood of large intrafractional shifts was found to be very low, they did occur in 6 treatment sessions. Intrafractional monitoring was found to be an important safety component of treatment delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Åse Ballangrud
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jim Mechalakos
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Josh Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - D Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|