1
|
Hirashima H, Nakamura M, Imanishi K, Nakao M, Mizowaki T. Evaluation of generalization ability for deep learning-based auto-segmentation accuracy in limited field of view CBCT of male pelvic region. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13912. [PMID: 36659871 PMCID: PMC10161011 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate generalization ability of segmentation accuracy for limited FOV CBCT in the male pelvic region using a full-image CNN. Auto-segmentation accuracy was evaluated using various datasets with different intensity distributions and FOV sizes. METHODS A total of 171 CBCT datasets from patients with prostate cancer were enrolled. There were 151, 10, and 10 CBCT datasets acquired from Vero4DRT, TrueBeam STx, and Clinac-iX, respectively. The FOV for Vero4DRT, TrueBeam STx, and Clinac-iX was 20, 26, and 25 cm, respectively. The ROIs, including the bladder, prostate, rectum, and seminal vesicles, were manually delineated. The U2 -Net CNN network architecture was used to train the segmentation model. A total of 131 limited FOV CBCT datasets from Vero4DRT were used for training (104 datasets) and validation (27 datasets); thereafter the rest were for testing. The training routine was set to save the best weight values when the DSC in the validation set was maximized. Segmentation accuracy was qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated between the ground truth and predicted ROIs in the different testing datasets. RESULTS The mean scores ± standard deviation of visual evaluation for bladder, prostate, rectum, and seminal vesicle in all treatment machines were 1.0 ± 0.7, 1.5 ± 0.6, 1.4 ± 0.6, and 2.1 ± 0.8 points, respectively. The median DSC values for all imaging devices were ≥0.94 for the bladder, 0.84-0.87 for the prostate and rectum, and 0.48-0.69 for the seminal vesicles. Although the DSC values for the bladder and seminal vesicles were significantly different among the three imaging devices, the DSC value of the bladder changed by less than 1% point. The median MSD values for all imaging devices were ≤1.2 mm for the bladder and 1.4-2.2 mm for the prostate, rectum, and seminal vesicles. The MSD values for the seminal vesicles were significantly different between the three imaging devices. CONCLUSION The proposed method is effective for testing datasets with different intensity distributions and FOV from training datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Hirashima
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Advanced Medical Physics, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Megumi Nakao
- Department of Advanced Medical Engineering and Intelligence, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizowaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shelley LEA, Sutcliffe MPF, Harrison K, Scaife JE, Parker MA, Romanchikova M, Thomas SJ, Jena R, Burnet NG. Autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage image guidance scans. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019; 5:025006. [PMID: 31057946 PMCID: PMC6466640 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaf1db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Autosegmentation of image guidance (IG) scans is crucial for streamlining and optimising delivered dose calculation in radiotherapy. By accounting for interfraction motion, daily delivered dose can be accumulated and incorporated into automated systems for adaptive radiotherapy. Autosegmentation of IG scans is challenging due to poorer image quality than typical planning kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) systems, and the resulting reduction of soft tissue contrast in regions such as the pelvis makes organ boundaries less distinguishable. Current autosegmentation solutions generally involve propagation of planning contours to the IG scan by deformable image registration (DIR). Here, we present a novel approach for primary autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage IG scans acquired during prostate radiotherapy, based on the Chan-Vese algorithm. Pre-processing steps such as Hounsfield unit/intensity scaling, identifying search regions, dealing with air, and handling the prostate, are detailed. Post-processing features include identification of implausible contours (nominally those affected by muscle or air), 3D self-checking, smoothing, and interpolation. In cases where the algorithm struggles, the best estimate on a given slice may revert to the propagated kVCT rectal contour. Algorithm parameters were optimised systematically for a training cohort of 26 scans, and tested on a validation cohort of 30 scans, from 10 patients. Manual intervention was not required. Comparing Chan-Vese autocontours with contours manually segmented by an experienced clinical oncologist achieved a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.78 (SE < 0.011). This was comparable with DIR methods for kVCT and CBCT published in the literature. The autosegmentation system was developed within the VoxTox Research Programme for accumulation of delivered dose to the rectum in prostate radiotherapy, but may have applicability to further anatomical sites and imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E A Shelley
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M P F Sutcliffe
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K Harrison
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J E Scaife
- Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
| | - M A Parker
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Romanchikova
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - S J Thomas
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R Jena
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Oncology Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - N G Burnet
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pathmanathan AU, van As NJ, Kerkmeijer LGW, Christodouleas J, Lawton CAF, Vesprini D, van der Heide UA, Frank SJ, Nill S, Oelfke U, van Herk M, Li XA, Mittauer K, Ritter M, Choudhury A, Tree AC. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy: A "Game Changer" for Prostate Treatment? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:361-373. [PMID: 29353654 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 10/12/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Radiation therapy to the prostate involves increasingly sophisticated delivery techniques and changing fractionation schedules. With a low estimated α/β ratio, a larger dose per fraction would be beneficial, with moderate fractionation schedules rapidly becoming a standard of care. The integration of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and linear accelerator allows for accurate soft tissue tracking with the capacity to replan for the anatomy of the day. Extreme hypofractionation schedules become a possibility using the potentially automated steps of autosegmentation, MRI-only workflow, and real-time adaptive planning. The present report reviews the steps involved in hypofractionated adaptive MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy and addresses the challenges for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela U Pathmanathan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas J van As
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Danny Vesprini
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J Frank
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Simeon Nill
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - X Allen Li
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn Mittauer
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Mark Ritter
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Alison C Tree
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McVicar N, Popescu IA, Heath E. Techniques for adaptive prostate radiotherapy. Phys Med 2016; 32:492-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/12/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
5
|
Li W, Vassil A, Zhong Y, Xia P. Daily dose monitoring with atlas-based auto-segmentation on diagnostic quality CT for prostate cancer. Med Phys 2013; 40:111720. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4824924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
6
|
Li T, Wu Q, Zhang Y, Vergalasova I, Lee WR, Yin FF, Wu QJ. Strategies for automatic online treatment plan reoptimization using clinical treatment planning system: A planning parameters study. Med Phys 2013; 40:111711. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4823473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|