Dosimetric comparison of patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer

Influence of tumor characteristics on correction differences between cone-beam computed tomography-guided patient setup strategies in stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the correction differences between vertebra and tumor matching as cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided setup strategies in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and the correlations with tumor characteristics such as size, mobility, and location.

METHODS

The manual registrations for 33 lung tumors treated with SBRT were retrospectively performed by matching thoracic vertebrae for vertebra matching and then by matching CBCT-visualized tumors within the internal target volume obtained from a four-dimensional CT dataset for tumor matching.

RESULTS

The mean correction difference between the two matching methods during the SBRT fractions was larger in the anterior-posterior direction (2.7 mm) than in the superior-inferior (2.1 mm) and left-right (1.4 mm) directions, with differences of less than 5 mm in 90% of the total 134 CBCT fractions. The X-axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor had significant correlations with the correction differences in all three directions, while the mobility-related parameters were correlated only in the superior-inferior direction. The absolute differences in lung-dose parameters after applying the margins (3.4-6.5 mm) required for the setup errors from vertebra matching relative to tumor matching were mild, with values of 1.95 Gy for the mean lung dose and 3.9% for V20.

CONCLUSION

The setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT-guided setup without rotation correction were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4-6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study The correction difference between the vertebra and tumor matching as CBCT-guided setup strategies was the largest in the anterior-posterior direction and significantly correlated with the X-axis and direct distances from the central axis to the tumor. What this study adds Setup differences between vertebra and tumor matching in the CBCT-guided setup were increased in tumors located long distances from the central axis. The additional safety margins of 3.4-6.5 mm were required for the setup errors from vertebra matching.

Automatically gated image-guided breath-hold IMRT is a fast, precise, and dosimetrically robust treatment for lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

High-dose radiotherapy of lung cancer is challenging. Tumors may move by up to 2 cm in craniocaudal and anteroposterior directions as a function of breathing cycle. Tumor displacement increases with treatment time, which consequentially increases the treatment uncertainty.

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed whether automatically gated cone-beam-CT (CBCT)-controlled intensity modulated fast deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in flattening filter free (FFF) technique and normofractionated lung DIBH intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatments delivered with a flattening filter can be applied with sufficient accuracy within a clinically acceptable timeslot.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plans of 34 patients with lung tumors were analyzed. Of these patients, 17 received computer-controlled fast DIBH SBRT with a dose of 60 Gy (5 fractions of 12 Gy or 12 fractions of 5 Gy) in an FFF VMAT technique (FFF-SBRT) every other day and 17 received conventional VMAT with a flattening filter (conv-VMAT) and 2-Gy daily fractional doses (cumulative dose 50-70 Gy).

RESULTS

FFF-SBRT plans required more monitor units (MU) than conv-VMAT plans (2956.6 ± 885.3 MU for 12 Gy/fraction and 1148.7 ± 289.2 MU for 5 Gy/fraction vs. 608.4 ± 157.5 MU for 2 Gy/fraction). Total treatment and net beam-on times were shorter for FFF-SBRT plans than conv-VMAT plans (268.0 ± 74.4 s vs. 330.2 ± 93.6 s and 85.8 ± 25.3 s vs. 117.2 ± 29.6 s, respectively). Total slot time was 13.0 min for FFF-SBRT and 14.0 min for conv-VMAT. All modalities could be delivered accurately despite multiple beam-on/-off cycles and were robust against multiple interruptions.

CONCLUSION

Automatically gated CBCT-controlled fast DIBH SBRT in VMAT FFF technique and normofractionated lung DIBH VMAT can be applied with a low number of breath-holds in a short timeslot, with excellent dosimetric accuracy. In clinical routine, these approaches combine optimally reduced lung tissue irradiation with maximal delivery precision for patients with small and larger lung tumors.