The design and fabrication of two portal vein flow phantoms by different methods

Clinical situations for which 3D Printing is considered an appropriate representation or extension of data contained in a medical imaging examination: vascular conditions

BACKGROUND

Medical three-dimensional (3D) printing has demonstrated utility and value in anatomic models for vascular conditions. A writing group composed of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Special Interest Group on 3D Printing (3DPSIG) provides appropriateness recommendations for vascular 3D printing indications.

METHODS

A structured literature search was conducted to identify all relevant articles using 3D printing technology associated with vascular indications. Each study was vetted by the authors and strength of evidence was assessed according to published appropriateness ratings.

RESULTS

Evidence-based recommendations for when 3D printing is appropriate are provided for the following areas: aneurysm, dissection, extremity vascular disease, other arterial diseases, acute venous thromboembolic disease, venous disorders, lymphedema, congenital vascular malformations, vascular trauma, vascular tumors, visceral vasculature for surgical planning, dialysis access, vascular research/development and modeling, and other vasculopathy. Recommendations are provided in accordance with strength of evidence of publications corresponding to each vascular condition combined with expert opinion from members of the 3DPSIG.

CONCLUSION

This consensus appropriateness ratings document, created by the members of the 3DPSIG, provides an updated reference for clinical standards of 3D printing for the care of patients with vascular conditions.

Silicone-based materials with tailored MR relaxation characteristics for use in reduced coil visibility and in tissue-mimicking phantom design

BACKGROUND

The development of materials with tailored signal intensity in MR imaging is critically important both for the reduction of signal from non-tissue hardware, as well as for the construction of tissue-mimicking phantoms. Silicone-based phantoms are becoming more popular due to their structural stability, stretchability, longer shelf life, and ease of handling, as well as for their application in dynamic imaging of physiology in motion. Moreover, silicone can be also used for the design of stretchable receive radio-frequency (RF) coils.

PURPOSE

Fabrication of materials with tailored signal intensity for MRI requires knowledge of precise T₁ and T₂ relaxation times of the materials used. In order to increase the range of possible relaxation times, silicone materials can be doped with gadolinium (Gd). In this work, we aim to systematically evaluate relaxation properties of Gd-doped silicone material at a broad range of Gd concentrations and at three clinically relevant magnetic field strengths (1.5 T, 3 T, and 7 T). We apply the findings for rendering silicone substrates of stretchable receive RF coils less visible in MRI. Moreover, we demonstrate early stage proof-of-concept applicability in tissue-mimicking phantom development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten samples of pure and Gd-doped Ecoflex silicone polymer samples were prepared with various Gd volume ratios ranging from 1:5000 to 1:10, and studied using 1.5 T and 3 T clinical and 7 T preclinical scanners. T₁ and T₂ relaxation times of each sample were derived by fitting the data to Bloch signal intensity equations. A receive coil made from Gd-doped Ecoflex silicone polymer was fabricated and evaluated in vitro at 3 T.

RESULTS

With the addition of a Gd-based contrast agent, it is possible to significantly change T₂ relaxation times of Ecoflex silicone polymer (from 213 ms to 20 ms at 1.5 T; from 135 ms to 17 ms at 3 T; and from 111.4 ms to 17.2 ms at 7 T). T₁ relaxation time is less affected by the introduction of the contrast agent (changes from 608 ms to 579 ms; from 802.5 ms to 713 ms at 3 T; from 1276 ms to 979 ms at 7 T). First results also indicate that liver, pancreas, and white matter tissues can potentially be closely mimicked using this phantom preparation technique. Gd-doping reduces the appearance of the silicone-based coil substrate during the MR scan by up to 81%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gd-based contrast agents can be effectively used to create Ecoflex silicone polymer-based phantoms with tailored T₂ relaxation properties. The relative low cost, ease of preparation, stretchability, mechanical stability, and long shelf life of Ecoflex silicone polymer all make it a good candidate for "MR invisible" coil development and bears promise for tissue-mimicking phantom development applicability.

Characterization of 3-Dimensional Printing and Casting Materials for use in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms at 3 T

Imaging phantoms are used to calibrate and validate the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems. Many new materials have been developed for additive manufacturing (three-dimensional [3D] printing) processes that may be useful in the direct printing or casting of dimensionally accurate, anatomically accurate, patient-specific, and/or biomimetic MRI phantoms. The T1, T2, and T2* spin relaxation times of polymer samples were tested to discover materials for use as tissue mimics and structures in MRI phantoms. This study included a cohort of polymer compounds that was tested in cured form. The cohort consisted of 101 standardized polymer samples fabricated from: two-part silicones and polyurethanes used in commercial casting processes; one-part optically cured polyurethanes used in 3D printing; and fused deposition thermoplastics used in 3D printing. The testing was performed at 3 T using inversion recovery, spin echo, and gradient echo sequences for T1, T2, and T2*, respectively. T1, T2, and T2* values were plotted with error bars to allow the reader to assess how well a polymer matches a tissue for a specific application. A correlation was performed between T1, T2, T2* values and material density, elongation, tensile strength, and hardness. Two silicones, SI_XP-643 and SI_P-45, may be usable mimics for reported liver values; one silicone, SI_XP-643, may be a useful mimic for muscle; one silicone, SI_XP-738, may be a useful mimic for white matter; and four silicones, SI_P-15, SI_GI-1000, SI_GI-1040, and SI_GI-1110, may be usable mimics for spinal cord. Elongation correlated to T2 (p = 0.0007), tensile strength correlated to T1 (p = 0.002), T2 (p = 0.0003), and T2* (p = 0.003). The 80 samples not providing measurable signal with T1, T2, T2* relaxation values too short to measure with the standard sequences, may be useful for MRI-invisible fixturing and medical devices at 3 T.

Evaluation of a Patient-Specific, Low-Cost, 3-Dimensional-Printed Transesophageal Echocardiography Human Heart Phantom

OBJECTIVE

Currently available 3-dimensional (3D) modeling and printing techniques allow for the creation of patient-specific models based on 3D medical imaging data. The authors hypothesized that a low-cost, patient-specific, cardiac computed tomography-based phantom, created using desktop 3D printing and casting, would have comparable image quality, accuracy, and usability to an existing commercially available echocardiographic phantom.

DESIGN

Blinded comparative study.

SETTING

Simulation laboratory at a single academic institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Voluntary cardiac anesthesiologists at a single academic institution.

INTERVENTIONS

Stage 1 of the study consisted of an online questionnaire in which a set of basic transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) views obtained from the 3D printed phantom and commercial phantom were presented to participants, who had to identify the views and evaluate their fidelity to clinical images on a Likert scale. In stage 2, participants performed an unblinded basic TEE examination on both phantoms.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The time needed to acquire each basic view was recorded. Overall usability of the phantoms was assessed through a questionnaire. The participants could recognize most of the views. Fidelity ratings for both phantoms were similar (p < 0.05), with the exception of a midesophageal 2-chamber view that was observed better on the 3D printed phantom. The time required to obtain the views was shorter for the 3D printed phantom, although not statistically significant for most views. The overall user experience was better for the 3D phantom for all categories examined (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggested that a 3D-printed TEE phantom is comparable with the commercially available one with good usability.