Correlation of Optical Surface Respiratory Motion Signal and Internal Lung and Liver Tumor Motion: A Retrospective Single-Center Observational Study

Purpose: Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) application has limitations. This study aimed to explore the relationship between patient characteristics and their external/internal correlation to qualitatively assess the external/internal correlation in a particular patient. Methods: Liver and lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in our institution were retrospectively analyzed. The external/internal correlation were calculated with Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) and SCC after support vector regression (SVR) fitting (SCC_svr). The relationship between the external/internal correlation and magnitudes of motion of the tumor and external marker (A_i, A_e), tumor volume V_t, patient age, gender, and tumor location were explored. Results: The external/internal motions of liver and lung cancer patients were strongly correlated in the S-I direction, with mean SCC_svr values of 0.913 and 0.813. The correlation coefficients between the external/internal correlations and the patients’ characteristics (A_i, A_e, V_t, and age) were all smaller than 0.5; A_i, A_e and liver tumor volumes were positively correlated with the strength of the external/internal correlation, while lung tumor volumes and patient age were negative. The external/internal correlations in males and females were roughly equal, and the external/internal correlations in patients with peripheral lung cancers were stronger than those in patients with central lung cancers. Conclusion: The external/internal correlation shows great individual differences. The effects of A_i, A_e, V_t, and age are weakly to moderately correlated. Our results suggest the necessity of individualized assessment of patient's external/internal motion correlation prior to the application of SGRT technique for breath motion monitoring.

Individually optimized contrast-enhanced 4D-CT for radiotherapy simulation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop an individually optimized contrast-enhanced (CE) 4D-computed tomography (CT) for radiotherapy simulation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDA).

METHODS

Ten PDA patients were enrolled. Each underwent three CT scans: a 4D-CT immediately following a CE 3D-CT and an individually optimized CE 4D-CT using test injection. Three physicians contoured the tumor and pancreatic tissues. Image quality scores, tumor volume, motion, tumor-to-pancreas contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared in the three CTs. Interobserver variations were also evaluated in contouring the tumor using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation.

RESULTS

Average image quality scores for CE 3D-CT and CE 4D-CT were comparable (4.0 and 3.8, respectively; P = 0.082), and both were significantly better than that for 4D-CT (2.6, P < 0.001). Tumor-to-pancreas contrast results were comparable in CE 3D-CT and CE 4D-CT (15.5 and 16.7 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively; P = 0.21), and the latter was significantly higher than in 4D-CT (9.2 HU, P = 0.001). Image noise in CE 3D-CT (12.5 HU) was significantly lower than in CE 4D-CT (22.1 HU, P = 0.013) and 4D-CT (19.4 HU, P = 0.009). CNRs were comparable in CE 3D-CT and CE 4D-CT (1.4 and 0.8, respectively; P = 0.42), and both were significantly better in 4D-CT (0.6, P = 0.008 and 0.014). Mean tumor volumes were significantly smaller in CE 3D-CT (29.8 cm³, P = 0.03) and CE 4D-CT (22.8 cm³, P = 0.01) than in 4D-CT (42.0 cm³). Mean tumor motion was comparable in 4D-CT and CE 4D-CT (7.2 and 6.2 mm, P = 0.17). Interobserver variations were comparable in CE 3D-CT and CE 4D-CT (Jaccard index 66.0% and 61.9%, respectively) and were worse for 4D-CT (55.6%) than CE 3D-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

CE 4D-CT demonstrated characteristics comparable to CE 3D-CT, with high potential for simultaneously delineating the tumor and quantifying tumor motion with a single scan.