1
|
Stolen E, Fullarton R, Hein R, Conner RL, Jacobsohn LG, Collins-Fekete CA, Beddar S, Akgun U, Robertson D. High-Density Glass Scintillators for Proton Radiography-Relative Luminosity, Proton Response, and Spatial Resolution. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:2137. [PMID: 38610351 PMCID: PMC11014246 DOI: 10.3390/s24072137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Proton radiography is a promising development in proton therapy, and researchers are currently exploring optimal detector materials to construct proton radiography detector arrays. High-density glass scintillators may improve integrating-mode proton radiography detectors by increasing spatial resolution and decreasing detector thickness. We evaluated several new scintillators, activated with europium or terbium, with proton response measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, characterizing relative luminosity, ionization quenching, and proton radiograph spatial resolution. We applied a correction based on Birks's analytical model for ionization quenching. The data demonstrate increased relative luminosity with increased activation element concentration, and higher relative luminosity for samples activated with europium. An increased glass density enables more compact detector geometries and higher spatial resolution. These findings suggest that a tungsten and gadolinium oxide-based glass activated with 4% europium is an ideal scintillator for testing in a full-size proton radiography detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Stolen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | - Ryan Fullarton
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.F.); (C.-A.C.-F.)
| | - Rain Hein
- Department of Physics, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA; (R.H.); (U.A.)
| | - Robin L. Conner
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (R.L.C.); (L.G.J.)
| | - Luiz G. Jacobsohn
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (R.L.C.); (L.G.J.)
| | - Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.F.); (C.-A.C.-F.)
| | - Sam Beddar
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Ugur Akgun
- Department of Physics, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA; (R.H.); (U.A.)
| | - Daniel Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Darne CD, Robertson DG, Alsanea F, Collins-Fekete CA, Beddar S. A novel proton-integrating radiography system design using a monolithic scintillator detector: experimental studies. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 2022; 1027:166077. [PMID: 35221402 PMCID: PMC8872121 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.166077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Research on proton-based imaging systems aims to improve treatment planning, internal anatomy visualization, and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a new proton radiography system design consisting of a monolithic plastic scintillator volume and two optical cameras for use with scanning proton pencil beams. Unlike the thin scintillating plates currently used for proton radiography, the plastic scintillator volume (20 × 20 × 20 cm3) captures a wider distribution of proton beam energy depositions and avoids proton-beam modulation. The proton imaging system's characteristics were tested using image uniformity (2.6% over a 5 × 5 cm2 area), stability (0.37%), and linearity (R2 = 1) studies. We used the light distribution produced within the plastic scintillator to generate proton radiographs via two different approaches: (a) integrating light by using a camera placed along the beam axis, and (b) capturing changes to the proton Bragg peak positions with a camera placed perpendicularly to the beam axis. The latter method was used to plot and evaluate relative shifts in percentage depth light (PDL) profiles of proton beams with and without a phantom in the beam path. A curvelet minimization algorithm used differences in PDL profiles to reconstruct and refine the phantom water-equivalent thickness (WET) map. Gammex phantoms were used to compare the proton radiographs generated by these two methods. The relative accuracies in calculating WET of the phantoms using the calibration-based beam-integration (and the PDL) methods were -0.18 ± 0.35% (-0.29 ± 3.11%), -0.11 ± 0.51% (-0.15 ± 2.64%), -2.94 ± 1.20% (-0.75 ± 6.11%), and -1.65 ± 0.35% (0.36 ± 3.93%) for solid water, adipose, cortical bone, and PMMA, respectively. Further exploration of this unique multicamera-based imaging system is warranted and could lead to clinical applications that improve treatment planning and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinmay D Darne
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Daniel G Robertson
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Fahed Alsanea
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Doolan PJ, Bentefour EH, Testa M, Cascio E, Sharp G, Royle G, Lu HM. Higher order analysis of time-resolved proton radiographs. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ab36ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
4
|
Huo W, Zwart T, Cooley J, Huang K, Finley C, Jee KW, Sharp GC, Rosenthal S, Xu XG, Lu HM. A single detector energy-resolved proton radiography system: a proof of principle study by Monte Carlo simulations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:025016. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf96f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
5
|
Esposito M, Waltham C, Taylor JT, Manger S, Phoenix B, Price T, Poludniowski G, Green S, Evans PM, Allport PP, Manolopulos S, Nieto-Camero J, Symons J, Allinson NM. PRaVDA: The first solid-state system for proton computed tomography. Phys Med 2018; 55:149-154. [PMID: 30420271 PMCID: PMC6250048 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 09/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton CT is widely recognised as a beneficial alternative to conventional X-ray CT for treatment planning in proton beam radiotherapy. A novel proton CT imaging system, based entirely on solid-state detector technology, is presented. Compared to conventional scintillator-based calorimeters, positional sensitive detectors allow for multiple protons to be tracked per read out cycle, leading to a potential reduction in proton CT scan time. Design and characterisation of its components are discussed. An early proton CT image obtained with a fully solid-state imaging system is shown and accuracy (as defined in Section IV) in Relative Stopping Power to water (RSP) quantified. METHOD A solid-state imaging system for proton CT, based on silicon strip detectors, has been developed by the PRaVDA collaboration. The system comprises a tracking system that infers individual proton trajectories through an imaging phantom, and a Range Telescope (RT) which records the corresponding residual energy (range) for each proton. A back-projection-then-filtering algorithm is used for CT reconstruction of an experimentally acquired proton CT scan. RESULTS An initial experimental result for proton CT imaging with a fully solid-state system is shown for an imaging phantom, namely a 75 mm diameter PMMA sphere containing tissue substitute inserts, imaged with a passively-scattered 125 MeV beam. Accuracy in RSP is measured to be ⩽1.6% for all the inserts shown. CONCLUSIONS A fully solid-state imaging system for proton CT has been shown capable of imaging a phantom with protons and successfully improving RSP accuracy. These promising results, together with system the capability to cope with high proton fluences (2×108 protons/s), suggests that this research platform could improve current standards in treatment planning for proton beam radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chris Waltham
- University of Lincoln, School of Computer Science, Lincoln, UK
| | | | - Sam Manger
- University of Warwick, Department of Physics, Warwick, UK
| | - Ben Phoenix
- University of Birmingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tony Price
- University of Birmingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Stuart Green
- University of Birmingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Birmingham, UK
| | - Philip M Evans
- University of Surrey, Centre for Vision, Speech and Signal Processing, Guildford, UK
| | - Philip P Allport
- University of Birmingham, School of Physics and Astronomy, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gehrke T, Gallas R, Jäkel O, Martišíková M. Proof of principle of helium-beam radiography using silicon pixel detectors for energy deposition measurement, identification, and tracking of single ions. Med Phys 2018; 45:817-829. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Gehrke
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO); Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy; Heidelberg University; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Raya Gallas
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO); Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy; Heidelberg University; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Heidelberg University Hospital; Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO); Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT); Heidelberg Germany
| | - Maria Martišíková
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO); National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO); Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meyer S, Gianoli C, Magallanes L, Kopp B, Tessonnier T, Landry G, Dedes G, Voss B, Parodi K. Comparative Monte Carlo study on the performance of integration- and list-mode detector configurations for carbon ion computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:1096-1112. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Labarbe R, Janssens G, Sterpin E. Estimating patient specific uncertainty parameters for adaptive treatment re-planning in proton therapy using in vivorange measurements and Bayesian inference: application to setup and stopping power errors. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:6281-96. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/17/6281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|