1
|
Prezado Y, Lamirault C, Larcher T, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Patriarca A, de Marzi L, Corvino A, Ortiz R, Juchaux M. On the significance of peak dose in normal tissue toxicity in spatially fractionated radiotherapy: The case of proton minibeam radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2025; 205:110769. [PMID: 39947329 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Revised: 01/09/2025] [Accepted: 01/29/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE Spatially fractionated radiotherapy is an unconventional radiotherapy approach able to widen the therapeutic window for difficult-to-treat cases today. To unlock its full potential, accurate knowledge of the relationship between the different dosimetry and geometry parameters and the biological response is still needed. When the same beam width is used, the valley dose has been assumed to be the main parameter influencing normal tissue sparing, with peak doses having little relevance. However, a recent retrospective evaluation of preclinical data suggests peak dose plays a major role in the normal tissue sparing of minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT). The goal of this study was to experimentally validate for the first time the significance of the peak dose for normal tissue sparing in proton MBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We irradiated the brains of naive rats with two different configurations of pMBRT, resulting in the same valley and average doses but different peak doses. Behavioural tests and histopathological evaluations were carried out. RESULTS At the same valley dose, a higher peak dose (high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), larger centre-to-centre (ctc) distance) is more detrimental than a lower peak dose (low PVDR, narrower catch). In the first case, the animals exhibited some hyperactivity in locomotor and exploration activity as well as memory alterations. In addition, the highest peak dose led to a significantly higher cumulative lesion score in the histopathology evaluations than the lowest peak dose. CONCLUSIONS While our study does not exclude the relevant role of the valley dose in tissue sparing, it does highlight the importance of peak doses, contradicting previous assumptions. Our results agree with the conclusion of a recent retrospective evaluation of preclinical studies in micro and minibeam radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña 15706, Spain; Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain; Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France.
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France
| | | | - Cristele Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - L de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France; Institut Curie, Université PSL, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Angela Corvino
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li T, Yao X, He R, Xue X, Wang S, Chen J, Qiu Q, Yin Y, Tang Q. Proton stereotactic centralized ablative radiation therapy for treating bulky tumor: a treatment plan study. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1474327. [PMID: 40182038 PMCID: PMC11965599 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1474327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective Stereotactic centralized/core ablative radiation therapy (SCART) is a novel radiotherapy approach. This study investigates the potential benefits of proton-based SCART (pSCART) by leveraging the dosimetric advantages of protons and integrating them with the SCART technique. Methods Five clinical cases previously treated with conventional proton therapy were selected for this study. The pSCART plans utilized a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) prescription dose of 24 Gy (RBE) × 3 fractions, with each plan consisting of three to five fields. The prescribed dose for the CyberKnife SCART was the highest value meeting the organs-at-risk (OARs) dose limits and the tumor edge dose limits. The dose distributions of the CyberKnife-based SCART and pSCART plans were compared using five criteria: i) prescription dose; ii) 80% prescription dose volume, targets coverage at 80% and 20% dose levels, and the 80%/20% ratio; iii) volume receiving >5 Gy outside the tumor edge; iv) dose tolerance limits to OARs; and v) mean dose to OARs. Results pSCART can deliver a higher prescription dose of 24 Gy × 3 fractions versus SCART's 15 Gy × 2-3 fractions or 18 Gy × 2 fractions. Specifically, pSCART outperforms SCART in terms of the 80% prescription dose volume and 80% dose level coverage of stereotactic centralized/core target volumes (SCTV) achieving 69.77%-100.00% versus SCART's 43.6%-99.5%. The 20% dose level coverage for gross target volume (GTV) is slightly lower for pSCART, achieving 88.96%-98.64% versus SCART's 90.1%-99.9%. The maximum point dose outside the target volume is lower for pSCART at 4.58-6.19 Gy versus SCART's 4.78-6.67 Gy; additionally, the V5Gy at the tumor edge is significantly smaller for pSCART at 5.93-23.72 cm3 versus SCART's 6.85-151.66 cm3. The average dose to most OARs in the pSCART plan is lower than in the SCART plan. Conclusions This work provides initial insights into evaluating treatment plans for bulky tumors using pSCART. Compared to the CyberKnife SCART, pSCART generates significantly higher prescription doses and larger high-dose regions within the GTV while delivering lower doses at the tumor edge, enhancing normal tissue sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengxiang Li
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Xinsen Yao
- Department of Radiotherapy Center, Chenzhou NO.1 People’s Hospital, Chenzhou, China
| | - Ruimin He
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Department of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Xian Xue
- Institute of Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Medicine, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), School of Nuclear Science and Technology (SNST), Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Jinhu Chen
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Qingtao Qiu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Yong Yin
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
- Department of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Quan Tang
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lin Y, Traneus E, Wang A, Li W, Gao H. Proton minibeam (pMBRT) radiation therapy: experimental validation of Monte Carlo dose calculation in the RayStation TPS. Phys Med Biol 2025; 70:045023. [PMID: 39854837 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/adae4f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
Background.Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a spatially fractionated radiation therapy modality that uses a multi-slit collimator (MSC) to create submillimeter slit openings for spatial dose modulation. The pMBRT dose profile is characterized by highly heterogeneous dose in the plane perpendicular to the beam and rapidly changing depth dose profiles. Dose measurements are typically benchmarked against in-house Monte Carlo (MC) simulation tools. For preclinical and clinical translation, a treatment planning system (TPS) capable of accurately predicting pMBRT doses in tissue and accessible on a commercial platform is essential. This study focuses on the beam modeling and verification of pMBRT using the RayStation TPS, a critical step in advancing its clinical implementation.Methods.The pMBRT system was implemented in RayStation for the IBA Proteus®ONE single-room compact proton machine. The RayStation pMBRT model is an extension of the clinical beam model, allowing pMBRT dose calculations through the MSC using the existing clinical beam model. Adjustable MSC parameters include air gap, slit thickness, slit pitch, number of slits, slits direction and slit thickness. The pMBRT TPS was validated experimentally against measurements using six different collimators with various slit widths (0.4-1.4 mm) and center-to-center slit distances (2.8-4.0 mm). Each collimator comprised five non-divergent slits. Validation involved MatriXX measurements for average dose, Gafchromic film placed at varying depths to measure lateral dose profiles, and film placed along the beam axis to measure depth-dose curves in solid water phantoms. A single 150 MeV energy layer with a 0.5 cm spot spacing was used to create a uniform radiation map across the MSC field.Results.The comparison of average depth dose measurements with RayStation MC calculations showed a gamma passing rate better than 95% using 3 mm/3% criteria, except for the 0.4 mm slit width. After adjusting the slit width by 40-60μm to account for machining uncertainties, the gamma passing rate exceeded 95% under the same criteria. For the peaks and valleys of the percentage depth doses, agreement between RayStation and film measurements was above 90% using 2 mm/5% criteria, except in the high linear energy transfer region. Lateral profile comparisons at depths of 2, 6, and 10 cm demonstrated over 90% agreement for all curves using 0.2 mm/5% criteria.Conclusions.The pMBRT beam model for the Proteus®ONE-based system has been successfully implemented in RayStation TPS, with its initial accuracy validated experimentally. Further measurements, including additional energies and Spread Out Bragg Peaks, are required to complete the clinical commissioning process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, United States of America
| | | | - Aoxiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, United States of America
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, KS, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marson F, Pizzardi S, Alborghetti L, Vurro F, Lacavalla MA, Fiorino C, Spinelli AE. Real-time dose measurement in minibeam radiotherapy using radioluminescence imaging. Phys Med 2025; 130:104894. [PMID: 39799812 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 12/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) uses small parallel beams of radiation to create a highly modulated dose pattern. The aim of this study is to develop an optical radioluminescence imaging (RLI) approach to perform real-time dose measurement for MBRT. METHODS MBRT was delivered using an image-guided small animal irradiator equipped with a custom collimator. Five slabs of plastic scintillators with a thicknesses of 0.5, 1, 2, 3 and 10 mm were placed on top of a mouse phantom, to localize and measure the delivered dose. A thin radioluminescence film (Gd2O2S:Tb) was used to obtain the mini beam dose profile that was compared against GafChromic (GC) films measurements. The RLI signal was detected with a CMOS camera placed at 90 deg with respect to the beam axis. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were also performed using TOPAS for comparison with the experimental results. RESULTS The measured peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR) obtained with RLI was 16.7 in line with GC films measurements. The differences between peak and valley dimension were less that 3% with respect to GC measurements. Using RLI performed with the scintillator slabs, it was possible to localize and measure in real-time MBRT delivery on the mouse phantom. CONCLUSIONS We proposed a novel method for MBRT dose localization and measurement in real-time based on RLI. The results we obtained are in good agreement with GC film measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Marson
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Pizzardi
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Alborghetti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Vurro
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Fiorino
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Medical Physics Department, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonello E Spinelli
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Experimental Imaging Center, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bonfrate A, Ronga MG, Patriarca A, Heinrich S, De Marzi L. Monte Carlo modeling of a commercial machine and experimental setup for FLASH-minibeam irradiations with electrons. Med Phys 2025; 52:1224-1234. [PMID: 39504384 PMCID: PMC11788234 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 10/14/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR/FLASH) irradiations, along with particle minibeam therapy (PMBT) are both emerging as promising alternatives to current radiotherapy techniques thanks to their improved healthy tissue sparing and similar tumor control. PURPOSE Monte Carlo (MC) modeling of a commercial machine delivering 5-7 MeV electrons at UHDR. This model was used afterward to compare measurements against simulations for an experimental setup combining both FLASH and PMBT modalities. METHODS We modeled the main accelerator elements with TOPAS3.8/Geant4.10.07.p03, optimized the electron source parameters, and subsequently benchmarked this geometry against measurements. Minibeam experiments were performed by delivering 7 MeV electrons at UHDR on three different 65-mm thick brass collimators as manufactured for protons with a 400-µm slit width: single slit, 5 slits with a center-to-center (CTC) distance of 4 mm and 9 slits with CTC of 2 mm. Finally, complementary simulations were run by changing critical PMBT collimator parameters to assess their specific impact on peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) as well as on the Bremsstrahlung photon contribution to the total dose. RESULTS Percentage depth dose (PDD) distributions and lateral dose profiles showed a good agreement between simulations and measurements, with a maximum discrepancy of less than 4%. With the PMBT collimators in place, discrepancies between simulated and measured dose profiles, lateral and in-depth in peaks and valleys, were within 3%. High PVDR between 5 and 26 were observed until 4 mm in the phantom. During the experiments, a mean dose rate of 167 Gy/s and an instantaneous dose rate of 1.2 × 105 Gy/s were obtained for the FLASH-minibeam setup. PMBT collimator parameters need to be optimized to maximize PVDR while limiting Bremsstrahlung photon contribution to the total dose. CONCLUSIONS The validation of the MC model and the configuration of an electron FLASH-minibeam setup were successfully completed, paving the way for future radiobiological investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Bonfrate
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy CentreCentre UniversitaireOrsayFrance
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, U1288University of Paris SaclayOrsayFrance
| | - Maria Grazia Ronga
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy CentreCentre UniversitaireOrsayFrance
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, U1288University of Paris SaclayOrsayFrance
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy CentreCentre UniversitaireOrsayFrance
| | | | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy CentreCentre UniversitaireOrsayFrance
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Inserm LITO, U1288University of Paris SaclayOrsayFrance
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang W, Hong X, Wu W, Wang C, Johnson D, Gan GN, Lin Y, Gao H. Multi-collimator proton minibeam radiotherapy with joint dose and PVDR optimization. Med Phys 2025; 52:1182-1192. [PMID: 39607058 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical translation of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) presents significant challenges, particularly in developing an optimal treatment planning technique. A uniform target dose is crucial for maximizing anti-tumor efficacy and facilitating the clinical acceptance of pMBRT. However, achieving a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) in organs-at-risk (OAR) is essential for sparing normal tissue. This balance becomes particularly difficult when OARs are located distal to the beam entrance or require patient-specific collimators. PURPOSE This work proposes a novel pMBRT treatment planning method that can achieve high PVDR at OAR and uniform dose at target simultaneously, via multi-collimator pMBRT (MC-pMBRT) treatment planning method with joint dose and PVDR optimization (JDPO). METHODS MC-pMBRT utilizes a set of generic and premade multi-slit collimators with different center-to-center distances and does not need patient-specific collimators. The collimator selection per field is OAR-specific and tailored to maximize PVDR in OARs while preserving target dose uniformity. Then, the inverse optimization method JDPO is utilized to jointly optimize target dose uniformity, PVDR, and other dose-volume-histogram based dose objectives, which is solved by iterative convex relaxation optimization algorithm and alternating direction method of multipliers. RESULTS The need and efficacy of MC-pMBRT is demonstrated by comparing the single-collimator (SC) approach with the multi-collimator (MC) approach. While SC degraded either PVDR for OAR or dose uniformity for the target, MC provided a good balance of PVDR and target dose uniformity. The proposed JDPO method is validated in comparison with the dose-only optimization (DO) method for MC-pMBRT, in reference to the conventional (CONV) proton RT (no pMBRT). Compared to CONV, MC-pMBRT (DO and JDPO) preserved target dose uniformity and plan quality, while providing unique PVDR in OAR. Compared to DO, JDPO further improved PVDR via PVDR optimization during treatment planning. CONCLUSION A novel pMBRT treatment planning method called MC-pMBRT is proposed that utilizes a set of generic and premade collimators with joint dose and PVDR optimization algorithm to optimize OAR-specific PVDR and target dose uniformity simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Xue Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Gregory N Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ahmed M, Beyreuther E, Gantz S, Horst F, Meyer J, Pawelke J, Schmid TE, Stolz J, Wilkens JJ, Bartzsch S. Design and dosimetric characterization of a transportable proton minibeam collimation system. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1473625. [PMID: 39741979 PMCID: PMC11685229 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1473625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 11/26/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy has shown to widen the therapeutic window compared to conventional radiation treatment in pre-clinical studies. The underlying biological mechanisms, however, require more research. Purpose The purpose of this study was to develop and characterize a mechanical collimation setup capable of producing 250µm wide proton minibeams with a center-to-center distance of 1000µm. Methods To find the optimal arrangement Monte Carlo simulations were employed using the Geant4 toolkit TOPAS to maximize key parameters such as the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) and the valley dose rate. The experimental characterization of the optimized setup was carried out with film dosimetry at the University Proton Therapy beamline in Dresden and the proton beamline of the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle with 150MeV and 50.5MeV, respectively. A microDiamond detector (PTW, Freiburg, Germany) was utilized at both beamlines for online proton minibeam dosimetry. Results A PVDR of 10 was achieved in Dresden and a PVDR of 14 in Seattle. Dosimetry measurements were carried out with EBT3 films at a depth of 5mm in a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) phantom. When comparing film dosimetry with the microDiamond, excellent agreement was observed in the valleys. However, the peak dose showed a discrepancy of approximately 10% in the 150MeV beam and 20% in the 50.5MeV beam between film and microDiamond. Discussion The characteristics of the minibeams generated with our system compares well with those of other collimated minibeams despite being smaller. The deviations of microDiamond measurements from film readings might be subject to the diamond detector responding differently in the peak and valley regions. Applying previously reported correction factors aligns the dose profile measured by the microDiamond with the profile acquired with EBT3 films in Dresden. Conclusion The novel proton minibeam system can be operated independently of specific beamlines. It can be transported easily and hence used for inter-institutional comparative studies. The quality of the minibeams allows us to perform in vitro and in vivo experiments in the future. The microDiamond was demonstrated to have great potential for online dosimetry for proton minibeams, yet requires more research to explain the observed discrepancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabroor Ahmed
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Gantz
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Juergen Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universitat Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas E. Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jessica Stolz
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J. Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lin Y, Li W, Wang A, Johnson D, Gan GN, Gao H. Comprehensive dosimetric commissioning of proton minibeam radiotherapy on a single gantry proton system. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1421869. [PMID: 39099699 PMCID: PMC11294745 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1421869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) can deliver spatially fractionated dose distributions with submillimeter resolution. These dose distributions exhibit significant heterogeneity in both depth and lateral directions. Accurate characterization of pMBRT doses requires dosimetry devices with high spatial resolution and a wide dynamic range. Furthermore, the dependency of dosimetric measurements on Linear Energy Transfer (LET), as observed in conventional proton therapy, is also present in pMBRT depth dose measurements. Purpose This work demonstrates the process of performing comprehensive dosimetric measurements to characterize the pMBRT collimator on a clinical single-gantry proton machine, utilizing commercially available dosimetry devices. Methods The minibeam collimator is designed to be mounted on the clinical nozzle as a beam-modifying accessory. Three collimators, each with a slit opening of 0.4 mm, are thoroughly evaluated. The center-to-center (c-t-c) distances of the slits for these collimators are 2.8 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.0 mm, respectively. High spatial resolution dosimetry devices are essential for PMBRT dose characterizations. To meet this requirement, two-dimensional (2D) dose measurement devices, Gafchromic films, are used to measure lateral profiles at various depths. Films are also used for depth dose profile measurements in solid water. Additionally, high-resolution point dose detectors, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors are employed for lateral profile measurements at various depths. Percent depth dose (PDD) measurements of pMBRT in solid water, with various proton energies, collimators, and air gaps, are performed using Gafchromic films. The film's LET dependency for proton beams is corrected to ensure accurate pMBRT PDD measurements. The Monte Carlo simulation tool TOPAS is utilized to compare and validate all experimental measurements. Results At depths where LET is not a concern, film dose measurements were consistent with microDiamond and Razor diode point measurements. The point detectors need to be orientated with the thin side aligned to the incoming beam. Comparison of the lateral dose profiles extracted from TOPAS simulations, films, microDiamond, and Razor diode detectors shows a passing rate exceeding 98% in 1D gamma analysis at 3% 0.1 mm criteria.However, when the microDiamond detector is orientated to face the pMBRT beam, its spatial resolution may not be sufficient to capture the peak and valley dose accurately. Nevertheless, an accuracy within 2% can still be achieved when comparing the average dose. The PDD measurements show that the peak valley dose ratio (PVDR) of pMBRT can be altered at different depths with different air gaps using the same collimator or different collimators of different c-t-c distances. Conclusion Our study demonstrates that comprehensive dose measurements for pMBRT can be conducted using standard clinical dose measurement devices. These measurements are indispensable for guiding and ensuring accurate dose reporting in pre-clinical studies using the pMBRT technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Aoxiang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Gregory N. Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin Y, Li W, Johnson D, Prezado Y, Gan GN, Gao H. Development and characterization of the first proton minibeam system for single-gantry proton facility. Med Phys 2024; 51:3995-4006. [PMID: 38642468 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam represents a preclinical spatially fractionated radiotherapy modality with great translational potential. The advantage lies in its high therapeutic index (compared to GRID and LATTICE) and ability to treat at greater depth (compared to microbeam). Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a synergy of proton and minibeam. While the single-gantry proton facility has gained popularity due to its affordability and compact design, it often has limited beam time available for research purposes. Conversely, given the current requirement of pMBRT on specific minibeam hardware collimators, necessitates a reproducible and fast setup to minimize pMBRT treatment time and streamline the switching time between pMBRT and conventional treatment for clinically translation. PURPOSE The contribution of this work is the development and characterization of the first pMBRT system tailored for single-gantry proton facility. The system allows for efficient and reproducible plug-and-play setup, achievable within minutes. METHODS The single room pMBRT system is constructed based on IBA ProteusONE proton machine. The end of nozzle is attached with beam modifying accessories though an accessory drawer. A small snout is attached to the accessory drawer and used to hold apertures and range shifters. The minibeam aperture consists of two components: a fitting ring and an aperture body. Three minibeam apertures were manufactured. The first-generation apertures underwent qualitatively analysis with film, and the second generation aperture underwent more comprehensive quantitative measurement. The reproducibility of the setup is accessed, and the film measurements are performed to characterize the pMBRT system in cross validation with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. RESULTS We presented initial results of large field pMBRT aperture and the film measurements indicates the effect of source-to-isocenter distance = 930 cm in Y proton scanning direction. Consistent with TOPAS MC simulation, the dose uniformity of pMBRT field <2 cm is demonstrated to be better than 2%, rendering its suitability for pre-clinical studies. Subsequently, we developed the second generation of aperture with five slits and characterized the aperture with film dosimetry studies and compared the results to the benchmark MC. Comprehensive film measurements were also performed to evaluate the effect of divergence, air gap and gantry-angle dependency and repeatability and revealing a consistent performance within 5%. Furthermore, the 2D gamma analysis indicated a passing rate exceeding 99% using 3% dose difference and 0.2 mm distance agreement criteria. We also establish the peak valley dose ratio and the depth dose profile measurements, and the results are within 10% from MC simulation. CONCLUSIONS We have developed the first pMBRT system tailored for a single-gantry proton facility, which has demonstrated accuracy in benchmark with MC simulations, and allows for efficient plug-and-play setup, emphasizing efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory N Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
González-Vegas R, Yousef I, Seksek O, Ortiz R, Bertho A, Juchaux M, Nauraye C, Marzi LD, Patriarca A, Prezado Y, Martínez-Rovira I. Investigating the biochemical response of proton minibeam radiation therapy by means of synchrotron-based infrared microspectroscopy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11973. [PMID: 38796617 PMCID: PMC11128026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62373-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The biology underlying proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is not fully understood. Here we aim to elucidate the biological effects of pMBRT using Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy (FTIRM). In vitro (CTX-TNA2 astrocytes and F98 glioma rat cell lines) and in vivo (healthy and F98-bearing Fischer rats) irradiations were conducted, with conventional proton radiotherapy and pMBRT. FTIRM measurements were performed at ALBA Synchrotron, and multivariate data analysis methods were employed to assess spectral differences between irradiation configurations and doses. For astrocytes, the spectral regions related to proteins and nucleic acids were highly affected by conventional irradiations and the high-dose regions of pMBRT, suggesting important modifications on these biomolecules. For glioma, pMBRT had a great effect on the nucleic acids and carbohydrates. In animals, conventional radiotherapy had a remarkable impact on the proteins and nucleic acids of healthy rats; analysis of tumour regions in glioma-bearing rats suggested major nucleic acid modifications due to pMBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto González-Vegas
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB Bellaterra, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Ibraheem Yousef
- MIRAS Beamline BL01, ALBA-CELLS Synchrotron, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08209, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Seksek
- IJCLab, French National Centre for Scientific Research, 91450, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB Bellaterra, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gordon K, Smyk D, Gulidov I, Golubev K, Fatkhudinov T. An Overview of Head and Neck Tumor Reirradiation: What Has Been Achieved So Far? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4409. [PMID: 37686685 PMCID: PMC10486419 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The recurrence rate of head and neck cancers (HNCs) after initial treatment may reach 70%, and poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Curative options for recurrent HNCs mainly depend on the treatment history and the recurrent tumor localization. Reirradiation for HNCs is effective and has been included in most guidelines. However, the option remains clinically challenging due to high incidence of severe toxicity, especially in cases of quick infield recurrence. Recent technical advances in radiation therapy (RT) provide the means for upgrade in reirradiation protocols. While the majority of hospitals stay focused on conventional and widely accessible modulated RTs, the particle therapy options emerge as tolerable and providing further treatment opportunities for recurrent HNCs. Still, the progress is impeded by high heterogeneity of the data and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This review aimed to summarize the outcomes of reirradiation for HNCs in the clinical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantin Gordon
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Daniil Smyk
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| | - Igor Gulidov
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Kirill Golubev
- A. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, Branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (A. Tsyb MRRC), 4, Korolev Street, 249036 Obninsk, Russia; (D.S.); (I.G.); (K.G.)
| | - Timur Fatkhudinov
- Medical Institute, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Miklukho-Maklaya Street 8, 117198 Moscow, Russia;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Masilela TAM, Prezado Y. Monte Carlo study of the free radical yields in minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:5115-5134. [PMID: 37211907 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel technique which has been shown to widen the therapeutic window through significant normal tissue sparing. Despite the heterogeneous dose distributions, tumor control is still ensured. Nevertheless the exact radiobiological mechanisms responsible for MBRT efficacy are not fully understood. PURPOSE Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from water radiolysis were investigated given their implications not only on targeted DNA damage, but also for their role in the immune response and non-targeted cell signalling effects: two potential drivers of MBRT efficacy. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations were performed using TOPAS-nBio to carry out the irradiation of a water phantom with beams of protons (pMBRT), photons (xMBRT), 4 He ions (HeMBRT), and 12 C ions (CMBRT). Primary yields at the end of the chemical stage were calculated in spheres of 20 μm diameter, located in the peaks and valleys at various depths up to the Bragg peak. The chemical stage was limited to 1 ns to approximate biological scavenging, and the yield of · OH, H2 O2 , ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ was recorded. RESULTS Beyond 10 mm, there were no substantial differences in the primary yields between peaks and valleys of the pMBRT and HeMBRT modalities. For xMBRT, there was a lower primary yield of the radical species · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ at all depths in the valleys compared to the peaks, and a higher primary yield of H2 O2 . Compared to the peaks, the valleys of the CMBRT modality were subject to a higher · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ yield, and lower H2 O2 yield. This difference between peaks and valleys became more severe in depth. Near the Bragg peak, the increase in the primary yield of the valleys over the peaks was 6% and 4% for · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ respectively, while there was a decrease in the yield of H2 O2 by 16%. Given the similar ROS primary yields in the peaks and valleys of pMBRT and HeMBRT, the level of indirect DNA damage is expected to be directly proportional to the peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR). The difference in the primary yields implicates a lower level of indirect DNA damage in the valleys compared to the peaks than what would be suggested by the PVDR for xMBRT, and a higher level for CMBRT. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the notion that depending on the particle chosen, one can expect different levels of ROS in the peaks and valley that goes beyond what would be expected by the macroscopic PVDR. The combination of MBRT with heavier ions is shown to be particularly interesting as the primary yield in the valleys progressively diverges from the level observed in the peaks as the LET increases. While differences in the reported · OH yields of this work implicated the indirect DNA damage, H2 O2 yields particularly implicate non-targeted cell signalling effects, and therefore this work provides a point of reference for future simulations in which the distribution of this species at more biologically relevant timescales could be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thongchai A M Masilela
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang W, Li W, Lin Y, Wang F, Chen RC, Gao H. TVL1-IMPT: Optimization of Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio Via Joint Total-Variation and L1 Dose Regularization for Spatially Fractionated Pencil-Beam-Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:768-778. [PMID: 36155212 PMCID: PMC10155885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel proton modality of spatially fractionated RT. pMBRT can reduce the radiation damage to normal tissues via biological dose sparing of high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). This work will develop a new spatially fractionated IMPT treatment planning method for pMBRT that jointly optimizes the plan quality and maximizes the PVDR. METHODS The new optimization method simultaneously maximizes the normal-tissue PVDR and optimizes the dose distribution at tumor targets and organs at risk. The PVDR maximization is through the joint total variation (TV) and L1 regularization with respect to the normal-tissue dose. That is, the beam-eye view projects dose slices of several depths for each beam angle; the TV of dose is maximized, corresponding to the PVDR maximization; and the L1 of dose is minimized, corresponding to the minimization of the organs-at-risk dose and maximization of survival fraction (SF). RESULTS The new IMPT method with TV and L1 regularization was validated in comparison with the conventional IMPT method for pMBRT in several clinical cases. The results show that TVL1 provided larger PVDR and SF than the conventional IMPT method for biological sparing of normal tissues, with preserved plan quality in terms of physical dose distribution. CONCLUSIONS A new spatially fractionated IMPT treatment planning method was developed for pMBRT that can optimize and improve normal-tissue PVDR and SF by incorporating TV and L1 dose regularization with properly chosen regularization parameters into IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Fen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sotiropoulos M, Prezado Y. Radiation quality correction factors for improved dosimetry in preclinical minibeam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:6716-6727. [PMID: 35904962 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In reference dosimetry, radiation quality correction factors are used in order to account for changes in the detector's response among different radiation qualities, improving dosimetric accuracy. PURPOSE Reference dosimetry radiation quality corrections factors for the PTW microDiamond were calculated for preclinical X-ray and proton minibeams, and their impact in dosimetric accuracy was evaluated. METHODS A formalism for the calculation of radiation quality correction factors for absolute dosimetry in minibeam fields was developed. Following our formalism, radiation quality correction factors were calculated for the PTW microDiamond detector, using the Monte Carlo method. Models of the detector, and X-ray and proton irradiation platform, were imported into the TOPAS Monte Carlo simulation toolkit. The radiation quality correction factors were calculated in the following scenarios: (i) reference dosimetry open field to minibeam center of the central peak, (ii) different positions at the minibeam profile (along the peaks and valleys direction) to the center of the central minibeam, and (iii) some representative depth positions. In addition, the radiation quality correction factors needed for the calculation of the peak-to-valley dose ratio at different depths were calculated. RESULTS An important overestimation of the dose (about 10%) was found in the case of the open to minibeam field for both X-rays and proton beams, when the correction factors were used. Smaller differences were observed in the other cases. CONCLUSIONS The usage of the PTW microDiamond detector requires radiation quality correction factors in order to be used in minibeam reference dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Technical aspects of proton minibeam radiation therapy: Minibeam generation and delivery. Phys Med 2022; 100:64-71. [PMID: 35750002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the normal tissue sparing of sub-millimetric, spatially fractionated beams with the improved ballistics of protons. This may allow a safe dose escalation in the tumour and has already proven to provide a remarkable increase of the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas in animal experiments. One of the main challenges in pMBRT concerns the generation of minibeams and the implementation in a clinical environment. This article reviews the different approaches for generating minibeams, using mechanical collimators and focussing magnets, and discusses the technical aspects of the implementation and delivery of pMBRT.
Collapse
|
17
|
Guerra DB, Oliveira EMN, Sonntag AR, Sbaraine P, Fay AP, Morrone FB, Papaléo RM. Intercomparison of radiosensitization induced by gold and iron oxide nanoparticles in human glioblastoma cells irradiated by 6 MV photons. Sci Rep 2022; 12:9602. [PMID: 35688846 PMCID: PMC9187689 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13368-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
In this work, an intercomparison of sensitization effects produced by gold (GNP) and dextran-coated iron oxide (SPION-DX) nanoparticles in M059J and U87 human glioblastoma cells was performed using 6 MV-photons. Three variables were mapped: the nanoparticle material, treatment concentration, and cell radiosensitivity. For U87, GNP treatments resulted in high sensitization enhancement ratios (SER[Formula: see text] up to 2.04). More modest effects were induced by SPION-DX, but still significant reductions in survival were achieved (maximum SER[Formula: see text] ). For the radiosensitive M059J, sensitization by both NPs was poor. SER[Formula: see text] increased with the degree of elemental uptake in the cells, but not necessarily with treatment concentration. For GNP, where exposure concentration and elemental uptake were found to be proportional, SER[Formula: see text] increased linearly with concentration in both cell lines. For SPION-DX, saturation of sensitization enhancement and metal uptake occurred at high exposures. Fold change in the [Formula: see text] ratios extracted from survival curves are reduced by the presence of SPION-DX but strongly increased by GNPs , suggesting that sensitization by GNPs occurs mainly via promotion of lethal damage, while for SPION-DX repairable damage dominates. The NPs were more effective in eliminating the radioresistant glioblastoma cells, an interesting finding, as resistant cells are key targets to improve treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danieli B Guerra
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil.
| | - Elisa M N Oliveira
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Amanda R Sonntag
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Patricia Sbaraine
- Division of Radiotherapy, São Lucas Hospital of PUCRS, Porto Alegre, 90610-000, Brazil
| | - Andre P Fay
- School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Fernanda B Morrone
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil
| | - Ricardo M Papaléo
- Interdisciplinary Center of Nanoscience and Micro-Nanotechnology, School of Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 90619-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ortiz R, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Preclinical dosimetry in proton minibeam radiation therapy: robustness analysis and guidelines. Med Phys 2022; 49:5551-5561. [PMID: 35621386 PMCID: PMC9544651 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy approach that has shown a significant increase in the therapeutic window in glioma‐bearing rats compared to conventional proton therapy. The dosimetry of pMBRT is challenging and error prone due to the submillimetric beamlet sizes used. The aim of this study was to perform a robustness analysis on the setup parameters utilized in current preclinical trials and provide guidelines for reproducible dosimetry. The results of this work are intended to guide upcoming implementations of pMBRT worldwide, as well as pave the way for future clinical implementations. Methods Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data were used to evaluate the impact of variations in setup parameters and uncertainties in collimator specifications on lateral pMBRT dose distributions. The value of each parameter was modified individually to evaluate their effect on dose distributions. Experimental dosimetry was performed by means of high‐resolution detectors, that is, radiochromic films, the IBA Razor and the Microdiamond detector. New guidelines were proposed to optimize the experimental setup in pMBRT studies and perform reproducible dosimetry. Results The sensitivity of dose distributions to uncertainties and variations in setup parameters was quantified. Quantities that define pMBRT lateral profiles (i.e., the peak‐to‐valley dose ratio [PVDR], peak and valley doses, and peak width) are significantly influenced by small‐scale fluctuations in several of those parameters. The setup implemented at the Orsay proton therapy center for pMBRT irradiation was optimized to increase PVDRs and peak symmetry. In addition, we proposed guidelines to perform accurate and reproducible dosimetry in preclinical studies. Conclusions This study revealed the importance of adopting guidelines and protocols tailored to the distinct dose delivery method and dose distributions in pMBRT. This new methodology leads to reproducible dosimetry, which is imperative in preclinical trials. The results and guidelines presented in this manuscript can ease the initiation of pMBRT investigations in other centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France.,Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, 91400, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McAuley GA, Lim CJ, Teran AV, Slater JD, Wroe AJ. Monte Carlo evaluation of high-gradient magnetically focused planar proton minibeams in a passive nozzle. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35421853 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac678b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the potential of using a single quadrupole magnet with a high magnetic field gradient to create planar minibeams suitable for clinical applications of proton minibeam radiation therapy.Approach. We performed Monte Carlo simulations involving single quadrupole Halbach cylinders in a passively scattered nozzle in clinical use for proton therapy. Pencil beams produced by the nozzle of 10-15 mm initial diameters and particle range of ∼10-20 cm in water were focused by magnets with field gradients of 225-350 T m-1and cylinder lengths of 80-110 mm to produce very narrow elongated (planar) beamlets. The corresponding dose distributions were scored in a water phantom. Composite minibeam dose distributions composed from three beamlets were created by laterally shifting copies of the single beamlet distribution to either side of a central beamlet. Modulated beamlets (with 18-30 mm nominal central SOBP) and corresponding composite dose distributions were created in a similar manner. Collimated minibeams were also compared with beams focused using one magnet/particle range combination.Main results. The focusing magnets produced planar beamlets with minimum lateral FWHM of ∼1.1-1.6 mm. Dose distributions composed from three unmodulated beamlets showed a high degree of proximal spatial fractionation and a homogeneous target dose. Maximal peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR) for the unmodulated beams ranged from 32 to 324, and composite modulated beam showed maximal PVDR ranging from 32 to 102 and SOBPs with good target dose coverage.Significance.Advantages of the high-gradient magnets include the ability to focus beams with phase space parameters that reflect beams in operation today, and post-waist particle divergence allowing larger beamlet separations and thus larger PVDR. Our results suggest that high gradient quadrupole magnets could be useful to focus beams of moderate emittance in clinical proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant A McAuley
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America
| | - Crystal J Lim
- School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA United States of America
| | - Anthony V Teran
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America.,Orange County CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Fountain Valley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jerry D Slater
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Wroe
- School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA United States of America.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States of America.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010116. [PMID: 35008280 PMCID: PMC8749801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Normal tissue’s morbidity continues to limit the increase in the therapeutic index in radiation therapy. This study explores the potential advantages of combining proton arc therapy and proton minibeam radiation therapy, which have already individually shown a significant normal tissue’s sparing. This alliance aims to integrate the benefits of those techniques in a single approach. Abstract (1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their combination and its potential advantages are being assessed in this proof-of-concept study for the first time. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate the dose and LET distributions in brain tumor irradiations. (3) Results: a net reduction in the dose to normal tissues (up to 90%), and the preservation of the spatial fractionation of the dose were achieved for all configurations evaluated. Additionally, Proton Minibeam Arc Therapy (pMBAT) reduces the volumes exposed to high-dose and high-LET values at expense of increased low-dose and intermediate-LET values. (4) Conclusions: pMBAT enhances the individual benefits of proton minibeams while keeping those of conventional proton arc therapy. These results might facilitate the path towards patients’ treatments since lower peak doses in normal tissues would be needed than in the case of a single array of proton minibeams.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cavallone M, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. Converging Proton Minibeams with Magnetic Fields for Optimized Radiation Therapy: A Proof of Concept. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010026. [PMID: 35008189 PMCID: PMC8750079 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton MiniBeam Radiation Therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that combines the benefits of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further optimize the dose distribution and reduce radiation side effects. The aim of this study is to investigate possible strategies to couple pMBRT with dipole magnetic fields to generate a converging minibeam pattern and increase the center-to-center distance between minibeams. Magnetic field optimization was performed so as to obtain the same transverse dose profile at the Bragg peak position as in a reference configuration with no magnetic field. Monte Carlo simulations reproducing realistic pencil beam scanning settings were used to compute the dose in a water phantom. We analyzed different minibeam generation techniques, such as the use of a static multislit collimator or a dynamic aperture, and different magnetic field positions, i.e., before or within the water phantom. The best results were obtained using a dynamic aperture coupled with a magnetic field within the water phantom. For a center-to-center distance increase from 4 mm to 6 mm, we obtained an increase of peak-to-valley dose ratio and decrease of valley dose above 50%. The results indicate that magnetic fields can be effectively used to improve the spatial modulation at shallow depth for enhanced healthy tissue sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cavallone
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
23
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Polledo L, Liens A, Warfving N, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Patriarca A, de Marzi L, Prezado Y. First Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy of Glioma-Bearing Rats. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194865. [PMID: 34638352 PMCID: PMC8507607 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach based on a distinct dose delivery method: the dose distributions follow a pattern with regions of peaks (high doses) and valleys (low doses). pMBRT was shown to be able to widen the therapeutic window in glioma-bearing rats. In previous studies the irradiation was performed in one single fraction. The work reported in this manuscript is the first evaluation detailing the response of glioma-bearing rats to a temporal fractionation in proton minibeam radiation therapy, delivered under a crossfire geometry. A significant increase of the median survival time was obtained when the dose was delivered over two sessions as opposed to in a single fraction. This result could facilitate the path towards pMBRT treatments. Abstract (1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small animal experiments. In all the experiments performed up to date in tumor bearing animals, the dose was delivered in one single fraction. This is the first assessment on the impact of a temporal fractionation scheme on the response of glioma-bearing animals to pMBRT. (2) Methods: glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with pMBRT using a crossfire geometry. The response of the irradiated animals in one and two fractions was compared. An additional group of animals was also treated with conventional broad beam irradiations. (3) Results: pMBRT delivered in two fractions at the biological equivalent dose corresponding to one fraction resulted in the highest median survival time, with 80% long-term survivors free of tumors. No increase in local toxicity was noted in this group with respect to the other pMBRT irradiated groups. Conventional broad beam irradiations resulted in the most severe local toxicity. (4) Conclusion: Temporal fractionation increases the therapeutic index in pMBRT and could ease the path towards clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Laura Polledo
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Alethea Liens
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Nils Warfving
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Conceptual Design of a Novel Nozzle Combined with a Clinical Proton Linac for Magnetically Focussed Minibeams. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184657. [PMID: 34572884 PMCID: PMC8467416 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the tissue sparing potential of submillimetric, spatially fractionated beams (minibeams) with the improved ballistics of protons to enhance the tolerance of normal tissue and allow a dose escalation in the tumour. This approach could allow a more effective treatment of radioresistant tumours and has already shown excellent results for rat gliomas. To exploit the full potential of pMBRT, it should be delivered using magnetically focussed and scanned minibeams. However, such an implementation has not yet been demonstrated at clinically relevant beam energies. In this work, we therefore present a new design combining our recently developed minibeam nozzle with the first clinical proton linear accelerator. We show the suitability of this combination for the generation of magnetically focussed and scanned minibeams with clinically relevant parameters as well as for the delivery of conventional pencil beam scanning techniques. Abstract (1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach with the potential to significantly increase normal tissue sparing while providing tumour control equivalent or superior to standard proton therapy. For reasons of efficiency, flexibility and minibeam quality, the optimal implementation of pMBRT should use magnetically focussed minibeams which, however, could not yet be generated in a clinical environment. In this study, we evaluated our recently proposed minibeam nozzle together with a new clinical proton linac as a potential implementation. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine under which conditions minibeams can be generated and to evaluate the robustness against focussing magnet errors. Moreover, an example of conventional pencil beam scanning irradiation was simulated. (3) Results: Excellent minibeam sizes between 0.6 and 0.9 mm full width at half maximum could be obtained and a good tolerance to errors was observed. Furthermore, the delivery of a 10 cm × 10 cm field with pencil beams was demonstrated. (4) Conclusion: The combination of the new proton linac and minibeam nozzle could represent an optimal implementation of pMBRT by allowing the generation of magnetically focussed minibeams with clinically relevant parameters. It could furthermore be used for conventional pencil beam scanning.
Collapse
|
25
|
Sotiropoulos M, Prezado Y. A scanning dynamic collimator for spot-scanning proton minibeam production. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18321. [PMID: 34526628 PMCID: PMC8443660 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97941-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In proton minibeam radiation therapy, proton minibeams are typically produced by modulating a uniform field using a multislit collimator. Multislit collimators produce minibeams of fixed length and width, and a new collimator has to be manufactured each time a new minibeam array is required, limiting its flexibility. In this work, we propose a scanning dynamic collimator for the generation of proton minibeams arrays. The new collimator system proposed is able to produce any minibeam required on an on-line basis by modulating the pencil beam spots of modern proton therapy machines, rather than a uniform field. The new collimator is evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and the produced proton minibeams are compared with that of a multislit collimator. Furthermore, a proof of concept experiment is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of producing a minibeam array by repositioning (i.e. scanning) a collimator. It is concluded that besides the technical challenges, the new collimator design is producing equivalent minibeam arrays to the multislit collimator, whilst is flexible to produce any minibeam array desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France.
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yamamoto S, Yabe T, Akagi T. Increase in the intensity of an optical signal with fluorescein during proton and carbon-ion irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:188-197. [PMID: 34124832 PMCID: PMC8292686 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although the imaging of luminescence emitted in water during irradiation of protons and carbon ions is a useful method for range and dose estimations, the intensity of the images is relatively low due to the low photon production of the luminescence phenomenon. Therefore, a relatively long time is required for the imaging. Since a fluorescent dye, fluorescein, may increase the intensity of the optical signal, we measured the luminescence images of water with different concentrations of fluorescein during irradiation of protons and carbon ions and compared the results with those by measurements with water. Methods A cooled charge‐coupled device (CCD) camera was used for imaging a water phantom with different concentrations of fluorescein from 0.0063 to 0.025 mg/cm3, in addition to a water phantom without fluorescein during irradiation of 150‐MeV protons and 241.5‐MeV/n carbon ions. Results For both protons and carbon ions, the intensity of the luminescence images increased as the concentration of fluorescein increased. With a fluorescein concentration of 0.025 mg/cm3, the intensities increased to more than 10 times those of water for both protons and carbon ions. Although the shape of the depth profiles of luminescence images of water with fluorescein appeared similar to that of water for protons, those for carbon ions were different from those of water due to the increase in the Cherenkov light component at shallow depths by the decrease in the angular dependencies of the Cherenkov light. Conclusion We confirmed the increase in intensity of the luminescence of water by adding fluorescein for particle ions. With a small amount of Cherenkov light contamination in the images, such as protons, the relative distributions of the luminescence images with fluorescein were similar to that of water and will be used for range or dose determination in a short time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Yamamoto
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takuya Yabe
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.,Department of Medical Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yamamoto S, Yabe T, Akagi T. Possibility evaluation of the optical imaging of proton mini-beams. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34010817 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac02d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy using mini-beams is a promising method to reduce radiation damage to normal tissue. However, distribution measurements of mini-beams are difficult due to their small structures. Since optical imaging is a possible method to measure high-resolution two-dimensional dose distribution, we conducted optical imaging of an acrylic block during the irradiation of mini-beams of protons. Mini-beams were made from a proton pencil beam irradiated to 1 mm slits made of tungsten plate. During irradiation of the mini-beams to the acrylic block, we measured the luminescence of the acrylic block using a charge-coupled device camera. With the measurements, we could obtain slit beam images that have slit shapes in the shallow area while they were uniform in their Bragg peaks, which was similar to the case of simulated optical images by Monte Carlo simulations. We confirmed that high-resolution optical imaging of mini-beams is possible and provides a promising method for efficient quality assessment of mini-beams as well as research on mini-beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Yamamoto
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Takuya Yabe
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.,Department of Medical Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mayerhofer M, Datzmann G, Degiovanni A, Dimov V, Dollinger G. Magnetically focused 70 MeV proton minibeams for preclinical experiments combining a tandem accelerator and a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator. Med Phys 2021; 48:2733-2749. [PMID: 33759211 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy plays an important role for the treatment of tumor diseases in two-thirds of all cases, but it is limited by side effects in the surrounding healthy tissue. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a promising option to widen the therapeutic window for tumor control at reduced side effects. An accelerator concept based on an existing tandem Van de Graaff accelerator and a linac enables the focusing of 70 MeV protons to form minibeams with a size of only 0.1 mm for a preclinical small animal irradiation facility, while avoiding the cost of an RFQ injector. METHODS The tandem accelerator provides a 16 MeV proton beam with a beam brightness of B = 4 nA mm 2 mrad 2 as averaged from 5 µs long pulses with a flat top current of 17 µA at 200 Hz repetition rate. Subsequently, the protons are accelerated to 70 MeV by a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator consisting of two Side Coupled Drift Tube Linac (SCDTL) structures and four Coupled Cavity Linac (CCL) structures [design: AVO-ADAM S.A (Geneva, Switzerland)]. A 3 GHz buncher and four magnetic quadrupole lenses are placed between the tandem and the post-accelerator to maximize the transmission through the linac. A quadrupole triplet situated downstream of the linac structure focuses the protons into an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 . The beam dynamics of the facility is optimized using the particle optics code TRACE three-dimensional (3D). Proton transmission through the facility is elaborated using the particle tracking code TRAVEL. RESULTS A study about buncher amplitude and phase shift between buncher and linac is showing that 49% of all protons available from the tandem can be transported through the post-accelerator. A mean beam current up to 19 nA is expected within an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 at the beam focus. CONCLUSION An extension of existing tandem accelerators by commercially available 3 GHz structures is able to deliver a proton minibeam that serves all requirements to obtain proton minibeams to perform preclinical minibeam irradiations as it would be the case for a complete commercial 3 GHz injector-RFQ-linac combination. Due to the modularity of the linac structure, the irradiation facility can be extended to clinically relevant proton energies up to or above 200 MeV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerd Datzmann
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Patriarca A, Juchaux M, Crepin D, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Le Dudal M, Hardy D, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Jouvion G, Prezado Y. Spatially Modulated Proton Minibeams Results in the Same Increase of Lifespan as a Uniform Target Dose Coverage in F98-Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat Res 2021; 194:715-723. [PMID: 32991712 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new approach in proton radiotherapy, by which a significant increase in the therapeutic index has already been demonstrated in RG2 glioma-bearing rats. In the current study we investigated the response of other types of glioma (F98) and performed a comparative evaluation of tumor control effectiveness by pMBRT (with different levels of dose heterogeneity) versus conventional proton therapy. The results of our study showed an equivalent increase in the lifespan for all evaluated groups (conventional proton irradiation and pMBRT) and no significant differences in the histopathological analysis of the tumors or remaining brain tissue. The reduced long-term toxicity observed with pMBRT in previous evaluations at the same dose suggests a possible use of pMBRT to treat glioma with less side effects while ensuring the same tumor control achieved with standard proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crepin
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Histologie, Embryologie et Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - David Hardy
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pathophysiology of Pediatric Genetic Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Paganetti H, Beltran C, Both S, Dong L, Flanz J, Furutani K, Grassberger C, Grosshans DR, Knopf AC, Langendijk JA, Nystrom H, Parodi K, Raaymakers BW, Richter C, Sawakuchi GO, Schippers M, Shaitelman SF, Teo BKK, Unkelbach J, Wohlfahrt P, Lomax T. Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcd16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
31
|
Mazal A, Vera Sanchez JA, Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Udias JM, España S, Sanchez-Tembleque V, Fraile LM, Bragado P, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Gordillo N, Garcia G, Castro Novais J, Perez Moreno JM, Mayorga Ortiz L, Ilundain Idoate A, Cremades Sendino M, Ares C, Miralbell R, Schreuder N. Biological and Mechanical Synergies to Deal With Proton Therapy Pitfalls: Minibeams, FLASH, Arcs, and Gantryless Rooms. Front Oncol 2021; 10:613669. [PMID: 33585238 PMCID: PMC7874206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has advantages and pitfalls comparing with photon therapy in radiation therapy. Among the limitations of protons in clinical practice we can selectively mention: uncertainties in range, lateral penumbra, deposition of higher LET outside the target, entrance dose, dose in the beam path, dose constraints in critical organs close to the target volume, organ movements and cost. In this review, we combine proposals under study to mitigate those pitfalls by using individually or in combination: (a) biological approaches of beam management in time (very high dose rate “FLASH” irradiations in the order of 100 Gy/s) and (b) modulation in space (a combination of mini-beams of millimetric extent), together with mechanical approaches such as (c) rotational techniques (optimized in partial arcs) and, in an effort to reduce cost, (d) gantry-less delivery systems. In some cases, these proposals are synergic (e.g., FLASH and minibeams), in others they are hardly compatible (mini-beam and rotation). Fixed lines have been used in pioneer centers, or for specific indications (ophthalmic, radiosurgery,…), they logically evolved to isocentric gantries. The present proposals to produce fixed lines are somewhat controversial. Rotational techniques, minibeams and FLASH in proton therapy are making their way, with an increasing degree of complexity in these three approaches, but with a high interest in the basic science and clinical communities. All of them must be proven in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Sedecal Molecular Imaging, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Udias
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel España
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Sanchez-Tembleque
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Mario Fraile
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Gordillo
- Department of Applied Physics, U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Garcia
- Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zou W, Diffenderfer ES, Cengel KA, Kim MM, Avery S, Konzer J, Cai Y, Boisseu P, Ota K, Yin L, Wiersma R, Carlson DJ, Fan Y, Busch TM, Koumenis C, Lin A, Metz JM, Teo BK, Dong L. Current delivery limitations of proton PBS for FLASH. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:212-218. [PMID: 33186682 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) is an attractive solution to realize the advantageous normal tissue sparing elucidated from FLASH high dose rates. The mechanics of PBS spot delivery will impose limitations on the effective field dose rate for PBS. METHODS This study incorporates measurements from clinical and FLASH research beams on uniform single energy and the spread-out Bragg Peak PBS fields to extrapolate the PBS dose rate to high cyclotron beam currents 350, 500, and 800 nA. The impact of the effective field dose rate from cyclotron current, spot spacing, slew time and field size were studied. RESULTS When scanning magnet slew time and energy switching time are not considered, single energy effective field FLASH dose rate (≥40 Gy/s) can only be achieved with less than 4 × 4 cm2 fields when the cyclotron output current is above 500 nA. Slew time and energy switching time remain the limiting factors for achieving high effective dose rate of the field. The dose rate-time structures were obtained. The amount of the total dose delivered at the FLASH dose rate in single energy layer and volumetric field was also studied. CONCLUSION It is demonstrated that while it is difficult to achieve FLASH dose rate for a large field or in a volume, local FLASH delivery to certain percentage of the total dose is possible. With further understanding of the FLASH radiobiological mechanism, this study could provide guidance to adapt current clinical multi-field proton PBS delivery practice for FLASH proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
| | - Eric S Diffenderfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Keith A Cengel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Michele M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Steve Avery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Joshua Konzer
- IBA PT-Inc., PT Engineer-Beam Physics, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Yongliang Cai
- IBA PT-Inc., PT Engineer-Beam Physics, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Paul Boisseu
- Pyramid Technical Consultants, Systems Engineering, Boston, USA
| | - Kan Ota
- Pyramid Technical Consultants, Systems Engineering, Boston, USA
| | - Lingshu Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Rodney Wiersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Yi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Theresa M Busch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Costas Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - BoonKeng K Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Charyyev S, Artz M, Szalkowski G, Chang C, Stanforth A, Lin L, Zhang R, Wang CC. Optimization of hexagonal‐pattern minibeams for spatially fractionated radiotherapy using proton beam scanning. Med Phys 2020; 47:3485-3495. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Charyyev
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | - Mark Artz
- UF Health Proton Therapy Institute Jacksonville FL 32206 USA
| | - Gregory Szalkowski
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA
| | - Chih‐Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | | | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - C.‐K. Chris Wang
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lansonneur P, Mammar H, Nauraye C, Patriarca A, Hierso E, Dendale R, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. First proton minibeam radiation therapy treatment plan evaluation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7025. [PMID: 32341427 PMCID: PMC7184593 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63975-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel dose delivery method based on spatial dose fractionation. pMBRT has been shown to be promising in terms of reduced side effects and superior tumour control in high-grade glioma-bearing rats compared to standard irradiation. These findings, together with the recent optimized implementation of pMBRT in a clinical pencil beam scanning system, have triggered reflection on the possible application to patient treatments. In this context, the present study was designed to conduct a first theoretical investigation of the clinical potential of this technique. For this purpose, a dedicated dose engine was developed and used to evaluate two clinically relevant patient treatment plans (high-grade glioma and meningioma). Treatment plans were compared with standard proton therapy plans assessed by means of a commercial treatment planning system (ECLIPSE-Varian Medical systems) and Monte Carlo simulations. A multislit brass collimator consisting of 0.4 mm wide slits separated by a centre-to-centre distance of 4 or 6 mm was placed between the nozzle and the patient to shape the planar minibeams. For each plan, spread-out Bragg peaks and homogeneous dose distributions (±7% dose variations) can be obtained in target volumes. The Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratios (PVDR) were evaluated between 9.2 and 12.8 at a depth of 20 mm for meningioma and glioma, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for target volumes and organs at risk were quantitatively compared, resulting in a slightly better target homogeneity with standard PT than with pMBRT plans, but similar DVHs for deep-seated organs-at-risk and lower average dose for shallow organs. The proposed delivery method evaluated in this work opens the way to an effective treatment for radioresistant tumours and will support the design of future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lansonneur
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - H Mammar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - C Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - E Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - R Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France. .,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Schneider T, De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Advancing proton minibeam radiation therapy: magnetically focussed proton minibeams at a clinical centre. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1384. [PMID: 31992757 PMCID: PMC6987213 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that has proven to significantly increase dose tolerances and sparing of normal tissue. It uses very narrow proton beams (diameter ≤1 mm), roughly one order of magnitude smaller than state-of-the-art pencil beams. The current implementation of pMBRT with mechanical collimators is suboptimal as it is inflexible, decreases efficiency and produces additional secondary neutrons. As a potential solution, we explore in this article minibeam generation through magnetic focussing and investigate possibilities for the integration of such a technique at existing clinical centres. For this, a model of the pencil beam scanning (PBS) nozzle and beam at the Orsay Proton Therapy Centre was established and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine its focussing capabilities. Moreover, various modifications of the nozzle geometry were considered. It was found that the PBS nozzle in its current state is not suitable for magnetic minibeam generation. Instead, a new, optimised nozzle design has been proposed and conditions necessary for minibeam generation were benchmarked. In addition, dose simulations in a water phantom were performed which showed improved dose distributions compared to those obtained with mechanical collimators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France. .,Université de Paris, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dos Santos M, Delorme R, Salmon R, Prezado Y. Minibeam radiation therapy: A micro- and nano-dosimetry Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 2020; 47:1379-1390. [PMID: 31900944 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative strategy based on a distinct dose delivery method that is administered using a series of narrow (submillimetric) parallel beams. To shed light on the biological effects of MBRT irradiation, we explored the micro- and nanodosimetric characteristics of three promising MBRT modalities (photon, electron, and proton) using Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. METHODS Irradiation with proton (100 MeV), electron (300 MeV), and photon (effective energy of 69 keV) minibeams were simulated using Geant4 MC code and the Geant4-DNA extension, which allows the simulation of energy transfer points with nanometric accuracy. As the target of the simulations, cells containing spherical nuclei with or without a detailed description of the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) geometry were placed at different depths in peak and valley regions in a water phantom. The energy deposition and number of events in the cell nuclei were recorded in the microdosimetry study, and the number of DNA breaks and their complexity were determined in the nanodosimetric study, where a multi-scale simulation approach was used for the latter. For DNA damage assessment, an adapted DBSCAN clustering algorithm was used. To compare the photon MBRT (xMBRT), electron MBRT (eMBRT), and proton MBRT (pMBRT) approaches, we considered the treatment of a brain tumor located at a depth of 75 mm. RESULTS Both mean energy deposition at micrometric scale and DNA damage in the "valley" cell nuclei were very low as compared with these parameters in the peak region at all depths for xMBRT and at depths of 0 to 30 mm and 0 to 50 mm for eMBRT and pMBRT, respectively. Only the charged minibeams were favorable for tumor control by producing similar effects in peak and valley cells after 70 mm. At the micrometer scale, the energy deposited per event pointed to a potential advantage of proton beams for tumor control, as more aggressive events could be expected at the end of their tracks. At the nanometer scale, all three MBRT modalities produced direct clustered DNA breaks, although the majority of damage (>93%) was composed of isolated single strand breaks. The pMBRT led to a significant increase in the proportion of clustered single strand breaks and double-strand breaks at the end of its range as compared to the entrance (7% at 75 mm vs 3% at 10 mm) in contrast to eMBRT and xMBRT. In the latter cases, the proportions of complex breaks remained constant, irrespective of the depth and region (peak or valley). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced normal tissue sparing can be expected with these three MBRT techniques. Among the three modalities, pMBRT offers an additional gain for radioresistant tumors, as it resulted in a higher number of complex DNA damage clusters in the tumor region. These results can aid understanding of the biological mechanisms of MBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dos Santos
- Department of Radiobiology and regenerative medicine (SERAMED), Laboratory of Radiobiology of Accidental exposures (LRAcc), IRSN, F-92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - R Delorme
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - R Salmon
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dilmanian FA, Venkatesulu BP, Sahoo N, Wu X, Nassimi JR, Herchko S, Lu J, Dwarakanath BS, Eley JG, Krishnan S. Proton minibeams-a springboard for physics, biology and clinical creativity. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190332. [PMID: 31944824 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam therapy (PMBT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy wherein broad beam radiation is replaced with segmented minibeams-either parallel, planar minibeam arrays generated by a multislit collimator or scanned pencil beams that converge laterally at depth to create a uniform dose layer at the tumor. By doing so, the spatial pattern of entrance dose is considerably modified while still maintaining tumor dose and efficacy. Recent studies using computational modeling, phantom experiments, in vitro and in vivo preclinical models, and early clinical feasibility assessments suggest that unique physical and biological attributes of PMBT can be exploited for future clinical benefit. We outline some of the guiding principle of PMBT in this concise overview of this emerging area of preclinical and clinical research inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Avraham Dilmanian
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Neurology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Bhanu P Venkatesulu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Departments of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Biophysics Research Institute of America, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jessica R Nassimi
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Steven Herchko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jiade Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - John G Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Guardiola C, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine in proton minibeam radiotherapy in a passive scattering beamline for preclinical trials. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190578. [PMID: 31868523 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the benefits of proton therapy with the remarkable normal tissue preservation observed with the use of submillimetric spatially fractionated beams. This promising technique has been implemented at the Institut Curie-Proton therapy centre (ICPO) using a first prototype of a multislit collimator. The purpose of this work was to develop a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation engine to reliably guide preclinical studies at ICPO. METHODS The whole "Y1"-passive beamline at the ICPO, including pMBRT implementation, was modelled using the Monte Carlo GATE v. 7.0 code. A clinically relevant proton energy (100 MeV) was used as starting point. Minibeam generation by means of the brass collimator used in the first experiments was modelled. A virtual source was modelled at the exit of the beamline nozzle and outcomes were compared with dosimetric measurements performed with EBT3 gafchromic films and a diamond detector in water. Dose distributions were recorded in a water phantom and in rat CT images (7-week-old male Fischer rats). RESULTS The dose calculation engine was benchmarked against experimental data and was then used to assess dose distributions in CT images of a rat, resulting from different irradiation configurations used in several experiments. It reduced computational time by an order of magnitude. This allows us to speed up simulations for in vivo trials, where we obtained peak-to-valley dose ratios of 1.20 ± 0.05 and 6.1 ± 0.2 for proton minibeam irradiations targeting the tumour and crossing the rat head. Tumour eradication was observed in the 67 and 22% of the animals treated respectively. CONCLUSION A Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for pMBRT implementation with mechanical collimation has been developed. This tool can be used to guide and interpret the results of in vivo trials. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first Monte Carlo dose engine for pMBRT that is being used to guide preclinical trials in a clinical proton therapy centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
De Marzi L, Nauraye C, Lansonneur P, Pouzoulet F, Patriarca A, Schneider T, Guardiola C, Mammar H, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatial fractionation of the dose in proton therapy: Proton minibeam radiation therapy. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:677-681. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
42
|
Billena C, Khan AJ. A Current Review of Spatial Fractionation: Back to the Future? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:177-187. [PMID: 30684666 PMCID: PMC7443362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy represents a significant departure from canonical thinking in radiation oncology despite having origins in the early 1900s. The original and most common implementation of spatially fractionated radiation therapy uses commercially available blocks or multileaf collimators to deliver a nonconfluent, sieve-like pattern of radiation to the target volume in a nonuniform dose distribution. Dosimetrically, this is parameterized by the ratio of the valley dose in cold spots to the peak dose in hot spots, or the valley-to-peak dose ratio. The radiobiologic mechanisms are postulated to involve radiation-induced bystander effects, microvascular alterations, and/or immunomodulation. Current indications include bulky or locally advanced disease that would not be amenable to conventional radiation or that has proved refractory to chemoradiation. Early-phase clinical trials have shown remarkable success, with some response rates >90% and minimal toxicity. This has promoted technological developments in 3-dimensional formats (LATTICE), micron-size beams (microbeam), and proton arrays. Nevertheless, more clinical and biological data are needed to specify ideal dosimetry parameters and to formulate robust clinical indications and guidelines for optimal standardized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole Billena
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Meyer J, Eley J, Schmid TE, Combs SE, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatially fractionated proton minibeams. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20180466. [PMID: 30359081 PMCID: PMC6541186 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Extraordinary normal tissue response to highly spatially fractionated X-ray beams has been explored for over 25 years. More recently, alternative radiation sources have been developed and utilized with the aim to evoke comparable effects. These include protons, which lend themselves well for this endeavour due to their physical depth dose characteristics as well as corresponding variable biological effectiveness. This paper addresses the motivation for using protons to generate spatially fractionated beams and reviews the technological implementations and experimental results to date. This includes simulation and feasibility studies, collimation and beam characteristics, dosimetry and biological considerations as well as the results of in vivo and in vitro studies. Experimental results are emerging indicating an extraordinary normal tissue sparing effect analogous to what has been observed for synchrotron generated X-ray microbeams. The potential for translational research and feasibility of spatially modulated proton beams in clinical settings is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juergen Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Prezado Y, Jouvion G, Guardiola C, Gonzalez W, Juchaux M, Bergs J, Nauraye C, Labiod D, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Patriarca A, Dendale R. Tumor Control in RG2 Glioma-Bearing Rats: A Comparison Between Proton Minibeam Therapy and Standard Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:266-271. [PMID: 30703513 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.01.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel radiation therapy approach that exploits the synergies of proton therapy with the gain in normal tissue preservation observed upon irradiation with narrow, spatially fractionated, beams. The net gain in normal tissue sparing that has been shown by pMBRT may lead to the efficient treatment of very radioresistant tumors, which are currently mostly treated palliatively. The aim of this study was to perform an evaluation of the tumor effectiveness of proton minibeam radiation therapy for the treatment of RG2 glioma-bearing rats. METHODS AND MATERIALS Two groups (n = 9) of RG2 glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with either standard proton therapy or with pMBRT, with a dose prescription of 25 Gy in 1 fraction. The animals were followed up for a maximum of 6 months. At the end of the study, histopathological studies were performed to assess both the tumor presence and the possible side effects. RESULTS Tumor control was achieved in the 2 irradiated series, with superior survival in the pMBRT group compared with the standard proton therapy group. Long-term (>170 days) survival rates of 22% and 67% were obtained in the standard proton therapy and pMBRT groups, respectively. No tumor was observed in the histopathological analysis. Although animals with long-term survival in the standard radiation therapy exhibit substantial brain damage, including marked radionecrosis, less severe toxicity was observed in the pMBRT group. CONCLUSIONS pMBRT offers a significant increase in the therapeutic index of brain tumors: The majority of the glioma-bearing rats (67%) survived 6 months with less severe side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France.
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Experimentale, Paris, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Wilfredo Gonzalez
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Judith Bergs
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
DePew KD, Ahmad S, Jin H. Experimental Assessment of Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy in Small-Field Delivery Using a Mevion S250 Proton Therapy System. J Med Phys 2019; 43:221-229. [PMID: 30636847 PMCID: PMC6299753 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_33_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Dose calculation accuracy of the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) is empirically assessed for small-aperture fields using a Mevion S250 double scattering proton therapy system. Materials and Methods: Five spherical pseudotumors were modeled in a RANDO head phantom. Plans were generated for the targets with apertures of 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 cm diameter using one, two, and three beams. Depth-dose curves and lateral profiles of the beams were taken with the planned blocks and compared to Eclipse calculations. Dose distributions measured with EBT3 films in the phantom were also compared to Eclipse calculations. Film quenching effect was simulated and considered. Results: Depth-dose scans in water showed a range pullback (up to 2.0 mm), modulation widening (up to 9.5 mm), and dose escalation in proximal end and sub-peak region (up to 15.5%) when compared to the Eclipse calculations for small fields. Measured full width at half maximum and penumbrae for lateral profiles differed <1.0 mm from calculations for most comparisons. In the phantom study, Eclipse TPS underestimated sub-peak dose. Gamma passing rates improved with each beam added to the plans. Greater range pullback and modulation degradation versus water scans were observed due to film quenching, which became more noticeable as target size increased. Conclusions: Eclipse TPS generates acceptable target coverage for small targets with carefully arranged multiple beams despite relatively large dose discrepancy for each beam. Surface doses higher than Eclipse calculations can be mitigated with multiple beams. When using EBT3 film, the quenching effect should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle D DePew
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Centre, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Salahuddin Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Centre, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Hosang Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Centre, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Henry T, Ödén J. Interlaced proton grid therapy – Linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness distributions. Phys Med 2018; 56:81-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
47
|
Prezado Y, Jouvion G, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Guardiola C, Juchaux M, Lamirault C, Labiod D, Jourdain L, Sebrie C, Dendale R, Gonzalez W, Pouzoulet F. Proton minibeam radiation therapy widens the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16479. [PMID: 30405188 PMCID: PMC6220274 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34796-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy which has already shown a remarkable reduction in neurotoxicity as to compared with standard proton therapy. Here we report on the first evaluation of tumor control effectiveness in glioma bearing rats with highly spatially modulated proton beams. Whole brains (excluding the olfactory bulb) of Fischer 344 rats were irradiated. Four groups of animals were considered: a control group (RG2 tumor bearing rats), a second group of RG2 tumor-bearing rats and a third group of normal rats that received pMBRT (70 Gy peak dose in one fraction) with very heterogeneous dose distributions, and a control group of normal rats. The tumor-bearing and normal animals were followed-up for 6 months and one year, respectively. pMBRT leads to a significant tumor control and tumor eradication in 22% of the cases. No substantial brain damage which confirms the widening of the therapeutic window for high-grade gliomas offered by pMBRT. Additionally, the fact that large areas of the brain can be irradiated with pMBRT without significant side effects, would allow facing the infiltrative nature of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, Institut Pasteur, 28 Rue du Docteur Roux, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- IR4M, UMR8081, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, 101, F-91898, Orsay, France
| | - Wilfredo Gonzalez
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Campus d'Orsay, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
- Paris Sud University, Paris -Saclay University, 91405, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Nauraye C, Hierso E, Dendale R, Guardiola C, Prezado Y. Implementation of planar proton minibeam radiation therapy using a pencil beam scanning system: A proof of concept study. Med Phys 2018; 45:5305-5316. [PMID: 30311639 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative approach that combines the advantages of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further reduce the side effects of radiation. One of the main challenges of this approach is the generation of very narrow proton pencil beams with an adequate dose-rate to treat patients within a reasonable treatment time (several minutes) in existing clinical facilities. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing pMBRT by combining the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique with the use of multislit collimators. This proof of concept study of pMBRT with a clinical system is intended to guide upcoming biological experiments. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations (TOPAS v3.1.p2) were used to design a suitable multislit collimator to implement planar pMBRT for conventional pencil beam scanning settings. Dose distributions (depth-dose curves, lateral profiles, Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio (PVDR) and dose-rates) for different proton beam energies were assessed by means of Monte Carlo simulations and experimental measurements in a water tank using commercial ionization chambers and a new p-type silicon diode, the IBA RAZOR. An analytical intensity-modulated dose calculation algorithm designed to optimize the weight of individual Bragg peaks composing the field was also developed and validated. RESULTS Proton minibeams were then obtained using a brass multislit collimator with five slits measuring 2 cm × 400 μm in width with a center-to-center distance of 4 mm. The measured and calculated dose distributions (depth-dose curves and lateral profiles) showed a good agreement. Spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) and homogeneous dose distributions around the target were obtained by means of intensity modulation of Bragg peaks, while maintaining spatial fractionation at shallow depths. Mean dose-rates of 0.12 and 0.09 Gy/s were obtained for one iso-energy layer and a SOBP conditions in the presence of multislit collimator. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing pMBRT on a PBS system. It also confirms the reliability of RAZOR detector for pMBRT dosimetry. This newly developed experimental methodology will support the design of future preclinical research with pMBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Eric Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay, 91898, France
| | - Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS, Paris 7 and Paris 11 Universities, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
[OA052] Proton minibeam radiation therapy: A promising alternative for high-grade gliomas. Phys Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
50
|
Farr JB, Moskvin V, Lukose RC, Tuomanen S, Tsiamas P, Yao W. Development, commissioning, and evaluation of a new intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system. Med Phys 2018; 45:4227-4237. [PMID: 30009481 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Revised: 07/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To invent, design, construct, and commission an intensity modulated minibeam proton therapy system (IMMPT) without the need for physical collimation and to compare its resulting conformity to a conventional IMPT system. METHODS A proton therapy system (Hitachi, Ltd, Hitachi City, Japan; Model: Probeat-V) was specially modified to produce scanned minibeams without collimation. We performed integral depth dose acquisitions and calibrations using a large diameter parallel-plate ionization chamber in a scanning water phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany; Models: Bragg Peak ionization chamber, MP3-P). Spot size and shape was measured using radiochromic film (Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater NJ; Type: EBT3), and a synthetic diamond diode type scanned point by point in air (PTW Models: MicroDiamond, MP3-P). The measured data were used as inputs to generate a Monte Carlo-based model for a commercial radiotherapy planning system (TPS) (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA; Model: Eclipse v13.7.15). The regular ProBeat-V system (sigma ~2.5 mm) TPS model was available for comparison. A simulated base of skull case with small and medium targets proximal to brainstem was planned for both systems and compared. RESULTS The spot sigma is determined to be 1.4 mm at 221 MeV at the isocenter and below 1 mm at proximal distances. Integral depth doses were indistinguishable from the standard spot commissioning data. The TPS fit the spot profiles closely, giving a residual error maximum of 2.5% in the spot penumbra tails (below 5% of maximum) from the commissioned energies 69.4 to 221.3 MeV. The resulting IMMPT plans were more conformal than the IMPT plans due to a sharper dose gradient (90-10%) 1.5 mm smaller for the small target, and 1.3 mm for the large target, at a representative central axial water equivalent depth of 7 cm. CONCLUSIONS We developed, implemented, and tested a new IMMPT system. The initial results look promising in cases where treatments can benefit from additional dose sparing to neighboring sensitive structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Farr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| | - V Moskvin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| | - R C Lukose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| | - S Tuomanen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| | - P Tsiamas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| | - W Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105-2794, USA
| |
Collapse
|