1
|
Fix MK, Frei D, Mueller S, Guyer G, Loebner HA, Volken W, Manser P. Auto-commissioning of a Monte Carlo electron beam model with application to photon MLC shaped electron fields. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36716491 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Presently electron beam treatments are delivered using dedicated applicators. An alternative is the usage of the already installed photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) enabling efficient electron treatments. Currently, the commissioning of beam models is a manual and time-consuming process. In this work an auto-commissioning procedure for the Monte Carlo (MC) beam model part representing the beam above the pMLC is developed for TrueBeam systems with electron energies from 6 to 22 MeV.Approach.The analytical part of the electron beam model includes a main source representing the primary beam and a jaw source representing the head scatter contribution each consisting of an electron and a photon component, while MC radiation transport is performed for the pMLC. The auto-commissioning of this analytical part relies on information pre-determined from MC simulations, in-air dose profiles and absolute dose measurements in water for different field sizes and source to surface distances (SSDs). For validation calculated and measured dose distributions in water were compared for different field sizes, SSDs and beam energies for eight TrueBeam systems. Furthermore, a sternum case in an anthropomorphic phantom was considered and calculated and measured dose distributions were compared at different SSDs.Main results.Instead of the manual commissioning taking up to several days of calculation time and several hours of user time, the auto-commissioning is carried out in a few minutes. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree generally within 3% of maximum dose or 2 mm. The gamma passing rates for the sternum case ranged from 96% to 99% (3% (global)/2 mm criteria, 10% threshold).Significance.The auto-commissioning procedure was successfully implemented and applied to eight TrueBeam systems. The newly developed user-friendly auto-commissioning procedure allows an efficient commissioning of an MC electron beam model and eases the usage of advanced electron radiotherapy utilizing the pMLC for beam shaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monte-Carlo techniques for radiotherapy applications I: introduction and overview of the different Monte-Carlo codes. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2023. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396923000079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
The dose calculation plays a crucial role in many aspects of contemporary clinical radiotherapy treatment planning process. It therefore goes without saying that the accuracy of the dose calculation is of very high importance. The gold standard for absorbed dose calculation is the Monte-Carlo algorithm.
Methods:
This first of two papers gives an overview of the main openly available and supported codes that have been widely used for radiotherapy simulations.
Results:
The paper aims to provide an overview of Monte-Carlo in the field of radiotherapy and point the reader in the right direction of work that could help them get started or develop their existing understanding and use of Monte-Carlo algorithms in their practice.
Conclusions:
It also serves as a useful companion to a curated collection of papers on Monte-Carlo that have been published in this journal.
Collapse
|
3
|
Brost EE, Wan Chan Tseung H, Antolak JA. A fast GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo engine for calculation of MLC-collimated electron fields. Med Phys 2023; 50:600-618. [PMID: 35986907 PMCID: PMC10087940 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric arc therapy have revolutionized photon external beam therapies, the technological advances associated with electron beam therapy have fallen behind. Modern linear accelerators contain technologies that would allow for more advanced forms of electron treatments, such as beam collimation, using the conventional photon multi-leaf collimator (MLC); however, no commercial solutions exist that calculate dose from such beam delivery modes. Additionally, for clinical adoption to occur, dose calculation times would need to be on par with that of modern dose calculation algorithms. PURPOSE This work developed a graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) engine incorporating the Varian TrueBeam linac head geometry for a rapid calculation of electron beams collimated using the conventional photon MLC. METHODS A compute unified device architecture framework was created for the following: (1) transport of electrons and photons through the linac head geometry, considering multiple scattering, Bremsstrahlung, Møller, Compton, and pair production interactions; (2) electron and photon propagation through the CT geometry, considering all interactions plus the photoelectric effect; and (3) secondary particle cascades through the linac head and within the CT geometry. The linac head collimating geometry was modeled according to the specifications provided by the vendor, who also provided phase-space files. The MC was benchmarked against EGSnrc/DOSXYZnrc/GEANT by simulating individual interactions with simple geometries, pencil, and square beam dose calculations in various phantoms. MC-calculated dose distributions for MLC and jaw-collimated electron fields were compared to measurements in a water phantom and with radiochromic film. RESULTS Pencil and square beam dose distributions are in good agreement with DOSXYZnrc. Angular and spatial distributions for multiple scattering and secondary particle production in thin slab geometries are in good agreement with EGSnrc and GEANT. Dose profiles for MLC and jaw-collimated 6-20-MeV electron beams showed an average absolute difference of 1.1 and 1.9 mm for the FWHM and 80%-20% penumbra from measured profiles. Percent depth doses showed differences of <5% for as compared to measurement. The computation time on an NVIDIA Tesla V100 card was 2.5 min to achieve a dose uncertainty of <1%, which is ∼300 times faster than published results in a similar geometry using a single-CPU core. CONCLUSIONS The GPU-based MC can quickly calculate dose for electron fields collimated using the conventional photon MLC. The fast calculation times will allow for a rapid calculation of electron fields for mixed photon and electron particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric E Brost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - H Wan Chan Tseung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John A Antolak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Y, Sun X, Liang Y, Hu Y, Liu C. Monte Carlo simulation of linac using PRIMO. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:185. [PMID: 36384637 PMCID: PMC9667592 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Monte Carlo simulation is considered as the most accurate method for dose calculation in radiotherapy. PRIMO is a Monte-Carlo program with a user-friendly graphical interface. Material and method A VitalBeam with 6MV and 6MV flattening filter free (FFF), equipped with the 120 Millennium multileaf collimator was simulated by PRIMO. We adjusted initial energy, energy full width at half maximum (FWHM), focal spot FWHM, and beam divergence to match the measurements. The water tank and ion-chamber were used in the measurement. Percentage depth dose (PDD) and off axis ratio (OAR) were evaluated with gamma passing rates (GPRs) implemented in PRIMO. PDDs were matched at different widths of standard square fields. OARs were matched at five depths. Transmission factor and dose leaf gap (DLG) were simulated. DLG was measured by electronic portal imaging device using a sweeping gap method. Result For the criterion of 2%/2 mm, 1%/2 mm and 1%/1 mm, the GPRs of 6MV PDD were 99.33–100%, 99–100%, and 99–100%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF PDD were 99.33–100%, 98.99–99.66%, and 97.64–98.99%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV OAR were 96.4–100%, 90.99–100%, and 85.12–98.62%, respectively; the GPRs of 6MV FFF OAR were 95.15–100%, 89.32–100%, and 87.02–99.74%, respectively. The calculated DLG matched well with the measurement (6MV: 1.36 mm vs. 1.41 mm; 6MV FFF: 1.07 mm vs. 1.03 mm, simulation vs measurement). The transmission factors were similar (6MV: 1.25% vs. 1.32%; 6MV FFF: 0.8% vs. 1.12%, simulation vs measurement). Conclusion The calculated PDD, OAR, DLG and transmission factor were all in good agreement with measurements. PRIMO is an independent (with respect to analytical dose calculation algorithm) and accurate Monte Carlo tool. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02149-5.
Collapse
|
5
|
De Saint-Hubert M, Suesselbeck F, Vasi F, Stuckmann F, Rodriguez M, Dabin J, Timmermann B, Thierry-Chef I, Schneider U, Brualla L. Experimental Validation of an Analytical Program and a Monte Carlo Simulation for the Computation of the Far Out-of-Field Dose in External Beam Photon Therapy Applied to Pediatric Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:882506. [PMID: 35875147 PMCID: PMC9300838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundThe out-of-the-field absorbed dose affects the probability of primary second radiation-induced cancers. This is particularly relevant in the case of pediatric treatments. There are currently no methods employed in the clinical routine for the computation of dose distributions from stray radiation in radiotherapy. To overcome this limitation in the framework of conventional teletherapy with photon beams, two computational tools have been developed—one based on an analytical approach and another depending on a fast Monte Carlo algorithm. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the accuracy of these approaches by comparison with experimental data obtained from anthropomorphic phantom irradiations.Materials and MethodsAn anthropomorphic phantom representing a 5-year-old child (ATOM, CIRS) was irradiated considering a brain tumor using a Varian TrueBeam linac. Two treatments for the same planned target volume (PTV) were considered, namely, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In all cases, the irradiation was conducted with a 6-MV energy beam using the flattening filter for a prescribed dose of 3.6 Gy to the PTV. The phantom had natLiF : Mg, Cu, P (MCP-N) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in its 180 holes. The uncertainty of the experimental data was around 20%, which was mostly attributed to the MCP-N energy dependence. To calculate the out-of-field dose, an analytical algorithm was implemented to be run from a Varian Eclipse TPS. This algorithm considers that all anatomical structures are filled with water, with the exception of the lungs which are made of air. The fast Monte Carlo code dose planning method was also used for computing the out-of-field dose. It was executed from the dose verification system PRIMO using a phase-space file containing 3x109 histories, reaching an average standard statistical uncertainty of less than 0.2% (coverage factor k = 1 ) on all voxels scoring more than 50% of the maximum dose. The standard statistical uncertainty of out-of-field voxels in the Monte Carlo simulation did not exceed 5%. For the Monte Carlo simulation the actual chemical composition of the materials used in ATOM, as provided by the manufacturer, was employed.ResultsIn the out-of-the-field region, the absorbed dose was on average four orders of magnitude lower than the dose at the PTV. For the two modalities employed, the discrepancy between the central values of the TLDs located in the out-of-the-field region and the corresponding positions in the analytic model were in general less than 40%. The discrepancy in the lung doses was more pronounced for IMRT. The same comparison between the experimental and the Monte Carlo data yielded differences which are, in general, smaller than 20%. It was observed that the VMAT irradiation produces the smallest out-of-the-field dose when compared to IMRT.ConclusionsThe proposed computational methods for the routine calculation of the out-of-the-field dose produce results that are similar, in most cases, with the experimental data. It has been experimentally found that the VMAT irradiation produces the smallest out-of-the-field dose when compared to IMRT for a given PTV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke De Saint-Hubert
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Finja Suesselbeck
- Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- Faculty of Mathematics and Science Institute of Physics and Medical Physics, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Fabiano Vasi
- Physik Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Stuckmann
- Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- Klinikum Fulda GAG, Universitätsmedizin Marburg, Fulda, Germany
| | - Miguel Rodriguez
- Hospital Paitilla, Panama City, Panama
- Instituto de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y de Alta Tecnología INDICASAT-AIP, Panama City, Panama
| | - Jérémie Dabin
- Research in Dosimetric Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Center (SCK CEN), Mol, Belgium
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisbug-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology and Imaging, German Cancer Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Thierry-Chef
- Radiation Programme, Barcelona Institute of Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
- University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Madrid, Spain
| | - Uwe Schneider
- Physik Institut, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Lorenzo Brualla
- Westdeutsches Protonentherapiezentrum Essen (WPE), Essen, Germany
- Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisbug-Essen, Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), Essen, Germany
- *Correspondence: Lorenzo Brualla,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaluarachchi MM, Saleh ZH, Schwer ML, Klein EE. Validation of a Monte Carlo model for multi leaf collimator based electron delivery. Med Phys 2020; 47:3586-3599. [PMID: 32324289 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop and validate a Monte Carlo model of the Varian TrueBeam to study electron collimation using the existing photon multi-leaf collimators (pMLC), instead of conventional electron applicators and apertures. MATERIALS AND METHODS A complete Monte Carlo model of the Varian TrueBeam was developed using Tool for particle simulation (TOPAS) (version 3.1.p3). Vendor-supplied information was used to model the treatment head components and the source parameters. A phase space plane was setup above the collimating jaws and captured particles were reused until a statistical uncertainty of 1% was achieved in the central axis. Electron energies 6, 9, 12, 16, and 20 MeV with a jaw-defined field of 20 × 20 cm2 at iso-center, pMLC-defined fields of 6.8 × 6.8 cm2 and 11.4 × 11.4 cm2 at 80 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD) and an applicator-defined field of 10 × 10 cm2 at iso-center were evaluated. All the measurements except the applicator-defined fields were measured using an ionization chamber in a water tank using 80 cm SSD. The dose difference, distance-to-agreement and gamma index were used to evaluate the agreement between the Monte Carlo calculations and measurements. Contributions of electron scattering off pMLC leaves and inter-leaf leakage on dose profiles were evaluated and compared with Monte Carlo calculations. Electron transport through a heterogeneous phantom was simulated and the resulting dose distributions were compared with film measurements. The validated Monte Carlo model was used to simulate several clinically motivated cases to demonstrate the benefit of pMLC-based electron delivery compared to applicator-based electron delivery. RESULTS Calculated and measured percentage depth-dose (PDD) curves agree within 2% after normalization. The agreement between normalized percentage depth dose curves were evaluated using one-dimensional gamma analysis with a local tolerance of 2%/1 mm and the %points passing gamma criteria was 100% for all energies. For jaw-defined fields, calculated profiles agree with measurements with pass rates of >97% for 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. Calculated FWHM and penumbra width agree with measurements within 0.4 cm. For fields with tertiary collimation using an pMLC or applicator, the average gamma pass rate of compared profiles was 98% with 2%/2 mm gamma criteria. The profiles measured to evaluate the pMLC leaf scattering agreed with Monte Carlo calculations with an average gamma pass rate of 96.5% with 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. Measured dose profiles below the heterogenous phantom agreed well with calculated profiles and matched within 2.5% for most points. The calculated clinically applicable cases using TOPAS MC and Eclipse TPS for single enface electron beam, electron-photon mixed beam and a matched electron-electron beam exhibited a reasonable agreement in PDDs, profiles and dose volume histograms. CONCLUSION We present a validation of a Monte Carlo model of Varian TrueBeam for pMLC-based electron delivery. Monte Carlo calculations agreed with measurements satisfying gamma criterion of 1%/1 mm for depth dose curves and 2%/1 mm for dose profiles. The simulation of clinically applicable cases demonstrated the clinical utility of pMLC-based electrons and the use of MC simulations for development of advanced radiation therapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maduka M Kaluarachchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, 02905, USA
| | - Ziad H Saleh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, 02905, USA
| | - Michelle L Schwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, 02905, USA
| | - Eric E Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rhode Island Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI, 02905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miloichikova I, Bulavskaya A, Cherepennikov Y, Gavrikov B, Gargioni E, Belousov D, Stuchebrov S. Feasibility of clinical electron beam formation using polymer materials produced by fused deposition modeling. Phys Med 2019; 64:188-194. [PMID: 31515019 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 07/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The main challenge in electron external beam radiation therapy with clinical accelerators is the absence of integrated systems to form irregular fields. The current approach to provide conformal irradiation is to use additional metallic shaping blocks, with inefficient and expensive workflows. This work presents a simple method to form therapeutic electron fields using 3D printed samples. These samples are manufactured by fused deposition modeling, which can affect crucial properties, such as material homogeneity, due to the presence of residual air-filled cavities. The applicability of this method was therefore investigated with a set of experiments and Monte Carlo simulations aimed at determining the electron depth dose distribution in polymer materials. The results show that therapeutic electron beams with energies 6-20 MeV can be effectively absorbed using these polymeric samples. The model developed in this study provides a way to assess the dose distribution in such materials and to calculate the appropriate thickness of polymer samples for therapeutic electron beam formation. It is shown that for total absorption of 6 MeV electron beams the material thickness should be at least 4 cm, while this value should be at least 8 cm for 12 MeV and 11 cm for 20 MeV, respectively. The results can be used to further develop 3D printing procedures for medical electron beam profile formation, allowing the creation of a collimator or absorber with patient-specific configuration using rapid prototyping systems, thus contributing to improve the accuracy of dose delivery in electron radiotherapy within a short manufacturing time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Miloichikova
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia; Cancer Research Institute of Tomsk NRMC RAS, Kooperativny Street 5, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
| | - Angelina Bulavskaya
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Yury Cherepennikov
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
| | - Boris Gavrikov
- Moscow City Oncology Hospital №62, Istra 27, 143423 Moscow, Russia
| | - Elisabetta Gargioni
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Dmitrij Belousov
- Institute of Automation and Electrometry SB RAS, Academician Koptyug Avenue 1, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - Sergei Stuchebrov
- National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Lenina Avenue 30, 634050 Tomsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Renaud MA, Serban M, Seuntjens J. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy optimization. Med Phys 2019; 46:1384-1396. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marc-André Renaud
- Department of Physics & Medical Physics Unit; McGill University; Montreal Canada
| | - Monica Serban
- Medical Physics Unit; McGill University Health Centre; Montreal Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit; McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre; Montreal Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mueller S, Fix MK, Henzen D, Frei D, Frauchiger D, Loessl K, Stampanoni MFM, Manser P. Electron beam collimation with a photon MLC for standard electron treatments. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:025017. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9fb6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Brualla L, Rodriguez M, Lallena AM. Monte Carlo systems used for treatment planning and dose verification. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 193:243-259. [PMID: 27888282 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-1075-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
General-purpose radiation transport Monte Carlo codes have been used for estimation of the absorbed dose distribution in external photon and electron beam radiotherapy patients since several decades. Results obtained with these codes are usually more accurate than those provided by treatment planning systems based on non-stochastic methods. Traditionally, absorbed dose computations based on general-purpose Monte Carlo codes have been used only for research, owing to the difficulties associated with setting up a simulation and the long computation time required. To take advantage of radiation transport Monte Carlo codes applied to routine clinical practice, researchers and private companies have developed treatment planning and dose verification systems that are partly or fully based on fast Monte Carlo algorithms. This review presents a comprehensive list of the currently existing Monte Carlo systems that can be used to calculate or verify an external photon and electron beam radiotherapy treatment plan. Particular attention is given to those systems that are distributed, either freely or commercially, and that do not require programming tasks from the end user. These systems are compared in terms of features and the simulation time required to compute a set of benchmark calculations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Brualla
- NCTeam, Strahlenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, D-45122, Essen, Germany.
| | | | - Antonio M Lallena
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Granada, E-18071, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|