Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging after90 Y liver radioembolization is used for both lesion identification and dosimetry. Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL) reconstruction algorithms are an alternative to ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) with improved image quality and lesion detectability. The investigation of optimal parameters for90 Y image reconstruction of Q.Clear, a commercial BPL algorithm developed by General Electric (GE), in PET/MR is a field of interest and the subject of this study. The NEMA phantom was filled at an 8:1 sphere-to-background ratio. Acquisitions were performed on a PET/MR scanner for clinically relevant activities between 0.7 and 3.3 MBq/ml. Reconstructions with Q.Clear were performed varying the β penalty parameter between 20 and 6000, the acquisition time between 5 and 20 min and pixel size between 1.56 and 4.69 mm. OSEM reconstructions of 28 subsets with 2 and 4 iterations with and without Time-of-Flight (TOF) were compared to Q.Clear with β = 4000. Recovery coefficients (RC), their coefficient of variation (COV), background variability (BV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and residual activity in the cold insert were evaluated. Increasing β parameter lowered RC, COV and BV, while CNR was maximized at β = 4000; further increase resulted in oversmoothing. For quantification purposes, β = 1000-2000 could be more appropriate. Longer acquisition times resulted in larger CNR due to reduced image noise. Q.Clear reconstructions led to higher CNR than OSEM. A β of 4000 was obtained for optimal image quality, although lower values could be considered for quantification purposes. An optimal acquisition time of 15 min was proposed considering its clinical use.

Quantitative comparison of pre-therapy 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT and post-therapy PET/MR studies of patients who have received intra-arterial radioembolization therapy with 90Y microspheres

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare yttrium -90 (⁹⁰Y) dosimetry obtained from pre-therapy ^99mTc-macroaggregated albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT versus post-therapy PET/MRI imaging among patients with primary or metastatic hepatic tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prior to ⁹⁰Y radioembolization (RE), 32 patients underwent a scan using MAA mimicking ⁹⁰Y distribution. After RE with ⁹⁰Y microspheres, the patients were imaged on a PET/MRI system. Reconstructed images were transferred to a common platform and used to calculate ⁹⁰Y dosimetry. The Passing-Bablok regression scatter diagram and the Bland and Altman method were used to analyze the difference between dosimetry values.

RESULTS

For MAA and PET/MRI modalities, the mean liver doses for all 32 subjects were 43.0 ± 20.9 Gy and 46.5 ± 22.7 Gy, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.4 ± 6.2 Gy. The repeatibility coefficient was 12.1 (27.0% of the mean). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was high (ρ = 0.92). Although, there was a substantial difference in the maximum doses to the liver between the modalities, the mean liver doses were relatively close, with a difference of 24.0% or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The two main contributors to the difference between dosimetry calculations using MAA versus ⁹⁰Y PET/MRI can be attributed to the changes in catheter positioning as well as the liver ROIs used for the calculations. In spite of these differences, our results demonstrate that the dosimetry values obtained from pre-therapy MAA SPECT/CT scans and PET/MRI post-therapy ⁹⁰Y studies were not significantly different.

The physics of radioembolization

Radioembolization is an established treatment for chemoresistant and unresectable liver cancers. Currently, treatment planning is often based on semi-empirical methods, which yield acceptable toxicity profiles and have enabled the large-scale application in a palliative setting. However, recently, five large randomized controlled trials using resin microspheres failed to demonstrate a significant improvement in either progression-free survival or overall survival in both hepatocellular carcinoma and metastatic colorectal cancer. One reason for this might be that the activity prescription methods used in these studies are suboptimal for many patients.In this review, the current dosimetric methods and their caveats are evaluated. Furthermore, the current state-of-the-art of image-guided dosimetry and advanced radiobiological modeling is reviewed from a physics' perspective. The current literature is explored for the observation of robust dose-response relationships followed by an overview of recent advancements in quantitative image reconstruction in relation to image-guided dosimetry.This review is concluded with a discussion on areas where further research is necessary in order to arrive at a personalized treatment method that provides optimal tumor control and is clinically feasible.

Comparison of PET/CT and PET/MR imaging and dosimetry of yttrium-90 (90Y) in patients with unresectable hepatic tumors who have received intra-arterial radioembolization therapy with 90Y microspheres

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to compare 90Y dosimetry obtained from PET/MRI versus PET/CT post-therapy imaging among patients with primary or metastatic hepatic tumors. First, a water-filled Jaszczak phantom containing fillable sphere with 90Y-chloride was acquired on both the PET/CT and PET/MRI systems, in order to check the cross-calibration of the modalities. Following selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with 90Y microspheres, 32 patients were imaged on a PET/CT system, immediately followed by a PET/MRI study. Reconstructed images were transferred to a common platform and used to calculate 90Y dosimetry. A Passing-Bablok regression scatter diagram and the Bland and Altman method were used to analyze the difference between the dosimetry values.

RESULTS

The phantom study showed that both modalities were calibrated with less than 1% error. The mean liver doses for the 32 subjects calculated from PET/CT and PET/MRI were 51.6 ± 24.7 Gy and 46.5 ± 22.7 Gy, respectively, with a mean difference of 5.1 ± 5.0 Gy. The repeatability coefficient was 9.0 (18.5% of the mean). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was very high, ρ = 0.97. Although the maximum dose to the liver can be significantly different (up to 40%), mean liver doses from each modalities were relatively close, with a difference of 18.5% or less.

CONCLUSIONS

The two main contributors to the difference in 90Y dosimetry calculations using PET/CT versus PET/MRI can be attributed to the differences in regions of interest (ROIs) and differences attributed to attenuation correction. Due to the superior soft-tissue contrast of MRI, liver contours are usually better seen than in CT images. However, PET/CT provides better quantification of PET images, due to better attenuation correction. In spite of these differences, our results demonstrate that the dosimetry values obtained from PET/MRI and PET/CT in post-therapy 90Y studies were similar.