A scanning-slit x-ray videoabsorptiometric technique for bone mineral measurement

Bone Mass Determination from Microradiographs by Computer-Assisted Videodensitometry

The mass of hard-tissue specimens is assessed by optimised microradiography followed by computer-assisted videodensitometry. Radiographs are produced with 27 kV roentgen radiation, filtered through 0.5 to 1 mm of aluminium, on high-resolution glass plates. Aluminium step wedges are used for density calibration, the result being expressed as ‘aluminium equivalent mass’. The plates are subjected to digital image analysis by an operator in interaction with a computer-based image processor, a television camera being used for image input. The program stored in the computer provides calibration of geometry and—via the stepwedge images—of densitometry, background adjustment, etc. Measurement takes place by integration over the specimen-image area. No assumptions being needed concerning a specific attenuation model, the errors stemming from the common presumption of exponential attenuation are eliminated. Density profiles or maps of mass distribution are readily obtained from the computer. From measurements of aluminium phantom samples, the total random error (coefficient of variation) was determined at 1.8 per cent, the microradiographic and videodensitometric procedures contributing 1.6 per cent and 0.9 per cent, respectively, whereas the systematic error was negligible. Since specimens need not be sectioned, this method does not interfere with subsequent histologic preparation.

Bone densitometry of excised vertebrae; anatomical relationships

Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined in 32 excised vertebrae using three methods: (1) dual-energy quantitative computed tomography (QCT), (2) dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) with 153-Gd in an anteriorposterior projection and (3) scanning slit X-ray absorptiometry (SSXA) in both AP and lateral projections. The QCT region-of-interest in the anterior vertebral body had a lower density than that of the total trabecular portion of the body, but was highly correlated to this larger region (r = 0.96; SEE = 8 mg/cm3). The anterior QCT region also correlated moderately with BMD from DPA (r = 0.77; SEE = 18 mg/cm3). Measurements of the vertebral body in lateral projection were less well correlated (r = 0.5-0.7) to QCT densities. Both the anterior QCT region (r = 0.81; SEE = 18 mg/cm3) and the BMD from DPA (r = 0.86; SEE = 16 mg/cm3) and the BMD from DPA (r = 0.86; SEE = 16 mg/cm3) were similarly predictive of density of the integral vertebral body. Differences among densitometric methods on the spine depend on the projection used and the region examined.