Multileaf collimator interleaf transmission

Commissioning of the Mobius3D independent dose verification system for TomoTherapy

In radiation therapy, a secondary independent dose verification is an important component of a quality control system. Mobius3D calculates three‐dimensional (3D) patient dose using reference beam data and a collapsed cone convolution algorithm and analyzes dose‐volume histogram automatically. There are currently no published data on commissioning and determining tolerance levels of Mobius3D for TomoTherapy. To verify the calculation accuracy and adjust the parameters of this system, we compared the measured dose using an ion chamber and film in a phantom with the dose calculated using Mobius3D for nine helical intensity‐modulated radiation therapy plans, each with three nominal field widths. We also compared 126 treatment plans used in our institution to treat prostate, head‐and‐neck, and esophagus tumors based on dose calculations by treatment planning system for given dose indices and 3D gamma passing rates with those produced by Mobius3D. On the basis of these results, we showed that the action and tolerance levels at the average dose for the planning target volume (PTV) at each treatment site are at μ ± 2σ and μ ± 3σ, respectively. After adjusting parameters, the dose difference ratio on average was −0.2 ± 0.6% using ion chamber and gamma passing rate with the criteria of 3% and 3 mm on average was 98.8 ± 1.4% using film. We also established action and tolerance levels for the PTV at the prostate, head‐and‐neck, esophagus, and for the organ at risk at all treatment sites. Mobius3D calculations thus provide an accurate secondary dose verification system that can be commissioned easily and immediately after installation. Before clinical use, the Mobius3D system needs to be commissioned using the treatment plans for patients treated in each institution to determine the calculational accuracy and establish tolerances for each treatment site and dose index.

Dosimetric Effect of Jaw Tracking in Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of jaw tracking with the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to reduce the normal tissue dose. Plans of nasopharynx, lung, and prostate cancers (10 plans for each) were used to perform VMAT with and without jaw tracking. The dose reduction was evaluated in terms of organ doses and integral doses. Organ-dose reduction with jaw tracking was statistically significant in the volume receiving a dose of 5 Gy (V₅) of bladder, rectum, and lung, the volume receiving a dose of 10 Gy (V₁₀) of bladder, rectum, and lung, and the mean dose of lung (P < 0.05). Integral-dose reduction with jaw tracking was statistically significant in almost all the treatment plans (P < 0.05). For organ-dose reduction, jaw tracking in VMAT plan was effective in reducing V₅ and V₁₀. For integral-dose reduction, jaw tracking in VMAT plan is an efficient method for decreasing V₅.

Dosimetric characteristics of LinaTech DMLC H multi leaf collimator: Monte Carlo simulation and experimental study

This study evaluated the basic dosimetric characteristics of a Dynamic Multi Leaf Collimator (DMLC) using a diode detector and film measurements for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance (IMRT QA). The EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) simulation system was used for the determination of MLC characteristics. Radiation transmission and abutting leaf leakage relevant to the LinaTech DMLC H were measured using an EDGE detector and EBT3 film. In this study, the BEAMnrc simulation code was used for modeling. The head of Siemens PRIMUS linac (6 MV) with external DMLC H was entered into a BEAMnrc Monte Carlo model using practical dosimetry data. Leaf material density, as well as interleaf and abutting air gaps were determined according to the computed and measured dose profiles. The IMRT QA field was used to evaluate the dose distribution of the simulated DMLC H. According to measurements taken with the EDGE detector and film, the total average measured leakage was 1.60 ± 0.03% and 1.57 ± 0.05%, respectively. For these measurements, abutting leaf transmission was 54.35 ± 1.85% and 53.08 ± 2.05%, respectively. To adapt the simulated leaf dose profiles with measurements, leaf material density, interleaf and abutting air gaps were adjusted to 18 g/cm³, 0.008 cm and 0.108 cm, respectively. Thus, the total average leakage was estimated to be about 1.59 ± 0.02%. The step‐and‐shoot IMRT was implemented and 94% agreement was achieved between the film and MC, using 3%‐3 mm gamma criteria. The results of this study showed that the dosimetric characteristics of DMLC H satisfied international standards.

Radiation dose distribution under the area protected using a Cerrobend block during external beam radiotherapy: a film study

Background

In radiation therapy, to spare normal surrounding tissues, either Multileaf Collimators or Cerrobend blocks are used.

Purpose

The current study focuses on the relative dose distribution under the areas protected by Cerrobend blocks.

Materials and methods

A dual-energy linear accelerator and a Cobalt-60 machine were utilised as radiation sources. Several blocks were designed using commercially available materials to shield radiation fields. The relative dose distribution was then evaluated using extended dose range 2 films.

Results

Results showed that the dose distribution under protected areas depends on several parameters including the width and height of protecting blocks, incident photon beam energy, radiation field size and source to surface distance. An increase in Cerrobend block height from 80 to 95 mm significantly decreases the dose at the protected areas.

Conclusion

An increase in the block width and photon energy decreases the relative dose deposition at the protected area. However, electron and neutron contaminations should also be taken into consideration.

Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160-leaf multileaf collimator

The Agility multileaf collimator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) has 160 leaves of projected width 0.5 cm at the isocenter, with maximum leaf speed 3.5cms−1. These characteristics promise to facilitate fast and accurate delivery of radiotherapy, particularly volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The aim of this study is therefore to create a beam model for the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Fitchburg, WI), and to use this beam model to explore the performance of the Agility MLC in delivery of VMAT. A 6 MV beam model was created and verified by measuring doses under irregularly shaped fields. VMAT treatment plans for five typical head‐and‐neck patients were created using the beam model and delivered using both binned and continuously variable dose rate (CVDR). Results were compared with those for an MLCi unit without CVDR. The beam model has similar parameters to those of an MLCi model, with interleaf leakage of only 0.2%. The verification of irregular fields shows a mean agreement between measured and planned dose of 1.3% (planned dose higher). The Agility VMAT head‐and‐neck plans show equivalent plan quality and delivery accuracy to those for an MLCi unit, with 95% of verification measurements within 3% and 3 mm of planned dose. Mean delivery time is 133 s with the Agility head and CVDR, 171 s without CVDR, and 282 s with an MLCi unit. Pinnacle3 has therefore been shown to model the Agility MLC accurately, and to provide accurate VMAT treatment plans which can be delivered significantly faster with Agility than with an MLCi.

PACS number: 87.55kd, 87.55km, 87.56bd, 87.56jk

Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc

PURPOSE

The commercial release of volumetric modulated arc therapy techniques using a conventional linear accelerator and the growing number of helical tomotherapy users have triggered renewed interest in dose verification methods, and also in tools for exploring the impact of machine tolerance and patient motion on dose distributions without the need to approximate time-varying parameters such as gantry position, MLC leaf motion, or patient motion. To this end we have developed a Monte Carlo-based calculation method capable of simulating a wide variety of treatment techniques without the need to resort to discretization approximations.

METHODS

The ability to perform complete position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo dose calculations was implemented in the BEAMnrc/DOSXZYnrc user codes of EGSnrc. The method includes full accelerator head simulations of our tomotherapy and Elekta linacs, and a realistic representation of continous motion via the sampling of a time variable. The functionality of this algorithm was tested via comparisons with both measurements and treatment planning dose distributions for four types of treatment techniques: 3D conformal, step-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy, helical tomotherapy, and volumetric modulated are therapy.

RESULTS

For static fields, the absolute dose agreement between the EGSnrc Monte Carlo calculations and measurements is within 2%/1 mm. Absolute dose agreement between Monte Carlo calculations and treatment planning system for the four different treatment techniques is within 3%/3 mm. Discrepancies with the tomotherapy TPS on the order of 10%/5 mm were observed for the extreme example of a small target located 15 cm off-axis and planned with a low modulation factor. The increase in simulation time associated with using position-probability sampling, as opposed to the discretization approach, was less than 2% in most cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A single Monte Carlo simulation method can be used to calculate patient dose distribution for various types of treatment techniques delivered with either tomotherapy or a conventional linac. The method simplifies the simulation process, improves dose calculation accuracy, and involves an acceptably small change in computation time.

Leakage of the Siemens 160 MLC multileaf collimator on a dual energy linear accelerator

Multileaf collimators (MLCs) have been in clinical use for many years and meanwhile are commonly used to deliver intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) beams. For this purpose it is important to know their dosimetric properties precisely, one of them being inter- and intraleaf leakage. The Siemens 160 MLC features a single focus design with flat-sided and tilted leaves instead of tongue-and-groove. The leakage performance of the 160 MLC was investigated on a dual energy linear accelerator Siemens ARTISTE with 6 MV and 18 MV photon energies. While the intraleaf leakage amounted to nearly the same dose for 6 and for 18 MV, a much higher interleaf leakage for 6 MV was measured. It could be reduced by simply rotating the collimator, and also by changing the voltage applied to the beam steering coils. The leakage of the 160 MLC is shown to be sensitive to beam alignment. This is of special interest for dual energy accelerators, as the two focal spots of both energies, neither in position nor in shape, do not necessarily always coincide. As a consequence of that, a higher leakage can be expected for one out of two energies for the 160 MLC.

Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery

Helical tomotherapy delivers intensity modulated radiation therapy using a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) to modulate a fan beam of radiation. This delivery occurs while the linac gantry and treatment couch are both in constant motion, so the beam describes, from a patient/phantom perspective, a spiral or helix of dose. The planning system models this continuous delivery as a large number (51) of discrete gantry positions per rotation, and given the small jaw/fan width setting typically used (1 or 2.5 cm) and the number of overlapping rotations used to cover the target (pitch often <0.5), the treatment planning system (TPS) potentially employs a very large number of static beam directions and leaf opening configurations to model the modulated fields. All dose calculations performed by the system employ a convolution/superposition model. In this work the authors perform a full Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation of tomotherapy deliveries to phantom computed tomography (CT) data sets to verify the TPS calculations. All MC calculations are performed with the EGSnrc-based MC simulation codes, BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. Simulations are performed by taking the sinogram (leaf opening versus time) of the treatment plan and decomposing it into 51 different projections per rotation, as does the TPS, each of which is segmented further into multiple MLC opening configurations, each with different weights that correspond to leaf opening times. Then the projection is simulated by the summing of all of the opening configurations, and the overall rotational treatment is simulated by the summing of all of the projection simulations. Commissioning of the source model was verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the percent depth dose and beam profiles shapes for various jaw settings. The accuracy of the MLC leaf width and tongue and groove spacing were verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the MLC leakage and a picket fence pattern. The validated source and MLC configuration were then used to simulate a complex modulated delivery from fixed gantry angle. Further, a preliminary rotational treatment plan to a delivery quality assurance phantom (the "cheese" phantom) CT data set was simulated. Simulations were compared with measured results taken with an A1SL ionization chamber or EDR2 film measurements in a water tank or in a solid water phantom, respectively. The source and MLC MC simulations agree with the film measurements, with an acceptable number of pixels passing the 2%/1 mm gamma criterion. 99.8% of voxels of the MC calculation in the planning target volume (PTV) of the preliminary plan passed the 2%/2 mm gamma value test. 87.0% and 66.2% of the voxels in two organs at risk (OARs) passed the 2%/2 mm tests. For a 3%/3 mm criterion, the PTV and OARs show 100%, 93.2%, and 86.6% agreement, respectively. All voxels passed the gamma value test with a criterion of 5%/3 mm. The Tomo-Therapy TPS showed comparable results.

6 MV dosimetric characterization of the 160 MLC, the new Siemens multileaf collimator

New technical developments constantly aim at improving the outcome of radiation therapy. With the use of a computer-controlled multileaf collimator (MLC), the quality of the treatment and the efficiency in patient throughput is significantly increased. New MLC designs aim to further enhance the advantages. In this article, we present the first detailed experimental investigation of the new 160 MLC, Siemens Medical Solutions. The assessment included the experimental investigation of typical MLC characteristics such as leakage, tongue-and-groove effect, penumbra, leaf speed, and leaf positioning accuracy with a 6 MV treatment beam. The leakage is remarkably low with an average of 0.37% due to a new design principle of slightly tilted leaves instead of the common tongue-and-groove design. But due to the tilt, the triangular tongue-and-groove effect occurs. Its magnitude of approximately 19% is similar to the dose defect measured for MLCs with the common tongue-and-groove design. The average longitudinal penumbra measured at depth d(max) = 15 mm with standard 100 x 100 mm2 fields is 4.1 +/- 0.5 mm for the central range and increases to 4.9 +/- 1.3 mm for the entire field range of 400 x 400 mm2. The increase is partly due to the single-focusing design and the large distance between the MLC and the isocenter enabling a large patient clearance. Regarding the leaf speed, different velocity tests were performed. The positions of the moving leaves were continuously recorded with the kilovoltage-imaging panel. The maximum leaf velocities measured were 42.9 +/- 0.6 mm/s. In addition, several typical intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments were performed and the delivery times compared to the Siemens OPTIFOCUS MLC. An average decrease of 11% in delivery time was observed. The experimental results presented in this article indicate that the dosimetric characteristics of the 160 MLC are capable of improving the quality of dose delivery with respect to precision and dose conformity.

The impact of linac output variations on dose distributions in helical tomotherapy

It has been suggested for quality assurance purposes that linac output variations for helical tomotherapy (HT) be within +/-2% of the long-term average. Due to cancellation of systematic uncertainty and averaging of random uncertainty over multiple beam directions, relative uncertainties in the dose distribution can be significantly lower than those in linac output. The sensitivity of four HT cases with respect to linac output uncertainties was assessed by scaling both modeled and measured systematic and random linac output uncertainties until a dose uncertainty acceptance criterion failed. The dose uncertainty acceptance criterion required the delivered dose to have at least a 95% chance of being within 2% of the planned dose in all of the voxels in the treatment volume. For a random linac output uncertainty of 5% of the long-term mean, the maximum acceptable amplitude of the modeled, sinusoidal, systematic component of the linac output uncertainty for the four cases was 1.8%. Although the measured linac output variations represented values that were outside of the +/-2% tolerance, the acceptance criterion did not fail for any of the four cases until the measured linac output variations were scaled by a factor of almost three. Thus, the +/-2% tolerance in linac output variations for HT is a more conservative tolerance than necessary.

Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems

Fixed-field treatments, delivered using conventional clinical linear accelerators fitted with multileaf collimators, have rapidly become the standard form of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several innovative nonstandard alternatives also exist, for which delivery and treatment planning systems are now commercially available. Three of these nonstandard IMRT approaches are reviewed here: tomotherapy, robotic linear accelerators (CyberKnife, Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), and standard linear accelerators modulated by jaws alone or by their jaws acting together with a tertiary beam-masking device. Rationales for the nonstandard IMRT approaches are discussed, and elements of their delivery system designs are briefly described. Differences between fixed-field IMRT dose distributions and the distributions that can be delivered by using the nonstandard technologies are outlined. Because conventional linear accelerators are finely honed machines, innovative design enhancement of one aspect of system performance often limits another facet of machine capability. Consequently the various delivery systems may prove optimal for different types of treatment, with specific machine designs excelling for disease sites with specific target volume and normal structure topologies. However it is likely that the delivery systems will be distinguished not just by the optimality of the dose distributions they deliver, but also by factors such as the efficiency of their treatment process, the integration of their onboard imaging systems into that process, and their ability to measure and minimize or compensate for target movement, including the effects of respiratory motion.

Influence of the linac design on intensity-modulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck plans

In this study, we quantify the impact of linac/MLC design parameters on IMRT treatment plans. The investigated parameters were leaf width in the MLC, leaf transmission, related to the thickness of the leaves, and penumbra related primarily to the source size. Seven head-and-neck patients with stage T1-T3N0-N2cM0 oropharyngeal cancer were studied. For each patient nine plans were made with a different set of linac/MLC parameters. The plans were optimized in Pinnacle(3) v7.6c and PLATO RTS v2.6.4, ITP v1.1.8. A hypothetical ideal linac/MLC was introduced to investigate the influence of one parameter at a time without interaction of other parameters. When any of the three parameters was increased from the ideal set-up values (leaf width 2.5 mm, transmission 0%, penumbra 3 mm), the mean dose to the parotid glands increased, given the same tumour coverage. The largest increase was found for increasing leaf transmission. The investigation showed that by changing more than one parameter of the ideal linac/MLC set-up, the increase in the mean dose was smaller than the sum of dose increments for each parameter separately. As a reference to clinical practice, we also optimized the plans of the seven patients with the clinically used Elekta SLi 15, equipped with a standard MLC with a leaf width of 10 mm. As compared to the ideal linac, this resulted in an increase of the average dose to the parotid glands of 5.8 Gy.

Evaluation of dosimetric effect of leaf position in a radiation field of an 80 leaf multileaf collimator fitted to the LINAC head as tertiary collimator

This study evaluates changes in the dosimetric characteristics of a Varian Millennium 80‐leaf multileaf collimator (MLC) in a radiation field. In this study, dose rate, scatter factor, percentage depth dose, surface dose and dose in the buildup region, beam profile, flatness and symmetry, and penumbra width measurements were made for 6‐MV and 15‐MV photon beams. Analysis of widths between 50% dose levels of the beam profiles to reflect the field size at the level of profile measurement shows a significant difference between the fields defined by MLC and/or jaws and MLC (zero gap) and the fields defined by jaws only. The position of the MLC leaves in the radiation field also significantly affects scatter factors. A new relationship has, therefore, been established between the scatter factors and the position of the MLC, which will indeed be useful in the dose calculation for irregular fields. Penumbra widths increase with field size and were higher for fields defined by jaws and/or MLC than jaws and MLC (zero gap) by 1.5 mm to 4.2 mm and 3.8 mm to 5.0 mm, for 6‐MV, and 1.5 mm to 2.4 mm and 3.0 mm to 5.6 mm, for 15‐MV, at 20% to 80% and 10% to 90% levels, respectively. The surface dose and the dose in the buildup region were smaller for fields defined by jaws and MLC (zero gap) than the fields defined by jaws and/or MLC for both photon energies. No significant differences were found in percentage depth dose beyond dmax, beam profiles above 80% dose level, and flatness and symmetry for both energies. The results of this study suggest that while one collects linear accelerator beam data with a MLC, the effects of the positions of the MLC leaves play an important role in dosimetric characteristics of 3D conformal radiation therapy as well as intensity‐modulated radiotherapy.

PACS number: 87.53.Dq

History of tomotherapy

Tomotherapy is the delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy using rotational delivery of a fan beam in the manner of a CT scanner. In helical tomotherapy the couch and gantry are in continuous motion akin to a helical CT scanner. Helical tomotherapy is inherently capable of acquiring CT images of the patient in treatment position and using this information for image guidance. This review documents technological advancements of the field concentrating on the conceptual beginnings through to its first clinical implementation. The history of helical tomotherapy is also a story of technology migration from academic research to a university-industrial partnership, and finally to commercialization and widespread clinical use.

Assessment of a new multileaf collimator concept usingGEANT4Monte Carlo simulations

The aim of the work was to investigate in advance the dosimetric properties of a new multileaf collimator (MLC) concept with the help of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations prior to the production of a prototype. The geometrical design of the MLC was implemented in the MC code GEANT4. For the simulation of a 6 MV treatment beam, an experimentally validated phase space and a virtual spatial Gaussian-shaped model placed in the origin were used. For the simulation of the geometry in GEANT4, the jaws and the two leaf packages were implemented with the help of computer-aided design data. First, transmission values for different tungsten alloys were extracted using the simulation codes GEANT4 and BEAMnrc and compared to experimental measurements. In a second step, high-resolution simulations were performed to detect the leakage at depth of maximum dose. The 20%-80% penumbra along the travel direction of the leaves was determined using 10 x 10 cm2 fields shifted along the x- and y-axis. The simulated results were compared with measured data. The simulation of the transmission values for different tungsten alloys showed a good agreement with the experimental measurements (within 2.0%). This enabled an accurate estimation of the attenuation coefficient for the various leaf materials. Simulations with varying width of the spatial Gaussian distribution showed that the leakage and the penumbra depend very much on this parameter: for instance, for widths of 2 and 4 mm, the interleaf leakage is below 0.3% and 0.75%, respectively. The results for the leakage and the penumbra (4.7+/-0.5 mm) are in good agreement with the measurements. This study showed that GEANT4 is appropriate for the investigation of the dosimetric properties of a multileaf collimator. In particular, a quantification of the leakage, the penumbra, and the tongue-and-groove effect and an evaluation of the influence of the beam parameters such as the width of the Gaussian distribution was possible.

Integral radiation dose to normal structures with conformal external beam radiation

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to evaluate the integral dose (ID) received by normal tissue from intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five radiation treatment plans including IMRT using a conventional linac with both 6 MV (6MV-IMRT) and 20 MV (20MV-IMRT), as well as three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) using 6 MV (6MV-3DCRT) and 20 MV (20MV-3DCRT) and IMRT using tomotherapy (6MV) (Tomo-IMRT), were created for 5 patients with localized prostate cancer. The ID (mean dose x tissue volume) received by normal tissue (NTID) was calculated from dose-volume histograms.

RESULTS

The 6MV-IMRT resulted in 5.0% lower NTID than 6MV-3DCRT; 20 MV beam plans resulted in 7.7%-11.2% lower NTID than 6MV-3DCRT. Tomo-IMRT NTID was comparable to 6MV-IMRT. Compared with 6MV-3DCRT, 6MV-IMRT reduced IDs to the rectal wall and penile bulb by 6.1% and 2.7%, respectively. Tomo-IMRT further reduced these IDs by 11.9% and 16.5%, respectively. The 20 MV did not reduce IDs to those structures.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in NTID between 3DCRT and IMRT is small. The 20 MV plans somewhat reduced NTID compared with 6 MV plans. The advantage of tomotherapy over conventional IMRT and 3DCRT for localized prostate cancer was demonstrated in regard to dose sparing of rectal wall and penile bulb while slightly decreasing NTID as compared with 6MV-3DCRT.

Verification of a rounded leaf-end MLC model used in a radiotherapy treatment planning system

A new multileaf collimator (MLC) model has been incorporated into version 7.4 of the Pinnacle radiotherapy treatment planning system (Philips Radiation Oncology Systems, Milpitas, CA). The MLC model allows for rounded MLC leaf-ends and provides separate parameters for inter-leaf transmission, intra-leaf transmission and the tongue width of the MLC leaf. In this report we detail the method followed to commission the MLC model for a Varian 120-leaf Millennium MLC (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) for both 6 and 10 MV photons, and test the validity of the model for an IMRT field. Dose profiles in water were measured for a range of square MLC field sizes and compared to the Pinnacle computed dose profiles; in addition, the dose distribution for a series of adjacent MLC fields was measured to observe the model's behaviour along match-lines. Based on these results intra-leaf transmissions of 1.5% for 6 MV and 1.8% for 10 MV, leaf-tip radius of 12.0 cm, an inter-leaf transmission of 0.5%, and a tongue width of 0.1 cm were chosen. Using these values to compute the planar dose distribution for a 6 MV IMRT field, the new version of Pinnacle displayed improved dosimetric agreement with the dose-to-water EPID image and ion chamber measurements when compared to the old version of Pinnacle, particularly along the MLC tongue edge and across match-lines. Discrepancies of up to 5% were observed between calculated and measured doses along match-lines for both 6 MV and 10 MV photons; however, the new MLC model did predict the presence of match-lines and was a significant improvement on the previous model.

Evaluation of image-guided helical tomotherapy for the retreatment of spinal metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Patients with vertebral metastasis that receive radiation therapy are typically treated to the spinal cord tolerance dose. As such, it is difficult to successfully deliver a second course of radiation therapy for patients with overlapping treatment volumes. In this study, an image-guided helical tomotherapy system was evaluated for the retreatment of previously irradiated vertebral metastasis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Helical tomotherapy dose gradients and maximum cord doses were measured in a cylindrical phantom for geometric test cases with separations between the planning target volume (PTV) and the spinal cord organ at risk (OAR) of 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm. Megavoltage computed tomography (CT) images were examined for their ability to localize spinal anatomy for positioning purposes by repeat imaging of the cervical spine in an anthropomorphic phantom. In addition to the phantom studies, 8 patients with cord compressions that had received previous radiation therapy were retreated to a mean dose of 28 Gy using conventional fractionation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Megavoltage CT images were capable of positioning an anthropomorphic phantom to within +/-1.2 mm (2sigma) superior-inferiorly and within +/-0.6 mm (2sigma) anterior-posteriorly and laterally. Dose gradients of 10% per mm were measured in phantom while PTV uniformity indices of less than 11% were maintained. The calculated maximum cord dose was 25% of the prescribed dose for a 10-mm PTV-to-OAR separation and 71% of the prescribed dose for a PTV-to-OAR separation of 2 mm. Eight patients total have been treated without radiation-induced myelopathy or any other adverse effects from treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A technique has been evaluated for the retreatment of vertebral metastasis using image-guided helical tomotherapy. Phantom and patient studies indicated that a tomotherapy system is capable of delivering dose gradients of 10% per mm and positioning the patient within 1.2 mm without the use of special stereotactic immobilization.

Dosimetric effect of collimating jaws for small multileaf collimated fields

The dosimetric effects from the jaw positioned close to the small field (0.5 x 0.5, 1 x 1, and 2 x 2 cm2) side-edge generated by a single-focused multileaf collimator (MLC) were measured and studied. The measurement is important in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) because generally the jaw cannot perfectly cover all the leaf-ends in a segment of irregular field. This leads to additional dose contributed by (1) the end surface of the jaw, (2) the leaf-end, and (3) the inter- and intraleaf leakage/transmissions during the dosimetric measurement. Moreover, most of the conventional treatment planning systems ignore these effects in the dose calculation. In this study, measurements were made using a Varian 21 EX linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beam through a MLC containing 120 leaves. Percentage depth dose, beam profile, and output for small fields were measured by varying the jaw at different positions away from the leaf-ends in the field side-edge. Moving the jaw away from the leaf-ends increases the output and penumbra width for the small fields. Such increase is particularly significant when the field size is small (0.5 x 0.5 cm2) and the degree of increase changes quickly when the jaw-end is at about 1-2 cm from the leaf-end. It is suggested that measurements should be carried out in the IMRT commissioning to provide information to physicists in reviewing the treatment planning system's accuracy regarding leaf leakage/transmission and jaw effects.

Quality assurance of a helical tomotherapy machine

Helical tomotherapy has been developed at the University of Wisconsin, and 'Hi-Art II' clinical machines are now commercially manufactured. At the core of each machine lies a ring-gantry-mounted short linear accelerator which generates x-rays that are collimated into a fan beam of intensity-modulated radiation by a binary multileaf, the modulation being variable with gantry angle. Patients are treated lying on a couch which is translated continuously through the bore of the machine as the gantry rotates. Highly conformal dose-distributions can be delivered using this technique, which is the therapy equivalent of spiral computed tomography. The approach requires synchrony of gantry rotation, couch translation, accelerator pulsing and the opening and closing of the leaves of the binary multileaf collimator used to modulate the radiation beam. In the course of clinically implementing helical tomotherapy, we have developed a quality assurance (QA) system for our machine. The system is analogous to that recommended for conventional clinical linear accelerator QA by AAPM Task Group 40 but contains some novel components, reflecting differences between the Hi-Art devices and conventional clinical accelerators. Here the design and dosimetric characteristics of Hi-Art machines are summarized and the QA system is set out along with experimental details of its implementation. Connections between this machine-based QA work, pre-treatment patient-specific delivery QA and fraction-by-fraction dose verification are discussed.

Reshapable physical modulator for intensity modulated radiation therapy

A new method of generating beam intensity modulation filters for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is presented. The modulator was based on a reshapable material, which is not compressible but can be deformed under pressure. A two-dimensional (2D) piston array was used to repeatedly shape the attenuating material. The material is a mixture of tungsten powder and a silicon-based binder. The linear attenuation coefficient of the material was measured to be 0.409 cm(-1) for a 6 MV x-ray beam. The maximum thickness of the physical modulator is 10.2 cm, allowing a transmission of 1.5%. A 16 x 16 square piston array was used to generate a depth pattern in the deformable attenuating material. Each piston has a cross section of 6.37 x 6.37 mm2. The modulator was placed 65 cm from the radiation source of the linear accelerator in the position of the shielding tray. At this position, each piston projects to a 1.0 x 1.0 cm2 area at the isocenter, giving a treatment field of 16 x 16 cm2. The percent depth dose curve and output factor measurement show a slight beam hardening and a 1%-4% increase in scatter fraction when 2.2-4.4 cm uniform thickness filters are in the beam. The surface dose was decreased with the filter in the beam. Ion chamber and verification films were used to verify the entrance dose. The measured absolute and relative doses were compared with the calculated dose. The agreement of measurements and calculations is within 3%. In order to verify the spatial modulation of dose, 1-D dose profiles were obtained using dose calculations. Calculated and measured profiles were compared. The 20%-80% penumbra of the modulator was measured to be 5.5-10 mm. The results show that a physical modulator formed using a 16 x 16 piston array and a deformable attenuation material can provide intensity modulation for IMRT comparable with those provided by currently available commercial MLC techniques.

A method for photon beam Monte Carlo multileaf collimator particle transport

Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms are recognized as the most accurate methodology for patient dose assessment. For intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered with dynamic multileaf collimators (DMLCs), accurate dose calculation, even with MC, is challenging. Accurate IMRT MC dose calculations require inclusion of the moving MLC in the MC simulation. Due to its complex geometry, full transport through the MLC can be time consuming. The aim of this work was to develop an MLC model for photon beam MC IMRT dose computations. The basis of the MC MLC model is that the complex MLC geometry can be separated into simple geometric regions, each of which readily lends itself to simplified radiation transport. For photons, only attenuation and first Compton scatter interactions are considered. The amount of attenuation material an individual particle encounters while traversing the entire MLC is determined by adding the individual amounts from each of the simplified geometric regions. Compton scatter is sampled based upon the total thickness traversed. Pair production and electron interactions (scattering and bremsstrahlung) within the MLC are ignored. The MLC model was tested for 6 MV and 18 MV photon beams by comparing it with measurements and MC simulations that incorporate the full physics and geometry for fields blocked by the MLC and with measurements for fields with the maximum possible tongue-and-groove and tongue-or-groove effects, for static test cases and for sliding windows of various widths. The MLC model predicts the field size dependence of the MLC leakage radiation within 0.1% of the open-field dose. The entrance dose and beam hardening behind a closed MLC are predicted within +/- 1% or 1 mm. Dose undulations due to differences in inter- and intra-leaf leakage are also correctly predicted. The MC MLC model predicts leaf-edge tongue-and-groove dose effect within +/- 1% or 1 mm for 95% of the points compared at 6 MV and 88% of the points compared at 18 MV. The dose through a static leaf tip is also predicted generally within +/- 1% or 1 mm. Tests with sliding windows of various widths confirm the accuracy of the MLC model for dynamic delivery and indicate that accounting for a slight leaf position error (0.008 cm for our MLC) will improve the accuracy of the model. The MLC model developed is applicable to both dynamic MLC and segmental MLC IMRT beam delivery and will be useful for patient IMRT dose calculations, pre-treatment verification of IMRT delivery and IMRT portal dose transmission dosimetry.

Full forward Monte Carlo calculation of portal dose from MLC collimated treatment beams

This work deals with a full Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of a radiotherapy treatment facility including a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) and electronic portal imaging device (EPID). A method for a planar calibration of the EPID response in terms of dose using the MC technique is presented. Calibration measurements and simulations with several blocks of attenuating material are carried out down to approximatively 5% of the open field transmitted dose. A linear relationship is shown between the squared EPID signal and the MC calculated dose. The calibrated EPID was used as a dosimetric system to validate a MC model for the MLC. Computations and measurements agreed within 2% of dose difference (or 2 mm in regions of high dose gradient). The technique described herein is not significantly limited by physics transport model constraints. Therefore it can potentially provide a more accurate verification of dose delivery to inhomogeneous anatomical regions in patients undergoing complex multi-field conformal or intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Interleaf leakage for 5 and 10 mm dynamic multileaf collimation systems incorporating patient motion

Use of dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is accelerating. Delivery systems have the ailment of interleaf leakage (IL). This is compounded by the inefficiency of IMRT delivery, estimated to be a factor of 5 for DMLC. With IL on the order of 4%, it is possible to deliver as much as 20% of the prescribed dose to nonprescribed regions. However, IL is characterized by narrow Gaussian peaks of approximately 0.5-1.0 mm full-width-half-maximum (FWHM). We performed a leakage study for 5 and 10 mm leaf systems, accounting for intratreatment and intertreatment motions. In solid phantoms, film was placed perpendicular to beams. DMLC patterns delivered step-wedged distributions. The same field was duplicated using a collimating jaw in a segmented fashion to obtain baseline data of primary and scatter contributions. Longitudinal shifts up to 4 mm and angulations up to 4 degrees were introduced during beam delivery by running multiple patterns, to arrive at a composite delivery. The intent of these rigid body motion experiments was to replicate patient motion. Clinical IMRT fields using segmented MLC were also tested. Films were scanned and converted to dose. A microionization chamber confirmed film data at discrete points. In all cases shifts diminished IL peak values. In the step-wedge case, the net 18 MV IL peaks diminished from 3.6% to 3.2% for the 10 mm system. The 5 mm system IL values decreased from 4.0% to 3.2% with a 2 mm shift but increased to 4.0% with 4 mm shifts. The clinical field data followed the same pattern with a washing out of peak values, but the overall transmission to shielded regions slightly increased. Therefore nonprescribed regions are influenced by an effective transmission value rather than discrete peak IL values. The 5 mm leaf system does not introduce increased IL and is an appropriate system for IMRT.

[Comparative dosimetry study of two methods of intensity modulation performed on the same accelerator]

Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an advanced method of conformal radiotherapy. It permits optimal dose distribution to the target volume while preserving surrounding normal tissues. IMRT, with a multileaf collimator, can be realised in two different ways: either the segmented mode, which consists of combining small elementary static field, or the dynamic mode, which consists of moving the leaves while irradiating. The purpose of this work was to study these two methods of modulation on a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a collimator consisting of 40 pairs of one-centimetre-wide leaves. The measurements, obtained by using a diode array, showed that the quality of the irradiation in the dynamic mode does not depend on either the dose rate or the duration of the irradiation. In the segmented mode, weak magnitude segments are preferable, but increase the errors in the delivered dose. Comparisons of various profiles showed that the measured profiles are consistent with those programmed. Both modes seem to be equivalent for step-shaped profiles. In the case of profiles with constant slope, the segmentation generated by the segmented method deteriorates the profile. Even though the choice of technique is strongly dependent on the material available, the dynamic mode presents greater flexibility of use and has been chosen in our institution for IMRT.

A design for a dual assembly multileaf collimator

A multileaf collimator for radiation therapy has been designed that splits each leaf bank into two vertically displaced levels with each level consisting of alternate leaves and leaf spaces. The leaves in the upper level shield the spaces in the lower level. Each level can move laterally, in the direction perpendicular to leaf motion by one leaf width. Following lateral movement of one level, the leaves align with the other level and radiation is transmitted through the collimator as multiple slit fields in a grid pattern. This transmission can be used to form an image of the external anatomy and would enable double-exposure portal images to be acquired much more rapidly than at present. These could potentially be acquired during the treatment delivery. The radiation profiles transmitted for image formation through the collimator design were investigated. Individual and grid pattern slit field profiles formed by tungsten and lead alloy collimators were measured with varying slit width, source-collimator distance, collimator-detector distance, and collimation thickness. The slit width was found to have the major influence on the transmitted profiles. As the slit width decreases the profiles become broader than the geometric slit projection resulting in increasing overlap of adjacent profiles. The overlap results in a modulated image of the external anatomy for small slit widths, rather than a sampled or "grid" image for larger widths. The shielding of this design was found to be adequate provided the leaf faces of the adjacent vertically displaced leaves are at least aligned, therefore an overlap or tongue and groove is not required.

Monte Carlo modelling of electron beams from medical accelerators

Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport is considered to be one of the most accurate methods of radiation therapy dose calculation. With the rapid development of computer technology, Monte Carlo based treatment planning for radiation therapy is becoming practical. A basic requirement for Monte Carlo treatment planning is a detailed knowledge of the radiation beams from medical accelerators. A practical approach to obtain the above is to perform Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport in the medical accelerator. Additionally, Monte Carlo modelling of the treatment machine head can also improve our understanding of clinical beam characteristics, help accelerator design and improve the accuracy of clinical dosimetry by providing more realistic beam data. This paper summarizes work over the past two decades on Monte Carlo simulation of clinical electron beams from medical accelerators.

Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy

Conformal and conformal avoidance radiation therapy are new therapeutic techniques that are generally characterized by high dose gradients. The success of this kind of treatment relies on quality assurance procedures in order to verify the delivery of the treatment. A delivery verification technique should consider quality assurance procedures for patient positioning and radiation delivery verification. A methodology for radiation delivery verification was developed and tested with our tomotherapy workbench. The procedure was investigated for two cases. The first treatment using a torus-shaped target was optimized for 72 beam directions and sequentially delivered as a single slice to a 33 cm diameter cylinder of homogeneous solid water. For the second treatment, a random pattern of energy fluence was helically delivered for two slices to a 9.0 cm diameter phantom containing inhomogeneities. The presented process provides the energy fluence (or a related quantity) delivered through the multileaf collimator (MLC) using the signal measured at the exit detector during the treatment delivery. As this information is created for every pulse of the accelerator, the energy fluence and state for each MLC leaf were verified on a pulse-by-pulse basis. The pulse-by-pulse results were averaged to obtain projection-by-projection information to allow for a comparison with the planned delivery. The errors between the planned and delivered energy fluences were concentrated between +/-2.0%, with none beyond +/-3.5%. In addition to accurately achieving radiation delivery verification, the process is fast, which could translate to radiation delivery verification in real time. This technique can also be extended to reconstruct the dose actually deposited in the patient or phantom (dose reconstruction).