Dosimetric validation for an automatic brain metastases planning software using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcsDosimetric validation for an automatic brain metastases planning software using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcs

The Impact of Multileaf Collimator Size on Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arcs-Based Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases

PURPOSE

To compare the plan quality of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) between 2.5-mm and 5-mm multileaf collimator (MLC) and investigate the factors' influence on the differences by MLC size.

METHODS

Seventy-six treatment plans including 145 targets calculated with a single isocenter multiple noncoplanar dynamic conformal arc (DCA) technique using automatic multiple brain metastases (MBM) treatment planning system. Conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), lesion underdosage volume factor (LUF), healthy tissue overdose volume factor (HTOF), geometric conformity index (g), and mean dose to normal organs were compared between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC. Then the factors that influenced the differences of these parameters were investigated. The impact of target size was also investigated for CI and GI values of individual targets (n=145), and differences between 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC were analyzed.

RESULTS

All parameters except for LUF were significantly better in plans with 2.5 mm MLC. Target size was a significant factor for difference in HTOF, and distance between targets was a significant factor for difference in brain dose and GI. Among 145 metastases, the average inverse CI was 1.35 and 1.47 with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC, respectively (p<0.001). The average GI was 3.21 and 3.53, respectively (p<0.001). For individual targets, target size was a significant factor in CI and GI both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC (p-value: <0.001, each). CI and GI were significantly better with 2.5-mm than 5-mm MLC. CI was almost >0.67 except for ≤5mm targets with 5-mm MLC. Also, GI was almost smaller than 3.0 for >10 mm targets both with 2.5-mm and 5-mm MLC.

CONCLUSIONS

MBM with 5-mm MLC was almost fine. However, it may be better to use a conservative margin for larger metastases. It may also be better to avoid SRS with 5-mm MLC for patients with ≤5 mm target size.

Validation of complex radiotherapy techniques using polymer gel dosimetry

Modern radiotherapy delivers highly conformal dose distributions to irregularly shaped target volumes while sparing the surrounding normal tissue. Due to the complex planning and delivery techniques, dose verification and validation of the whole treatment workflow by end-to-end tests became much more important and polymer gel dosimeters are one of the few possibilities to capture the delivered dose distribution in 3D. The basic principles and formulations of gel dosimetry and its evaluation methods are described and the available studies validating device-specific geometrical parameters as well as the dose delivery by advanced radiotherapy techniques, such as 3D-CRT/IMRT and stereotactic radiosurgery treatments, the treatment of moving targets, online-adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy as well as proton and ion beam treatments, are reviewed. The present status and limitations as well as future challenges of polymer gel dosimetry for the validation of complex radiotherapy techniques are discussed.

End to end comparison of surface-guided imaging versus stereoscopic X-rays for the SRS treatment of multiple metastases with a single isocenter using 3D anthropomorphic gel phantoms

INTRODUCTION

Two end-to-end tests evaluate the accuracy of a surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) system (CRAD Catalyst HD) for position verification in comparison to a stereoscopic x-ray imaging system (Brainlab Exactrac ) for single-isocenter, multiple metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using 3D polymer gel inserts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D-printed phantom (Prime phantom, RTsafe PC, Athens, Greece) with two separate cylindrical polymer gel inserts were immobilized in open-face masks and treated with a single isocentric, multitarget SRS plan. Planning was done in Brainlab (Elements) to treat five metastatic lesions in one fraction, and initial setup was done using cone beam computed tomography. Positional verification was done using orthogonal X-ray imaging (Brainlab Exactrac) and/or a surface imaging system (CRAD Catalyst HD, Uppsala, Sweden), and shift discrepancies were recorded for each couch angle. Forty-two hours after irradiation, the gel phantom was scanned in a 1.5 Tesla MRI, and images were fused with the patient computed tomography data/structure set for further analysis of spatial dose distribution.

RESULTS

Discrepancies between the CRAD Catalyst HD system and Brainlab Exactrac were <1 mm in the translational direction and <0.5° in the angular direction at noncoplanar couch angles. Dose parameters (DMean% , D95% ) and 3D gamma index passing rates were evaluated for both setup modalities for each planned target volume (PTV) at a variety of thresholds: 3%/2 mm (Exactrac≥93.1% and CRAD ≥87.2%), 5%/2 mm (Exactrac≥95.6% and CRAD ≥94.6%), and 5%/1 mm (Exactrac≥81.8% and CRAD ≥83.7%).

CONCLUSION

Dose metrics for a setup with surface imaging was found to be consistent with setup using x-ray imaging, demonstrating high accuracy and reproducibility for treatment delivery. Results indicate the feasibility of using surface imaging for position verification at noncoplanar couch angles for single-isocenter, multiple-target SRS using end-to-end quality assurance (QA) testing with 3D polymer gel dosimetry.

Validation of PTV margin for Gamma Knife Icon frameless treatment using a PseudoPatient® Prime anthropomorphic phantom

The Gamma Knife Icon allows the treatment of brain tumors mask-based single-fraction or fractionated treatment schemes. In clinic, uniform axial expansion of 1 mm around the gross tumor volume (GTV) and a 1.5 mm expansion in the superior and inferior directions are used to generate the planning target volume (PTV). The purpose of the study was to validate this margin scheme with two clinical scenarios: (a) the patient's head remaining right below the high-definition motion management (HDMM) threshold, and (b) frequent treatment interruptions followed by plan adaptation induced by large pitch head motion. A remote-controlled head assembly was used to control the motion of a PseudoPatient® Prime head phantom; for dosimetric evaluations, an ionization chamber, EBT3 films, and polymer gels were used. These measurements were compared with those from the Gamma Knife plan. For the absolute dose measurements using an ionization chamber, the percentage differences for both targets were less than 3.0% for all scenarios, which was within the expected tolerance. For the film measurements, the two-dimensional (2D) gamma index with a 2%/2 mm criterion showed the passing rates of ≥87% in all scenarios except the scenario 1. The results of Gel measurements showed that GTV (D₁₀₀ ) was covered by the prescription dose and PTV (D₉₅ ) was well above the planned dose by up to 5.6% and the largest geometric PTV offset was 0.8 mm for all scenarios. In conclusion, the current margin scheme with HDMM setting is adequate for a typical patient's intrafractional motion.

Characterization of a novel 3D printed patient specific phantom for quality assurance in cranial stereotactic radiosurgery applications

In single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) intracranial applications, multiple targets are being treated concurrently, often involving non-coplanar arcs, small photon beams and steep dose gradients. In search for more rigorous quality assurance protocols, this work presents and evaluates a novel methodology for patient-specific pre-treatment plan verification, utilizing 3D printing technology. In a patient's planning CT scan, the external contour and bone structures were segmented and 3D-printed using high-density bone-mimicking material. The resulting head phantom was filled with water while a film dosimetry insert was incorporated. Patient and phantom CT image series were fused and inspected for anatomical coherence. HUs and corresponding densities were compared in several anatomical regions within the head. Furthermore, the level of patient-to-phantom dosimetric equivalence was evaluated both computationally and experimentally. A single-isocenter multi-focal SRS treatment plan was prepared, while dose distributions were calculated on both CT image series, using identical calculation parameters. Phantom- and patient-derived dose distributions were compared in terms of isolines, DVHs, dose-volume metrics and 3D gamma index (GI) analysis. The phantom was treated as if the real patient and film measurements were compared against the patient-derived calculated dose distribution. Visual inspection of the fused CT images suggests excellent geometric similarity between phantom and patient, also confirmed using similarity indices. HUs and densities agreed within one standard deviation except for the skin (modeled as 'bone') and sinuses (water-filled). GI comparison between the calculated distributions resulted in passing rates better than 97% (1%/1 mm). DVHs and dose-volume metrics were also in satisfying agreement. In addition to serving as a feasibility proof-of-concept, experimental absolute film dosimetry verified the computational study results. GI passing rates were above 90%. Results of this work suggest that employing the presented methodology, patient-equivalent phantoms (except for the skin and sinuses areas) can be produced, enabling literally patient-specific pre-treatment plan verification in intracranial applications.

GammaKnife versus VMAT radiosurgery plan quality for many brain metastases

The purpose of this work was to compare dose distributions between two radiosurgery modalities, single‐isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and GammaKnife Perfexion (GK), in the treatment of a large number (≥7) of brain metastases. Twelve patients with 103 brain metastases were analyzed. The median number of targets per patient was 8 (range: 7–14). GK plans were compared to noncoplanar VMAT plans using both 6‐MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) and 10‐MV FFF modes. Parameters analyzed included radiation therapy oncology group conformity index (CI), 12, 6, and 3 Gy isodose volumes (V12 Gy, V6 Gy, V3 Gy), mean and maximum hippocampal dose, and maximum skin dose. There were statistically significant differences in CI (2.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.6 ± 0.8 and 1.7 ± 0.9, P < 0.001, P < 0.001), V12 Gy (2.8 ± 6.1 cc vs 3.0 ± 5.2 cc and 3.1 ± 5.4 cc, P = 0.003, P < 0.001), and V3 Gy (323.0 ± 294.8 cc vs, 880.1 ± 369.1 cc and 937.9 ±  vs 361.9 cc, P = 0.005, P = 0.001) between GK versus both 6‐MV FFF and 10‐MV FFF. No significant differences existed for maximum hippocampal or skin doses. In conclusion, highly optimized VMAT produced improved conformity at the expense of a higher V12 Gy and V3 Gy volume when compared with highly optimized GK.

Gel dosimetry for three dimensional proton range measurements in anthropomorphic geometries

Proton beams used for radiotherapy have potential for superior sparing of normal tissue, although range uncertainties are among the main limiting factors in the accuracy of dose delivery. The aim of this study was to benchmark an N-vinylpyrrolidone based polymer gel to perform three-dimensional measurement of geometric proton beam characteristics and especially to test its suitability as a range probe in combination with an anthropomorphic phantom. For single proton pencil beams as well as for 3×3cm² mono-energy layers depth dose profiles, lateral dose distribution at different depths and proton range were evaluated in simple cubic gel phantoms at different energies from 75 to 115MeV and different dose levels. In addition, a 90MeV mono-energetic beam was delivered to an anthropomorphic 3D printed head phantom, which was filled with gel. Subsequently, all phantoms underwent magnetic resonance imaging using an axial pixel size of 0.68-0.98mm and with slice thicknesses of 2 or 3mm to derive a 3-dimensional distribution of the T₂ relaxation time, which correlates with radiation dose. Indices describing lateral dose distribution and proton range were compared against predictions from a treatment planning system (TPS, for cubic and head phantoms) and Monte Carlo simulations (MC, for the head phantom) after manual rigid co-registration with the T₂ relaxation time datasets. For all pencil beams, the FWHM agreement with TPS was better than 1mm or 7%. For the mono-energetic layer, the agreement with TPS in this respect was even better than 0.3mm in each case. With respect to range, results from gel measurements differed no more than 0.9mm (1.6%) from values predicted by TPS. In case of the anthropomorphic phantom, deviations with respect to a nominal range of about 61mm as well as in FWHM were slightly higher, namely within 1.0mm and 1.1mm respectively. Average deviations between gel and TPS/MC were similar (-0.3mm±0.4mm/-0.2±0.5mm). In conclusion, polymer gel dosimetry was found to be a valuable tool to determine geometric proton beam properties three-dimensionally and with high spatial resolution in simple cubic as well as in a more complex anthropomorphic phantom. Post registration range errors of the order of 1mm could be achieved. The additional registration uncertainty (95%) was 1mm.

On the total system error of a robotic radiosurgery system: phantom measurements, clinical evaluation and long-term analysis

The total system error (TSE) of a CyberKnife^® system was measured using two phantom-based methods and one patient-based method. The standard radiochromic film (RCF) end-to-end (E2E) test using an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom and isocentric treatment delivery was used with the 6Dskull, Fiducial and Xsight^® spine (XST) tracking methods. More than 200 RCF-based E2E results covering the period from installation in 2006 until 2017 were analyzed with respect to tracking method, system hardware and software versions, secondary collimation system, and years since installation. An independent polymer gel E2E method was also applied, involving a 3D printed head phantom and multiple spherical target volumes widely distributed within the brain. Finally, the TSE was assessed by comparing the delineated target in the planning computed tomography images of a patient treated for a thalamic functional target with the radiation-induced lesion defined on the six-month follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) images. Statistical analysis of the RCF-based TSE results showed mean  ±  standard deviation values of 0.40  ±  0.18 mm, 0.40  ±  0.19 mm, and 0.55  ±  0.20 mm for the 6Dskull, Fiducial, and XST tracking methods, respectively. Polymer gel TSE values smaller than 0.66 mm were found for seven targets distributed within the brain, showing that the targeting accuracy of the system is sustained even for targets situated up to 80 mm away from the center of the skull. An average clinical TSE value of 0.87  ±  0.25 mm was also measured using the FSE T2 and FLAIR post-treatment MR image data. Analysis of the long-term RCF-based E2E tests showed no changes of TSE over time. This study is the first to report long-term (>10 years) analysis of TSE, TSE measurement for targets positioned at large distances from the virtual machine isocenter, or a clinical assessment of TSE for the CyberKnife system. All of these measurements demonstrate TSE consistently  <  1 mm.

Optimizing radiosurgery with photons for ocular melanoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Photon radiotherapy has been established for the treatment of ocular melanoma (OM). Here we investigate the planning qualities of two different planning approaches, a combination of dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) complemented with multiple non-coplanar static intensity-modulated (IMRT) fields (DCA-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in combination with automated planning (AP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients treated for ocular melanoma with curative intent on a Linac-based radiosurgery system were analyzed. Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) was applied using 50 Gy in 5 fractions using the combination of DCA-IMRT. Plans were reviewed and the thirteen cases were compared to plans obtained with optimized automated VMAT based on a set of 28 distinct patients treated with DCA-IMRT who were selected to generate the AP model for the prediction of dose volume constraints.

RESULTS

Overall, plan quality of DCA-IMRT was superior to AP with VMAT. PTV coverage did not exceed 107% in any case treated with DCA-IMRT, compared to seven patients with VMAT. The median PTV covered by >95% was 98.3% (91.9%-99.7%) with DCA-IMRT, compared to 95.1% (91.5%-97.9%) (p < 0.01) with VMAT. The median mean dose delivered to the treated eye was 22.4 Gy (12.3 Gy-33.3 Gy) with DCA-IMRT compared to 27.2 Gy (15.5 Gy-33.7 Gy) (p < 0.01). Dose to the ipsilateral lacrimal gland and the ipsilateral optic nerve were comparable for DCA-IMRT and VMAT, however, the dose to the lens was lower with DCA-IMRT compared to VMAT.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of multiple arcs complemented with multiple IMRT fields sets the gold standard for fSRS of ocular melanoma for photon therapy.