• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (5071025)   Today's Articles (71)
For: McKay CM, Henshall KR, Hull AE. The effect of rate of stimulation on perception of spectral shape by cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:386-92. [PMID: 16119359 DOI: 10.1121/1.1937349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Arora K, Plant K, Dawson P, Cowan R. Effect of reducing electrical stimulation rate on hearing performance of Nucleus® cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 2025;64:173-182. [PMID: 38420783 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2024.2314620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
2
Guérit F, Deeks JM, Arzounian D, Gransier R, Wouters J, Carlyon RP. Using Interleaved Stimulation and EEG to Measure Temporal Smoothing and Growth of the Sustained Neural Response to Cochlear-Implant Stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2023;24:253-264. [PMID: 36754938 PMCID: PMC10121955 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-023-00886-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]  Open
3
Jiam NT, Limb C. Music perception and training for pediatric cochlear implant users. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020;17:1193-1206. [PMID: 33090055 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1841628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
4
Lamping W, Goehring T, Marozeau J, Carlyon RP. The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2020;391:107969. [PMID: 32320925 PMCID: PMC7116331 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
5
Adenis V, Gourévitch B, Mamelle E, Recugnat M, Stahl P, Gnansia D, Nguyen Y, Edeline JM. ECAP growth function to increasing pulse amplitude or pulse duration demonstrates large inter-animal variability that is reflected in auditory cortex of the guinea pig. PLoS One 2018;13:e0201771. [PMID: 30071005 PMCID: PMC6072127 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]  Open
6
Brochier T, McDermott HJ, McKay CM. The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2017;141:4097. [PMID: 28618807 PMCID: PMC5457292 DOI: 10.1121/1.4983658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 04/26/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
7
Effects of Stimulation Rate With the FS4 and HDCIS Coding Strategies in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:882-8. [PMID: 27295444 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000001107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
8
Penninger RT, Kludt E, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Stimulating on multiple electrodes can improve temporal pitch perception. Int J Audiol 2015;54:376-83. [PMID: 25630393 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.997313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
9
Vermeire K, Landsberger DM, Schleich P, Van de Heyning PH. Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing. Hear Res 2013;306:29-36. [PMID: 24055624 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 08/31/2013] [Accepted: 09/09/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
10
Won JH, Drennan WR, Nie K, Jameyson EM, Rubinstein JT. Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2011;130:376-88. [PMID: 21786906 PMCID: PMC3155593 DOI: 10.1121/1.3592521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
11
Macherey O, Deeks JM, Carlyon RP. Extending the limits of place and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2011;12:233-51. [PMID: 21116672 PMCID: PMC3046333 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-010-0248-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2010] [Accepted: 10/26/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
12
Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;268:27-39. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1335-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/02/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
13
Battmer RD, Dillier N, Lai WK, Begall K, Leypon EE, González JCF, Manrique M, Morera C, Müller-Deile J, Wesarg T, Zarowski A, Killian MJ, von Wallenberg E, Smoorenburg GF. Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear™ Nucleus®CI24RE device: Relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles. Int J Audiol 2010;49:657-66. [DOI: 10.3109/14992021003801471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
14
Kong YY, Carlyon RP. Temporal pitch perception at high rates in cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;127:3114-23. [PMID: 21117760 DOI: 10.1121/1.3372713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
15
Carlyon RP, Deeks JM, McKay CM. The upper limit of temporal pitch for cochlear-implant listeners: stimulus duration, conditioner pulses, and the number of electrodes stimulated. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010;127:1469-78. [PMID: 20329847 DOI: 10.1121/1.3291981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
16
Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate effects. Hear Res 2008;244:15-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2008] [Revised: 05/24/2008] [Accepted: 06/24/2008] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA