Abstract
Macaque monkeys, like humans, are more sensitive to differences in formant frequency than to differences in the frequency of pure tones (see Sinnott et al. (1987) J. Comp. Psychol. 94, 401-415; Pfingst (1993) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2124-2129; Prosen et al. (1990) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88, 2152-2158; Sinnott et al. (1985) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 78, 1977-1985; Sinnott and Kreiter (1991) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2421-2429; for summary, see May et al. (1996) Aud. Neurosci. 3, 135-162). In the discrimination of formant frequency, it appears that the relevant cue for macaque monkeys is relative level differences of the component frequencies (Sommers et al. (1992) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 3499-3510). To further explore the result of Sommers et al., we trained macaque monkeys (Macaca fuscata) to report detection of a change in the spectral shape of multi-component harmonic complexes. Spectral shape changes were produced by the addition of intensity increments. When the amplitude spectrum of the comparison stimulus was modeled after the /ae/ vowel sound, thresholds for detecting a change from the comparison stimulus were lowest when intensity increments were added at spectral peaks. These results parallel previous data from human subjects, suggesting that both human and monkey subjects may process vowel spectra through simultaneous comparisons of component levels across the spectrum. When the subjects were asked to detect a change from a comparison stimulus with a flat amplitude spectrum, the subjects showed sensitivity that was relatively comparable to that of human subjects tested in other investigations (e.g. Zera et al. (1993) J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 3431-3441). In additional experiments, neither increasing the dynamic range of the /ae/ spectrum nor dynamically varying the amplitude of the increment during the stimulus presentation reliably affected detection thresholds.
Collapse