Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, threshold microstructure, and psychophysical tuning over a wide frequency range in humans

Mutations in unfolded protein response regulator ATF6 cause hearing and vision loss syndrome

Activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) is a key regulator of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and is important for ER function and protein homeostasis in metazoan cells. Patients carrying loss-of-function ATF6 disease alleles develop the cone dysfunction disorder achromatopsia. The effect of loss of ATF6 function on other cell types, organs, and diseases in people remains unclear. Here, we report that progressive sensorineural hearing loss was a notable complaint in some patients carrying ATF6 disease alleles and that Atf6-/- mice also showed progressive auditory deficits affecting both sexes. In mice with hearing deficits, we found disorganized stereocilia on hair cells and focal loss of outer hair cells. Transcriptomics analysis of Atf6-/- cochleae revealed a marked induction of the UPR, especially through the protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) arm. These findings identify ATF6 as an essential regulator of cochlear health and function. Furthermore, they support the idea that ATF6 inactivation in people causes progressive sensorineural hearing loss as part of a blindness-deafness genetic syndrome targeting hair cells and cone photoreceptors. Last, our genetic findings indicate that ER stress is an important pathomechanism underlying cochlear damage and hearing loss, with clinical implications for patient lifestyle modifications that minimize environmental and physiological sources of ER stress to the ear.

Evaluation of a Fast Method to Measure High-Frequency Audiometry Based on Bayesian Learning

This study aimed to assess the validity of a high-frequency audiometry tool based on Bayesian learning to provide a reliable, repeatable, automatic, and fast test to clinics. The study involved 85 people (138 ears) who had their high-frequency thresholds measured with three tests: standard audiometry (SA), alternative forced choice (AFC)-based algorithm, and Bayesian active (BA) learning-based algorithm. The results showed median differences within ±5 dB up to 10 kHz when comparing the BA with the other two tests, and median differences within ±10 dB at higher frequencies. The variability increased from lower to higher frequencies. The BA showed lower thresholds compared to the SA at the majority of the frequencies. The results of the different tests were consistent across groups (age, hearing loss, and tinnitus). The data for the BA showed high test-retest reliability (>90%). The time required for the BA was shorter than for the AFC (4 min vs. 13 min). The data suggest that the BA test for high-frequency audiometry could be a good candidate for clinical screening. It would add reliable and significant information without adding too much time to the visit.

Relationship between irregularities in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions suppression and psychophysical tuning curves

The suppression of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) allows the objective evaluation of cochlear frequency selectivity by determining the suppression tuning curve (STC). Interestingly, some STCs have additional sidelobes at the high frequency flank, which are thought to result from interaction between the probe tone and the cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE being suppressed. Sidelobes are often in regions of other neighboring SOAEs but can also occur in the absence of any other SOAE. The aim of this study was to compare STCs and psychoacoustic tuning curves (PTCs). Therefore, STCs and PTCs were measured in: (1) subjects in which the STC had a sidelobe, and (2) subjects without STC sidelobes. Additionally, PTCs were measured in subjects without SOAEs. Across participant groups, the quality factor Q_10dB of the PTCs was similar, independently from whether SOAEs were present or absent. Thus, the presence of an SOAE does not provide enhanced frequency selectivity at the emission frequency. Moreover, both PTC and STC show irregularities, but these are not related in a straightforward way. This suggests that different mechanisms cause these irregularities.

Transient otoacoustic emissions and audiogram fine structure in the extended high-frequency region

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies at conventional audiometric frequencies found associations between the ripple depth seen in audiogram fine structure (AFS) and amplitudes of both transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and overall hearing threshold levels (HTLs). These associations are explained by the cochlear mechanical theory of multiple coherent reflections of the travelling wave apically by reflections sites on the basilar membrane and basally by the stapes.

DESIGN

The aim was to investigate whether a similar relationship is seen in the extended high-frequency (EHF) range from 8-16 kHz. Measurements from 8-16 kHz were obtained in normal-hearing subjects comprising EHF HTLs, EHF TEOAEs using a double evoked paradigm, and Bekesy audiometry to assess AFS ripple depth and spectral periodicity.

STUDY SAMPLE

Twenty eight normal-hearing subjects participated.

RESULTS

Results showed no significant correlation between AFS ripple depth and either frequency-averaged EHF HTLs or EHF TEOAE amplitudes. The amplitude of AFS ripple depth was also lower than that seen in the conventional frequency region and spectral periodicity in the ripple more difficult to discern.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest a weaker interference pattern between forward and reverse cochlear travelling waves in the most basal region compared to more apical regions, or a difference in cochlear mechanical properties.

Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl (Tyto alba)

Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) have been observed in a variety of different vertebrates, including humans and barn owls (Tyto alba). The underlying mechanisms producing the SOAEs and the meaning of their characteristics regarding the frequency selectivity of an individual and species are, however, still under debate. In the present study, we measured SOAE spectra in lightly anesthetized barn owls and suppressed their amplitudes by presenting pure tones at different frequencies and sound levels. Suppression effects were quantified by deriving suppression tuning curves (STCs) with a criterion of 2 dB suppression. SOAEs were found in 100% of ears (n = 14), with an average of 12.7 SOAEs per ear. Across the whole SOAE frequency range of 3.4-10.2 kHz, the distances between neighboring SOAEs were relatively uniform, with a median distance of 430 Hz. The majority (87.6%) of SOAEs were recorded at frequencies that fall within the barn owl's auditory fovea (5-10 kHz). The STCs were V-shaped and sharply tuned, similar to STCs from humans and other species. Between 5 and 10 kHz, the median Q_10dB value of STC was 4.87 and was thus lower than that of owl single-unit neural data. There was no evidence for secondary STC side lobes, as seen in humans. The best thresholds of the STCs varied from 7.0 to 57.5 dB SPL and correlated with SOAE level, such that smaller SOAEs tended to require a higher sound level to be suppressed. While similar, the frequency-threshold curves of auditory-nerve fibers and STCs of SOAEs differ in some respects in their tuning characteristics indicating that SOAE suppression tuning in the barn owl may not directly reflect neural tuning in primary auditory nerve fibers.

Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function

Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) is an active acoustic signal emitted by the inner ear providing salient information about cochlear function and dysfunction. To provide a basis for laboratory investigation and clinical use, we investigated the characteristics of SFOAEs, including detection rate, musical training influence, and gain function. Sixty-five normal hearing subjects (15 musicians and 50 non-musicians, aged 16-45 years) were tested and analyzed at the probe level of 30 and 50 dB sound pressure levels (SPL) in the center frequency of 1 and 4 kHz in the study. The results indicate that (1) the detection rates of SFOAE are sensitive to the gender, (2) musicians reveal enhanced hearing capacity and SFOAE amplitudes compared with non-musicians, and (3) probe frequency has a significant effect on the compression threshold of SFOAE. Our findings highlight the importance of SFOAE in the clinical hearing screening and diagnosis and emphasize the use of musical training for the rehabilitation enhancement of the auditory periphery and hearing threshold.

No otoacoustic evidence for a peripheral basis of absolute pitch

Absolute pitch (AP) is the ability to identify the perceived pitch of a sound without an external reference. Relatively rare, with an incidence of approximately 1/10,000, the mechanisms underlying AP are not well understood. This study examined otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) to determine if there is evidence of a peripheral (i.e., cochlear) basis for AP. Two OAE types were examined: spontaneous emissions (SOAEs) and stimulus-frequency emissions (SFOAEs). Our motivations to explore a peripheral foundation for AP were several-fold. First is the observation that pitch judgment accuracy has been reported to decrease with age due to age-dependent physiological changes cochlear biomechanics. Second is the notion that SOAEs, which are indirectly related to perception, could act as a fixed frequency reference. Third, SFOAE delays, which have been demonstrated to serve as a proxy measure for cochlear frequency selectivity, could indicate tuning differences between groups. These led us to the hypotheses that AP subjects would (relative to controls) exhibit a. greater SOAE activity and b. sharper cochlear tuning. To test these notions, measurements were made in normal-hearing control (N = 33) and AP-possessor (N = 20) populations. In short, no substantial difference in SOAE activity was found between groups, indicating no evidence for one or more strong SOAEs that could act as a fixed cue. SFOAE phase-gradient delays, measured at several different probe levels (20-50 dB SPL), also showed no significant differences between groups. This observation argues against sharper cochlear frequency selectivity in AP subjects. Taken together, these data support the prevailing view that AP mechanisms predominantly arise at a processing level in the central nervous system (CNS) at the brainstem or higher, not within the cochlea.

A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions

Behavioral hearing thresholds and otoacoustic emission (OAE) spectra often exhibit quasiperiodic fluctuations with frequency. For behavioral and OAE responses to single tones-the latter referred to as stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs)-this microstructure has been attributed to intracochlear reflections of SFOAE energy between its region of generation and the middle ear boundary. However, the relationship between behavioral and SFOAE microstructures, as well as their presumed dependence on the properties of the SFOAE-generation mechanism, have yet to be adequately examined. To address this, behavioral thresholds and SFOAEs evoked by near-threshold tones were compared in 12 normal-hearing female subjects. The microstructures observed in thresholds and both SFOAE amplitudes and delays were found to be strikingly similar. SFOAE phase accumulated an integer number of cycles between the frequencies of microstructure maxima, consistent with a dependence of microstructure periodicity on SFOAE propagation delays. Additionally, microstructure depth was correlated with SFOAE magnitude in a manner resembling that predicted by the intracochlear reflection framework, after assuming reasonable values of parameters related to middle ear transmission. Further exploration of this framework may yield more precise estimates of such parameters and provide insight into their frequency dependence.

Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions

Frequency selectivity is a key functional property of the inner ear and since hearing research began, the frequency resolution of the human ear has been a central question. In contrast to animal studies, which permit invasive recording of neural activity, human studies must rely on indirect methods to determine hearing selectivity. Psychophysical studies, which used masking of a tone by other sounds, indicate a modest frequency selectivity in humans. By contrast, estimates using the phase delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAE) predict a remarkably high selectivity, unique among mammals. An alternative measure of cochlear frequency selectivity are suppression tuning curves of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). Several animal studies show that these measures are in excellent agreement with neural frequency selectivity. Here we contribute a large data set from normal-hearing young humans on suppression tuning curves (STC) of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). The frequency selectivities of human STC measured near threshold levels agree with the earlier, much lower, psychophysical estimates. They differ, however, from the typical patterns seen in animal auditory nerve data in that the selectivity is remarkably independent of frequency. In addition, SOAE are suppressed by higher-level tones in narrow frequency bands clearly above the main suppression frequencies. These narrow suppression bands suggest interactions between the suppressor tone and a cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE frequency being suppressed. The data show that the relationship between pre-neural mechanical processing in the cochlea and neural coding at the hair-cell/auditory nerve synapse needs to be reconsidered.

Individual Differences in Behavioural Decision Weights Related to Irregularities in Cochlear Mechanics

An unexpected finding of previous psychophysical studies is that listeners show highly replicable, individualistic patterns of decision weights on frequencies affecting their performance in spectral discrimination tasks--what has been referred to as individual listening styles. We, like many other researchers, have attributed these listening styles to peculiarities in how listeners attend to sounds, but we now believe they partially reflect irregularities in cochlear micromechanics modifying what listeners hear. The most striking evidence for cochlear irregularities is the presence of low-level spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) measured in the ear canal and the systematic variation in stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs), both of which result from back-propagation of waves in the cochlea. SOAEs and SFOAEs vary greatly across individual ears and have been shown to affect behavioural thresholds, behavioural frequency selectivity and judged loudness for tones. The present paper reports pilot data providing evidence that SOAEs and SFOAEs are also predictive of the relative decision weight listeners give to a pair of tones in a level discrimination task. In one condition the frequency of one tone was selected to be near that of an SOAE and the frequency of the other was selected to be in a frequency region for which there was no detectable SOAE. In a second condition the frequency of one tone was selected to correspond to an SFOAE maximum, the frequency of the other tone, an SFOAE minimum. In both conditions a statistically significant correlation was found between the average relative decision weight on the two tones and the difference in OAE levels.

Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners

OBJECTIVE

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) can provide useful measures of tuning of auditory filters. We previously established that stimulus-frequency (SF) OAE suppression tuning curves (STCs) reflect major features of behavioral tuning (psychophysical tuning curves, PTCs) in normally-hearing listeners. Here, we aim to evaluate whether SFOAE STCs reflect changes in PTC tuning in cases of abnormal hearing.

DESIGN

PTCs and SFOAE STCs were obtained at 1 kHz and/or 4 kHz probe frequencies. For exploratory purposes, we collected SFOAEs measured across a wide frequency range and contrasted them to commonly measured distortion product (DP) OAEs.

STUDY SAMPLE

Thirteen listeners with varying degrees of sensorineural hearing loss.

RESULTS

Except for a few listeners with the most hearing loss, the listeners had normal/nearly normal PTCs. However, attempts to record SFOAE STCs in hearing-impaired listeners were challenging and sometimes unsuccessful due to the high level of noise at the SFOAE frequency, which is not a factor for DPOAEs. In cases of successful measurements of SFOAE STCs there was a large variability in agreement between SFOAE STC and PTC tuning.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that SFOAE STCs cannot substitute for PTCs in cases of abnormal hearing, at least with the paradigm adopted in this study.