Masking release at 4 kHz in harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) associated with sinusoidal amplitude-modulated masking noise

Auditory masking of tonal and conspecific signals by continuous active sonar, amplitude modulated noise, and Gaussian noise in killer whales (Orcinus orca)

Continuous active sonar is thought to mitigate severe acoustic impacts due to its lower sound pressure level compared to pulsed active sonar typically used by world navies. However, due to its almost continuous duty cycle, continuous active sonar could have a higher potential for auditory masking. Here, we evaluate the auditory masking potential of several noise types including a recording of continuous active sonar, amplitude modulated noise, and Gaussian noise, on signal detection in two killer whales. Signals were either a 1.5 kHz pure tone or a recording of a broadband burst-pulse killer whale call. For the 1.5 kHz tone, all noise types resulted in statistically significant masking, however, there was a release from masking of approximately 13 dB for the amplitude-modulated noise. When the killer whale call was the signal, the whales employed an off-frequency listening strategy where the whales were able to detect frequency components of the signal that did not directly overlap with the noise. However, this strategy was less useful for the continuous active sonar noise due to its broadband harmonic structure. Continuous active sonar has spectral features that considerably overlap with those of killer whale calls, making this type of noise an effective auditory masker.

Mechanisms of auditory masking in marine mammals

Anthropogenic noise is an increasing threat to marine mammals that rely on sound for communication, navigation, detecting prey and predators, and finding mates. Auditory masking is one consequence of anthropogenic noise, the study of which is approached from multiple disciplines including field investigations of animal behavior, noise characterization from in-situ recordings, computational modeling of communication space, and hearing experiments conducted in the laboratory. This paper focuses on laboratory hearing experiments applying psychophysical methods, with an emphasis on the mechanisms that govern auditory masking. Topics include tone detection in simple, complex, and natural noise; mechanisms for comodulation masking release and other forms of release from masking; the role of temporal resolution in auditory masking; and energetic vs informational masking.

Assessing potential perception of shipping noise by marine mammals in an arctic inlet

Shipping is increasing in Arctic regions, exposing marine mammals to increased underwater noise. Noise analyses often use unweighted broadband sound pressure levels (SPL) to assess noise impacts, but this does not account for the animals' hearing abilities at different frequencies. In 2018 and 2019, noise levels were recorded at five and three sites, respectively, along a shipping route in an inlet of Northern Baffin Island, Canada. Broadband SPLs (10 Hz-25 kHz), unweighted and with auditory weighing functions from three marine mammal groups, were compared between times ore carriers (travelling < 9 knots) were present or absent. Clearly audible distances of shipping noise and exposure durations were estimated for each weighting function relative to vessel direction, orientation, and year. Auditory weighting functions had significant effects on the potential perception of shipping noise. Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) experienced similar SPLs to unweighted levels. Narwhals (Monodon monoceros) and ringed seals (Pusa hispida) experienced lower SPLs. Narwhals were unlikely to clearly perceive shipping noise unless ships were in close proximity (<3 km) and ambient noise levels were low. Detectability propagation models of presumed noise exposure from shipping must be based on the hearing sensitivities of each species group when assessing noise impacts on marine mammals.