Variable Stiffness Shoes for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Gait Mechanics and Medial Joint Contact Forces

Efficacy and safety of quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps tendon (QT), bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts are widely used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but the optimal autograft choice remains controversial. This study assessed the treatment effects of QT versus BPTB and HT autografts for ACLR.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for eligible studies published from inception until July 2022. Effect estimates were presented as odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. All pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (3 randomized controlled trials [RCTs], 3 prospective studies, and 15 retrospective studies) involving 2964 patients with ACLR were selected for meta-analysis. Compared with the HT autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of graft failure (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.93; P = 0.031). Compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of donor site pain (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24; P < 0.001). Moreover, the QT autograft was associated with a lower side-to-side difference than that observed with the HT autograft (WMD: - 0.74; 95% CI: - 1.47 to - 0.01; P = 0.048). Finally, compared with the BPTB autograft, the QT autograft was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe kneecap symptoms during sports and work activities (OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.05-0.37; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that the QT autograft can be defined as a safe and effective alternative choice for ACLR, but its superiority is yet to be proven by RCTs and prospective studies. Level of evidence Level III.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Biomechanics

Biomechanics plays a significant yet complex role in osteoarthritis (OA) onset and progression. Identifying alterations in biomechanical factors and their complex interactions is critical for gaining new insights into OA pathophysiology and identification of clearly defined and modifiable mechanical treatment targets. This review synthesized biomechanics studies from March 2022 to April 2023, from which three themes relating to human gait emerged: (1) new insights into the pathogenesis of OA using computational modeling and machine learning, (2) technology-enhanced biomechanical interventions for OA, and (3) out-of-lab biomechanical assessments of OA. We further highlighted future-focused areas which may continue to advance the field of biomechanics in OA, with a particular emphasis on exploiting technology to understand and treat biomechanical mechanisms of OA outside the laboratory. The breadth of studies included in this review highlights the complex role of biomechanics in OA and showcase numerous innovative and outstanding contributions to the field. Exciting cross-disciplinary efforts integrating computational modeling, mobile sensors, and machine learning methods show great promise for streamlining in vivo multi-scale biomechanics workflows and are expected to underpin future breakthroughs in the understanding and treatment of biomechanics in OA.