Bone Health of Young Male Gymnasts: A Systematic Review

Comparison of bone mineral density of runners with inactive males: A cross-sectional 4HAIE study

The purpose of the study was to determine whether running is associated with greater bone mineral density (BMD) by comparing the BMD of regularly active male runners (AR) with inactive nonrunner male controls (INC). This cross-sectional study recruited 327 male AR and 212 male INC (aged 18-65) via a stratified recruitment strategy. BMD of the whole body (WB) and partial segments (spine, lumbar spine (LS), leg, hip, femoral neck (FN), and arm for each side) were measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and lower leg dominance (dominant-D/nondominant-ND) was established by functional testing. An ANCOVA was used to compare AR and INC. The AR had greater BMD for all segments of the lower limb (p<0.05), but similar BMD for all segments of the upper limb (p>0.05) compared with INC. Based on the pairwise comparison of age groups, AR had greater BMD of the ND leg in every age group compared with INC (p<0.05). AR had grater BMD of the D leg in every age group except for (26-35 and 56-65) compare with INC (p<0.05). In the youngest age group (18-25), AR had greater BMD in every measured part of lower extremities (legs, hips, femoral necks) compared with INC (p<0.05). In the 46-55 age group AR had greater BMD than INC (p < 0.05) only in the WB, D Leg, D neck, and ND leg. In the 56-65 age group AR had greater BMD than INC (p<0.05) only in the ND leg. Overall, AR had greater BMD compared with INC in all examined sites except for the upper limbs, supporting the notion that running may positively affect bone parameters. However, the benefits differ in the skeletal sites specifically, as the legs had the highest BMD difference between AR and INC. Moreover, the increase in BMD from running decreased with age.

Higher fracture prevalence and smaller bone size in patients with hEDS/HSD-a prospective cohort study

Increased fracture risk in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes has been reported, but the reasons for it are incompletely understood. We aimed to investigate possible determinants of this increased risk and found that hEDS/HSD patients present with a cortical bone size deficit compared with control subjects, possibly related to lower mechanical loading.

INTRODUCTION

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) comprise a group of heritable connective tissue disorders caused by defects in the biosynthesis, secretion, and/or organization of fibrillar collagens which might impair bone strength. Our aim was to compare fracture prevalence, volumetric and areal bone mineral density (BMD), bone geometry, muscle size and the muscle-bone interaction, body composition and longitudinal changes therein between patients with hypermobile EDS (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), and healthy control subjects.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data comprised 39 female hEDS/HSD patients (age 41 ± 11 years) and 43 age-matched controls. After 8 years, 27 hEDS/HSD and 17 control subjects were re-evaluated. Tibial trabecular and cortical volumetric BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), cortical bone geometry, and lower leg muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured using pQCT. Body composition, areal BMD, and BMC were determined by DXA.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients with hEDS/HSD presented with a smaller cortical bone area, smaller cortical thickness and muscle CSA, and a higher fracture prevalence than control subjects (all p < 0.05). No differences in areal or volumetric BMD were found. Longitudinally, muscle CSA decreased in both groups and muscle density decreased in the hEDS/HSD group (p < 0.001) whereas all bone parameters remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

hEDS/HSD patients have a cortical bone size deficit compared with controls, possibly contributing to their increased fracture risk. They presented with decreased muscle CSA but normal bone/muscle area ratio, suggesting that this bone size deficit is likely secondary to decreased mechanical loading. Further, there were no arguments for accelerated bone loss in hEDS/HSD subjects.

Impact of Artistic Gymnastics on Bone Formation Marker, Density and Geometry in Female Adolescents: ABCD-Growth Study

Background

To compare bone density accrual and markers of bone geometry and formation between female adolescents engaged and not engaged in artistic gymnastics (AGs).

Methods

This was a 12-month longitudinal study involving 20 female adolescents, including 10 controls and 10 gymnasts (AGs) aged 11 to 16 years. At baseline, the gymnasts had a minimum of 12 months of practice, and the controls reported no participation in any organized sport. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lower limbs, upper limbs, spine, and whole body. In addition, BMD and geometrical properties of the femur were assessed. As a bone formation marker, osteocalcin level was measured.

Results

Femoral aspects were increased in the gymnasts by 19% (P=0.009), 14% (P=0.047), and 10% (P=0.046) in the Ward's triangle, trochanter, and the overall bone, respectively, than in the control girls. Geometrical parameters, bone accrual, and osteocalcin levels were similar in both groups. The weekly training load explained 30.8% of all bone gains on the lower limbs and affected the density on parts of the femur.

Conclusions

The gymnasts, after a 12-month follow-up, demonstrated a higher BMD in the Ward's triangle and whole femur than the controls, as well as an improvement in femur density. These changes were mainly due to the weekly training load. Lastly, the gymnasts had significant bone accrual (after 12 months) in the upper limbs, lower limbs, and whole body.

The Components of Bone and What They Can Teach Us about Regeneration

The problem of bone regeneration has engaged both physicians and scientists since the beginning of medicine. Not only can bone heal itself following most injuries, but when it does, the regenerated tissue is often indistinguishable from healthy bone. Problems arise, however, when bone does not heal properly, or when new tissue is needed, such as when two vertebrae are required to fuse to stabilize adjacent spine segments. Despite centuries of research, such procedures still require improved therapeutic methods to be devised. Autologous bone harvesting and grafting is currently still the accepted benchmark, despite drawbacks for clinicians and patients that include limited amounts, donor site morbidity, and variable quality. The necessity for an alternative to this "gold standard" has given rise to a bone-graft and substitute industry, with its central conundrum: what is the best way to regenerate bone? In this review, we dissect bone anatomy to summarize our current understanding of its constituents. We then look at how various components have been employed to improve bone regeneration. Evolving strategies for bone regeneration are then considered.