Penetration of Treosulfan and its Active Monoepoxide Transformation Product into Central Nervous System of Juvenile and Young Adult Rats

Population pharmacokinetic approach for evaluation of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide disposition in plasma and brain on the basis of a rat model

PURPOSE

Efficacy of treosulfan, used in the treatment of marrow disorders, depends on the activity of its monoepoxy-(EBDM) and diepoxy compounds. The study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of treosulfan and EBDM in the rat plasma and brain by means of mixed-effects modelling.

METHODS

The study had a one-animal-per-sample design and included ninty-six 10-week-old Wistar rats of both sexes. Treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in the brain and plasma were measured by an HPLC-MS/MS method. The population pharmacokinetic model was established in NONMEM software with a first-order estimation method with interaction.

RESULTS

One-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described changes in the concentrations of treosulfan in plasma, and EBDM concentrations in plasma and in the brain. Treosulfan concentrations in the brain followed a two-compartment model. Both treosulfan and EBDM poorly penetrated the blood-brain barrier (ratio of influx and efflux clearances through the blood-brain barrier was 0.120 and 0.317 for treosulfan and EBDM, respectively). Treosulfan plasma clearance was significantly lower in male rats than in females (0.273 L/h/kg vs 0.419 L/h/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

The developed population pharmacokinetic model is the first that allows the prediction of treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in rat plasma and brain. These results provide directions for future studies on treosulfan regarding the contribution of transport proteins or the development of a physiological-based model.

Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics and its Variability in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Conditioning Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current State of the Art, In-Depth Analysis, and Perspectives

Treosulfan is a prodrug that undergoes a highly pH- and temperature-dependent nonenzymatic conversion to the monoepoxide {(2S,3S)-1,2-epoxy-3,4-butanediol 4-methanesulfonate [S,S-EBDM]} and diepoxide {(2S,3S)-1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane [S,S-DEB]}. Currently, treosulfan is tested in clinical trials as an alternative to busulfan in conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Of note, the optimal dosing of the prodrug is still unresolved, especially in infants. In this paper, the pharmacokinetics of treosulfan, together with its biologically active epoxides, is comprehensively reviewed for the first time, with the focus on conditioning prior to HSCT. Most of the insightful data presented in this review comes from studies that have been conducted in the last 3 years. The article widely discusses the volume of distribution and total clearance of treosulfan. In particular, the interindividual variability of these key parameters in infants, children above 1 year of age, and adults is analyzed, including possible covariates. A clinically important aspect of the formation rate-limited elimination of S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB is described, including the correlation between the exposure of the prodrug and S,S-EBDM in children. The significance of the elimination half-life of treosulfan and its epoxides for successful conditioning prior to HSCT is also raised. Furthermore, the organ disposition of treosulfan and S,S-EBDM in rats is discussed in the context of the clinical toxicity and myeloablative activity of treosulfan versus busulfan. Moreover, perspectives for future therapeutic drug monitoring of treosulfan are presented. The review is intended to be helpful to pharmacists and doctors in the comprehension of the clinical pharmacokinetics of treosulfan.

Kinetics of in Vitro Guanine- N7-Alkylation in Calf Thymus DNA by (2 S,3 S)-1,2-Epoxybutane-3,4-diol 4-methanesulfonate and (2 S,3 S)-1,2:3,4-Diepoxybutane: Revision of the Mechanism of DNA Cross-Linking by the Prodrug Treosulfan

Prodrug treosulfan, originally registered for treatment of ovarian cancer, has gained a use in conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Treosulfan converts nonenzymatically to the monoepoxide intermediate (EBDM), and then to (2 S,3 S)-1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane (DEB). The latter alkylates DNA forming mainly (2' S,3' S)- N-7-(2',3',4'-trihydroxybut-1'-yl)guanine (THBG) and (2 S,3 S)-1,4-bis(guan-7'-yl)butane-2,3-diol cross-link (bis-N7G-BD) via the intermediate epoxide adduct (EHBG). It is believed that DNA cross-linking by DEB is a primary mechanism for the anticancer and myeloablative properties of treosulfan, but clear evidence is lacking. Recently, we have proved that EBDM alkylates DNA producing (2' S,3' S)- N-7-(2',3'-dihydroxy-4'-methylsulfonyloxybut-1'-yl)-guanine (HMSBG) and that free HMSBG converts to EHBG. In this paper, we investigated the kinetics of HMSBG, bis-N7G-BD, and THBG in DNA in vitro to elucidate the contribution of EBDM and DEB to treosulfan-dependent DNA-DNA cross-linking. Calf thymus DNA was exposed to ( A) 100 μM treosulfan, ( B) 200 μM treosulfan, and ( C) DEB at a concentration 100 μM, exceeding that produced by 200 μM treosulfan. Following mild acid thermal hydrolysis of DNA, ultrafiltration, and off-line HPLC purification, the guanine adducts were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Both bis-N7G-BD and THBG reached highest concentrations in the DNA in experiment B. Ratios of the maximal concentration of bis-N7G-BD and THBG to DEB (adduct C_max/DEB C_max) in experiments A and B were 1.7-3.0-times greater than in experiment C. EHBG converted to the bis-N7G-BD cross-link at a much higher rate constant (0.20 h^-1) than EBDM and DEB initially alkylated the DNA (1.8-3.4 × 10^-5 h^-1), giving rise to HMSBG and EHBG, respectively. HMSBG decayed unexpectedly slowly (0.022 h^-1) compared with the previously reported behavior of the free adduct (0.14 h^-1), which revealed the inhibitory effect of the DNA environment on the adduct epoxidation to EHBG. A kinetic simulation based on the obtained results and the literature pharmacokinetic parameters of treosulfan, EBDM, and DEB suggested that in patients treated with the prodrug, EBDM could produce the vast majority of EHBG and bis-N7G-BD via HMSBG. In conclusion, EBDM can produce DNA-DNA lesions independently of DEB, and likely plays a greater role in DNA cross-linking after in vivo administration of treosulfan than DEB. These findings compel revision of the previously proposed mechanism of the pharmacological action of treosulfan and contribute to better understanding of the importance of EBDM for biological effects.

In Vivo Red Blood Cells/Plasma Partition Coefficient of Treosulfan and Its Active Monoepoxide in Rats

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Treosulfan is a prodrug applied in the treatment of ovarian cancer and conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. So far, the bioanalysis of treosulfan in either whole blood or red blood cells (RBC) has not been carried out. In this work, the RBC/plasma partition coefficient (K_e/p) of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide was determined for the first time.

METHODS

Male and female 10-week-old Wistar rats (n = 6/6) received an intraperitoneal injection of treosulfan at the dose of 500 mg/kg body weight. The concentrations of treosulfan and its monoepoxide in plasma (C_p) and RBC were analyzed with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method.

RESULTS

The mean K_e/p of treosulfan and its monoepoxide were 0.74 and 0.60, respectively, corresponding to the blood/plasma partition coefficient of 0.88 and 0.82. The Spearman test demonstrated that the K_e/p of the prodrug correlated with its C_p, but no correlation between the K_e/p and C_p of the active monoepoxide was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Treosulfan and its monoepoxide achieve higher concentrations in plasma than in RBC; therefore, the choice of plasma for bioanalysis is rational as compared to whole blood. The distribution of treosulfan into RBC may be a saturable process at therapeutic concentrations.

Disposition of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide in a bone marrow, liver, lungs, brain, and muscle: Studies in a rat model with clinical relevance

For the recent years, the application of treosulfan (TREO)-based conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been increasing as an alternative to busulfan-based therapy, especially for patients presenting high risk of developing hepato-, pulmo-, and neurotoxicity. So far, the penetration of TREO and its epoxy-derivatives into central nervous system and aqueous humor of the eye has been investigated. However, lacking knowledge on the compounds distribution into the other key tissues precludes comprehensive understanding and assessment of TREO clinical efficacy and toxicity. In this paper, the disposition of TREO and its active monoepoxide (S,S-EBDM) in a bone marrow, liver, lungs, brain, and quadriceps femoris was studied in an animal model. Male and female adult Wistar rats (n=48/48) received an intraperitoneal injection of TREO at the dose of 500mg/kg b.w. Concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM in tissues were determined with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic calculations were performed in WinNonlin using a noncompartmental analysis. Mean values of the maximal concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM in the organs were sex-independent and ranged from 61 to 1650μM and 25-105μM, respectively. No quantifiable levels of S,S-EBDM were found in the liver. Average tissue/plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratio for unbound TREO increased in the sequence: brain (0.10)<muscle (0.77)<bone marrow=lungs (0.82)<liver (0.96). The tissue/plasma AUC ratio for unbound S,S-EBDM changed as follows: brain (0.35)<lungs (0.50)<bone marrow (0.75)<muscle (1.14). Elimination half-lives of the compounds in plasma and the organs ranged from 0.7h to 2.1h. Scaling of the obtained AUCs of TREO and S,S-EBDM and the literature AUCs of busulfan to concentrations of the drugs in HSCT patients' plasma show that TREO reaches much higher levels in the organs than busulfan. Nonetheless, low S,S-EBDM exposure in a liver, lungs, and brain, even compared with busulfan, may contribute to relatively low organ toxicity of TREO-based conditioning regimens. Similarity of the scaled bone marrow AUCs of S,S-EBDM and busulfan corresponds to comparable myeloablative potency of TREO- and busulfan-based conditioning. The biological half-lives of TREO and S,S-EBDM in plasma and the studied organs indicate that 48h lag time following administration of the last dose of TREO to HSCT patients is sufficient to protect the transplanted stem cells from the compounds' exposure.

Bone Marrow-Derived Cell Accumulation in the Spinal Cord Is Independent of Peripheral Mobilization in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Bone marrow-derived cells (BMDCs) are capable of migrating across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and accumulating in the central nervous system (CNS) when transplanted into recipients conditioned with whole-body irradiation or chemotherapy. We used the chemotherapeutic agents busulfan and treosulfan to condition recipient mice for transplantation with bone marrow (BM) cells isolated from donor mice ubiquitously expressing green fluorescent protein. We attempted to increase the accumulation of BMDCs in the CNS by mobilization of BMDCs using either, or both, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) or plerixafor (AMD3100). We also used several concentrations of busulfan. We hypothesized that higher concentrations of busulfan and BMDC mobilization would increase numbers of GFP⁺ cells in the CNS. The doses of busulfan employed (60–125 mg/kg) all resulted in high levels of sustained chimerism (>85% 1 year post-transplant) in both the blood and BM of wild-type (WT) mice and an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) mouse model. Moreover, cells accumulated within the CNS in a dose-, time-, and disease-dependent manner. Conditioning with the hydrophilic busulfan analog treosulfan, which is unable to cross the BBB efficiently, also resulted in a high degree of BM chimerism. However, few GFP⁺ BMDCs were found within the CNS of WT or ALS mice of treosulfan-conditioned mice. Mobilization of BMDCs into the circulation using GCSF and/or AMD3100 did not lead to increased accumulation of GFP⁺ BMDCs within the CNS of WT or ALS mice. Weekly analysis of BMDC accumulation revealed that BMDCs accumulated more rapidly and to a greater extent in the CNS of ALS mice conditioned with a high dose (125 mg/kg) of busulfan compared to a lower dose (80 mg/kg). The number of GFP⁺ BMDCs in the CNS labeling with the proliferation marker Ki67 increased in parallel with BMDC accumulation within the CNS. Our results indicate that establishment of high levels of blood and BM chimerism alone is not sufficient to induce BMDC accumulation within the CNS and that CNS conditioning is a crucial requirement for BMDC accumulation to occur. Moreover, it appears that proliferation of BMDCs that infiltrate the CNS is partly responsible for cell accumulation in busulfan-conditioned ALS mice.

Ocular disposition of treosulfan and its active epoxy-transformers following intravenous administration in rabbits

Treosulfan (TREO) has an established position in chemotherapy of advanced ovarian cancer but has been also applied in uveal melanoma patients. Moreover, it is used as an orphan drug for a myeloablative conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. In this paper, biodistribution of prodrug TREO and its active monoepoxide (S,S-EBDM) and diepoxide (S,S-DEB) into aqueous humor of the eye was studied for the first time. For that purpose, alone TREO and the mixture of TREO, S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB were administered intravenously to New Zealand White rabbits. The three analytes were determined in plasma and aqueous humor by validated HPLC methods and pharmacokinetic calculations were performed in WinNonlin. After the infusion of TREO, the aqueous humor/plasma C_max ratio and area under the curve ratio amounted 0.04 and 0.10 for TREO, and 1.1 and 2.2 for S,S-EBDM, respectively. Following the bolus injection of the mixture of the prodrug and its epoxides, the aqueous humor/plasma C_max ratios for TREO, S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB were 0.05, 0.66, and 4.0, respectively. The presented results indicate a poor penetration of TREO into the eye, which may impair systemic treatment of ocular tumors but is beneficial in terms of a lack of clinically relevant ophthalmic adverse effects.