Monoamine-dependent, opioid-independent antihypersensitivity effects of intrathecally administered milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a postoperative pain model in rats

Combined antiallodynic effects of Neurotropin®-tramadol and Neurotropin®-mirogabalin in rats with L5-spinal nerve ligation

We aimed to examine the efficacy of combination therapies of Neurotropin® with tramadol and Neurotropin with mirogabalin for neuropathic pain management. A neuropathic pain model (L5 spinal nerve ligation model: L5-SNL) using male Wistar rats was generated through tight ligation of the left fifth lumbar nerve using silk sutures. Mechanical allodynia was assessed using the 50% paw withdrawal threshold. The combined antiallodynic effects were evaluated using isobolographic analyses. Small intestinal transit was evaluated using the charcoal meal test, and motor coordination using the rota-rod test. Neurotropin (50-200 NU/kg, p.o.), tramadol (7.5-60 mg/kg, p.o.), and mirogabalin (3-30 mg/kg, p.o.) showed a dose-dependent antiallodynic effect in L5-SNL rats. The combined antiallodynic effects of Neurotropin and tramadol were additive or synergistic, whereas those of Neurotropin and mirogabalin were additive. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the small intestinal transit, whereas tramadol (30-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited it. Neurotropin (100-400 NU/kg, p.o.) did not affect the walking time, whereas mirogabalin (10-100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly decreased it. Neurotropin dose-dependently ameliorated mechanical allodynia in rats, and combination therapy with Neurotropin-tramadol or Neurotropin-mirogabalin may alleviate neuropathic pain without aggravating the adverse effects of tramadol and mirogabalin.

The efficacy of duloxetine depends on spinal cholinergic plasticity in neuropathic pain model rats

Antidepressants, such as duloxetine, are widely used to treat chronic pain, including neuropathic pain; however, their efficacy is unsatisfactory. In our previous studies, we showed that in a spinal nerve ligation (SNL) rat model, the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system, which involves in the anti-hypersensitivity mechanism of antidepressants, decrease its activity over time following peripheral nerve injury. In this study, we hypothesized that the analgesic effects of duloxetine may diminish following the attenuation of the descending noradrenergic inhibitory system. The analgesic effects of duloxetine in SNL model rats at the early (SNL2W) and chronic (SNL6W) phases following spinal nerve ligation were compared. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to the SNL2W or SNL6W groups and used to evaluate the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine using the von Frey filament test. The anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine at a dose of 10 mg/kg were lower in SNL6W rats than in SNL2W rats. Basal noradrenaline concentrations in rat spinal dorsal horns were higher in the SNL6W group than in the SNL2W group, and there was no difference in the increase in spinal noradrenaline concentrations between the 2 groups following duloxetine administration. In addition, we found that duloxetine-induced acetylcholine (ACh) release and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) expression in the spinal dorsal horn decreased in SNL6W rats. At a dose of 30 mg/kg, duloxetine showed anti-allodynic effects even in SNL6W rats and induced ACh release in the spinal cord. Furthermore, these anti-allodynic effects were completely inhibited by intrathecal atropine (muscarinic antagonist) administration. Moreover, 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of the TrkB agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (5 mg/kg), not only restored ChAT expression, but also decreased the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine. These findings suggest that the attenuation of the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine at the chronic phase of SNL may be due to impaired spinal acetylcholine-mediated analgesia. In addition, the activation of BDNF-TrkB signaling may be beneficial in reversing this impairment.

•

The anti-allodynic effect of duloxetine decreases at chronic stage following nerve injury than at early phase.

•

There are no differences in the inhibition of noradrenaline reuptake by duloxetine between SNL2W and SNL6W rats.

•

The spinal ChAT immunoreactivity and duloxetine-induced spinal ACh release are reduced in SNL6W rats.

•

TrkB agonist increases spinal ChAT and restores the attenuation of anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine in SNL6W rats.

Novel Approaches, Drug Candidates, and Targets in Pain Drug Discovery

Because of the problems associated with opioids, drug discovery efforts have been employed to develop opioids with reduced side effects using approaches such as biased opioid agonism, multifunctional opioids, and allosteric modulation of opioid receptors. Receptor targets such as adrenergic, cannabinoid, P2X3 and P2X7, NMDA, serotonin, and sigma, as well as ion channels like the voltage-gated sodium channels Nav1.7 and Nav1.8 have been targeted to develop novel analgesics. Several enzymes, such as soluble epoxide hydrolase, sepiapterin reductase, and MAGL/FAAH, have also been targeted to develop novel analgesics. In this review, old and recent targets involved in pain signaling and compounds acting at these targets are summarized. In addition, strategies employed to reduce side effects, increase potency, and efficacy of opioids are also elaborated. This review should aid in propelling drug discovery efforts to discover novel analgesics.

Spinal Activation of Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase-B Recovers the Impaired Endogenous Analgesia in Neuropathic Pain Rats

BACKGROUND

Although endogenous analgesia plays an important role in controlling pain states, chronic pain patients exhibit decreased endogenous analgesia compared to healthy individuals. In rats, noxious stimulus-induced analgesia (NSIA), which is an indicator of endogenous analgesia, diminished 6 weeks after spinal nerve ligation (SNL6W). A recent study in rats with deleted noradrenergic fibers demonstrated that the noradrenergic fibers were essential to NSIA. It has also been reported that brain-derived neurotrophic factor increased spinal noradrenergic fibers. Therefore, this study examined the effect of TrkB activation, which is the receptor for brain-derived neurotrophic factor, on impaired NSIA in SNL6W rats. In addition, we also examined the effect of endogenous analgesia on acute incisional pain.

METHODS

After 5 daily intraperitoneal injections of 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (7,8-DHF, TrkB agonist, 5 mg/kg), NSIA was examined by measuring the withdrawal threshold increment in the left (contralateral to nerve ligation) hindpaw at 30 minutes after capsaicin injection (250 μg) in the forepaw. K252a (TrkB antagonist, 2 μg) was administrated intrathecally for 5 days. Idazoxan (α2 adrenoceptor antagonist, 30 μg), atropine (muscarinic antagonist, 30 μg), and propranolol (nonselective β adrenoceptor antagonist, 30 μg) were administered intrathecally for 15 minutes before capsaicin injection. Microdialysis and immunohistochemistry were performed to examine the noradrenergic plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn. A hindpaw incision was performed on the left (contralateral to nerve ligation) hindpaw. Data were analyzed by 1-way analyses of variance or 2-way repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance followed by a Student t test with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Five daily intraperitoneal injections of 7,8-DHF restored the attenuated NSIA in SNL6W rats (n = 7, P = .002; estimated treatment effect [95% CI]: 62.9 [27.0-98.7] g), with this effect blocked by 5 daily intrathecal coadministrations of K252a (n = 6, P < .001; -57.8 [-78.3 to -37.2] g). This effect was also inhibited by a single intrathecal administration of idazoxan (n = 8, P < .001; -61.6 [-92.4 to -30.9] g) and atropine (n = 8, P = .003; -52.6 [-73.3 to -31.9] g), but not by propranolol. Furthermore, 7,8-DHF increased the noradrenergic fiber in the spinal dorsal horn and the noradrenaline release in response to the capsaicin injection in the forepaw in SNL6W rats. In addition, repeated injections of 7,8-DHF prevented delayed recovery from incisional pain in SNL6W rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal activation of TrkB may recover the attenuated endogenous analgesia by improving the adrenergic plasticity, thereby leading to prevention of pain prolongation after surgery.

Novel Endomorphin Analogs Are More Potent and Longer-Lasting Analgesics in Neuropathic, Inflammatory, Postoperative, and Visceral Pain Relative to Morphine

Activation of the mu-opioid receptor provides the gold standard for pain relief, but most opioids used clinically have adverse effects that have contributed to an epidemic of overdose deaths. We recently characterized mu-opioid receptor selective endomorphin (EM) analogs that provide potent antinociception with reduction or absence of a number of side effects of traditionally prescribed opioids including abuse liability, respiratory depression, motor impairment, tolerance, and inflammation. The current study explores the effectiveness of these EM analogs relative to morphine in four major pain models by intrathecal as well as intravenous administration in male Sprague Dawley rats and subcutaneous administration in male CD-1 mice. In the spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain, mechanical allodynia and mechanical hyperalgesia were assessed with von Frey and Randall-Selitto tests, respectively. In the paw incision model of postoperative pain, von Frey testing was used to assess mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia was evaluated with Hargreaves testing. In the Complete Freund's Adjuvant model of inflammatory pain, thermal hyperalgesia was assessed using Hargreaves testing. In CD-1 mice, visceral pain was assessed with the acetic acid writhing test. In all cases, EM analogs had equal or greater potency and longer duration of action relative to morphine. The data suggest that EM analogs, particularly analog 4 (ZH853), could provide effective therapy for a diverse spectrum of pain conditions with low risk of adverse side effects compared with currently used opioids such as morphine.

PERSPECTIVE

Novel EM analogs show equal or greater potency and effectiveness relative to morphine in multiple pain models. Together with substantially reduced side effects, including abuse liability, the compounds show promise for addressing the critical need for effective pain relief as well as reducing the opioid overdose epidemic.

Altered Gene Expression of RNF34 and PACAP Possibly Involved in Mechanism of Exercise-Induced Analgesia for Neuropathic Pain in Rats

Despite the availability of several modalities of treatment, including surgery, pharmacological agents, and nerve blocks, neuropathic pain is often unresponsive and sometimes progresses to intractable chronic pain. Although exercise therapy is a candidate for treatment of neuropathic pain, the mechanism underlying its efficacy has not been elucidated. To clarify the molecular mechanism for pain relief induced by exercise, we measured Rnf34 and Pacap mRNA levels in the spinal cord dorsal horn of SNL rats, a model of neuropathic pain. SNL model rats exhibited stable mechanical hyperalgesia for at least 6 weeks. When the rats were forced to exercise on a treadmill, mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia were significantly ameliorated compared with the non-exercise group. Accordingly, gene expression level of Rnf34 and Pacap were also significantly altered in the time course analysis after surgery. These results suggest that exercise therapy possibly involves pain relief in SNL rats by suppressing Rnf34 and Pacap expression in the spinal cord.

Spinal dopaminergic involvement in the antihyperalgesic effect of antidepressants in a rat model of neuropathic pain

Antidepressants such as tricyclic antidepressants, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors are a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain. Here, we aimed to determine the involvement of the spinal dopaminergic system in the antihyperalgesic effects of antidepressants in a rat model of neuropathic pain induced by spinal nerve ligation (SNL). The right L5 spinal nerve of male Sprague-Dawley rats was ligated under inhalation anesthesia to induce hyperalgesia. Behavioral testing was performed by measuring ipsilateral hindpaw withdrawal thresholds after intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran, and fluoxetine. D2-like receptors were blocked by intrathecal administration of sulpiride. We also determined the concentrations of dopamine in the spinal cord using microdialysis after injection of antidepressants. The dopamine contents in the spinal dorsal horn were also measured in normal and SNL rats at 2, 3, 4, and 8 weeks after SNL surgery. Intraperitoneal injection of amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran, and fluoxetine (3-30mg/kg) produced antihyperalgesic effects, and prevented by intrathecal pre-injection of sulpiride (30μg). Microdialysis revealed the dopamine levels in the spinal cord were increased after intraperitoneal injection of each antidepressant (10mg/kg). Furthermore, the dopamine content in homogenized spinal cord tissue were increased at 2 weeks after SNL and then subsequently declined. Our results suggest that the effect of antidepressants against neuropathic pain is related to modulation of not only noradrenalin and serotonin but also dopamine levels in the spinal cord.

Antidepressant Drugs for Postsurgical Pain: Current Status and Future Directions

Current treatments for postsurgical pain are often inadequate and adverse effects are substantial such that residual pain and/or side effects impair recovery. The recognition of analgesic efficacy with antidepressant drugs for chronic pain suggests the potential for efficacy in acute postsurgical pain. As reviewed here, current evidence suggests that approximately half of previous trials suggest efficacy of various antidepressants for acute postoperative pain. However, most trials are older with deficiencies including: lack of designation of a primary outcome, no assessment of movement-evoked pain, small size and limited safety assessment. Only one of three trials addressing prevention of chronic postsurgical pain suggested any efficacy; however, the evidence base for this indication is limited. Thus, current evidence does not yet support routine use of any one specific antidepressant for treatment of acute, or prevention of chronic, postsurgical pain. However, limitations in available trials are such that one cannot yet rule out the possibility that one or more antidepressant drugs may provide benefit in specific populations. Therefore, future larger trials should explore optimal dosing and duration of antidepressant treatment, procedure specificity, safety evaluation, and assessment of movement-evoked pain.

Disruption of Spinal Noradrenergic Activation Delays Recovery of Acute Incision-Induced Hypersensitivity and Increases Spinal Glial Activation in the Rat

Results of clinical studies suggest that descending inhibitory controls from the brainstem are important for speeding recovery from pain after surgery. We examined the effects of destroying spinally projecting noradrenergic neurons via intrathecally administered antibody to dopamine β-hydroxylase conjugated to saporin (DβH-saporin) on recovery in an acute incisional pain model. Mechanical and thermal paw withdrawal thresholds and nonevoked spontaneous guarding scores were tested for several weeks postoperatively and analyzed using mixed effects growth curve modeling. DβH-saporin treatment resulted in a significant prolongation in the duration of mechanical and to a lesser degree thermal hypersensitivity in the ipsilateral paw of incised rats but did not increase the duration of spontaneous guarding. DβH-saporin treatment was also associated with increased microglial and astrocyte activation in the ipsilateral spinal cord 21 days after incision compared with immunoglobulin G-saporin treated controls. Chronic intrathecal administration of the α2 adrenergic receptor antagonist atipamezole (50-200 μg/d) produced similar effects. These data suggest that spinally projecting noradrenergic pathways and spinal α2 adrenergic receptor activation are important for speeding recovery from hypersensitivity after surgical incision possibly by reducing spinal glial activation. Interventions that augment the noradrenergic system might be important to speed recovery from pain after surgery.

PERSPECTIVE

Endogenous descending spinal noradrenergic activation promotes resolution of incision-induced hypersensitivity and inhibits spinal microglial and astrocyte activation in part through α2 adrenergic receptors.

The antihyperalgesic effects of intrathecal bupropion, a dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in a rat model of neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are often used for the treatment of neuropathic pain, and their analgesic effects rely on increased noradrenaline and serotonin levels in the spinal cord. Clinical studies have also shown that bupropion, a dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, has strong efficacy in neuropathic pain; however, the role of spinal cord dopamine in neuropathic pain is unknown. We hypothesized that bupropion inhibits neuropathic pain by increasing noradrenaline and dopamine in the spinal cord. In the present study, we determined the efficacy and underlying mechanisms of intrathecal administration of bupropion in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, and right L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL) was performed to produce mechanical hyperalgesia of the hindpaw. Withdrawal threshold to a paw pressure test was measured before and after intrathecal administration of bupropion, without or with intrathecal antagonists for α2-adrenoceptors and dopamine D2 receptors. In vivo microdialysis was performed in the dorsal horn of the lumbar spinal cord to measure noradrenaline and dopamine concentrations after intrathecal injection of bupropion. We also measured the noradrenaline and dopamine contents in the ipsilateral dorsal lumbar spinal cord in normal rats and in rats 2, 3, and 4 weeks after SNL.

RESULTS

Intrathecal injection of bupropion produced a dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effect (3, 10, 30, and 100 μg, P < 0.001). The effect (30 μg) was dose-dependently reversed by intrathecal pretreatment (15 minutes before bupropion injection) with the α2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (3, 10, and 30 μg, P < 0.001) and D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride (3, 10, and 30 μg, P < 0.001). Microdialysis revealed that noradrenaline and dopamine concentrations in the spinal dorsal horn were increased after intrathecal injection of bupropion (30 μg, P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the noradrenaline and dopamine contents in the spinal dorsal horn were increased 2 weeks after SNL (P < 0.001 and P = 0.044, respectively) and then decreased gradually.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that plasticity of descending inhibitory pathways such as the noradrenaline and dopamine systems contributes to the maintenance of neuropathic pain and that spinal cord noradrenaline and dopamine both play an inhibitory role in neuropathic pain.

Antidepressant drugs for prevention of acute and chronic postsurgical pain: early evidence and recommended future directions

BACKGROUND

This review evaluates trials of antidepressants for acute and chronic postsurgical pain.

METHODS

Trials were systematically identified using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Extracted data included the following: pain at rest and with movement, adverse effects, and other outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (985 participants) of early postoperative pain evaluated amitriptyline (three trials), bicifadine (two trials), desipramine (three trials), duloxetine (one trial), fluoxetine (one trial), fluradoline (one trial), tryptophan (four trials), and venlafaxine (one trial). Three studies (565 participants) of chronic postoperative pain prevention evaluated duloxetine (one trial), escitalopram (one trial), and venlafaxine (one trial). Heterogeneity because of differences in drug, dosing regimen, outcomes, and/or surgical procedure precluded any meta-analyses. Superiority to placebo was reported in 8 of 15 trials for early pain reduction and 1 of 3 trials for chronic pain reduction. The majority of positive trials did not report sufficient data to estimate treatment effect sizes. Many studies had inadequate size, safety evaluation/reporting, procedure specificity, and movement-evoked pain assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently insufficient evidence to support the clinical use of antidepressants-beyond controlled investigations-for treatment of acute, or prevention of chronic, postoperative pain. Multiple positive trials suggest the therapeutic potential of antidepressants, which need to be replicated. Other nontrial evidence suggests potential safety concerns of perioperative antidepressant use. Future studies are needed to better define the risk-benefit ratio of antidepressants in postoperative pain management. Higher-quality trials should optimize dosing, timing and duration of antidepressant treatment, trial size, patient selection, safety evaluation and reporting, procedure specificity, and assessment of movement-evoked pain relevant to postoperative functional recovery.

Peripheral Nerve Injury Reduces Analgesic Effectsof Systemic Morphine via Spinal 5-Hydroxytryptamine 3 Receptors

Background:

Morphine produces powerful analgesic effects against acute pain, but it is not effective against neuropathic pain, and the mechanisms underlying this reduced efficacy remain unclear. Here, the authors compared the efficacy of systemic morphine between normal rats and rats with peripheral nerve injury, with a specific focus on descending serotonergic mechanisms.

Methods:

After L5 spinal nerve ligation injury, male Sprague–Dawley rats were subjected to behavioral testing, in vivo microdialysis of the spinal dorsal horn to determine serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) and noradrenaline release, and immunohistochemistry (n = 6 in each group).

Results:

Intraperitoneal administration of morphine (1, 3, or 10 mg/kg) produced analgesic effects in normal and spinal nerve ligation rats, but the effects were greater in normal rats (P &lt; 0.001). Morphine increased 5-HT release (450 to 500% of the baseline), but not noradrenaline release, in the spinal dorsal horn via activation of serotonergic neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla. Intrathecal pretreatment with ondansetron (3 μg), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, or 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine creatinine sulfate (100 μg), a selective neurotoxin for serotonergic terminals, attenuated the analgesic effect of morphine (10 mg/kg) in normal rats but increased the analgesic effect of morphine in spinal nerve ligation rats (both P &lt; 0.05).

Conclusions:

Systemic administration of morphine increases 5-HT levels in the spinal cord, and the increase in 5-HT contributes to morphine-induced analgesia in the normal state but attenuates that in neuropathic pain through spinal 5-HT3 receptors. The plasticity of the descending serotonergic system may contribute to the reduced efficacy of systemic morphine in neuropathic pain.

Antinociceptive Effects of the Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors Milnacipran and Duloxetine on Vincristine-Induced Neuropathic Pain Model in Mice

Vincristine is an anticancer drug used to treat a variety of cancer types, but it frequently causes peripheral neuropathy. Neuropathic pain is often associated with the appearance of abnormal sensory signs, such as allodynia. Milnacipran and duloxetine, serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, have shown efficacy against several chronic pain syndromes. In this study, we investigated the attenuation of vincristine-induced mechanical allodynia in mice by milnacipran and duloxetine. To induce peripheral neuropathy, vincristine was administered once per day (0.1 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) for 7 days. Mechanical allodynia was evaluated by measuring the withdrawal response to stimulation with a von Frey filament. In vincristine-treated mice, mechanical allodynia was observed on days 3-28 of vincristine administration. A single administration of milnacipran (40 mg/kg, i.p.) or duloxetine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) had no effect on vincristine-induced mechanical allodynia. However, repeated administration of milnacipran (20 or 40 mg/kg, once per day, i.p.) or duloxetine (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg, once per day, i.p.) for 7 days significantly reduced vincristine-induced mechanical allodynia. These results suggest that chronic vincristine administration induces mechanical allodynia, and that repeated milnacipran and duloxetine administration may be an effective approach for the treatment of neuropathic pain caused by vincristine treatment for cancer.

Impaired noradrenaline homeostasis in rats with painful diabetic neuropathy as a target of duloxetine analgesia

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a serious complication of diabetes mellitus that affects a large number of patients in many countries. The molecular mechanisms underlying the exaggerated nociception in PDN have not been established. Recently, duloxetine (DLX), a serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor, has been recommended as one of the first-line treatments of PDN in the United States Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency and the Japanese Guideline for the Pharmacologic Management of Neuropathic pain. Because selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors show limited analgesic effects in PDN, we examined whether the potent analgesic effect of DLX contributes toward improving the pathologically aberrant noradrenaline homeostasis in diabetic models.

RESULTS

In streptozotocin (STZ) (50 mg/kg, i.v.)-induced diabetic rats that exhibited robust mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia, DLX (10 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly and markedly increased the nociceptive threshold. The analgesic effect of DLX was nullified by the prior administration of N-(2-chloroethyl)-N-ethyl-2-bromobenzylamine (DSP-4) (50 mg/kg, i.p.), which drastically eliminated dopamine-beta-hydroxylase- and norepinephrine transporter-immunopositive fibers in the lumbar spinal dorsal horn and significantly reduced the noradrenaline content in the lumbar spinal cord. The treatment with DSP-4 alone markedly lowered the nociceptive threshold in vehicle-treated non-diabetic rats; however, this pro-nociceptive effect was occluded in STZ-treated diabetic rats. Furthermore, STZ-treated rats exhibited a higher amount of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase- and norepinephrine transporter-immunopositive fibers in the dorsal horn and noradrenaline content in the spinal cord compared to vehicle-treated rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired noradrenaline-mediated regulation of the spinal nociceptive network might underlie exaggerated nociception in PDN. DLX might exert its analgesic effect by selective enhancement of noradrenergic signals, thus counteracting this situation.

Relative contributions of norepinephrine and serotonin transporters to antinociceptive synergy between monoamine reuptake inhibitors and morphine in the rat formalin model

Multimodal analgesia is designed to optimize pain relief by coadministering drugs with distinct mechanisms of action or by combining multiple pharmacologies within a single molecule. In clinical settings, combinations of monoamine reuptake inhibitors and opioid receptor agonists have been explored and one currently available analgesic, tapentadol, functions as both a µ-opioid receptor agonist and a norepinephrine transporter inhibitor. However, it is unclear whether the combination of selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibition and µ-receptor agonism achieves an optimal antinociceptive synergy. In this study, we assessed the pharmacodynamic interactions between morphine and monoamine reuptake inhibitors that possess different affinities and selectivities for norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. Using the rat formalin model, in conjunction with measurements of ex vivo transporter occupancy, we show that neither the norepinephrine-selective inhibitor, esreboxetine, nor the serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, produce antinociceptive synergy with morphine. Atomoxetine, a monoamine reuptake inhibitor that achieves higher levels of norepinephrine than serotonin transporter occupancy, exhibited robust antinociceptive synergy with morphine. Similarly, a fixed-dose combination of esreboxetine and fluoxetine which achieves comparable levels of transporter occupancy potentiated the antinociceptive response to morphine. By contrast, duloxetine, a monoamine reuptake inhibitor that achieves higher serotonin than norepinephrine transporter occupancy, failed to potentiate the antinociceptive response to morphine. However, when duloxetine was coadministered with the 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist, ondansetron, potentiation of the antinociceptive response to morphine was revealed. These results support the notion that inhibition of both serotonin and norepinephrine transporters is required for monoamine reuptake inhibitor and opioid-mediated antinociceptive synergy; yet, excess serotonin, acting via 5-HT₃ receptors, may reduce the potential for synergistic interactions. Thus, in the rat formalin model, the balance between norepinephrine and serotonin transporter inhibition influences the degree of antinociceptive synergy observed between monoamine reuptake inhibitors and morphine.

The antinociceptive effect of milnacipran in the monosodium iodoacetate model of osteoarthritis pain and its relation to changes in descending inhibition

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic joint disorder whose principal symptom is chronic pain. Current analgesics are inadequate and the mechanisms contributing to this pain are poorly understood but likely to include both local joint changes and central consequences. These studies used monoamine receptor agents combined with behavioral studies and single-unit dorsal horn recordings to examine whether descending noradrenergic and serotonergic inhibitions are altered in the monosodium iodoacetate model of OA pain, and whether increasing these inhibitions with the serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor milnacipran can attenuate the attendant hypersensitivity. Early and late in the course of this model, milnacipran (s.c.) reduced behavioral hypersensitivity, and inhibited evoked responses from sensitized dorsal horn neurons. In naïve animals and the early, but not late, phase of the model, spinal administration of the α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist atipamezole fully reversed this neuronal inhibition, whereas atipamezole administered alone revealed that endogenous noradrenergic inhibition was reduced in the late phase. Blocking spinal 5-hydroxytryptamine-7 receptors with (2R)-1-[(3-hydroxyphenyl)sulfonyl]-2-[2-(4-methyl-1-piperidinyl)ethyl]pyrrolidine hydrochloride suggested that the effects of milnacipran in the late phase were partly mediated by these receptors, and that descending serotonergic inhibition was increased in this phase. An opioidergic mechanism behind the effects of milnacipran was indicated by a partial reversal of these effects with naloxone. These studies demonstrate antinociceptive effects for milnacipran in a model of OA pain, whose effects come via descending serotonergic and noradrenergic, as well as opioidergic, pathways. Variations in the activity of these pathways over the course of this model may contribute to the presence of behavioral hypersensitivity and determine through which endogenous systems milnacipran exerts its effects.

Effects of milnacipran, a 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, on C-fibre-evoked field potentials in spinal long-term potentiation and neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The analgesic action of 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) on nociceptive synaptic transmission in the spinal cord is poorly understood. We investigated the effects of milnacipran, an SNRI, on C-fibre-evoked field potentials (FPs) in spinal long-term potentiation (LTP), a proposed synaptic mechanism of hypersensitivity, and on the FPs in a neuropathic pain model.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

C-fibre-evoked FPs by electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve fibres were recorded in the spinal dorsal horn of anaesthetized adult rats, and LTP was induced by high-frequency stimulation of the sciatic nerve fibres. A rat model of neuropathic pain was produced by L5 spinal nerve ligation and transection.

KEY RESULTS

Milnacipran produced prolonged inhibition of C-fibre-evoked FPs when applied spinally after the establishment of LTP of C-fibre-evoked FPs in naïve animals. In the neuropathic pain model, spinal administration of milnacipran clearly reduced the basal C-fibre-evoked FPs. These inhibitory effects of milnacipran were blocked by spinal administration of methysergide, a 5-HT½ receptor antagonist, and yohimbine or idazoxan, α₂-adrenoceptor antagonists. However, spinal administration of milnacipran in naïve animals did not affect the basal C-fibre-evoked FPs and the induction of spinal LTP.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Milnacipran inhibited C-fibre-mediated nociceptive synaptic transmission in the spinal dorsal horn after the establishment of spinal LTP and in the neuropathic pain model, by activating both spinal 5-hydroxytryptaminergic and noradrenergic systems. The condition-dependent inhibition of the C-fibre-mediated transmission by milnacipran could provide novel evidence regarding the analgesic mechanisms of SNRIs in chronic pain.

Different analgesic effects of adenosine between postoperative and neuropathic pain

BACKGROUND

Adenosine is an endogenous neuromodulator in both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Adenosine inhibits pain signals by hyperpolarizing neuronal membrane.

METHODS

To clarify the effects of adenosine on pain signals, we tested intrathecal adenosine injection in two neuropathic pains (spinal cord compression and chronic constriction of sciatic nerve) and postoperative pain (plantar incision).

RESULTS

In all three kinds of pain models, significant shortening of withdrawal latencies to thermal stimulation were detected from 24 h to 1 week after the surgery. Significant improvements of pain sensation were observed in all three models after intrathecal injection of Cl-adenosine 24 h after surgery. At 72 h after surgery, intrathecal Cl-adenosine injection inhibited hyperalgesia in the two neuropathic pain models but not in the postoperative pain model. Adenosine A1R messenger RNA (mRNA) expression significantly decreased in the plantar incision model. Adenosine A1R protein levels also decreased compared with the other two models and normal control.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that adenosine effectively inhibits pain signals in neuropathic pain but is less effective in postoperative pain because of the decrease in adenosine A1 receptors.

The posterior hypothalamus exerts opposing effects on nociception via the A7 catecholamine cell group in rats

Stimulation of the posterior hypothalamic area (PH) produces antinociception in rats and humans, but the precise mechanisms are unknown. The PH forms anatomical connections with the parabrachial area, which contains the pontine A7 catecholamine cell group, a group of spinally projecting noradrenergic neurons known to produce antinociception in the dorsal horn. The aim of the present study was to determine whether PH-induced antinociception is mediated in part through connections with the A7 cell group in female Sprague-Dawley rats, as measured by the tail flick and foot withdrawal latency. Stimulation of the PH with the cholinergic agonist carbachol (125 nmol) produced antinociception that was blocked by pretreatment with atropine sulfate. Intrathecal injection of the α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine reversed PH-induced antinociception, but the α(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist WB4101 facilitated antinociception. Intrathecal injection of normal saline had no effect. In a separate experiment, cobalt chloride, which reversibly arrests synaptic activity, was microinjected into the A7 cell group and blocked PH-induced antinociception. These findings provide evidence that the PH modulates nociception in part through connections with the A7 catecholamine cell group through opposing effects. Antinociception occurs from actions at α(2)-adrenoceptors in the dorsal horn, while concurrent hyperalgesia occurs from actions of norepinephrine at α(1)-adrenoceptors. This hyperalgesic response likely attenuates antinociception from PH stimulation.

Milnacipran inhibits glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor activity in spinal dorsal horn neurons

Background

Antidepressants, which are widely used for treatment of chronic pain, are thought to have antinociceptive effects by blockade of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake. However, these drugs also interact with various receptors such as excitatory glutamatergic receptors. Thermal hyperalgesia was induced by intrathecal injection of NMDA in rats. Paw withdrawal latency was measured after intrathecal injection of antidepressants. The effects of antidepressants on the NMDA and AMPA-induced responses were examined in lamina II neurons of rat spinal cord slices using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. The effects of milnacipran followed by application of NMDA on pERK activation were also investigated in the spinal cord.

Results

Intrathecal injection of milnacipran (0.1 μmol), but not citalopram (0.1 μmol) and desipramine (0.1 μmol), followed by intrathecal injection of NMDA (1 μg) suppressed thermal hyperalgesia. Milnacipran (100 μM) reduced the amplitude of NMDA (56 ± 3 %, 64 ± 5 % of control)-, but not AMPA (98 ± 5 %, 97 ± 5 % of control)-mediated currents induced by exogenous application and dorsal root stimulation, respectively. Citalopram (100 μM) and desipramine (30 μM) had no effect on the amplitude of exogenous NMDA-induced currents. The number of pERK-positive neurons in the group treated with milnacipran (100 μM), but not citalopram (100 μM) or desipramine (30 μM), followed by NMDA (100 μM) was significantly lower compared with the NMDA-alone group.

Conclusions

The antinociceptive effect of milnacipran may be dependent on the drug’s direct modulation of NMDA receptors in the superficial dorsal horn. Furthermore, in addition to inhibiting the reuptake of monoamines, glutamate NMDA receptors are also important for analgesia induced by milnacipran.

An increase in spinal cord noradrenaline is a major contributor to the antihyperalgesic effect of antidepressants after peripheral nerve injury in the rat

Antidepressants are often used for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Clinical studies suggest that the efficacy of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for neuropathic pain is greater than that of selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In the present study, we determined the efficacy and mechanisms involved in the antihyperalgesic effects of milnacipran, an SNRI, compared with paroxetine, an SSRI, and maprotiline, a selective NA reuptake inhibitor, using a rat model of neuropathic pain. Male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent spinal nerve ligation (SNL), and the withdrawal threshold to paw pressure was measured. Intraperitoneal injection of milnacipran (3-30mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effect. The effect was reversed by intrathecal injection of the α(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan (30μg), but not by various 5-HT receptor antagonists. Paroxetine produced an antihyperalgesic effect only at the highest dose tested (10mg/kg). This effect was reversed by intrathecal injection of both idazoxan and ondansetron (30μg), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Maprotiline produced an antihyperalgesic effect (10 and 30mg/kg), and the effect was reversed by intrathecal idazoxan. In microdialysis studies, NA and 5-HT concentrations in the spinal dorsal horn were increased after injection of either milnacipran or paroxetine, and only NA was increased after maprotiline. Furthermore, the NA content in the spinal cord of SNL rats was greater than that in normal animals. These findings suggest that an increase in NA in the spinal cord plays an important role in the antihyperalgesic effects of not only NA reuptake inhibitors but also SSRIs.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2010

This paper is the thirty-third consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2010 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

Monoaminergic Antidepressants in the Relief of Pain: Potential Therapeutic Utility of Triple Reuptake Inhibitors (TRIs)

Over 75% of depressed patients suffer from painful symptoms predicting a greater severity and a less favorable outcome of depression. Imaging, anatomical and functional studies have demonstrated the existence of common brain structures, neuronal pathways and neurotransmitters in depression and pain. In particular, the ascending serotonergic and noradrenergic pathways originating from the raphe nuclei and the locus coeruleus; respectively, send projections to the limbic system. Such pathways control many of the psychological functions that are disturbed in depression and in the perception of pain. On the other hand, the descending pathways, from monoaminergic nuclei to the spinal cord, are specifically implicated in the inhibition of nociception providing rationale for the use of serotonin (5-HT) and/or norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, NRIs, SNRIs), in the relief of pain. Compelling evidence suggests that dopamine (DA) is also involved in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression. Indeed, recent insights have demonstrated a central role for DA in analgesia through an action at both the spinal and suprasinal levels including brain regions such as the periaqueductal grey (PAG), the thalamus, the basal ganglia and the limbic system. In this context, dopaminergic antidepressants (i.e., containing dopaminergic activity), such as bupropion, nomifensine and more recently triple reuptake inhibitors (TRIs), might represent new promising therapeutic tools in the treatment of painful symptoms with depression. Nevertheless, whether the addition of the dopaminergic component produces more robust effects than single- or dual-acting agents, has yet to be demonstrated. This article reviews the main pathways regulating pain transmission in relation with the monoaminergic systems. It then focuses on the current knowledge regarding the in vivo pharmacological properties and mechanism of action of monoaminergic antidepressants including SSRIs, NRIs, SNRIs and TRIs. Finally, a synthesis of the preclinical studies supporting the efficacy of these antidepressants in analgesia is also addressed in order to highlight the relative contribution of 5-HT, NE and DA to nociception.