Evaluation of the Selectivity and Cysteine Dependence of Inhibitors across the Regulator of G Protein-Signaling Family

In Silico Design of Novel RGS2-Galpha-q Interaction Inhibitors with Anticancer Activity

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) are a family of approximately 30 proteins that bind to and deactivate the alpha subunits of G-proteins (Gα) by accelerating their GTP hydrolysis rates, which terminates G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. Thus, RGS proteins are essential in regulating GPCR signaling, and most members are implicated as critical nodes in human diseases such as hypertension, depression, and others. Regulator of G-protein signaling 2 (RGS2), a member of the R4 family of RGS proteins, is overexpressed in many solid breast cancers, and its levels in prostate cancer significantly correlate with the metastatic stage and poor prognosis. We sought to develop RGS2 inhibitors as potential chemotherapeutic agents utilizing structure-based drug design approaches. Available structures of the RGS2-Gα complex were used to extract a pharmacophore model for searching chemical databases. Docking of identified hits to RGS2 as well as other RGS structures was used to screen the hits for potent and selective RGS2 inhibitors. Whole cell assays showed the top 10 ranking compounds, AJ-1-AJ-10, to inhibit RGS2-Gαq interactions. Differential scanning fluorimetry showed AJ-3 to bind RGS2 but not Gαq. All 10 compounds inhibited the growth of several RGS2 expressing cancers in cell culture assays. In addition, AJ-3 inhibited the migration of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in wound healing assays. This is the first group of RGS2 inhibitors identified by structure-based approaches and that show anticancer activity. These results highlight the potential RGS2 inhibitors have to be a new class of chemotherapeutic agents.

Regulator of G-protein signaling expression in human intestinal enteroendocrine cells and potential role in satiety hormone secretion in health and obesity

BACKGROUND

Gut L-type enteroendocrine cells (EECs) are intestinal chemosensory cells that secrete satiety hormones GLP-1 and PYY in response to activation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) by luminal components of nutrient digestion and microbial fermentation. Regulator of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins are negative regulators of GPCR signaling. The expression profile of RGS in EECs, and their potential role in satiety hormone secretion and obesity is unknown.

METHODS

Transcriptomic profiling of RGS was completed in native colonic EECs was completed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) in lean and obesity, and human jejunal EECs with data obtained from a publicly available RNAseq dataset (GSE114853). RGS validation studies were completed using whole mucosal intestinal tissue obtained during endoscopy in 61 patients (n = 42 OB, n = 19 Lean); a subset of patients' postprandial plasma was assayed for GLP-1 and PYY. Ex vivo human intestinal cultures and in vitro NCI-H716 cells overexpressing RGS9 were exposed to GLP-1 secretagogues in conjunction with a nonselective RGS-inhibitor and assayed for GLP-1 secretion.

FINDINGS

Transcriptomic profiling of colonic and jejunal enteroendocrine cells revealed a unique RGS expression profile in EECs, and further within GLP-1+ L-type EECs. In obesity the RGS expression profile was altered in colonic EECs. Human gut RGS9 expression correlated positively with BMI and negatively with postprandial GLP-1 and PYY. RGS inhibition in human intestinal cultures increased GLP-1 release from EECs ex vivo. NCI-H716 cells overexpressing RGS9 displayed defective nutrient-stimulated GLP-1 secretion.

INTERPRETATION

This study introduces the expression profile of RGS in human EECs, alterations in obesity, and suggests a role for RGS proteins as modulators of GLP-1 and PYY secretion from intestinal EECs.

FUNDING

AA is supported by the NIH(C-Sig P30DK84567, K23 DK114460), a Pilot Award from the Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery, and a Translational Product Development Fund from The Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science Office of Translational Practice in partnership with the University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute.

R4 RGS proteins as fine tuners of immature and mature hematopoietic cell trafficking

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest and most diverse group of membrane receptors. They are involved in almost every physiologic process and consequently have a pivotal role in an extensive number of pathologies, including genetic, neurologic, and immune system disorders. Indeed, the vast array of GPCRs mechanisms have led to the development of a tremendous number of drug therapies and already account for about a third of marketed drugs. These receptors mediate their downstream signals primarily via G proteins. The regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are now in the spotlight as the critical modulatory factors of active GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins to fine-tune the biologic responses driven by the GPCRs. Also, they possess noncanonical functions by multiple mechanisms, such as protein-protein interactions. Essential roles and impacts of these RGS proteins have been revealed in physiology, including hematopoiesis and immunity, and pathologies, including asthma, cancers, and neurologic disorders. This review focuses on the largest subfamily of R4 RGS proteins and provides a brief overview of their structures and G-proteins selectivity. With particular interest, we explore and highlight, their expression in the hematopoietic system and the regulation in the engraftment of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Distinct expression patterns of R4 RGS proteins in the hematopoietic system and their pivotal roles in stem cell trafficking pave the way for realizing new strategies for enhancing the clinical performance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Finally, we discuss the exciting future trends in drug development by targeting RGS activity and expression with small molecules inhibitors and miRNA approaches.

Fragment-Based Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Screen against a Regulator of G Protein Signaling Identifies a Binding "Hot Spot"

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have attracted attention as a result of their primary role in directing the specificity as well as the temporal and spatial aspects of G protein-coupled receptor signaling. In addition, alterations in RGS protein expression have been observed in a number of disease states, including certain cancers. In this area, RGS17 is of particular interest. It has been demonstrated that, while RGS17 is expressed primarily in the central nervous system, it has been found to be inappropriately expressed in lung, prostate, breast, cervical, and hepatocellular carcinomas. Overexpression of RGS17 leads to dysfunction in inhibitory G protein signaling and an overproduction of the intracellular second messenger cAMP, which in turn alters the transcription patterns of proteins known to promote various cancer types. Suppressing RGS17 expression with RNA interference (RNAi) has been found to decrease tumorigenesis and sufficiently prevents cancer cell migration, leading to the hypothesis that pharmacological blocking of RGS17 function could be useful in anticancer therapies. We have identified small-molecule fragments capable of binding the RGS homology (RH) domain of RGS17 by using a nuclear magnetic resonance fragment-based screening approach. By chemical shift mapping of the two-dimensional ¹⁵ N,¹ H heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra of the backbone-assigned ¹⁵ N-labeled RGS17-RH, we determined the fragment binding sites to be distant from the Gα interface. Thus, our study identifies a putative fragment binding site on RGS17 that was previously unknown.

Regulator of G Protein Signalling 4 (RGS4) as a Novel Target for the Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss

We and others have previously identified signalling pathways associated with the adenosine A₁ receptor (A₁R) as important regulators of cellular responses to injury in the cochlea. We have shown that the “post-exposure” treatment with adenosine A₁R agonists confers partial protection against acoustic trauma and other forms of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The aim of this study was to determine if increasing A₁R responsiveness to endogenous adenosine would have the same otoprotective effect. This was achieved by pharmacological targeting of the Regulator of G protein Signalling 4 (RGS4). RGS proteins inhibit signal transduction pathways initiated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) by enhancing GPCR deactivation and receptor desensitisation. A molecular complex between RGS4 and neurabin, an intracellular scaffolding protein expressed in neural and cochlear tissues, is the key negative regulator of A₁R activity in the brain. In this study, Wistar rats (6–8 weeks) were exposed to traumatic noise (110 dBSPL, 8–16 kHz) for 2 h and a small molecule RGS4 inhibitor CCG-4986 was delivered intratympanically in a Poloxamer-407 gel formulation for sustained drug release 24 or 48 h after noise exposure. Intratympanic administration of CCG-4986 48 h after noise exposure attenuated noise-induced permanent auditory threshold shifts by up to 19 dB, whilst the earlier drug administration (24 h) led to even better preservation of auditory thresholds (up to 32 dB). Significant improvement of auditory thresholds and suprathreshold responses was linked to improved survival of sensorineural tissues and afferent synapses in the cochlea. Our studies thus demonstrate that intratympanic administration of CCG-4986 can rescue cochlear injury and hearing loss induced by acoustic overexposure. This research represents a novel paradigm for the treatment of various forms of SNHL based on regulation of GPCR.

Allosteric Pathways Originating at Cysteine Residues in Regulators of G-Protein Signaling Proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins play a central role in modulating signaling via G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Specifically, RGS proteins bind to activated Gα subunits in G-proteins, accelerate the GTP hydrolysis, and thereby rapidly dampen GPCR signaling. Therefore, covalent molecules targeting conserved cysteine residues among RGS proteins have emerged as potential candidates to inhibit the RGS/Gα protein-protein interaction and enhance GPCR signaling. Although these inhibitors bind to conserved cysteine residues among RGS proteins, we have previously suggested [J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:3454–3460] that their potencies and specificities are related to differential protein dynamics among RGS proteins. Using data from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, we reveal these differences in dynamics of RGS proteins by partitioning the protein structural space into a network of communities that allow allosteric signals to propagate along unique pathways originating at inhibitor binding sites and terminating at the RGS/Gα protein-protein interface.

RGS Proteins as Critical Regulators of Motor Function and Their Implications in Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson disease (PD) is a devastating, largely nonfamilial, age-related disorder caused by the progressive loss of dopamine (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Release of DA from these neurons into the dorsal striatum is crucial for regulating movement and their loss causes PD. Unfortunately, the mechanisms underlying SNc neurodegeneration remain unclear, and currently there is no cure for PD, only symptomatic treatments. Recently, several regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins have emerged as critical modulators of PD pathogenesis and/or motor dysfunction and dyskinesia: RGSs 4, 6, 9, and 10. Striatal RGS4 has been shown to exacerbate motor symptoms of DA loss by suppressing M4-autoreceptor-Gα i/o signaling in striatal cholinergic interneurons. RGS6 and RGS9 are key regulators of D2R-Gα i/o signaling in SNc DA neurons and striatal medium spiny neurons, respectively. RGS6, expressed in human and mouse SNc DA neurons, suppresses characteristic PD hallmarks in aged mice, including SNc DA neuron loss, motor deficits, and α-synuclein accumulation. After DA depletion, RGS9 (through its inhibition of medium spiny neuron D2R signaling) suppresses motor dysfunction induced by L-DOPA or D2R-selective agonists. RGS10 is highly expressed in microglia, the brain's resident immune cells. Within the SNc, RGS10 may promote DA neuron survival through the upregulation of prosurvival genes and inhibition of microglial inflammatory factor expression. Thus, RGSs 4, 6, 9, and 10 are critical modulators of cell signaling pathways that promote SNc DA neuron survival and/or proper motor control. Accordingly, these RGS proteins represent novel therapeutic targets for the treatment of PD pathology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Parkinson disease (PD), the most common movement disorder, is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) dopamine (DA) neuron loss and subsequent motor deficits. Current PD therapies only target disease motor symptomology and are fraught with side effects. Therefore, researchers have begun to explore alternative therapeutic options. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, whether primarily expressed in SNc DA neurons (RGS6), striatal neurons (RGSs 4 and 9), or microglia (RGS10), modulate key signaling pathways important for SNc DA neuron survival and/or proper motor control. As such, RGS proteins represent novel therapeutic targets in PD.

Regulator of G-Protein Signaling (RGS) Protein Modulation of Opioid Receptor Signaling as a Potential Target for Pain Management

Opioid drugs are the gold standard for the management of pain, but their use is severely limited by dangerous and unpleasant side effects. All clinically available opioid analgesics bind to and activate the mu-opioid receptor (MOR), a heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled receptor, to produce analgesia. The activity of these receptors is modulated by a family of intracellular RGS proteins or regulators of G-protein signaling proteins, characterized by the presence of a conserved RGS Homology (RH) domain. These proteins act as negative regulators of G-protein signaling by serving as GTPase accelerating proteins or GAPS to switch off signaling by both the Gα and βγ subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins. Consequently, knockdown or knockout of RGS protein activity enhances signaling downstream of MOR. In this review we discuss current knowledge of how this activity, across the different families of RGS proteins, modulates MOR activity, as well as activity of other members of the opioid receptor family, and so pain and analgesia in animal models, with particular emphasis on RGS4 and RGS9 families. We discuss inhibition of RGS proteins with small molecule inhibitors that bind to sensitive cysteine moieties in the RH domain and the potential for targeting this family of intracellular proteins as adjuncts to provide an opioid sparing effect or as standalone analgesics by promoting the activity of endogenous opioid peptides. Overall, we conclude that RGS proteins may be a novel drug target to provide analgesia with reduced opioid-like side effects, but that much basic work is needed to define the roles for specific RGS proteins, particularly in chronic pain, as well as a need to develop newer inhibitors.

Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins as drug targets: Progress and future potentials

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play critical roles in regulating processes such as cellular homeostasis, responses to stimuli, and cell signaling. Accordingly, GPCRs have long served as extraordinarily successful drug targets. It is therefore not surprising that the discovery in the mid-1990s of a family of proteins that regulate processes downstream of GPCRs generated great excitement in the field. This finding enhanced the understanding of these critical signaling pathways and provided potentially new targets for pharmacological intervention. These regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins were viewed by many as nodes downstream of GPCRs that could be targeted with small molecules to tune signaling processes. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the discovery of RGS proteins and of the gradual and continuing discovery of their roles in disease states, focusing particularly on cancer and neurological disorders. We also discuss high-throughput screening efforts that have led to the discovery first of peptide-based and then of small-molecule inhibitors targeting a subset of the RGS proteins. We explore the unique mechanisms of RGS inhibition these chemical tools have revealed and highlight the most up-to-date studies using these tools in animal experiments. Finally, we discuss the future opportunities in the field, as there are clearly more avenues left to be explored and potentials to be realized.

An Interhelical Salt Bridge Controls Flexibility and Inhibitor Potency for Regulators of G-protein Signaling Proteins 4, 8, and 19

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate receptor signaling by binding to activated G-protein α-subunits, accelerating GTP hydrolysis. Selective inhibition of RGS proteins increases G-protein activity and may provide unique tissue specificity. Thiadiazolidinones (TDZDs) are covalent inhibitors that act on cysteine residues to inhibit RGS4, RGS8, and RGS19. There is a correlation between protein flexibility and potency of inhibition by the TDZD 4-[(4- fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-(4-methylphenyl)-1,2,4-thiadiazolidine-3,5-dione (CCG-50014). In the context of a single conserved cysteine residue on the α 4 helix, RGS19 is the most flexible and most potently inhibited by CCG-50014, followed by RGS4 and RGS8. In this work, we identify residues responsible for differences in both flexibility and potency of inhibition among RGS isoforms. RGS19 lacks a charged residue on the α 4 helix that is present in RGS4 and RGS8. Introducing a negative charge at this position (L118D) increased the thermal stability of RGS19 and decreased the potency of inhibition of CCG-50014 by 8-fold. Mutations eliminating salt bridge formation in RGS8 and RGS4 decreased thermal stability in RGS8 and increased potency of inhibition of both RGS4 and RGS8 by 4- and 2-fold, respectively. Molecular dynamics simulations with an added salt bridge in RGS19 (L118D) showed reduced RGS19 flexibility. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange studies showed striking differences in flexibility in the α 4 helix of RGS4, 8, and 19 with salt bridge-modifying mutations. These results show that the α 4 salt bridge-forming residue controls flexibility in several RGS isoforms and supports a causal relationship between RGS flexibility and the potency of TDZD inhibitors. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Inhibitor potency is often viewed in relation to the static structure of a target protein binding pocket. Using both experimental and computation studies we assess determinants of dynamics and inhibitor potency for three different RGS proteins. A single salt bridge-forming residue determines differences in flexibility between RGS isoforms; mutations either increase or decrease protein motion with correlated alterations in inhibitor potency. This strongly suggests a causal relationship between RGS protein flexibility and covalent inhibitor potency.

Genetic Analysis of Rare Human Variants of Regulators of G Protein Signaling Proteins and Their Role in Human Physiology and Disease

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate the physiologic actions of many neurotransmitters, hormones, and other signaling molecules. Human RGS proteins comprise a family of 20 canonical proteins that bind directly to G protein-coupled receptors/G protein complexes to limit the lifetime of their signaling events, which regulate all aspects of cell and organ physiology. Genetic variations account for diverse human traits and individual predispositions to disease. RGS proteins contribute to many complex polygenic human traits and pathologies such as hypertension, atherosclerosis, schizophrenia, depression, addiction, cancers, and many others. Recent analysis indicates that most human diseases are due to extremely rare genetic variants. In this study, we summarize physiologic roles for RGS proteins and links to human diseases/traits and report rare variants found within each human RGS protein exome sequence derived from global population studies. Each RGS sequence is analyzed using recently described bioinformatics and proteomic tools for measures of missense tolerance ratio paired with combined annotation-dependent depletion scores, and protein post-translational modification (PTM) alignment cluster analysis. We highlight selected variants within the well-studied RGS domain that likely disrupt RGS protein functions and provide comprehensive variant and PTM data for each RGS protein for future study. We propose that rare variants in functionally sensitive regions of RGS proteins confer profound change-of-function phenotypes that may contribute, in newly appreciated ways, to complex human diseases and/or traits. This information provides investigators with a valuable database to explore variation in RGS protein function, and for targeting RGS proteins as future therapeutic targets.

Screen Targeting Lung and Prostate Cancer Oncogene Identifies Novel Inhibitors of RGS17 and Problematic Chemical Substructures

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins temporally regulate heterotrimeric G protein signaling cascades elicited by G protein-coupled receptor activation and thus are essential for cell homeostasis. The dysregulation of RGS protein expression has been linked to several pathologies, spurring discovery efforts to identify small-molecule inhibitors of these proteins. Presented here are the results of a high-throughput screening (HTS) campaign targeting RGS17, an RGS protein reported to be inappropriately upregulated in several cancers. A screen of over 60,000 small molecules led to the identification of five hit compounds that inhibit the RGS17-Gα_o protein-protein interaction. Chemical and biochemical characterization demonstrated that three of these hits inhibited the interaction through the decomposition of parent compound into reactive products under normal chemical library storage/usage conditions. Compound substructures susceptible to decomposition are reported and the decomposition process characterized, adding to the armamentarium of tools available to the screening field, allowing for the conservation of resources in follow-up efforts and more efficient identification of potentially decomposed compounds. Finally, analogues of one hit compound were tested, and the results establish the first ever structure-activity relationship (SAR) profile for a small-molecule inhibitor of RGS17.