Robust inference of positive selection on regulatory sequences in the human brain

A whole-genome scan for evidence of recent positive and balancing selection in aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis) utilizing a well-fit evolutionary baseline model

The aye-aye (Daubentonia madagascariensis) is one of the 25 most endangered primate species in the world, maintaining amongst the lowest genetic diversity of any primate measured to date. Characterizing patterns of genetic variation within aye-aye populations, and the relative influences of neutral and selective processes in shaping that variation, is thus important for future conservation efforts. In this study, we performed the first whole-genome scans for recent positive and balancing selection in the species, utilizing high-coverage population genomic data from newly sequenced individuals. We generated null thresholds for our genomic scans by creating an evolutionarily appropriate baseline model that incorporates the demographic history of this aye-aye population, and identified a small number of candidate genes. Most notably, a suite of genes involved in olfaction - a key trait in these nocturnal primates - were identified as experiencing long-term balancing selection. We also conducted analyses to quantify the expected statistical power to detect positive and balancing selection in this population using site frequency spectrum-based inference methods, once accounting for the potentially confounding contributions of population history, recombination and mutation rate variation, and purifying and background selection. This work, presenting the first high-quality, genome-wide polymorphism data across the functional regions of the aye-aye genome, thus provides important insights into the landscape of episodic selective forces in this highly endangered species.

Evolution of diapause in the African turquoise killifish by remodeling the ancient gene regulatory landscape

Suspended animation states allow organisms to survive extreme environments. The African turquoise killifish has evolved diapause as a form of suspended development to survive a complete drought. However, the mechanisms underlying the evolution of extreme survival states are unknown. To understand diapause evolution, we performed integrative multi-omics (gene expression, chromatin accessibility, and lipidomics) in the embryos of multiple killifish species. We find that diapause evolved by a recent remodeling of regulatory elements at very ancient gene duplicates (paralogs) present in all vertebrates. CRISPR-Cas9-based perturbations identify the transcription factors REST/NRSF and FOXOs as critical for the diapause gene expression program, including genes involved in lipid metabolism. Indeed, diapause shows a distinct lipid profile, with an increase in triglycerides with very-long-chain fatty acids. Our work suggests a mechanism for the evolution of complex adaptations and offers strategies to promote long-term survival by activating suspended animation programs in other species.

Ascertainment Bias in the Genomic Test of Positive Selection on Regulatory Sequences

Evolution of gene expression mediated by cis-regulatory changes is thought to be an important contributor to organismal adaptation, but identifying adaptive cis-regulatory changes is challenging due to the difficulty in knowing the expectation under no positive selection. A new approach for detecting positive selection on transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) was recently developed, thanks to the application of machine learning in predicting transcription factor (TF) binding affinities of DNA sequences. Given a TFBS sequence from a focal species and the corresponding inferred ancestral sequence that differs from the former at n sites, one can predict the TF-binding affinities of many n-step mutational neighbors of the ancestral sequence and obtain a null distribution of the derived binding affinity, which allows testing whether the binding affinity of the real derived sequence deviates significantly from the null distribution. Applying this test genomically to all experimentally identified binding sites of 3 TFs in humans, a recent study reported positive selection for elevated binding affinities of TFBSs. Here, we show that this genomic test suffers from an ascertainment bias because, even in the absence of positive selection for strengthened binding, the binding affinities of known human TFBSs are more likely to have increased than decreased in evolution. We demonstrate by computer simulation that this bias inflates the false positive rate of the selection test. We propose several methods to mitigate the ascertainment bias and show that almost all previously reported positive selection signals disappear when these methods are applied.

Ascertainment bias in the genomic test of positive selection on regulatory sequences

Evolution of gene expression mediated by cis-regulatory changes is thought to be an important contributor to organismal adaptation, but identifying adaptive cis-regulatory changes is challenging due to the difficulty in knowing the expectation under no positive selection. A new approach for detecting positive selection on transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) was recently developed, thanks to the application of machine learning in predicting transcription factor (TF) binding affinities of DNA sequences. Given a TFBS sequence from a focal species and the corresponding inferred ancestral sequence that differs from the former at n sites, one can predict the TF binding affinities of many n-step mutational neighbors of the ancestral sequence and obtain a null distribution of the derived binding affinity, which allows testing whether the binding affinity of the real derived sequence deviates significantly from the null distribution. Applying this test genomically to all experimentally identified binding sites of three TFs in humans, a recent study reported positive selection for elevated binding affinities of TFBSs. Here we show that this genomic test suffers from an ascertainment bias because, even in the absence of positive selection for strengthened binding, the binding affinities of known human TFBSs are more likely to have increased than decreased in evolution. We demonstrate by computer simulation that this bias inflates the false positive rate of the selection test. We propose several methods to mitigate the ascertainment bias and show that almost all previously reported positive selection signals disappear when these methods are applied.

Transcription factor binding sites are frequently under accelerated evolution in primates

Recent comparative genomic studies have identified many human accelerated elements (HARs) with elevated substitution rates in the human lineage. However, it remains unknown to what extent transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) are under accelerated evolution in humans and other primates. Here, we introduce two pooling-based phylogenetic methods with dramatically enhanced sensitivity to examine accelerated evolution in TFBSs. Using these new methods, we show that more than 6000 TFBSs annotated in the human genome have experienced accelerated evolution in Hominini, apes, and Old World monkeys. Although these TFBSs individually show relatively weak signals of accelerated evolution, they collectively are more abundant than HARs. Also, we show that accelerated evolution in Pol III binding sites may be driven by lineage-specific positive selection, whereas accelerated evolution in other TFBSs might be driven by nonadaptive evolutionary forces. Finally, the accelerated TFBSs are enriched around developmental genes, suggesting that accelerated evolution in TFBSs may drive the divergence of developmental processes between primates.

Evolution and dysfunction of human cognitive and social traits: A transcriptional regulation perspective

Evolutionary changes in brain and craniofacial development have endowed humans with unique cognitive and social skills, but also predisposed us to debilitating disorders in which these traits are disrupted. What are the developmental genetic underpinnings that connect the adaptive evolution of our cognition and sociality with the persistence of mental disorders with severe negative fitness effects? We argue that loss of function of genes involved in transcriptional regulation represents a crucial link between the evolution and dysfunction of human cognitive and social traits. The argument is based on the haploinsufficiency of many transcriptional regulator genes, which makes them particularly sensitive to loss-of-function mutations. We discuss how human brain and craniofacial traits evolved through partial loss of function (i.e. reduced expression) of these genes, a perspective compatible with the idea of human self-domestication. Moreover, we explain why selection against loss-of-function variants supports the view that mutation-selection-drift, rather than balancing selection, underlies the persistence of psychiatric disorders. Finally, we discuss testable predictions.

Dynamic reprogramming of H3K9me3 at hominoid-specific retrotransposons during human preimplantation development

Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin is required for early development. How H3K9me3 is involved in early human development remains, however, largely unclear. Here, we resolve the temporal landscape of H3K9me3 during human preimplantation development and its regulation for diverse hominoid-specific retrotransposons. At the 8-cell stage, H3K9me3 reprogramming at hominoid-specific retrotransposons termed SINE-VNTR-Alu (SVA) facilitates interaction between certain promoters and SVA-derived enhancers, promoting the zygotic genome activation. In trophectoderm, de novo H3K9me3 domains prevent pluripotent transcription factors from binding to hominoid-specific retrotransposons-derived regulatory elements for inner cell mass (ICM)-specific genes. H3K9me3 re-establishment at SVA elements in the ICM is associated with higher transcription of DNA repair genes, when compared with naive human pluripotent stem cells. Our data demonstrate that species-specific reorganization of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin at hominoid-specific retrotransposons plays important roles during early human development, shedding light on how the epigenetic regulation for early development has evolved in mammals.

The evolution, evolvability and engineering of gene regulatory DNA

Mutations in non-coding regulatory DNA sequences can alter gene expression, organismal phenotype and fitness^1-3. Constructing complete fitness landscapes, in which DNA sequences are mapped to fitness, is a long-standing goal in biology, but has remained elusive because it is challenging to generalize reliably to vast sequence spaces^4-6. Here we build sequence-to-expression models that capture fitness landscapes and use them to decipher principles of regulatory evolution. Using millions of randomly sampled promoter DNA sequences and their measured expression levels in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we learn deep neural network models that generalize with excellent prediction performance, and enable sequence design for expression engineering. Using our models, we study expression divergence under genetic drift and strong-selection weak-mutation regimes to find that regulatory evolution is rapid and subject to diminishing returns epistasis; that conflicting expression objectives in different environments constrain expression adaptation; and that stabilizing selection on gene expression leads to the moderation of regulatory complexity. We present an approach for using such models to detect signatures of selection on expression from natural variation in regulatory sequences and use it to discover an instance of convergent regulatory evolution. We assess mutational robustness, finding that regulatory mutation effect sizes follow a power law, characterize regulatory evolvability, visualize promoter fitness landscapes, discover evolvability archetypes and illustrate the mutational robustness of natural regulatory sequence populations. Our work provides a general framework for designing regulatory sequences and addressing fundamental questions in regulatory evolution.

Adaptive eQTLs reveal the evolutionary impacts of pleiotropy and tissue-specificity while contributing to health and disease

Large numbers of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have recently been identified in humans, and many of these regulatory variants have large allele frequency differences between populations. Here, we conducted genome-wide scans of selection to identify adaptive eQTLs (i.e., eQTLs with large population branch statistics). We then tested if tissue pleiotropy affects whether eQTLs are more or less likely to be adaptive and identified tissues that have been key targets of positive selection during the last 100,000 years. Top adaptive eQTL outliers include rs1043809, rs66899053, and rs2814778 (a SNP that is associated with malaria resistance). We found that effect sizes of eQTLs were negatively correlated with population branch statistics and that adaptive eQTLs affect two-thirds as many tissues as do non-adaptive eQTLs. Because the tissue breadth of an eQTL can be viewed as a measure of pleiotropy, these results imply that pleiotropy inhibits adaptation. The proportion of eQTLs that are adaptive varies by tissue, and we found that eQTLs that regulate expression in testis, thyroid, blood, or sun-exposed skin are enriched for signatures of positive selection. By contrast, eQTLs that regulate expression in the cerebrum or female-specific tissues have a relative lack of adaptive outliers. Scans of selections also reveal that many adaptive eQTLs are closely linked to disease-associated loci. Taken together, our results indicate that eQTLs have played an important role in recent human evolution.

Both Binding Strength and Evolutionary Accessibility Affect the Population Frequency of Transcription Factor Binding Sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana

Mutations in DNA sequences that bind transcription factors and thus modulate gene expression are a source of adaptive variation in gene expression. To understand how transcription factor binding sequences evolve in natural populations of the thale cress Arabidopsis thaliana, we integrated genomic polymorphism data for loci bound by transcription factors with in vitro data on binding affinity for these transcription factors. Specifically, we studied 19 different transcription factors, and the allele frequencies of 8,333 genomic loci bound in vivo by these transcription factors in 1,135 A. thaliana accessions. We find that transcription factor binding sequences show very low genetic diversity, suggesting that they are subject to purifying selection. High frequency alleles of such binding sequences tend to bind transcription factors strongly. Conversely, alleles that are absent from the population tend to bind them weakly. In addition, alleles with high frequencies also tend to be the endpoints of many accessible evolutionary paths leading to these alleles. We show that both high affinity and high evolutionary accessibility contribute to high allele frequency for at least some transcription factors. Although binding sequences with stronger affinity are more frequent, we did not find them to be associated with higher gene expression levels. Epistatic interactions among individual mutations that alter binding affinity are pervasive and can help explain variation in accessibility among binding sequences. In summary, combining in vitro binding affinity data with in vivo binding sequence data can help understand the forces that affect the evolution of transcription factor binding sequences in natural populations.

The hourglass model of evolutionary conservation during embryogenesis extends to developmental enhancers with signatures of positive selection

Inter-species comparisons of both morphology and gene expression within a phylum have revealed a period in the middle of embryogenesis with more similarity between species compared to earlier and later time-points. This "developmental hourglass" pattern has been observed in many phyla, yet the evolutionary constraints on gene expression, and underlying mechanisms of how this is regulated, remains elusive. Moreover, the role of positive selection on gene regulation in the more diverged earlier and later stages of embryogenesis remains unknown. Here, using DNase-seq to identify regulatory regions in two distant Drosophila species (D. melanogaster and D. virilis), we assessed the evolutionary conservation and adaptive evolution of enhancers throughout multiple stages of embryogenesis. This revealed a higher proportion of conserved enhancers at the phylotypic period, providing a regulatory basis for the hourglass expression pattern. Using an in silico mutagenesis approach, we detect signatures of positive selection on developmental enhancers at early and late stages of embryogenesis, with a depletion at the phylotypic period, suggesting positive selection as one evolutionary mechanism underlying the hourglass pattern of animal evolution.

Impact of Genetic Variation in Gene Regulatory Sequences: A Population Genomics Perspective

The unprecedented rise of high-throughput sequencing and assay technologies has provided a detailed insight into the non-coding sequences and their potential role as gene expression regulators. These regulatory non-coding sequences are also referred to as cis-regulatory elements (CREs). Genetic variants occurring within CREs have been shown to be associated with altered gene expression and phenotypic changes. Such variants are known to occur spontaneously and ultimately get fixed, due to selection and genetic drift, in natural populations and, in some cases, pave the way for speciation. Hence, the study of genetic variation at CREs has improved our overall understanding of the processes of local adaptation and evolution. Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing and better annotations of CREs have enabled the evaluation of the impact of such variation on gene expression, phenotypic alteration and fitness. Here, we review recent research on the evolution of CREs and concentrate on studies that have investigated genetic variation occurring in these regulatory sequences within the context of population genetics.

On the importance of evolutionary constraint for regulatory sequence identification

Regulation of gene expression relies on the activity of specialized genomic elements, enhancers or silencers, distributed over sometimes large distance from their target gene promoters. A significant part of vertebrate genomes consists in such regulatory elements, but their identification and that of their target genes remains challenging, due to the lack of clear signature at the nucleotide level. For many years the main hallmark used for identifying functional elements has been their sequence conservation between genomes of distant species, indicative of purifying selection. More recently, genome-wide biochemical assays have opened new avenues for detecting regulatory regions, shifting attention away from evolutionary constraints. Here, we review the respective contributions of comparative genomics and biochemical assays for the definition of regulatory elements and their targets and advocate that both sequence conservation and preserved synteny, taken as signature of functional constraint, remain essential tools in this task.

The Cancer Genome: Paradigm or Paradox?

Simple Summary

The observation that genetic mutations often do not cause cancer or disease in the phenomena of mosaicism, clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), and heteroplasmy provides us with important clues about the origin and nature of cancer. We should be wary that the cancer genome may lead us astray to the wrong destination on a bad expedition unless we adopt the right cancer theory to elucidate it, and adhere to the proper scientific method to investigate it.

Abstract

Nowadays, many professionals are sequencing the DNA and studying the cancer genome. However, if the genetic theory of cancer is flawed, our faith in the cancer genome will falter. If gene sequencing is only a tool, we should question what we are making or creating with this tool. When we do not have the right cancer theory at our disposal, we cannot be sure that what we create from the cancer genome is meaningful or useful. In this article, we illustrate that mosaicism, CHIP, and heteroplasmy dispute our traditional perspectives about a genetic origin of cancer and challenge our current narratives about the cancer genome. We caution that when we have the wrong cancer theory, big data can provide poor evidence. Precision medicine may become rather imprecise. Targeted therapy either does not work or work for the wrong reasons. The cancer genome thus becomes a paradox rather than a paradigm.