Coactivator condensation drives cardiovascular cell lineage specification

RNA polymerase II partitioning is a shared feature of diverse oncofusion condensates

Condensates regulate transcription by selectively compartmentalizing biomolecules, yet the rules of specificity and their relationship to function remain enigmatic. To identify rules linked to function, we leverage the genetic selection bias of condensate-promoting oncofusions. Focusing on the three most frequent oncofusions driving translocation renal cell carcinoma, we find that they promote the formation of condensates that activate transcription by gain-of-function RNA polymerase II partitioning through a shared signature of elevated π and π-interacting residues and depletion of aliphatic residues. This signature is shared among a broad set of DNA-binding oncofusions associated with diverse cancers. We find that this signature is necessary and sufficient for RNA polymerase II partitioning, gene activation, and cancer cell phenotypes. Our results reveal that dysregulated condensate specificity is a shared molecular mechanism of diverse oncofusions, highlighting the functional role of condensate composition and the power of disease genetics in investigating relationships between condensate specificity and function.

Functional specificity in biomolecular condensates revealed by genetic complementation

Biomolecular condensates are thought to create subcellular microenvironments that regulate specific biochemical activities. Extensive in vitro work has helped link condensate formation to a wide range of cellular processes, including gene expression, nuclear transport, signalling and stress responses. However, testing the relationship between condensate formation and function in cells is more challenging. In particular, the extent to which the cellular functions of condensates depend on the nature of the molecular interactions through which the condensates form is a major outstanding question. Here, we review results from recent genetic complementation experiments in cells, and highlight how genetic complementation provides important insights into cellular functions and functional specificity of biomolecular condensates. Combined with observations from human genetic disease, these experiments suggest that diverse condensate-promoting regions within cellular proteins confer different condensate compositions, biophysical properties and functions.

Disordered Regions of Condensate-promoting Proteins Have Distinct Molecular Signatures Associated with Cellular Function

Disordered regions of proteins play crucial roles in cellular functions through diverse mechanisms. Some disordered regions function by promoting the formation of biomolecular condensates through dynamic multivalent interactions. While many have assumed that interactions among these condensate-promoting disordered regions are non-specific, recent studies have shown that distinct sequence compositions and patterning lead to specific condensate compositions associated with cellular function. Despite in-depth characterization of several key examples, the full chemical diversity of condensate-promoting disordered regions has not been surveyed. Here, we define a list of disordered regions of condensate-promoting proteins to survey the relationship between sequence and function. We find that these disordered regions show amino acid biases associated with different cellular functions. These amino acid biases are evolutionarily conserved in the absence of positional sequence conservation. Overall, our analysis highlights the relationship between sequence features and function for condensate-promoting disordered regions. This analysis suggests that molecular signatures encoded within disordered regions could impart functional specificity.

Transcription regulation by biomolecular condensates

Biomolecular condensates regulate transcription by dynamically compartmentalizing the transcription machinery. Classic models of transcription regulation focus on the recruitment and regulation of RNA polymerase II by the formation of complexes at the 1-10 nm length scale, which are driven by structured and stoichiometric interactions. These complexes are further organized into condensates at the 100-1,000 nm length scale, which are driven by dynamic multivalent interactions often involving domain-ligand pairs or intrinsically disordered regions. Regulation through condensate-mediated organization does not supersede the processes occurring at the 1-10 nm scale, but it provides regulatory mechanisms for promoting or preventing these processes in the crowded nuclear environment. Regulation of transcription by transcriptional condensates is involved in cell state transitions during animal and plant development, cell signalling and cellular responses to the environment. These condensate-mediated processes are dysregulated in developmental disorders, cancer and neurodegeneration. In this Review, we discuss the principles underlying the regulation of transcriptional condensates, their roles in physiology and their dysregulation in human diseases.

Emerging Insights into Sall4's Role in Cardiac Regenerative Medicine

Sall4 as a pivotal transcription factor has been extensively studied across diverse biological processes, including stem cell biology, embryonic development, hematopoiesis, tissue stem/progenitor maintenance, and the progression of various cancers. Recent research highlights Sall4's emerging roles in modulating cardiac progenitors and cellular reprogramming, linking its functions to early heart development and regenerative medicine. These findings provide new insights into the critical functions of Sall4 in cardiobiology. This review explores Sall4's complex molecular mechanisms and their implications for advancing cardiac regenerative medicine.

YAP/TAZ Signalling Controls Epidermal Keratinocyte Fate

The paralogues Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) control cell proliferation and cell fate determination from embryogenesis to ageing. In the skin epidermis, these proteins are involved in both homeostatic cell renewal and injury-induced regeneration and also drive carcinogenesis and other pathologies. YAP and TAZ are usually considered downstream of the Hippo pathway. However, they are the central integrating link for the signalling microenvironment since they are involved in the interplay with signalling cascades induced by growth factors, cytokines, and physical parameters of the extracellular matrix. In this review, we summarise the evidence on how YAP and TAZ are activated in epidermal keratinocytes; how YAP/TAZ-mediated signalling cooperates with other signalling molecules at the plasma membrane, cytoplasmic, and nuclear levels; and how YAP/TAZ ultimately controls transcription programmes, defining epidermal cell fate.

Reconciling competing models on the roles of condensates and soluble complexes in transcription factor function

Phase separation explains the exquisite spatial and temporal regulation of many biological processes, but the role of transcription factor-mediated condensates in gene regulation is contentious, requiring head-to-head comparison of competing models. Here, we focused on the prototypical yeast transcription factor Gcn4 and assessed two models for gene transcription activation, i.e., mediated via soluble complexes or transcriptional condensates. Both models rely on the ability of transcription factors and coactivators to engage in multivalent interactions. Unexpectedly, we found that propensity to form homotypic Gcn4 condensates does not correlate well with transcriptional activity. Contrary to prevailing models, binding to DNA suppresses Gcn4 phase separation. Notably, the ability of Gcn4 to form soluble complexes with coactivator subunit Med15 closely mirrored the propensity to recruit Med15 into condensates, indicating that these properties are intertwined and cautioning against interpretation of mutational data without head-to-head comparisons. However, Gcn4 variants with the highest affinity for Med15 do not function as well as expected and instead have activities that reflect their abilities to phase separate with Med15. These variants therefore indeed form cellular condensates, and those attenuate activity. Our results show that transcription factors can function as soluble complexes as well as condensates, reconciling two seemingly opposing models, and have implications for other phase-separating systems.

A fine kinetic balance of interactions directs transcription factor hubs to genes

Eukaryotic gene regulation relies on the binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs). TFs bind chromatin transiently yet occupy their target sites by forming high-local concentration microenvironments (hubs and condensates) that increase the frequency of binding. Despite their ubiquity, such microenvironments are difficult to study in endogenous contexts due to technical limitations. Here, we use live embryo light-sheet imaging, single-molecule tracking, and genomics to overcome these limitations and investigate how hubs are localized to target genes to drive TF occupancy and transcription. By examining mutants of a hub-forming TF, Zelda, in Drosophila embryos, we find that hub formation propensity, spatial distributions, and temporal stabilities are differentially regulated by DNA binding and disordered protein domains. We show that hub localization to genomic targets is driven by a finely-tuned kinetic balance of interactions between proteins and chromatin, and hubs can be redirected to new genomic sites when this balance is perturbed.

Disorder-mediated interactions target proteins to specific condensates

Selective compartmentalization of cellular contents is fundamental to the regulation of biochemistry. Although membrane-bound organelles control composition by using a semi-permeable barrier, biomolecular condensates rely on interactions among constituents to determine composition. Condensates are formed by dynamic multivalent interactions, often involving intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) of proteins, yet whether distinct compositions can arise from these dynamic interactions is not known. Here, by comparative analysis of proteins differentially partitioned by two different condensates, we find that distinct compositions arise through specific IDR-mediated interactions. The IDRs of differentially partitioned proteins are necessary and sufficient for selective partitioning. Distinct sequence features are required for IDRs to partition, and swapping these sequence features changes the specificity of partitioning. Swapping whole IDRs retargets proteins and their biochemical activity to different condensates. Our results demonstrate that IDR-mediated interactions can target proteins to specific condensates, enabling the spatial regulation of biochemistry within the cell.