Ascertaining regions affected by GC-biased gene conversion through weak-to-strong mutational hotspots

A major objective for evolutionary biology is to identify regions affected by positive selection. High dN/dS values for proteins and accelerated lineage-specific substitution rates for non-coding regions are considered classic signatures of positive selection. However, these could also be the result of non-adaptive phenomena, such as GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC), which favors the fixation of strong (C/G) over weak (A/T) nucleotides. Recent estimates indicate that gBGC affected up to 20% of regions with signatures of positive selection. Here we evaluate the impact of gBGC through its molecular signature of weak-to-strong mutational hotspots. We implemented specific modifications to the test proposed by Tang and Lewontin (1999) for identifying regions of differential variability and applied it to regions previously investigated for the influence of gBGC. While we found significant agreement with previous reports, our results suggest a smaller influence of gBGC than previously estimated, warranting further development of methods for its detection.

Many human accelerated regions are developmental enhancers

The genetic changes underlying the dramatic differences in form and function between humans and other primates are largely unknown, although it is clear that gene regulatory changes play an important role. To identify regulatory sequences with potentially human-specific functions, we and others used comparative genomics to find non-coding regions conserved across mammals that have acquired many sequence changes in humans since divergence from chimpanzees. These regions are good candidates for performing human-specific regulatory functions. Here, we analysed the DNA sequence, evolutionary history, histone modifications, chromatin state and transcription factor (TF) binding sites of a combined set of 2649 non-coding human accelerated regions (ncHARs) and predicted that at least 30% of them function as developmental enhancers. We prioritized the predicted ncHAR enhancers using analysis of TF binding site gain and loss, along with the functional annotations and expression patterns of nearby genes. We then tested both the human and chimpanzee sequence for 29 ncHARs in transgenic mice, and found 24 novel developmental enhancers active in both species, 17 of which had very consistent patterns of activity in specific embryonic tissues. Of these ncHAR enhancers, five drove expression patterns suggestive of different activity for the human and chimpanzee sequence at embryonic day 11.5. The changes to human non-coding DNA in these ncHAR enhancers may modify the complex patterns of gene expression necessary for proper development in a human-specific manner and are thus promising candidates for understanding the genetic basis of human-specific biology.

Direct and indirect consequences of meiotic recombination: implications for genome evolution

There is considerable variation within eukaryotic genomes in the local rate of crossing over. Why is this and what effect does it have on genome evolution? On the genome scale, it is known that by shuffling alleles, recombination increases the efficacy of selection. By contrast, the extent to which differences in the recombination rate modulate the efficacy of selection between genomic regions is unclear. Recombination also has direct consequences on the origin and fate of mutations: biased gene conversion and other forms of meiotic drive promote the fixation of mutations in a similar way to selection, and recombination itself may be mutagenic. Consideration of both the direct and indirect effects of recombination is necessary to understand why its rate is so variable and for correct interpretation of patterns of genome evolution.

Detecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion

The identification of loci influenced by positive selection is a major goal of evolutionary genetics. A popular approach is to perform scans of alignments on a genome-wide scale in order to find regions evolving at accelerated rates on a particular branch of a phylogenetic tree. However, positive selection is not the only process that can lead to accelerated evolution. Notably, GC-biased gene conversion (gBGC) is a recombination-associated process that results in the biased fixation of G and C nucleotides. This process can potentially generate bursts of nucleotide substitutions within hotspots of meiotic recombination. Here, we analyse the results of a scan for positive selection on genes on branches across the primate phylogeny. We show that genes identified as targets of positive selection have a significant tendency to exhibit the genomic signature of gBGC. Using a maximum-likelihood framework, we estimate that more than 20 per cent of cases of significantly elevated non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rates ratio (d(N)/d(S)), particularly in shorter branches, could be due to gBGC. We demonstrate that in some cases, gBGC can lead to very high d(N)/d(S) (more than 2). Our results indicate that gBGC significantly affects the evolution of coding sequences in primates, often leading to patterns of evolution that can be mistaken for positive selection.

Contrasts between adaptive coding and noncoding changes during human evolution

Changes in non-protein-coding regulatory DNA sequences have been proposed to play distinctive roles in adaptive evolution. We analyzed correlations between gene functions and evidence for positive selection in a common statistical framework across several large surveys of coding and noncoding sequences throughout the human genome. Strong correlations with both classifications in gene ontologies and measurements of gene expression indicate that neural development and function have adapted mainly through noncoding changes. In contrast, adaptation via coding changes is dominated by immunity, olfaction, and male reproduction. Genes with highly tissue-specific expression have undergone more adaptive coding changes, suggesting that pleiotropic constraints inhibit such changes in broadly expressed genes. In contrast, adaptive noncoding changes do not exhibit this pattern. Our findings underscore the probable importance of noncoding changes in the evolution of human traits, particularly cognitive traits.

Gene regulation and the origins of human biological uniqueness

What makes us human? It is likely that changes in gene expression and regulation, in addition to those in protein-coding genes, drove the evolution of uniquely human biological traits. In this review, we discuss how efforts to annotate regulatory functions in the human genome are being combined with maps of human-specific sequence acceleration to identify cis-regulatory elements with human-specific activity. Although the evolutionary interpretation of these events is a subject of considerable debate, the technical and analytical means are now at hand to identify the set of evolutionary genetic events that shaped our species.

Regulatory DNAs and the evolution of human development

Changes in gene regulation have long been thought to underlie biological differences between humans and other primates. Recent advances have facilitated the study of human-specific sequence changes in regulatory DNAs in the context of human development. Comparative genomic analyses coupled with genome-wide in vivo developmental enhancer screens have identified thousands of known and likely regulatory elements in the genome. These have provided the substrate for statistical and experimental identification of regulatory sequences with human-specific developmental activities. On the basis of these early results, the outlines of an integrated strategy have emerged that combines gene expression atlases of human development, in vivo reverse genetic studies of regulatory DNAs, and maps of human-specific sequence change to reveal the genetic basis of unique human biology.