1
|
Cao Y, Zhou T, Gao J. Heterogeneous peer effects of college roommates on academic performance. Nat Commun 2024; 15:4785. [PMID: 38844484 PMCID: PMC11156860 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49228-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding how student peers influence learning outcomes is crucial for effective education management in complex social systems. The complexities of peer selection and evolving peer relationships, however, pose challenges for identifying peer effects using static observational data. Here we use both null-model and regression approaches to examine peer effects using longitudinal data from 5,272 undergraduates, where roommate assignments are plausibly random upon enrollment and roommate relationships persist until graduation. Specifically, we construct a roommate null model by randomly shuffling students among dorm rooms and introduce an assimilation metric to quantify similarities in roommate academic performance. We find significantly larger assimilation in actual data than in the roommate null model, suggesting roommate peer effects, whereby roommates have more similar performance than expected by chance alone. Moreover, assimilation exhibits an overall increasing trend over time, suggesting that peer effects become stronger the longer roommates live together. Our regression analysis further reveals the moderating role of peer heterogeneity. In particular, when roommates perform similarly, the positive relationship between a student's future performance and their roommates' average prior performance is more pronounced, and their ordinal rank in the dorm room has an independent effect. Our findings contribute to understanding the role of college roommates in influencing student academic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Cao
- CompleX Lab, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
- Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Tao Zhou
- CompleX Lab, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
- Big Data Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Jian Gao
- Center for Science of Science and Innovation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
- Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
- Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
- Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brosig-Koch J, Hehenkamp B, Kokot J. Who benefits from quality competition in health care? A theory and a laboratory experiment on the relevance of patient characteristics. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2023. [PMID: 37147773 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
We study how competition between physicians affects the provision of medical care. In our theoretical model, physicians are faced with a heterogeneous patient population, in which patients systematically vary with regard to both their responsiveness to the provided quality of care and their state of health. We test the behavioral predictions derived from this model in a controlled laboratory experiment. In line with the model, we observe that competition significantly improves patient benefits as long as patients are able to respond to the quality provided. For those patients, who are not able to choose a physician, competition even decreases the patient benefit compared to a situation without competition. This decrease is in contrast to our theoretical prediction implying no change in benefits for passive patients. Deviations from patient-optimal treatment are highest for passive patients in need of a low quantity of medical services. With repetition, both, the positive effects of competition for active patients as well as the negative effects of competition for passive patients become more pronounced. Our results imply that competition can not only improve but also worsen patient outcome and that patients' responsiveness to quality is decisive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Brosig-Koch
- Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg and Health Economics Research Center (CINCH) Essen, Magdeburg, Germany
| | | | - Johanna Kokot
- University of Hamburg, Hamburg Center for Health Economics (HCHE), Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avdic D, Ivets M, Lagerqvist B, Sriubaite I. Providers, peers and patients. How do physicians' practice environments affect patient outcomes? JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2023; 89:102741. [PMID: 36878022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2023.102741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
We study how physicians' practice environments affect their treatment decisions and quality of care. Using clinical registry data from Sweden, we compare stent choices of cardiologists moving across hospitals over time. To disentangle changes in practice styles attributable to hospital- and peer group-specific factors, we exploit quasi-random variation on cardiologists working together on the same days. We find that migrating cardiologists' stent choices rapidly adapt to their new practice environment after relocation and are equally driven by the hospital and peer environments. In contrast, while decision errors increase, treatment costs and adverse clinical events remain largely unchanged despite the altered practice styles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Avdic
- Department of Economics, Deakin university, 70 Elgar Road, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
| | - Maryna Ivets
- Ruhr Graduate School in Economics, Germany; CINCH-Health Economics Research Center, Germany
| | - Bo Lagerqvist
- UCR and Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Ieva Sriubaite
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Peer relationships may motivate physicians to aspire to high professional standards but have not been a major focus of quality improvement efforts. OBJECTIVE To determine whether peer relationships between primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists formed during training motivate improved specialist care for patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this quasi-experimental study, difference-in-differences analysis was used to estimate differences in experiences with specialist care reported by patients of the same PCP for specialists who did vs did not co-train with the PCP, controlling for any differences in patient ratings of the same specialists in the absence of co-training ties. Specialist visits resulting from PCP referrals from 2016 to 2019 in a large health system were analyzed, including a subset of undirected referrals in which PCPs did not specify a specialist. Data were collected from January 2016 to December 2019 and analyzed from March 2020 to October 2022. EXPOSURE The exposure was PCP-specialist overlap in training (medical school or postgraduate medical) at the same institution for at least 1 year (co-training). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Composite patient experience rating of specialist care constructed from Press Ganey's Medical Practice Survey. RESULTS Of 9920 specialist visits for 8655 patients (62.9% female; mean age, 57.4 years) with 502 specialists in 13 specialties, 3.1% (306) involved PCP-specialist dyads with a co-training tie. Co-training ties between PCPs and specialists were associated with a 9.0 percentage point higher adjusted composite patient rating of specialist care (95% CI, 5.6-12.4 percentage points; P < .001), analogous to improvement from the median to the 91st percentile of specialist performance. This association was stronger for PCP-specialist dyads with full temporal overlap in training (same class or cohort) and consistently strong for 9 of 10 patient experience items, including clarity of communication and engagement in shared decision-making. In secondary analyses of objective markers of altered specialist practice in an expanded sample of visits not limited by the availability of patient experience data, co-training was associated with changes in medication prescribing, suggesting behavioral changes beyond interpersonal communication. Patient characteristics varied minimally by co-training status of PCP-specialist dyads. Results were similar in analyses restricted to undirected referrals (in which PCPs did not specify a specialist). Concordance between PCPs and specialists in physician age, sex, medical school graduation year, and training institution (without requiring temporal overlap) was not associated with better care experiences. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this quasi-experimental study, PCP-specialist co-training elicited changes in specialist care that substantially improved patient experiences, suggesting potential gains from strategies encouraging the formation of stronger physician-peer relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian J Pany
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J Michael McWilliams
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Associate Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Müller J, Upmann T. Eigenvalue productivity: Measurement of individual contributions in teams. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273623. [PMID: 36107910 PMCID: PMC9477377 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
While the output of a team is evident, the productivity of each team member is typically not readily identifiable. In this paper we consider the problem of measuring the productivity of team members. We propose a new concept of coworker productivity, which we refer to as eigenvalue productivity (EVP). We demonstrate the existence and uniqueness of our concept and show that it possesses several desirable properties. Also, we suggest a procedure for specifying the required productivity matrix of a team, and illustrate the operational practicability of EVP by means of three examples representing different types of available data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Müller
- School of Business Administration and Economics, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Thorsten Upmann
- Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Oldenburg, Germany
- Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, University of Oldenburg, Campus Wechloy, Oldenburg, Germany
- Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eckles D, Bakshy E. Bias and High-Dimensional Adjustment in Observational Studies of Peer Effects. J Am Stat Assoc 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1796393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Dean Eckles
- Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- Institute for Data, Systems & Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eilermann K, Halstenberg K, Kuntz L, Martakis K, Roth B, Wiesen D. The Effect of Expert Feedback on Antibiotic Prescribing in Pediatrics: Experimental Evidence. Med Decis Making 2019; 39:781-795. [PMID: 31423892 PMCID: PMC6843625 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19866699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics, which is common in pediatric care, is a key driver of antimicrobial resistance. To mitigate the development of resistance, antibiotic stewardship programs often suggest the inclusion of feedback targeted at individual providers. Empirically, however, it is not well understood how feedback affects individual physicians’ antibiotic prescribing decisions. Also, the question of how physicians’ characteristics, such as clinical experience, relate to antibiotic prescribing decisions and to responses to feedback is largely unexplored. Objective. To analyze the causal effect of descriptive expert feedback (and individual characteristics) on physicians’ antibiotic prescribing decisions in pediatrics. Design. We employed a randomized, controlled framed field experiment, in which German pediatricians (n=73) decided on the length of first-line antibiotic treatment for routine pediatric cases. In the intervention group (n=39), pediatricians received descriptive feedback in form of an expert benchmark, which allowed them to compare their own prescribing decisions with expert recommendations. The recommendations were elicited in a survey of pediatric department directors (n=20), who stated the length of antibiotic therapies they would choose for the routine cases. Pediatricians’ characteristics were elicited in a comprehensive questionnaire. Results. Providing pediatricians with expert feedback significantly reduced the length of antibiotic therapies by 10% on average. Also, the deviation of pediatricians’ decisions from experts’ recommendations significantly decreased. Antibiotic therapy decisions were significantly related to pediatricians’ clinical experience, risk attitudes, and personality traits. The effect of feedback was significantly associated with physicians’ experience. Conclusion. Our results indicate that descriptive expert feedback can be an effective means to guide pediatricians, especially those who are inexperienced, toward more appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Therefore, it seems to be suitable for inclusion in antibiotic stewardship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerstin Eilermann
- Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics, and Social Sciences (CGS), Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katrin Halstenberg
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ludwig Kuntz
- />Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- />Operations Management Group, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kyriakos Martakis
- />Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- />Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute, School CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- />Department of Pediatric Neurology, University Children’s Hospital (UKGM) and Medical Faculty, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Bernhard Roth
- Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Wiesen
- Daniel Wiesen, Department of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, Cologne, 50923, Germany ()
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Causal peer effects in police misconduct. Nat Hum Behav 2019; 3:797-807. [PMID: 31133678 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0612-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
We estimate causal peer effects in police misconduct using data from about 35,000 officers and staff from London's Metropolitan Police Service for the period 2011-2014. We use instrumental variable techniques and exploit the variation in peer misconduct that results when officers switch peer groups. We find that a 10% increase in prior peer misconduct increases an officer's later misconduct by 8%. As the police are empowered to enforce the law and protect individual liberties, integrity and fairness in policing are essential for establishing and maintaining legitimacy and public consent1-5. Understanding the antecedents of misconduct will help to develop interventions that reduce misconduct.
Collapse
|
9
|
van Veldhuizen R, Oosterbeek H, Sonnemans J. Peers at work: Evidence from the lab. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192038. [PMID: 29408863 PMCID: PMC5800692 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a lab experiment designed to study the role of observability for peer effects in the setting of a simple production task. In our experiment, participants in the role of workers engage in a team real-effort task. We vary whether they can observe, or be observed by, one of their co-workers. In contrast to earlier findings from the field, we find no evidence that low-productivity workers perform better when they are observed by high-productivity co-workers. Instead, our results imply that peer effects in our experiment are heterogeneous, with some workers reciprocating a high-productivity co-worker but others taking the opportunity to free ride.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Joep Sonnemans
- University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam/Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brosig-Koch J, Hehenkamp B, Kokot J. The effects of competition on medical service provision. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2017; 26 Suppl 3:6-20. [PMID: 29285872 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Revised: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
We explore how competition between physicians affects medical service provision. Previous research has shown that, without competition, physicians deviate from patient-optimal treatment under payment systems like capitation and fee-for-service. Although competition might reduce these distortions, physicians usually interact with each other repeatedly over time and only a fraction of patients switches providers at all. Both patterns might prevent competition to work in the desired direction. To analyze the behavioral effects of competition, we develop a theoretical benchmark that is then tested in a controlled laboratory experiment. Experimental conditions vary physician payment and patient characteristics. Real patients benefit from provision decisions made in the experiment. Our results reveal that, in line with the theoretical prediction, introducing competition can reduce overprovision and underprovision, respectively. The observed effects depend on patient characteristics and the payment system, though. Tacit collusion is observed and particularly pronounced with fee-for-service payment, but it appears to be less frequent than in related experimental research on price competition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Brosig-Koch
- Health Economics Research Center CINCH, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Burkhard Hehenkamp
- Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Johanna Kokot
- Health Economics Research Center CINCH, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brosig-Koch J, Riechmann T, Weimann J. The dynamics of behavior in modified dictator games. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0176199. [PMID: 28448506 PMCID: PMC5407812 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigate the dynamics of individual pro-social behavior over time. The dynamics are tested by running the same experiment with the same subjects at several points in time. To exclude learning and reputation building, we employ non-strategic decision tasks and a sequential prisoners-dilemma as a control treatment. In the first wave, pro-social concerns explain a high share of individual decisions. Pro-social decisions decrease over time, however. In the final wave, most decisions can be accounted for by assuming pure selfishness. Stable behavior in the sense that subjects stick to their decisions over time is observed predominantly for purely selfish subjects. We offer two explanation for our results: diminishing experimenter demand effects and moral self-licensing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Brosig-Koch
- Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Thomas Riechmann
- Faculty of Business Studies and Economics, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - Joachim Weimann
- Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications. LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 205] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
13
|
Haghani M, Sarvi M. Following the crowd or avoiding it? Empirical investigation of imitative behaviour in emergency escape of human crowds. Anim Behav 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
14
|
Haghani M, Sarvi M, Shahhoseini Z, Boltes M. How Simple Hypothetical-Choice Experiments Can Be Utilized to Learn Humans' Navigational Escape Decisions in Emergencies. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166908. [PMID: 27870880 PMCID: PMC5117746 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2016] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
How humans resolve non-trivial tradeoffs in their navigational choices between the social interactions (e.g., the presence and movements of others) and the physical factors (e.g., spatial distances, route visibility) when escaping from threats in crowded confined spaces? The answer to this question has major implications for the planning of evacuations and the safety of mass gatherings as well as the design of built environments. Due to the challenges of collecting behavioral data from naturally-occurring evacuation settings, laboratory-based virtual-evacuation experiments have been practiced in a number of studies. This class of experiments faces the traditional question of contextual bias and generalizability: How reliably can we infer humans' behavior from decisions made in hypothetical settings? Here, we address these questions by making a novel link between two different forms of empirical observations. We conduct hypothetical emergency exit-choice experiments framed as simple pictures, and then mimic those hypothetical scenarios in more realistic fashions through staging mock evacuation trials with actual crowds. Econometric choice models are estimated based on the observations made in both experimental contexts. The models are contrasted with each other from a number of perspectives including their predictions as well as the sign, magnitude, statistical significance, person-to-person variations (reflecting individuals' perception/preference differences) and the scale (reflecting context-dependent decision randomness) of their inferred parameters. Results reveal a surprising degree of resemblance between the models derived from the two contexts. Most strikingly, they produce fairly similar prediction probabilities whose differences average less than 10%. There is also unexpected consensus between the inferences derived from both experimental sources on many aspects of people's behavior notably in terms of the perception of social interactions. Results show that we could have elicited peoples' escape strategies with fair precision without observing them in action (i.e., simply by using only hypothetical-choice data as an inexpensive, practical and non-invasive experimental technique in this context). As a broader application, this offers promising evidence as to the potential applicability of the hypothetical-decision experiments to other decision contexts (at least for non-financial decisions) when field or real-world data is prohibitively unavailable. As a practical application, the behavioral insights inferred from our observations (reflected in the estimated parameters) can improve how accurately we predict the movement patterns of human crowds in emergency scenarios arisen in complex spaces. Fully-generic-in-parameters, our proposed models can even be directly introduced to a broad range of crowd simulation software to replicate navigation decision making of evacuees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milad Haghani
- Centre for Disaster Management and Public Safety, School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Stationary Ln, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Majid Sarvi
- Centre for Disaster Management and Public Safety, School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Stationary Ln, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Zahra Shahhoseini
- Centre for Disaster Management and Public Safety, School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Stationary Ln, Parkville VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Maik Boltes
- Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Charness
- Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
- Department of Economics, University of Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ernst Fehr
- Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
- Department of Economics, University of Zürich, 8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|