Widespread regulatory specificities between transcriptional co-repressors and enhancers in Drosophila

Systematic screening of enhancer-blocking insulators in Drosophila identifies their DNA sequence determinants

Long-range transcriptional activation of gene promoters by abundant enhancers in animal genomes calls for mechanisms to limit inappropriate regulation. DNA elements called insulators serve this purpose by shielding promoters from an enhancer when interposed. Unlike promoters and enhancers, insulators have not been systematically characterized due to lacking high-throughput screening assays, and questions regarding how insulators are distributed and encoded in the genome remain. Here, we establish "insulator-seq" as a plasmid-based massively parallel reporter assay in Drosophila cultured cells to perform a systematic insulator screen of selected genomic loci. Screening developmental gene loci showed that not all insulator protein binding sites effectively block enhancer-promoter communication. Deep insulator mutagenesis identified sequences flexibly positioned around the CTCF insulator protein binding motif that are critical for functionality. The ability to screen millions of DNA sequences without positional effect has enabled functional mapping of insulators and provided further insights into the determinants of insulators.

Abundant repressor binding sites in human enhancers are associated with the fine-tuning of gene regulation

The regulation of gene expression relies on the coordinated action of transcription factors (TFs) at enhancers, including both activator and repressor TFs. We employed deep learning (DL) to dissect HepG2 enhancers into positive (PAR), negative (NAR), and neutral activity regions. Sharpr-MPRA and STARR-seq highlight the dichotomy impact of NARs and PARs on modulating and catalyzing the activity of enhancers, respectively. Approximately 22% of HepG2 enhancers, termed "repressive impact enhancers" (RIEs), are predominantly populated by NARs and transcriptional repression motifs. Genes flanking RIEs exhibit a stage-specific decline in expression during late development, suggesting RIEs' role in trimming enhancer activities. About 16.7% of human NARs emerge from neutral rhesus macaque DNA. This gain of repressor binding sites in RIEs is associated with a 30% decrease in the average expression of flanking genes in humans compared to rhesus macaque. Our work reveals modulated enhancer activity and adaptable gene regulation through the evolutionary dynamics of TF binding sites.

A genome-wide screen identifies silencers with distinct chromatin properties and mechanisms of repression

Differential gene transcription enables development and homeostasis in all animals and is regulated by two major classes of distal cis-regulatory DNA elements (CREs): enhancers and silencers. Although enhancers have been thoroughly characterized, the properties and mechanisms of silencers remain largely unknown. By an unbiased genome-wide functional screen in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells, we discover a class of silencers that bind one of three transcription factors (TFs) and are generally not included in chromatin-defined CRE catalogs as they mostly lack detectable DNA accessibility. The silencer-binding TF CG11247, which we term Saft, safeguards cell fate decisions in vivo and functions via a highly conserved domain we term zinc-finger-associated C-terminal (ZAC) and the corepressor G9a, independently of G9a's H3K9-methyltransferase activity. Overall, our identification of silencers with unexpected properties and mechanisms has important implications for the understanding and future study of repressive CREs, as well as the functional annotation of animal genomes.

SCAR-6 elncRNA locus epigenetically regulates PROZ and modulates coagulation and vascular function

In this study, we characterize a novel lncRNA-producing gene locus that we name Syntenic Cardiovascular Conserved Region-Associated lncRNA-6 (scar-6) and functionally validate its role in coagulation and cardiovascular function. A 12-bp deletion of the scar-6 locus in zebrafish (scar-6gib007Δ12/Δ12) results in cranial hemorrhage and vascular permeability. Overexpression, knockdown and rescue with the scar-6 lncRNA modulates hemostasis in zebrafish. Molecular investigation reveals that the scar-6 lncRNA acts as an enhancer lncRNA (elncRNA), and controls the expression of prozb, an inhibitor of factor Xa, through an enhancer element in the scar-6 locus. The scar-6 locus suppresses loop formation between prozb and scar-6 sequences, which might be facilitated by the methylation of CpG islands via the prdm14-PRC2 complex whose binding to the locus might be stabilized by the scar-6 elncRNA transcript. Binding of prdm14 to the scar-6 locus is impaired in scar-6gib007Δ12/Δ12 zebrafish. Finally, activation of the PAR2 receptor in scar-6gib007Δ12/Δ12 zebrafish triggers NF-κB-mediated endothelial cell activation, leading to vascular dysfunction and hemorrhage. We present evidence that the scar-6 locus plays a role in regulating the expression of the coagulation cascade gene prozb and maintains vascular homeostasis.

Development of compact transcriptional effectors using high-throughput measurements in diverse contexts

Transcriptional effectors are protein domains known to activate or repress gene expression; however, a systematic understanding of which effector domains regulate transcription across genomic, cell type and DNA-binding domain (DBD) contexts is lacking. Here we develop dCas9-mediated high-throughput recruitment (HT-recruit), a pooled screening method for quantifying effector function at endogenous target genes and test effector function for a library containing 5,092 nuclear protein Pfam domains across varied contexts. We also map context dependencies of effectors drawn from unannotated protein regions using a larger library tiling chromatin regulators and transcription factors. We find that many effectors depend on target and DBD contexts, such as HLH domains that can act as either activators or repressors. To enable efficient perturbations, we select context-robust domains, including ZNF705 KRAB, that improve CRISPRi tools to silence promoters and enhancers. We engineer a compact human activator called NFZ, by combining NCOA3, FOXO3 and ZNF473 domains, which enables efficient CRISPRa with better viral delivery and inducible control of chimeric antigen receptor T cells.

Retinoblastoma protein activity revealed by CRISPRi study of divergent Rbf1 and Rbf2 paralogs

Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor proteins (Rb) are highly conserved metazoan transcriptional corepressors involved in regulating the expression of thousands of genes. The vertebrate lineage and the Drosophila genus independently experienced an Rb gene duplication event, leading to the expression of several Rb paralogs whose unique and redundant roles in gene regulation remain to be fully explored. Here, we used a novel CRISPRi system in Drosophila to identify the significance of paralogy in the Rb family. We engineered dCas9 fusions to the fly Rbf1 and Rbf2 paralogs and deployed them to gene promoters in vivo, studying them in their native chromatin context. By directly querying the in vivo response of dozens of genes to Rbf1 and Rbf2 targeting, using both transcriptional as well as sensitive developmental readouts, we find that Rb paralogs function as "soft repressors" and have highly context-specific activities. Our comparison of targeting endogenous genes to reporter genes in cell culture identified striking differences in activity, underlining the importance of using CRISPRi effectors in a physiologically relevant context to identify paralog-specific activities. Our study uncovers the complexity of Rb-mediated transcriptional regulation in a living organism, and serves as a stepping stone for future CRISPRi development in Drosophila.

Enhancer selectivity in space and time: from enhancer-promoter interactions to promoter activation

The primary regulators of metazoan gene expression are enhancers, originally functionally defined as DNA sequences that can activate transcription at promoters in an orientation-independent and distance-independent manner. Despite being crucial for gene regulation in animals, what mechanisms underlie enhancer selectivity for promoters, and more fundamentally, how enhancers interact with promoters and activate transcription, remain poorly understood. In this Review, we first discuss current models of enhancer-promoter interactions in space and time and how enhancers affect transcription activation. Next, we discuss different mechanisms that mediate enhancer selectivity, including repression, biochemical compatibility and regulation of 3D genome structure. Through 3D polymer simulations, we illustrate how the ability of 3D genome folding mechanisms to mediate enhancer selectivity strongly varies for different enhancer-promoter interaction mechanisms. Finally, we discuss how recent technical advances may provide new insights into mechanisms of enhancer-promoter interactions and how technical biases in methods such as Hi-C and Micro-C and imaging techniques may affect their interpretation.

An autoinhibitory switch of the LSD1 disordered region controls enhancer silencing

Transcriptional coregulators and transcription factors (TFs) contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) that are critical for their association and function in gene regulation. More recently, IDRs have been shown to promote multivalent protein-protein interactions between coregulators and TFs to drive their association into condensates. By contrast, here we demonstrate how the IDR of the corepressor LSD1 excludes TF association, acting as a dynamic conformational switch that tunes repression of active cis-regulatory elements. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange shows that the LSD1 IDR interconverts between transient open and closed conformational states, the latter of which inhibits partitioning of the protein's structured domains with TF condensates. This autoinhibitory switch controls leukemic differentiation by modulating repression of active cis-regulatory elements bound by LSD1 and master hematopoietic TFs. Together, these studies unveil alternative mechanisms by which disordered regions and their dynamic crosstalk with structured regions can shape coregulator-TF interactions to control cis-regulatory landscapes and cell fate.

Developmental and Housekeeping Genes: Two Types of Genetic Organization in the Drosophila Genome

We developed a procedure for locating genes on Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes and described three types of chromosome structures (gray bands, black bands, and interbands), which differed markedly in morphological and genetic properties. This was reached through the use of our original methods of molecular and genetic analysis, electron microscopy, and bioinformatics data processing. Analysis of the genome-wide distribution of these properties led us to a bioinformatics model of the Drosophila genome organization, in which the genome was divided into two groups of genes. One was constituted by 65, in which the genome was divided into two groups, 62 genes that are expressed in most cell types during life cycle and perform basic cellular functions (the so-called "housekeeping genes"). The other one was made up of 3162 genes that are expressed only at particular stages of development ("developmental genes"). These two groups of genes are so different that we may state that the genome has two types of genetic organization. Different are the timings of their expression, chromatin packaging levels, the composition of activating and deactivating proteins, the sizes of these genes, the lengths of their introns, the organization of the promoter regions of the genes, the locations of origin recognition complexes (ORCs), and DNA replication timings.

Canalizing cell fate by transcriptional repression

Precision in the establishment and maintenance of cellular identities is crucial for the development of multicellular organisms and requires tight regulation of gene expression. While extensive research has focused on understanding cell type-specific gene activation, the complex mechanisms underlying the transcriptional repression of alternative fates are not fully understood. Here, we provide an overview of the repressive mechanisms involved in cell fate regulation. We discuss the molecular machinery responsible for suppressing alternative fates and highlight the crucial role of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) in this process. Depletion of these TFs can result in unwanted gene expression and increased cellular plasticity. We suggest that these TFs recruit cell type-specific repressive complexes to their cis-regulatory elements, enabling them to modulate chromatin accessibility in a context-dependent manner. This modulation effectively suppresses master regulators of alternative fate programs and their downstream targets. The modularity and dynamic behavior of these repressive complexes enables a limited number of repressors to canalize and maintain major and minor cell fate decisions at different stages of development.

A regulatory role for the unstructured C-terminal domain of the CtBP transcriptional corepressor

The C-terminal binding protein (CtBP) is a transcriptional corepressor that plays critical roles in development, tumorigenesis, and cell fate. CtBP proteins are structurally similar to alpha hydroxyacid dehydrogenases and feature a prominent intrinsically disordered region in the C terminus. In the mammalian system, CtBP proteins lacking the C-terminal domain (CTD) are able to function as transcriptional regulators and oligomerize, putting into question the significance of this unstructured domain for gene regulation. Yet, the presence of an unstructured CTD of ∼100 residues, including some short motifs, is conserved across Bilateria, indicating the importance of maintaining this domain over evolutionary time. To uncover the significance of the CtBP CTD, we functionally tested naturally occurring Drosophila isoforms of CtBP that possess or lack the CTD, namely CtBP(L) and CtBP(S). We used the CRISPRi system to recruit dCas9-CtBP(L) and dCas9-CtBP(S) to endogenous promoters to directly compare their transcriptional impacts in vivo. Interestingly, CtBP(S) was able to significantly repress transcription of the Mpp6 promoter, while CtBP(L) was much weaker, suggesting that the long CTD may modulate CtBP's repression activity. In contrast, in cell culture, the isoforms behaved similarly on a transfected Mpp6 reporter gene. The context-specific differences in activity of these two developmentally regulated isoforms suggests that the CTD may help provide a spectrum of repression activity suitable for developmental programs.

Soft repression and chromatin modification by conserved transcriptional corepressors

Transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cells involves the activity of multifarious DNA-binding transcription factors and recruited corepressor complexes. Together, these complexes interact with the core transcriptional machinery, chromatin, and nuclear environment to effect complex patterns of gene regulation. Much focus has been paid to the action of master regulatory switches that are key to developmental and environmental responses, as these genetic elements have important phenotypic effects. The regulation of widely-expressed metabolic control genes has been less well studied, particularly in cases in which physically-interacting repressors and corepressors have subtle influences on steady-state expression. This latter phenomenon, termed "soft repression" is a topic of increasing interest as genomic approaches provide ever more powerful tools to uncover the significance of this level of control. This review provides an oversight of classic and current approaches to the study of transcriptional repression in eukaryotic systems, with a specific focus on opportunities and challenges that lie ahead in the study of soft repression.