Comparison of the Antiviral Activity of Bictegravir against HIV-1 and HIV-2 Isolates and Integrase Inhibitor-Resistant HIV-2 Mutants

Biktarvy for the treatment of HIV infection: Progress and prospects

Bictegravir (BIC), a second-generation integrase strand-transfer inhibitor (INSTI) with high resilience to INSTI-resistance mutations, is integrated as a key component of Biktarvy® - a fixed-dose once-daily triple-drug regimen of bictegravir (BIC), emtricitabine (FTC) plus tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). Based on the accumulated evidence from HIV clinical trials and real-world studies, the clinical effectiveness of BIC + FTC + TAF has been proven non-inferior to other fixed-dose once-daily combinations such as dolutegravir + FTC + TAF and dolutegravir + abacavir + lamivudine. Biktarvy also shows limited drug-drug interactions and a high barrier to drug resistance. According to recent HIV guidelines, BIC + FTC + TAF is recommended as initial and long-term therapy for the treatment of HIV infection. For the pre-exposure prophylaxis, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) remains advisable, but BIC may be possibly added to TDF or TAF. In the development of a long-acting once-monthly regimen, the novel nano-formulation of BIC + FTC + TAF could be possibly developed in the future.

Antiretroviral Treatment of HIV-2 Infection: Available Drugs, Resistance Pathways, and Promising New Compounds

Currently, it is estimated that 1-2 million people worldwide are infected with HIV-2, accounting for 3-5% of the global burden of HIV. The course of HIV-2 infection is longer compared to HIV-1 infection, but without effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), a substantial proportion of infected patients will progress to AIDS and die. Antiretroviral drugs in clinical use were designed for HIV-1 and, unfortunately, some do not work as well, or do not work at all, for HIV-2. This is the case for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide (T-20), most protease inhibitors (PIs), the attachment inhibitor fostemsavir and most broadly neutralizing antibodies. Integrase inhibitors work well against HIV-2 and are included in first-line therapeutic regimens for HIV-2-infected patients. However, rapid emergence of drug resistance and cross-resistance within each drug class dramatically reduces second-line treatment options. New drugs are needed to treat infection with drug-resistant isolates. Here, we review the therapeutic armamentarium available to treat HIV-2-infected patients, as well as promising drugs in development. We also review HIV-2 drug resistance mutations and resistance pathways that develop in HIV-2-infected patients under treatment.

An open-label evaluation of safety and tolerability of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for post-exposure prophylaxis following potential exposure to human immunodeficiency virus-1

BACKGROUND

Single-tablet regimen (STR) provides a convenient once-daily regimen for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Here, we investigated the safety and tolerability of coformulated bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) as a three-drug, STR for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Chinese individuals.

METHODS

This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm trial conducted in a sexually transmitted diseases and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome clinic of a tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. Adults requiring PEP were prescribed BIC/FTC/TAF one pill once a day for 28 days. Clinical and laboratory data were collected and analyzed at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24.

RESULTS

Of 112 participants enrolled in the study, 109 (97.3%) were male and the mean age was 30 ± 8 years. PEP completion was 96.4% (95% confidence interval: 91.1-99.0%). Two participants stopped PEP after 2 days because the source partner was identified as HIV uninfected. One participant was excluded due to hepatitis B virus infection according to the exclusion criteria. One discontinued due to the participant's decision. No participant acquired HIV through week 24. Adherence was 98.9% (standard deviation [SD]: 3.3%) by self-reporting and 98.5% (SD: 3.5%) by pill count. Only five participants experienced mild clinical adverse events attributed to the study drug (including headache, diarrhea, and nausea) and four participants had elevated serum creatinine (grade 1).

CONCLUSIONS

A once daily, STR of BIC/FTC/TAF used as PEP was safe and well-tolerated with a high rate of completion and adherence in Chinese. BIC/FTC/TAF may be a good option for PEP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR2100048080.

High Instantaneous Inhibitory Potential of Bictegravir and the New Spiro-β-Lactam BSS-730A for HIV-2 Isolates from RAL-Naïve and RAL-Failing Patients

Integrase inhibitors (INIs) are an important class of drugs for treating HIV-2 infection, given the limited number of drugs active against this virus. While the clinical efficacy of raltegravir and dolutegravir is well established, the clinical efficacy of bictegravir for treating HIV-2 infected patients has not been determined. Little information is available regarding the activity of bictegravir against HIV-2 isolates from patients failing raltegravir-based therapy. In this study, we examined the phenotypic and matched genotypic susceptibility of HIV-2 primary isolates from raltegravir-naïve and raltegravir-failing patients to raltegravir, dolutegravir, and bictegravir, and to the new spiro-β-lactam BSS-730A. The instantaneous inhibitory potential (IIP) was calculated to help predict the clinical activity of bictegravir and BSS-730A. Isolates from raltegravir-naïve patients were highly sensitive to all INIs and BSS-730A. Combined integrase mutations E92A and Q148K conferred high-level resistance to raltegravir, and E92Q and T97A conferred resistance to raltegravir and dolutegravir. The antiviral activity of bictegravir and BSS-730A was not affected by these mutations. BSS-730A displayed strong antiviral synergism with raltegravir. Mean IIP values at Cmax were similar for all INIs and were not significantly affected by resistance mutations. IIP values were significantly higher for BSS-730A than for INIs. The high IIP values of bictegravir and BSS-730A for raltegravir-naïve and raltegravir-resistant HIV-2 isolates highlight their potential value for treating HIV-2 infection. Overall, the results are consistent with the high clinical efficacy of raltegravir and dolutegravir for HIV-2 infection and suggest a promising clinical profile for bictegravir and BSS-730A.

Brief Report: Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Efficacy in Participants With Preexisting Primary Integrase Inhibitor Resistance Through 48 Weeks of Phase 3 Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Preexisting drug resistance limits the utility of HIV antiretroviral therapy. Studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF), including in patients with M184V/I substitutions.

SETTING

We investigated virologic outcomes through 48 weeks of B/F/TAF treatment in individuals with preexisting primary integrase strand transfer inhibitor resistance (INSTI-R).

METHODS

Preexisting INSTI-R was retrospectively evaluated from 7 B/F/TAF studies. INSTI-R was assessed by historical genotypes and/or baseline RNA or DNA sequencing. Viral loads were measured at all visits.

RESULTS

Preexisting primary INSTI-R substitutions were detected in 20 of the 1907 participants (1.0%). The 20 participants were predominantly male (75%), were Black (65%), had HIV-1 subtype B (85%), and had baseline median CD4 counts of 594 cells/mm3 and median age of 52 years. Most of the participants (n = 19) were virologically suppressed at baseline and had one primary INSTI-R substitution, E92G, Y143C/H, S147G, Q148H/K/R, N155S, or R263K, +/-secondary substitutions. All suppressed participants maintained virologic suppression throughout 48 weeks without any viral blips. One treatment-naive participant had virus with Q148H+G140S that was fully sensitive to bictegravir but only partially to dolutegravir (phenotype <2.5-fold change and >4-fold change, respectively). With a baseline viral load of 30,000 copies/mL, this participant was virologically suppressed by week 4 and maintained <50 copies/mL through week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

This small cohort with primary INSTI-R achieved and/or maintained virologic suppression through 48 weeks of B/F/TAF treatment. Consistent with the potent in vitro activity of bictegravir against most INSTI-R patterns, B/F/TAF may be a potential treatment option for patients with select preexisting INSTI-R, if confirmed by further studies.

Spectrum of Activity of Raltegravir and Dolutegravir Against Novel Treatment-Associated Mutations in HIV-2 Integrase: A Phenotypic Analysis Using an Expanded Panel of Site-Directed Mutants

BACKGROUND

Integrase inhibitors (INIs) are a key component of antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) and HIV-2 infection. Although INI resistance pathways are well-defined for HIV-1, mutations that emerge in HIV-2 in response to INIs are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We performed systematic searches of GenBank and HIV-2 drug resistance literature to identify treatment-associated mutations for phenotypic evaluation. We then constructed a library of 95 mutants of HIV-2ROD9 that contained single or multiple amino acid changes in the integrase protein. Each variant was tested for susceptibility to raltegravir and dolutegravir using a single-cycle indicator cell assay.

RESULTS

We observed extensive cross-resistance between raltegravir and dolutegravir in HIV-2ROD9. HIV-2-specific integrase mutations Q91R, E92A, A153G, and H157Q/S, which have not been previously characterized, significantly increased the half maximum effective concentration (EC50) for raltegravir when introduced into 1 or more mutational backgrounds; mutations E92A/Q, T97A, and G140A/S conferred similar enhancements of dolutegravir resistance. HIV-2ROD9 variants encoding G118R alone, or insertions of residues SREGK or SREGR at position 231, were resistant to both INIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis demonstrates the contributions of novel INI-associated mutations to raltegravir and dolutegravir resistance in HIV-2. These findings should help to improve algorithms for genotypic drug resistance testing in HIV-2-infected individuals.

HIV-1 integrase resistance associated mutations and the use of dolutegravir in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

As sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries are transitioning to dolutegravir (DTG)-based ART, baseline data are required for optimal monitoring of therapeutic response. In this frame, we sought to generate up-to-date evidence on the use of integrase-strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) and associated drug resistance mutations (DRMs) within SSA. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we included randomized and non-randomized trials, cohort-studies, cross-sectional studies, and case-reports published on INSTI or integrase DRMs in SSA. We included studies of patients exposed to DTG, raltegravir (RAL) or elvitegravir (EVG). Primary outcomes were "the rate of virological control (VC:<50copies/ml)" and "the presence of DRMs" on INSTI-based regimens among patients in SSA. We synthesised extracted data using subgroup analysis, and random effect models were used where appropriate. Additional analyses were conducted to assess study heterogeneity. We identified 1,916 articles/citations through database searches, of which 26 were included in the analysis pertaining to 5,444 patients (mean age: 37±13 years), with 67.62% (3681/5444) female. Specifically, 46.15% (12/26) studies focused on DTG, 26.92% (7/26) on RAL, 23.08% (6/26) on both DTG and RAL, and 3.85% (1/26) on EVG. We found an increasing use of DTG overtime (0% before 2018 to 100% in 2021). Median treatment duration under INSTI-based regimens was 12 [9-36] months. Overall, the rate of VC was 88.51% [95%CI: 73.83-97.80] with DTG vs. 82.49% [95%CI: 55.76-99.45] and 96.55% [95%CI: 85.7-100.00] with RAL and EVG, respectively. In univariate analysis, VC with DTG-containing vs. other INSTI-regimens was significantly higher (OR = 1.44 [95%CI: 1.15-1.79], p = 0.0014). Among reported DRMs at failure, the only DTG resistance-mutations were G118R and R263K. In SSA, DTG presents a superiority effect in VC compared to other INSTIs. Nonetheless, the early detection of INSTI-DRMs calls for sentinel surveillance for a successful transition and a sustained efficacy of DTG in SSA. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42019122424.

In vitro analysis of the replicative capacity and phenotypic susceptibility to integrase inhibitors of HIV-2 mutants with integrase insertions

BACKGROUND

HIV-2 resistance to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) is characterized by two main pathways: (i) mutations at codons 143, 148 and155; and (ii) amino acid insertion after integrase codon 231 (231ins).

OBJECTIVES

To complete INSTI resistance data on HIV-2 by determining the viral replicative capacity and INSTI phenotypic susceptibility of integrase mutants obtained through site-directed mutagenesis.

METHODS

Site-directed mutants (SDMs) were constructed and viral stocks produced. Viral replicative capacity was assessed by measuring HIV-2 viral load at days 3, 7 and 14. In vitro phenotypic susceptibility was measured using the ANRS PBMC assay.

RESULTS

Viruses bearing 231ins did not present impaired replicative capacity, except the 231ins GIRGK mutant. A 231ins GK SDM was resistant to raltegravir and cabotegravir, but remained susceptible to dolutegravir and bictegravir. SDMs harbouring a 5 amino acid insertion (GYKGK or SREGK) were both resistant to all INSTIs. The SDM with T97A+N155H, with or without E92Q, was resistant to all INSTIs, except bictegravir.

CONCLUSIONS

These first data on the newly described resistance pathway 231ins, using site-directed mutagenesis, showed no measurable impact on viral fitness and confirmed the decreased susceptibility to a first-generation INSTI (raltegravir) and cabotegravir. Resistance to second-generation INSTIs (dolutegravir and bictegravir) occurred for mutants with a 5 amino acid 231ins.

Long Dissociation of Bictegravir from HIV-1 Integrase-DNA Complexes

The HIV integrase (IN) strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) bictegravir (BIC) has a long dissociation half-life (t_1/2) from wild-type IN-DNA complexes: BIC 163 hr > dolutegravir (DTG) 96 hr > raltegravir (RAL) 10 hr > elvitegravir (EVG) 3.3 hr. In cells, BIC had more durable antiviral activity against wild-type HIV after drug washout than RAL or EVG. BIC also had a longer t_1/2 and maintained longer antiviral activity after drug washout than DTG with the clinically relevant resistance IN mutant G140S+Q148H. Structural analyses indicate that BIC makes more contacts with the IN-DNA complex than DTG mainly via its bicyclic ring system which may contribute to more prolonged residence time and resilience against many resistance mutations.