Toward Harmonization of Voriconazole CLSI and EUCAST Breakpoints for Candida albicans Using a Validated In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

How Yeast Antifungal Resistance Gene Analysis Is Essential to Validate Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Systems

Objectives

The antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of yeast pathogen alerts clinicians about the potential emergence of resistance. In this study, we compared two commercial microdilution AFST methods: Sensititre YeastOne read visually (YO) and MICRONAUT-AM read visually (MN) or spectrophotometrically (MNV), interpreted with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria, respectively.

Methods

Overall, 97 strains from 19 yeast species were measured for nine antifungal drugs including a total of 873 observations. First, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was compared between YO and MNV, and between MNV and MN, either directly or by assigning them to five susceptibility categories. Those categories were based on the number of MIC dilutions around the breakpoint or epidemiological cut-off reference values (ECOFFs or ECVs). Second, YO and MNV methods were evaluated for their ability to detect the elevation of MICs due to mutation in antifungal resistance genes, thanks to pairs or triplets of isogenic strains isolated from a single patient along a treatment previously analyzed for antifungal resistance gene mutations. Reproducibility measurement was evaluated, thanks to three quality control (QC) strains.

Results

YO and MNV direct MIC comparisons obtained a global agreement of 67%. Performing susceptibility category comparisons, only 22% and 49% of the MICs could be assigned to categories using breakpoints and ECOFFs/ECVs, respectively, and 40% could not be assigned due to the lack of criteria in both consortia. The YO and MN susceptibility categories gave accuracies as low as 50%, revealing the difficulty to implement this method of comparison. In contrast, using the antifungal resistance gene sequences as a gold standard, we demonstrated that both methods (YO and MN) were equally able to detect the acquisition of resistance in the Candida strains, even if MN showed a global lower MIC elevation than YO. Finally, no major differences in reproducibility were observed between the three AFST methods.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the valuable use of both commercial microdilution AFST methods to detect antifungal resistance due to point mutations in antifungal resistance genes. We highlighted the difficulty to conduct conclusive analyses without antifungal gene sequence data as a gold standard. Indeed, MIC comparisons taking into account the consortia criteria of interpretation remain difficult even after the effort of harmonization.

A Pragmatic Approach to Susceptibility Classification of Yeasts without EUCAST Clinical Breakpoints

EUCAST has established clinical breakpoints for the six most common Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans but not for less common yeasts because sufficient evidence is lacking. Consequently, the question “How to interpret the MIC?” for other yeasts often arises. We propose a pragmatic classification for amphotericin B, anidulafungin, fluconazole, and voriconazole MICs against 30 different rare yeasts. This classification takes advantage of MIC data for more than 4000 isolates generated in the EUCAST Development Laboratory for Fungi validated by alignment to published EUCAST MIC data. The classification relies on the following two important assumptions: first, that when isolates are genetically related, pathogenicity and intrinsic susceptibility patterns may be similar; and second, that even if species are not phylogenetically related, the rare yeasts will likely respond to therapy, provided the MIC is comparable to that against wild-type isolates of more prevalent susceptible species because rare yeasts are most likely “rare” due to a lower pathogenicity. In addition, the treatment recommendations available in the current guidelines based on the in vivo efficacy data and clinical experience are taken into consideration. Needless to say, it is of utmost importance (a) to ascertain that the species identification is correct (using MALDI-TOF or sequencing), and (b) to re-test the isolate once or twice to confirm that the MIC is representative for the isolate (because of the inherent variability in MIC determinations). We hope this pragmatic guidance is helpful until evidence-based EUCAST breakpoints can be formally established.

The Role of New Posaconazole Formulations in the Treatment of Candida albicans Infections: Data from an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model

Posaconazole is more active than fluconazole against Candida albicans in vitro and is approved for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis but not for that of invasive candidiasis (IC). Here, we explored the efficacy of posaconazole against C. albicans in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model of IC and determined the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment for the oral solution and intravenous (i.v.)/tablet formulations. Three clinical C. albicans isolates (posaconazole MICs, 0.008 to 0.25 mg/liter) were studied in the in vitro PK/PD dilution model simulating steady-state posaconazole PK. The in vitro exposure-effect relationship, area under the 24-h free drug concentration curve (fAUC_0-24)/MIC, was described and compared with in vivo outcome in animals with IC. PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints and trough levels required for optimal treatment were determined for EUCAST and CLSI 24-h/48-h (CLSI24h/CLSI48h) methods using the fAUC_0-24/MIC associated with half-maximal activity (EI₅₀) and Monte Carlo simulation analysis for oral solution (400 mg every 12 hours [q12h]) and i.v./tablet formulations (300 mg q24h). The in vitro mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) EI₅₀ was 330 (183 to 597) fAUC_0-24/MIC for CLSI24h and 169 (92 to 310) for EUCAST/CLSI48h methods, which are close to the near-stasis in vivo effect. The probability of target attainment for EI₅₀ was estimated; for the wild-type isolates (MIC ≤ 0.06 mg/liter), it was low for the oral solution and higher than 95% for the i.v./tablet formulations for the EUCAST/CLSI48h methods but not for the CLSI 24-h method. Non-wild-type isolates with EUCAST/CLSI48h MICs of 0.125 and 0.25 mg/liter would require trough levels of >1.2 and >2.4 mg/liter, respectively. Posaconazole i.v./tablet formulations may have a role in the therapy of invasive infections by wild-type C. albicans isolates, provided that a steady state is reached quickly. A PK/PD susceptibility breakpoint at the epidemiological cutoff (ECV/ECOFF) of 0.06 mg/liter was determined.

In-vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model data suggest a potential role of new formulations of posaconazole against Candida krusei but not Candida glabrata infections

Posaconazole exhibits in-vitro activity against Candida glabrata and Candida krusei. Epidemiological cut-off values set by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) are 1/1 and 0.5/0.5 mg/L, respectively, but clinical breakpoints have not been established to date. This study explored the pharmacodynamics (PD) of posaconazole in a validated one-compartment in-vitro pharmacokinetic (PK)/PD model, and determined the probability of PK/PD target attainment (PTA) for the available formulations. Five C. glabrata and three C. krusei isolates with posaconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.06-2 and 0.03-0.25 mg/L, respectively, were tested in the PK/PD model simulating different time-concentration profiles of posaconazole. The exposure-effect relationship fAUC_0-24/MIC was described for EUCAST/CLSI methods, and PTA was calculated in order to determine PK/PD susceptibility breakpoints for oral solution (400 mg q12h), and intravenous (i.v.)/tablet formulations (300 mg q24h). Fungicidal activity (~2log kill) was found against the most susceptible C. glabrata isolate alone, and against all three C. krusei isolates. The corresponding EUCAST/CLSI PK/PD targets (fAUC_0-24/MIC) were 102/79 for C. glabrata and 12/8 for C. krusei. Mean PTA was high (>95%) for C. glabrata isolates with EUCAST/CLSI MICs ≤0.03/≤0.03 mg/L for oral solution and ≤0.125/≤0.125 mg/L for i.v. and tablet formulations for the wild-type population. For C. krusei isolates, mean PTA was high (>95%) for EUCAST/CLSI MICs ≤0.25/≤0.5 mg/L for oral solution and ≤1/≤2 mg/L for i.v. and tablet formulations for the wild-type population. The use of posaconazole to treat C. glabrata infections is questionable. Intravenous and tablet formulations may be therapeutic options for the treatment of C. krusei infections, and oral exposure can be optimized with therapeutic drug monitoring (trough levels >0.6-0.9 mg/L).