Pharmacokinetics and Penetration of Sitafloxacin into Alveolar Epithelial Lining Fluid in Critically Ill Thai Patients with Pneumonia

Establishing Sitafloxacin Epidemiological Cut-off Values (ECOFFs) for Clinical Bacterial Isolates

Objective

To establish the epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) of sitafloxacin against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, and Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Methods

We collected 2264 clinical isolates from five different labs located in four cities in China. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and inhibition zone diameters of sitafloxacin for all isolates were determined by using the broth microdilution method (BMD) and the disk diffusion method according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines. MIC ECOFFs were determined using ECOFFinder software, with the 99% calculated ECOFF selected as the initial value. Zone diameter ECOFFs were determined via the visual estimation method. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on E. coli strains exhibiting overlapping MICs between wild-type (WT) and non-wild-type (NWT) groups to analyze resistance mechanisms.

Results

Sitafloxacin MICs ranged from 0.002 to 64 mg/L, while inhibition zone diameters ranged from 6 to 45 mm across the nine species. MIC ECOFFs were determined as 0.032, 0.064, 0.125, 0.5, 0.064, 0.125, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg/L for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis (tentative ECOFF), P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, S. aureus, E. faecalis, E. faecium, and S. pneumoniae, respectively. Except for S. pneumoniae, MICs of the other eight species showed a high correlation with zone diameters (|r| > 0.8, P < 0.0001). Consequently, the zone diameter ECOFFs were established as 26, 25, 24, 24, 25, 26, 21, and 22 for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. mirabilis, P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, S. aureus, E. faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively.

Conclusion

We established MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for sitafloxacin against the nine species listed above. The MIC ECOFF for P. mirabilis was classified as tentative. For S. pneumoniae, the correlation between zone diameters and MICs was insufficient to establish a zone diameter ECOFF.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Sitafloxacin in Plasma and Alveolar Epithelial Lining Fluid of Critically Ill Thai Patients With Pneumonia

Sitafloxacin is one of the oral respiratory quinolones for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. The pharmacokinetic (PK) changes of sitafloxacin in critical illness have been previously reported. However, sitafloxacin exposure and target attainment have never been confirmed in this population. To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of sitafloxacin, plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations were obtained after sitafloxacin administration as a 200-mg single dose under fasting condition in 12 subjects. A population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. The probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) against the MIC distribution of S. pneumoniae isolated from Thai patients was estimated by Monte Carlo simulations. The pharmacokinetics of sitafloxacin in plasma was best described by a one-compartment model linking to the ELF compartment. The partition coefficient which relates drug exposure in ELF to drug exposure in plasma was estimated to be 0.77. Age was a significant covariate that impacted the relative bioavailability. Results from Monte Carlo simulations showed that the maximum approved dose of sitafloxacin 100 mg q 12 h provided > 90% PTA and CFR in both plasma and ELF. The current maximal dosing of sitafloxacin provided adequate exposure in plasma and ELF for the treatment of critically ill Thai patients with pneumonia.

Clinical Efficacy of Sitafloxacin-Colistin-Meropenem and Colistin-Meropenem in Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia (HAP)/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) in One Super-Tertiary Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is now a therapeutic problem worldwide.

METHOD

An open-label, randomized, superiority, single-blind trial was conducted in Rajavithi Hospital, a super-tertiary care facility in Bangkok, Thailand. CRAB HAP/VAP patients were randomly assigned to receive either sitafloxacin-colistin-meropenem or colistin-meropenem. Outcomes in the two groups were then assessed with respect to mortality, clinical response, and adverse effects.

RESULT

Between April 2021 and April 2022, 77 patients were treated with combinations of either sitafloxacin plus colistin plus meropenem (n = 40) or colistin plus meropenem (n = 37). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to all-cause mortality rates at 7 days and 14 days (respectively, 7.5% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.616, and 10% vs. 10%; p = 1). Patients who received sitafloxacin-colistin-meropenem showed improved clinical response compared with patients who received colistin-meropenem in terms of both intention-to-treat (87.5% vs. 62.2%; p = 0.016) and per-protocol analysis (87.2% vs. 67.7%; p = 0.049). There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding sitafloxacin as a third agent to meropenem plus colistin could improve clinical outcomes in CRAB HAP/VAP with little or no impact on adverse effects. In short, sitafloxacin-meropenem-colistin could be another therapeutic option for combatting CRAB HAP/VAP.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulation for dosage optimization of colistin and sitafloxacin, alone and in combination, against carbapenem-, multidrug-, and colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

To the best of our knowledge, to date, no study has investigated the optimal dosage regimens of either colistin or sitafloxacin against drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) infections by using specific parameters. In the current study, we aimed to explore the optimal dosage regimens of colistin and sitafloxacin, either in monotherapy or in combination therapy, for the treatment of carbapenem-, multidrug-, and colistin-resistant A. baumannii infections. A Monte Carlo simulation was applied to determine the dosage regimen that could achieve the optimal probability of target attainment (PTA) and cumulative fraction of response (CFR) (≥90%) based on the specific parameters of each agent and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the clinical isolates. This study explored the dosage regimen of 90, 50, 30, and 10 mL/min for patients with creatinine clearance (CrCL). We also explored the dosage regimen for each patient with CrCL using combination therapy because there is a higher possibility of reaching the desired PTA or CFR. Focusing on the MIC90 of each agent in combination therapy, the dosage regimen for colistin was a loading dose of 300 mg followed by a maintenance dose ranging from 50 mg every 48 h to 225 mg every 12 h and the dosage regimen for sitafloxacin was 325 mg every 48 h to 750 mg every 12 h. We concluded that a lower-than-usual dose of colistin based on specific pharmacokinetic data in combination with a higher-than-usual dose of sitafloxacin could be an option for the treatment of carbapenem-, multidrug-, and colistin-resistant. A. baumannii. The lower dose of colistin might show a low probability of adverse reaction, while the high dose of sitafloxacin should be considered. In the current study, we attempted to find if there is a strong possibility of drug selection against crucial drug-resistant pathogen infections in a situation where there is a lack of new antibiotics. However, further study is needed to confirm the results of this simulation study.

Comparison of the in vitro antibacterial activity of ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sitafloxacin, finafloxacin, and delafloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in China

Objective

The resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) to currently available fluoroquinolones (FQs), namely ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin (LFX), and moxifloxacin (MFX), renders the treatment of TB infections less successful. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the susceptibility and intracellular killing assay of Mtb to next-generation FQs in vitro and determine the correlation of FQs resistance and newly detected mutations in gyrB by molecular docking.

Methods

Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six FQs, including currently available FQs (OFX, LFX, and MFX) and next-generation FQs, i.e., sitafloxacin (SFX), finafloxacin (FIN) and delafloxacin (DFX) against Mtb clinical isolates obtained in 2015 and 2022, respectively. Quinolone-resistance-determining regions of gyrA and gyrB were subjected to DNA sequencing and the correlation of FQs resistance and new mutations in gyrB were determined by molecular docking. Furthermore, the intracellular antibacterial activity of the six FQs against Mtb H37Rv in THP-1 cells was evaluated.

Results

SFX exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against Mtb isolates (MIC90 = 0.25 μg/mL), whereas DFX and OFX exhibited comparable activity (MIC90 = 8 μg/mL). A statistically significant difference was observed among the MICs of the new generation FQs (SFX, P = 0.002; DFX, P = 0.008). Additionally, a marked increase in MICs was found in strains isolated in 2022 compared with those isolated in 2015. There might be correlation between FQs resistance and mutations in gyrB G520T and G520A. Cross-resistance rate between SFX and MFX was 40.6 % (26/64). At a concentration of 1 μg/mL, SFX exhibited high intracellular antibacterial activity (96.6 % ± 1.5 %) against the Mtb H37Rv, comparable with that of MFX at a concentration of 2 μg/mL.

Conclusion

SFX exhibits the highest inhibitory activity against Mtb in vitro and THP-1 cell lines, which exhibits partial-cross resistance with MFX. There might be correlation between FQs resistance and mutations in gyrB G520T and G520A.Our findings provide crucial insights into the potential clinical application of SFX and DFX in the treatment of Mtb infections.

Lung penetration and pneumococcal target binding of antibiotics in lower respiratory tract infection

OBJECTIVES

To achieve the therapeutic effects, antibiotics must penetrate rapidly into infection sites and bind to targets. This study reviewed updated knowledge on the ability of antibiotics to penetrate into the lung, their physicochemical properties influencing the pulmonary penetration and their ability to bind to targets on pneumococci.

METHODS

A search strategy was developed using PubMED, Web of Science, and ChEMBL. Data on serum protein binding, drug concentration, target binding ability, drug transporters, lung penetration, physicochemical properties of antibiotics in low respiratory tract infection (LRTI) were collected.

RESULTS

It was seen that infection site-to-serum concentration ratios of most antibiotics are >1 at different time points except for ceftriaxone, clindamycin and vancomycin. Most agents have proper physicochemical properties that facilitate antibiotic penetration. In antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, the binding affinity of antibiotics to targets mostly decreases compared to that in susceptible strains. The data on binding affinity of linezolid, clindamycin and vancomycin were insufficient. The higher drug concentration at the infection sites compared to that in the blood can be associated with inflammation conditions. Little evidence showed the effect of drug transporters on the clinical efficacy of antibiotics against LRTI.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on antibiotic penetration into the lung in LRTI patients and binding affinity of antibiotics for pneumococcal targets are still limited. Further studies are required to clarify the associations of the lung penetration and target binding ability of antibitotics with therapeutic efficacy to help propose the right antibiotics for LRTI.

Colistin Monotherapy versus Colistin plus Sitafloxacin for Therapy of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections: A Preliminary Study

The in vitro study of sitafloxacin against carbapenem-resistant (CR) Acinetobacter baumannii demonstrated activity against most strains of CR A. baumannii, and the combination of colistin and sitafloxacin showed an in vitro synergistic effect against CR A. baumannii. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety between colistin plus sitafloxacin with colistin alone for therapy for CR A. baumannii infection. This randomized controlled trial enrolled 56 patients with CR A. baumannii infection (28/group) during 2018-2021, and the treatment duration was 7-14 days. The study outcomes were 28-day mortality, clinical and microbiological responses, and adverse events. There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between groups (32.1% combination vs. 32.1% monotherapy, p = 1.000). Favorable clinical response at the end of treatment was comparable between groups (81.5% combination vs. 77.8% monotherapy, p = 0.788). Microbiological response at the end of treatment was also comparable between groups (73.1% combination vs. 74.1% monotherapy, p = 0.934). Acute kidney injury was found in 53.8% of the combination group, and in 45.8% of the monotherapy group (p = 0.571). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in 28-day mortality between the colistin monotherapy and the colistin plus sitafloxacin groups. There was also no significant difference in adverse events between groups.

Penetration of Antibacterial Agents into Pulmonary Epithelial Lining Fluid: An Update

A comprehensive review of drug penetration into pulmonary epithelial lining fluid (ELF) was previously published in 2011. Since then, an extensive number of studies comparing plasma and ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents have been published and are summarized in this review. The majority of the studies included in this review determined ELF concentrations of antibacterial agents using bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, and this review focuses on intrapulmonary penetration ratios determined with area under the concentration-time curve from healthy human adult studies or pharmacokinetic modeling of various antibacterial agents. If available, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters determined from preclinical murine infection models that evaluated ELF concentrations are also provided. There are also a limited number of recently published investigations of intrapulmonary penetration in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections, where greater variability in ELF concentrations may exist. The significance of these changes may impact the intrapulmonary penetration in the setting of infection, and further studies relating ELF concentrations to clinical response are needed. Phase I drug development programs now include assessment of initial pharmacodynamic target values for pertinent organisms in animal models, followed by evaluation of antibacterial penetration into the human lung to assist in dosage selection for clinical trials in infected patients. The recent focus has been on β-lactam agents, including those in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors, particularly due to the rise of multidrug-resistant infections. This manifests as a large portion of the review focusing on cephalosporins and carbapenems, with or without β-lactamase inhibitors, in both healthy adult subjects and critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Further studies are warranted in critically ill patients with lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the relationship between intrapulmonary penetration and clinical and microbiological outcomes. Our clinical research experience with these studies, along with this literature review, has allowed us to outline key steps in developing and evaluating dosage regimens to treat extracellular bacteria in lower respiratory tract infections.

A randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin versus moxifloxacin in adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral sitafloxacin versus oral moxifloxacin in the treatment of Chinese adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, positive-controlled clinical trial (chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20130046). CAP patients received sitafloxacin tablets 100 mg once daily (qd) or 100 mg twice daily (bid) to compare with moxifloxacin tablets 400 mg qd, for 7-10 days. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of sitafloxacin to moxifloxacin in clinical cure rate at test of cure (TOC) visit in per-protocol set (PPS).

RESULTS

A total of 343 patients were randomized (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, n = 117; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, n = 116; moxifloxacin, n = 110), 291 patients were included in the PPS (sitafloxacin 100 mg qd, n = 96; sitafloxacin 100 mg bid, n = 94; moxifloxacin, n = 101). The clinical cure rate was 94.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 96.8% in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 95.0% in the moxifloxacin group. At the TOC visit, the microbiological success rate was 97.0% (32/33) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 97.1% (34/35) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 94.9% (37/39) in the moxifloxacin group in the microbiological evaluable set (MES). The incidence of study-drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 23.3% (27/116) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg qd group, 29.8% (34/114) in the sitafloxacin 100 mg bid group and 28.2% (31/110) in the moxifloxacin group (p > .05). The common AEs related to study drug were dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, increased platelet count and alanine transaminase (ALT) elevation. All the AEs resolved completely after discontinuation of study drug.

CONCLUSION

Sitafloxacin 100 mg qd or 100 mg bid for 7-10 days is not inferior to moxifloxacin 400 mg qd for 7-10 days in clinical efficacy for adult CAP patients. Sitafloxacin provides a safety profile comparable to moxifloxacin.