Synergy of levofloxacin (L-ofloxacin) and oxacillin against quinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, measured by the time-kill method

The pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin and sunitinib

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sunitinib on pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin. The previous study proved that levofloxacin co-administered with sunitib changes the following pharmacokinetic parameters i.e. Cmax and AUC for both sunitinib and SU012662 (sunitinib metabolite). We will also investigate if the limited sample strategy can be applied for levofloxacin.

METHODS

Rabbits were divided into two groups. In both groups there were six animals. In the control group levofloxacin was administered and in investigated group levofloxacin and sunitinib were co-administered. The dose of levofloxacin was 20mg/kg and the dose of sunitinib was 25mg. The concentration in plasma was determined by HPLC-FLD. The pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated by WinNonLin software. The results were evaluated by the following statistical tests: Shapiro-Wilk, t-Student and Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin obeys the two-compartment model. Sunitinib influences the following pharmacokinetic parameters of levofloxacin: half-life, elimination constant and volume of distribution. Statistical analysis proved that there is a correlation between AUC and the following five time-points: 0.25 h, 4h, 6h, 10h and 12h.

CONCLUSIONS

The study proved that there is a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between sunitinib and levofloxacin. The statistical analysis proved that the limited sample strategy can be applied for levofloxacin.

Levofloxacin disposition in cerebrospinal fluid in patients with external ventriculostomy

In vitro levofloxacin exhibits both potent or intermediate activity against most of the pathogens frequently responsible for acute bacterial meningitis and synergistic activity with some beta-lactams. Since levofloxacin was shown to penetrate the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) during meningeal inflammation both in animals and in humans, the disposition of levofloxacin in CSF was studied in 10 inpatients with external ventriculostomy because of communicating hydrocephalus related to subarachnoid occlusion due to cerebral accidents who were treated with 500 mg of levofloxacin intravenously twice a day because of extracerebral infections. Plasma and CSF concentration-time profiles and pharmacokinetics were assessed at steady state. Plasma and CSF levofloxacin concentrations were analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. The peak concentration of levofloxacin at steady state (C(max ss))was 10.45 mg/liter in plasma and 4.06 mg/liter in CSF, respectively, with the ratio of the C(max ss) in CSF to the C(max ss) in plasma being 0.47. The areas under the concentration-time curves during the 12-h dosing interval (AUC(0-tau)s) were 47.69 mg. h/liter for plasma and 33.42 mg. h/liter for CSF, with the ratio of the AUC(0-tau) for CSF to the AUC(0-tau) for plasma being 0.71. The terminal-phase half-life of levofloxacin in CSF was longer than that in plasma (7.02 +/- 1.57 and 5.51 +/- 1.36 h, respectively; P = 0.034). The ratio of the levofloxacin concentration in CSF to the concentration in plasma progressively increased with time, from 0.30 immediately after dosing to 0.99 at the end of the dosing interval. In the ventricular CSF of patients with uninflamed meninges, levofloxacin was shown to provide optimal exposure, which approximately corresponded to the level of exposure of the unbound drug in plasma. The findings provide support for trials of levofloxacin with twice-daily dosing in combination with a reference beta-lactam for the treatment of bacterial meningitis in adults. This cotreatment could be useful both for overcoming Streptococcus pneumoniae resistance and for enabling optimal exposure of the CSF to at least one antibacterial agent for the overall treatment period.

Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of levofloxacin in patients with spontaneous acute bacterial meningitis

We have assessed levofloxacin penetration in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the liquor-to-plasma ratio (C(L)/C(P)) at 2 hours after dosing in 5 patients with spontaneous acute bacterial meningitis. CSF levofloxacin concentration at 2 hours after dosing was 1.99+/-0.67 microg/mL, and the C(L)/C(P) at 2 hours after dosing was 0.34+/-0.09.

Effect of different combinations of sparfloxacin, oxacillin, and fosfomycin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci

The in vitro activity of combinations of sparfloxacin/oxacillin, sparfloxacin/fosfomycin, and oxacillin/fosfomycin was investigated against 16 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates and 12 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) isolates moderately resistant to sparfloxacin. Synergic interactions were observed more frequently against MRSE than against MRSA strains. The most effective combination on both species was fosfomycin plus oxacillin, synergistic against ten of 16 MRSA and eight of 12 MRSE strains.

Improved efficacy with nonsimultaneous administration of first doses of gentamicin and ceftazidime in vitro

First doses of aminoglycoside and beta-lactam antibiotics, when used in combination, are usually given simultaneously; however, nonsimultaneous administration may be more efficacious. We used a dynamic in vitro model, which simulates in vivo serum kinetics, to assess the effect of spacing the first doses of gentamicin and ceftazidime used against Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and two clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, PA1 and PA2. The following dose regimens against P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were compared: (i) gentamicin given alone, (ii) ceftazidime given alone, (iii) gentamicin and ceftazidime given simultaneously, (iv) gentamicin followed by ceftazidime at 15 or 50 min or at 2, 4, or 8 h, and (v) ceftazidime which was followed by gentamicin at 4 h. The effects of regimen iii and the 4-h interval in regimen iv against PA1 and PA2 were also compared. Initial peak concentrations used were 8 mg/liter for gentamicin and 80 mg/liter for ceftazidime, with drug half-lives of 2.5 and 1.8 h, respectively. Compared with simultaneous administration, nonsimultaneous administration (regimens iv and v) produced greater overall bacterial killing and was associated with a delay in bacterial regrowth (p < 0.005) of up to 6.6 to 8.3 h, regardless of the order in which the drugs were given. The optimal interval between gentamicin and ceftazidime doses, which maximized initial bactericidal effect and the time before regrowth, appeared to be 2 to 4 h.

Levofloxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy

Levofloxacin, an oral fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, is the optical S-(-) isomer of ofloxacin. In vitro it is generally twice as potent as ofloxacin. Levofloxacin is active against most aerobic Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms and demonstrates moderate activity against anaerobes. Drug penetration into body tissues and fluids is rapid and widespread after oral administration. In clinical trials conducted in Japan, oral levofloxacin has demonstrated antibacterial efficacy against a variety of infections, including upper and lower respiratory tract, genitourinary, obstetric, gynaecological and skin and soft tissues. In comparative trials with ofloxacin, levofloxacin, at half the daily dosage of ofloxacin, showed equivalent efficacy and a reduced incidence of adverse effects in the treatment of lower respiratory tract and complicated urinary tract infections. Levofloxacin has a tolerability profile similar to that of other oral fluoroquinolones, with gastrointestinal and central nervous system effects reported most commonly. Theophylline dosage adjustment does not appear to be necessary in patients receiving concomitant levofloxacin. Coadministration with antacids or with other drugs containing divalent or trivalent cations reduces levofloxacin absorption. Thus, levofloxacin has potential as a broad spectrum antibacterial drug in the treatment of a variety of infections. However, clinical trials recruiting non-Japanese patients are in progress and these results will form a basis on which future recommendations for the broader use of levofloxacin can be made.

Susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from patients with cancer to levofloxacin and other quinolones

The antibacterial activity of levofloxacin was compared with those of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against bacterial isolates from patients with cancer. In general, levofloxacin was as active or was twofold more active than ofloxacin and was two- to fourfold less active than ciprofloxacin against most gram-negative pathogens. Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ciprofloxacin was the most active agent tested (MIC for 90% of isolates tested, 1.0 microgram/ml). Overall, all three agents had similar activities against gram-positive organisms and were moderately active against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococcus species, and Enterococcus species.