Once-daily aminoglycoside therapy: potential ototoxicity

Aminoglycosides in Critically Ill Septic Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Receiving Intermittent Hemodialysis: A Multicenter, Observational Study

PURPOSE

Data on aminoglycoside stewardship in critically ill septic patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) needing intermittent hemodialysis (IH) are scarce. The first objective of the study was to evaluate whether aminoglycoside administration occurs before vs after IH in the real-life management of critically ill septic patients with AKI needing IH. The second objective was to assess the delay in achieving a potential reinjection window for a second dose of aminoglycoside, which should be obtained with a postdialysis vs predialysis regimen.

METHODS

A post hoc observational analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of critically ill patients with AKI needing renal replacement therapy was conducted. Inclusion criteria consisted of any patients receiving IH for AKI during an antimicrobial therapy for a septic episode.

FINDINGS

Among 206 of 341 septic patients (60%) receiving aminoglycosides, 90 underwent IH (46 with previous continuous renal replacement therapy and 44 without). Amikacin and gentamicin were administered for a mean (SD) of 2.2 (1.5) and 2.5 (2.1) days with mean (SD) doses of 20.6 (6.6) and 5.4 (2.5) mg/kg, respectively. In the 44 patients undergoing exclusive IH, aminoglycosides were administered in a predialysis in 53% of episodes versus 35% in a postdialysis schedule. The first C_min target was obtained earlier with a predialysis vs postdialysis schedule (33.9 [14.2] hours vs 50.9 [12.2] hours, P = 0.009).

IMPLICATIONS

Despite being less frequently used than a predialysis schedule, the postdialysis administration of aminoglycosides remains a regular practice in the intensive care unit. A predialysis schedule of administration in IH reduces the interval time to tolerable aminoglycoside redosing.

Development of a Semimechanistic Model to Describe the Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis

The aim of this study was to ascertain the most suitable dosing schedule for gentamicin in patients receiving hemodialysis. We developed a model to describe the concentration-time course of gentamicin in patients receiving hemodialysis. Using the model, an optimal dosing schedule was evaluated. Various dosing regimens were compared in their ability to achieve maximum concentration (C(max), > or = 8 mg/L) and area under the concentration time-curve (AUC > or = 70 mg x h/L and < or = 120 mg x h/L per 24 hours). The model was evaluated by comparing model predictions against real data collected retrospectively. Simulations from the model confirmed the benefits of predialysis dosing. The mean optimal dose was 230 mg administered immediately before dialysis. The model was found to have good predictive performance when simulated data were compared to data observed in real patients. In summary, a model was developed that describes gentamicin pharmacokinetics in patients receiving hemodialysis. Predialysis dosing provided a superior pharmacokinetic profile than did postdialysis dosing.

[Level of evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides]

Aminoglycosides are major antibiotics indicated for the treatment of infection with gram-negative bacilli. They are characterized by high clinical effectiveness but their main drawback is the occurrence of toxicity in a significant number of patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters of aminoglycosides exhibit wide inter-individual variability and the relationships between concentration and effect have been clearly demonstrated. Consistent studies have demonstrated that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of aminoglycosides administered in multiple daily doses was cost-effective in maximising antibiotic efficacy and/or reducing incidence of toxicity. Therefore TDM of aminoglycosides should be considered "essential". Level of evidence for TDM of aminoglycosides administered once daily is not so clearly demonstrated however it should be highly recommended.

Randomized, controlled trial comparing once daily and three times daily gentamicin in children with urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVE

To undertake population pharmacokinetic modeling and to determine the safety and efficacy of once daily (OD) gentamicin dosing in children with severe urinary tract infections (UTI).

METHODS

An open, randomized, controlled trial comparing OD with three times daily (TD) gentamicin dosing in hospitalized children ages 1 month to 12 years with UTI. Daily doses (milligrams per kg per day) of gentamicin in both groups were 7.5 (<5 years old), 6.0 (5 to 10 years old) and 4.5 (>10 years old).

RESULTS

There were 179 children enrolled (90 OD, 89 TD). Baseline clinical characteristics and pathogens were similar, except that circulatory compromise and renal cortical scintigraphic defects were more common in the OD group. Median gentamicin treatment durations were 3.0 (OD) and 2.7 (TD) days. Mean peak gentamicin concentrations were 17.3 (OD) vs. 6.4 (TD) mg/l; 99% of peak concentrations were >7 mg/l in the OD group whereas 16% of peak concentrations were <5 mg/l in the TD group. Mean trough concentrations were 0.35 (OD) vs. 0.55 (TD) mg/l. In the OD group 4% of trough concentrations were > or = 2 mg/l, whereas in the TD group only 0.7% were > or = 2 mg/l. Age or prior elevated peak concentrations did not predict high trough concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of the data fitted a one-compartment model with first order elimination. There were no clinical or bacteriologic failures. The two disease-related complications were confined to the OD group. No nephro- or ototoxicity was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

With age-appropriate dosing and measurement of serum trough concentrations before the second dose, OD gentamicin is safe and effective for the treatment of UTI requiring parenteral treatment in children aged 1 month to 12 years.

Gentamicin for the practicing urologist: review of efficacy, single daily dosing and "switch" therapy

PURPOSE

We review the literature on gentamicin, including single daily dosing and "switch" therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used MEDLINE to search the literature from 1966 to June 1997, and then manually searched bibliographies to identify studies that our initial search might have missed.

RESULTS

Gentamicin has attractive characteristics, including wide spectrum, infrequent resistance, economy and familiarity. Although limited by well known toxicities, gentamicin remains a drug of choice for serious Gram-negative infections. Dosing strategies, such as single daily dosing and switch therapy, have renewed enthusiasm for this time-honored drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Gentamicin remains a valuable drug in urology. Once daily dosing and switch therapy offer the potential to increase effectiveness and convenience while decreasing toxicity and costs.

Validation of the Hartford nomogram in trauma surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Hartford nomogram for once-daily aminoglycoside dosing in trauma surgery patients.

METHODS

A chart review was performed in trauma surgery patients who were started on once-daily aminoglycoside therapy. A peak aminoglycoside concentration was drawn 30 minutes after the end of the first or second infusion, and a random concentration was drawn approximately 10 hours after the dose. The 10-hour random concentration was used to validate the Hartford nomogram by predicting the actual dosing interval (determined by extrapolating the peak and random concentrations to achieve a trough concentration <1 mg/L). The percentage of intervals accurately predicted by the nomogram was determined.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients (34 men and 15 women), age 43.0+/-15.9 y, total body weight 81.3+/-24.5 kg, ideal body weight 68.1+/-10.7 kg, dosing body weight (DBW) 72.0+/-14.4 kg, and estimated creatinine clearance [Cl(cr)] 89.5+/-20.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 were evaluated. Patients received 505+/-105 mg (7.0+/-0.4 mg/kg) of either gentamicin or tobramycin per dose. The concentration 30 minutes after the infusion was 22.4+/-5.9 mg/L, the concentration at the end of the dosing interval was 0.20+/-0.46 mg/L, the 10-hour random concentration was 2.6+/-1.8 mg/L, the elimination rate constant was 0.26+/-0.08 h(-1), the elimination half-life was 3.0+/-1.2 hours, and the volume of distribution was 19.9+/-7.9 L (0.28+/-0.09 L/kg of DBW). Ninety-eight percent (48/49) of the intervals were accurately predicted by the nomogram.

CONCLUSIONS

In trauma surgery patients with Cl(cr) of more than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, the Hartford nomogram using a single random aminoglycoside concentration accurately predicted the same once-daily aminoglycoside intervals as determined by two concentrations. Less aggressive therapeutic drug monitoring in this patient subpopulation can lead to significant cost savings.