Scanning electron microscopy of microbial cells on membrane filters

Adapted methods for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in assessment of human sperm morphology

Infertility is a widespread problem, and in some cases, the routine basic semen analysis is not sufficient to detect the cause of male infertility. The use of the scanning electron microscope (SEM) could provide a detailed insight into spermatozoa morphology, but it requires specific sample preparation techniques. The purpose of this study was to select, adjust, and optimize a method for the preparation of spermatozoa samples prior to SEM analysis, and to establish the protocol required for its use in clinical practice. We examined sperm samples of 50 men. The samples were fixed with modified iso-osmolar aldehyde solution followed by osmium post-fixation. In the first method, dehydration of the cells and subsequent critical point drying (CPD) were performed on a coverslip. In the second method, the samples were dehydrated in centrifuge tubes; hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) was used as a drying agent instead of CPD, and the samples were air-dried. The third procedure was based on a membrane filter. The samples were dehydrated and dried with HMDS in a Gooch crucible, continuously, without centrifugation or redispersion of the sample. Our results showed that the fixation with modified iso-osmolar aldehyde solution followed by osmium post-fixation, and combined with dehydration and CPD on a coverslip, is the most convenient procedure for SEM sample preparation. In the case of small-size samples or low sperm concentration, dehydration and drying with HMDS on the membrane filter enabled the best reliability, repeatability, and comparability of the results. The presented procedures are suitable for routine use, and they can be applied to confirm as well as to correct a diagnosis.

Antimicrobial mechanism and activity of dodecyl rosmarinate against Staphylococcus carnosus LTH1502 as influenced by addition of salt and change in pH

Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of rosmarinic acid (RA) and dodecyl rosmarinate (RE12) against Staphylococcus carnosus LTH1502 were studied as a function of pH (5.8 to 7.2) and in the presence of salts (KCl and MgCl2, 0 to 500 mM). Microbial cultures were exposed to unesterified RA and to esterified RE12, and cell number was determined by plate counting. Cells exposed to RA and RE12 at the minimum bactericidal concentration (200 and 0.05 mM, respectively) were examined using scanning electron microscopy to observe potential morphological changes. Activity of RA was found to be strongly dependent on pH, salt type, and concentration, whereas RE12 led to the compound's activity becoming independent of pH, salt concentration, and type. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that morphology of cells treated with RE12 after incubation of 1 h was irrevocably altered. Our results suggest that esterification (i) altered the mechanism of action by increasing the compound's affinity for cell membranes and (ii) decreased the compound's susceptibility to changes in environmental conditions that alter its charge. Highly specific changes in structure-activity relationships can be observed when esterifying a naturally active phenol such as RA with an alkyl chain that has a carbon chain length of 12.

Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy

Polycarbonate Nuclepore filters are better than cellulose filters for the direct counting of bacteria because they have uniform pore size and a flat surface that retains all of the bacteria on top of the filter. Although cellulose filters also retain all of the bacteria, many are trapped inside the filter where they cannot be counted. Before use, the Nuclepore filters must be dyed with irgalan black to eliminate autofluorescence. Direct counts of bacteria in lake and ocean waters are twice as high with Nuclepore filters as with cellulose filters.

Comparison of two direct-count techniques for enumerating aquatic bacteria

Planktonic bacteria from an estuary were concentrated on membrane filters and counted with both a scanning electron microscope and an epi-illuminated fluorescent microscope. Counts on 0.2 micron Nuclepore filters (polycarbonate) were significantly higher (P less than 0.001) than counts on 0.2-micron Sartorius filters (cellulose). In contrast, there was not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques when Nuclepore filters were used (0.5 less than P less than 0.9). The average cell volume from this study area was 0.047 micron3. The estimated number of bacteria ranged from 10(6) to 10(7) bacteria per ml, representing from 4 to 40 mg of C per m3.