Coactivation in vitro of the sigma54-dependent promoter Pu of the TOL plasmid of Pseudomonas putida by HU and the mammalian HMG-1 protein

IHF is required for the transcriptional regulation of the Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough orp operons

Transcriptional activation of σ(54)-dependent promoters is usually tightly regulated in response to environmental cues. The high abundance of potential σ(54)-dependent promoters in the anaerobe bacteria, Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough, reflects the high versatility of this bacteria suggesting that σ(54) factor is the nexus of a large regulatory network. Understanding the key players of σ(54)-regulation in this organism is therefore essential to gain insights into the adaptation to anaerobiosis. Recently, the D. vulgaris orp genes, specifically found in anaerobe bacteria, have been shown to be transcribed by the RNA polymerase coupled to the σ(54) alternative sigma factor. In this study, using in vitro binding experiments and in vivo reporter fusion assays in the Escherichia coli heterologous host, we showed that the expression of the divergent orp promoters is strongly dependent on the integration host factor IHF. Bioinformatic and mutational analysis coupled to reporter fusion activities and mobility shift assays identified two functional IHF binding site sequences located between the orp1 and orp2 promoters. We further determined that the D. vulgaris DVU0396 (IHFα) and DVU1864 (IHFβ) subunits are required to control the expression of the orp operons suggesting that they form a functionally active IHF heterodimer. Interestingly results obtained from the in vivo inactivation of DVU0396, which is required for orp operons transcription, suggest that several functionally IHF active homodimer or heterodimer are present in D. vulgaris.

The logicome of environmental bacteria: merging catabolic and regulatory events with Boolean formalisms

The regulatory and metabolic networks that rule biodegradation of pollutants by environmental bacteria are wired to the rest of the cellular physiology through both transcriptional factors and intermediary signal molecules. In this review, we examine some formalisms for describing catalytic/regulatory circuits of this sort and advocate the adoption of Boolean logic for combining transcriptional and enzymatic occurrences in the same biological system. As an example, we show how known regulatory and metabolic actions that bring about biodegradation of m-xylene by Pseudomonas putida mt-2 can be represented as clusters of binary operations and then reconstructed as a digital network. Despite the many simplifications, Boolean tools still capture the gross behaviour of the system even in the absence of kinetic constants determined experimentally. On this basis, we argue that still with a limited volume of data binary formalisms allow us to penetrate the raison d'être of extant regulatory and metabolic architectures.

The anaerobic regulatory network required for Pseudomonas aeruginosa nitrate respiration

In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the narK(1)K(2)GHJI operon encodes two nitrate/nitrite transporters and the dissimilatory nitrate reductase. The narK(1) promoter is anaerobically induced in the presence of nitrate by the dual activity of the oxygen regulator Anr and the N-oxide regulator Dnr in cooperation with the nitrate-responsive two-component regulatory system NarXL. The DNA bending protein IHF is essential for this process. Similarly, narXL gene transcription is enhanced under anaerobic conditions by Anr and Dnr. Furthermore, Anr and NarXL induce expression of the N-oxide regulator gene dnr. Finally, NarXL in cooperation with Dnr is required for anaerobic nitrite reductase regulatory gene nirQ transcription. A cascade regulatory model for the fine-tuned genetic response of P. aeruginosa to anaerobic growth conditions in the presence of nitrate was deduced.

The guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) alarmone, DksA and promoter affinity for RNA polymerase in regulation of sigma-dependent transcription

The RNA polymerase-binding protein DksA is a cofactor required for guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp)-responsive control of transcription from sigma70 promoters. Here we present evidence: (i) that both DksA and ppGpp are required for in vivo sigma54 transcription even though they do not have any major direct effects on sigma54 transcription in reconstituted in vitro transcription and sigma-factor competition assays, (ii) that previously defined mutations rendering the housekeeping sigma70 less effective at competing with sigma54 for limiting amounts of core RNA polymerase similarly suppress the requirement for DksA and ppGpp in vivo and (iii) that the extent to which ppGpp and DksA affect transcription from sigma54 promoters in vivo reflects the innate affinity of the promoters for sigma54-RNA polymerase holoenzyme in vitro. Based on these findings, we propose a passive model for ppGpp/DksA regulation of sigma54-dependent transcription that depends on the potent negative effects of these regulatory molecules on transcription from powerful stringently regulated sigma70 promoters.

DNA bending in the Sin recombination synapse: functional replacement of HU by IHF

The serine recombinase Sin requires a non-specific DNA-bending protein such as Hbsu for activity at its recombination site resH. Hbsu, and Sin subunits bound at site II of resH, together regulate recombination, ensuring selectivity for directly repeated resH sites by specifying assembly of an intertwined synapse. To investigate the role of the DNA-bending protein in defining the architecture of the synapse, we constructed a chimaeric recombination site (resF) which allows Hbsu to be substituted by IHF, binding specifically between site I (the crossover site) and site II. Two Sin dimers and one IHF dimer can bind together to the closely adjoining sites in resF, forming folded complexes. The precise position of the IHF site within the site I-site II spacer determines the conformation of these complexes, and also the reactivity of the resF sites in recombination assays. The data suggest that a sharp bend with a specific geometry is required in the spacer DNA, to bring the Sin dimers at sites I and II together in the correct relative orientation for synapse assembly and regulation, consistent with our model for a highly condensed synapse in which Hbsu/IHF has a purely architectural function.

In vivo UV laser footprinting of the Pseudomonas putidasigma 54Pu promoter reveals that integration host factor couples transcriptional activity to growth phase

The occupation of the final sigma(54)-dependent Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida by the integration host factor (IHF) under different growth conditions has been monitored in its native state and stoichiometry (i.e. monocopy) with UV laser footprinting technology. We present evidence that an abrupt change in intracellular IHF concentrations occurs when P. putida cells enter stationary phase. This change results in enhanced binding of the factor to the promoter and in the ensuing bending of the target DNA. Since Pu activity depends rigorously on DNA bending, promoter occupation is in turn translated into a much higher transcriptional output when cells leave exponential growth. Inspection of the residual activity of Pu in an IHF(-) strain reveals that IHF predominantly locks the capacity of the promoter to specific growth stages and also that additional physiological signals are entered in the system through final sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. The results substantiate the notion that final sigma(54) promoters process metabolic co-regulation signals through factor-induced changes in the architecture of the cognate DNA region. Further, they validate UV laser technology as a suitable tool to visualize nondisruptive alterations of DNA shape in vivo.

Recruitment of RNA polymerase is a rate-limiting step for the activation of the sigma(54) promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida

The activity of the sigma(54)-promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida was examined in vitro with a DNA template lacking upstream activating sequences, such that RNA polymerase can be activated by the enhancer-binding protein XylR only from solution. Although the transcription activation pathway in this system lacked the step of integration host factor (IHF)-mediated looping of the XylR.DNA complex toward the prebound RNA polymerase, IHF still stimulated promoter activity. The positive effect of IHF became evident not only with XylR from solution, but also with other sigma(54)-dependent activators such as NtrC and NifA. Furthermore, an equivalent outcome was shown for the nonspecific DNA-binding protein HU. This stimulation of transcription in the absence of the enhancer was traced to the recruitment of RNA polymerase (i.e. increased efficiency of formation of closed complexes) brought about by IHF or HU binding. Thus, under limiting concentrations of the polymerase, the factor-mediated binding of the enzyme to Pu seems to enter a kinetic checkpoint in the system that prevents the XylR-mediated formation of an open complex.

Upstream A-tracts increase bacterial promoter activity through interactions with the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

Upstream A-tracts stimulate transcription from a variety of bacterial promoters, and this has been widely attributed to direct effects of the intrinsic curvature of A-tract-containing DNA. In this work we report experiments that suggest a different mechanism for the effects of upstream A-tracts on transcription. The similarity of A-tract-containing sequences to the adenine- and thymine-rich upstream recognition elements (UP elements) found in some bacterial promoters suggested that A-tracts might increase promoter activity by interacting with the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase (RNAP). We found that an A-tract-containing sequence placed upstream of the Escherichia coli lac or rrnB P1 promoters stimulated transcription both in vivo and in vitro, and that this stimulation required the C-terminal (DNA-binding) domain of the RNAP alpha subunit. The A-tract sequence was protected by wild-type RNAP but not by alpha-mutant RNAPs in footprints. The effect of the A-tracts on transcription was not as great as that of the most active UP elements, consistent with the degree of similarity of the A-tract sequence to the UP element consensus. A-tracts functioned best when positioned close to the -35 hexamer rather than one helical turn farther upstream, similar to the positioning optimal for UP element function. We conclude that A-tracts function as UP elements, stimulating transcription by providing binding site(s) for the RNAP alphaCTD, and we suggest that these interactions could contribute to the previously described wrapping of promoter DNA around RNAP.

Clues and consequences of DNA bending in transcription

This review attempts to substantiate the notion that nonlinear DNA structures allow prokaryotic cells to evolve complex signal integration devices that, to some extent, parallel the transduction cascades employed by higher organisms to control cell growth and differentiation. Regulatory cascades allow the possibility of inserting additional checks, either positive or negative, in every step of the process. In this context, the major consequence of DNA bending in transcription is that promoter geometry becomes a key regulatory element. By using DNA bending, bacteria afford multiple metabolic control levels simply through alteration of promoter architecture, so that positive signals favor an optimal constellation of protein-protein and protein-DNA contacts required for activation. Additional effects of regulated DNA bending in prokaryotic promoters include the amplification and translation of small physiological signals into major transcriptional responses and the control of promoter specificity for cognate regulators.