The "3-Day Rule" for Stool Tests May Not Apply When Using PCR Panels

A diagnostic stewardship approach to prevent unnecessary testing of an enteric bacterial molecular panel

IMPORTANCE

Testing for enteric bacterial pathogens in patients hospitalized for more than 3 days is almost always inappropriate. Our study validates the utility of the 3-day rule and the use of clinical decision support tools to decrease unnecessary testing of enteropathogenic bacteria other than C. difficile. Overriding the restriction was very low yield. Our study highlights the importance of diagnostic stewardship and further refines the criteria for allowing providers to override the restriction while monitoring the impact of the interventions.

Usefulness of serum procalcitonin and point-of-care multiplex PCR gastro-intestinal panel in acute diarrhea or colitis in the emergency department

Introduction: Acute infectious diarrhea is one of the most common diseases worldwide. Procalcitonin (PCT) is useful for antibiotic stewardship in lower respiratory tract infections but has been poorly studied in infectious diarrhea. Our objective is to describe the PCT concentrations according to diarrhea etiology.Methods: This is a single-center prospective cohort study involving adults consulting the emergency department (ED) for an acute diarrhea or colitis. Serum PCT was measured and a stool sample was tested with FilmArray® Gastro-Intestinal Panel. The primary endpoint is the PCT concentration according to each type of pathogen identified using Gastro-Intestinal-panel and/or stool cultures at ED admission.Results: 125 patients were included: 80 had an acute infectious diarrhea, 21 an acute colitis and 24 another illness causing diarrhea. The median (interquartile ranges) PCT values (ng/ml) were 0.13 (0.08-0.28), 0.07 (0.06-0.54), 0.13 (0.09-0.26) and 0.05 (0.03-0.17), respectively if there was a bacteria (n = 41), parasite (n = 3), virus (n = 10) or no pathogen identified and 0.34 (0.13-1.03) if the diarrhea was due to another illness (n = 24).Conclusion: In patients admitted to the ED with an acute infectious diarrhea or acute colitis, PCT remained low when a bacteria was identified. It may not be informative in current practice to guide antibiotic therapy.

Alternative Causes of Infectious Diarrhea in Patients with Negative Tests for Clostridoides Difficile

BACKGROUND

Hospitalized patients with diarrhea who have a negative Clostridoides difficile (C. difficile) test are not routinely evaluated for alternative causes of infectious diarrhea. This study assessed for potential infectious causes of diarrhea in hospitalized patients with an order for repeat C. difficile toxin enzyme immunoassay (tEIA) testing after an initial tEIA test was negative.

METHODS

For patients age ≥18 years who had a second C. difficile tEIA test ordered within 96 h after a negative tEIA test, remnant fecal specimens from the first (negative) tEIA test were evaluated using the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel PCR, C. difficile toxigenic culture, and culture on a blood agar plate (BAP) to identify other potential causes of infectious diarrhea. Growth of organisms on the BAP was also used to assess potential disruptions in the gastrointestinal microbiota.

RESULTS

Among 84 remnant specimens, toxigenic C. difficile was identified in 9 (11%) by culture or PCR, while potential alternative causes of infectious diarrhea, including norovirus, rotavirus, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, and Salmonella, were identified in 11 specimens (13%) by PCR. For the majority of patients, no infectious cause of diarrhea was identified, but 84% exhibited disrupted gastrointestinal microbiota, which may contribute to diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

When a hospitalized patient has a negative C. difficile tEIA test but continues to have diarrhea, alternative infectious and noninfectious causes of diarrhea should be considered. If the patient has clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of infection or risk factors for gastrointestinal infection, laboratory testing for other etiologic agents may be appropriate.

Healthcare associated diarrhea, not Clostridioides difficile

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the epidemiology, cause, diagnostic evaluation, and management of healthcare-associated diarrhea (HCAD) with particular attention to current epidemiology and recent developments in diagnostics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction gastrointestinal panels allow rapid detection of a wide array of potential enteropathogens but the role, yield, and utility of these tests have not been systematically assessed in patients with HCAD. Recent epidemiologic studies reaffirm that HCAD is predominantly a noninfectious condition most often caused by medications or underlying medical conditions, sometimes Clostridioides difficile, and occasionally viruses. Other infections are rare.

SUMMARY

Clinical assessment remains fundamental to the evaluation of HCAD and targeted testing for C. difficile is sufficient in most patients. Multiplex gastrointestinal panels may have a role in immunocompromised patients but more study is needed. Medication-induced diarrhea is common and underappreciated and not limited to antibiotics, laxatives, and enemas.

Multiplex Molecular Stool Testing Rarely Impacts Antimicrobial Treatment Decisions More Than Three Days After Admission

Background Acute diarrheal illness in the United States is a significant cause of healthcare utilization and hospitalizations. For patients who develop diarrhea while hospitalized, testing for pathogens other than Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) using conventional stool testing is low yield. Newer testing modalities for infectious diarrhea such as the multiplex molecular stool testing provide an improved detection rate and a faster turn-around time compared to conventional stool testing.  Methods We retrospectively examined the use of a multiplex molecular stool test at our institution for all hospital encounters over a two-year period to determine which organisms were identified ≤ 3 days and > 3 days after admission.  Results A total of 2032 patients underwent multiplex molecular stool testing during the study period, with 1698 (83.6%) performed ≤ 3 days and 334 (16.3%) > 3 days after admission. An enteric non-C. difficile pathogen was identified more frequently when patients were tested ≤ 3 days after admission (350, 20.6%) as compared to > 3 days after admission (38, 11.4%, p<0.0001). Excluding coinfections, C. difficile was identified more frequently when patients were tested > 3 days after admission (64, 20.3%) versus another organism (30, 9.0%) (p<0.0001). Of those patients with a non-C. difficile pathogen identified > 3 days after admission, a bacterial pathogen amenable to treatment was only identified in 6% (21) of patients.  Conclusion Multiplex molecular stool testing for patients tested > 3 days after admission is a low yield of information that could guide antimicrobial treatment decisions, and C. difficile testing is more useful in this clinical situation.

Diarrheal Morbidity During Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: The Diagnostic Yield of Stool Cultures

INTRODUCTION

Diarrhea affects a significant proportion of patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We explored the diagnostic yield of stool cultures for enteric pathogens among patients undergoing HCT.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study. Between 5/2007 and 4/2020, consecutive patients who underwent HCT were included if inpatient bacterial stool cultures were collected. Patient characteristics, results, and timing of stool cultures obtained during hospitalization were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 1072 individuals underwent autologous (n = 603) and allogeneic (n = 469) HCT. Overall, 947 stool culture samples were obtained from 561 (52%) patients with diarrheal illness during hospitalization for HCT. Most (99%) samples were obtained beyond 3 days of admission, mainly (77%) during neutropenia. Overall, only four (0.42%) (autologous, n = 3; allogeneic, n = 1) patients had a positive stool culture and in all cases Campylobacter spp. were the pathogens identified. The number of stool cultures needed-to-test to diagnose one case of bacterial infection was 237. The cost of diagnosing one case of bacterial diarrhea was US $8770. Patients with a positive stool culture did not have discerning characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the yield of stool cultures for enteropathogens in patients undergoing HCT is extremely low and thus should be avoided in most cases.

Newer approaches in diagnosis of diarrhea in immunocompromised patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will focus on the epidemiology and cause of diarrheal illness in solid organ transplant and stem-cell transplant population recipients with a specific focus on the role of advanced multiplex technology in the diagnosis of diarrhea within this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

A wide range of infectious and noninfectious causes of diarrhea have been described in immunocompromised patients. The most common infections noted are Clostridioides difficile, norovirus, and cytomegalovirus, whereas immunosuppressive drugs and mucositis are the most common noninfectious causes of diarrhea. Historically, diagnostic evaluation has been limited to an array of single pathogen assays. Newer multiplex assays have become available that allow rapid, sensitive detection of a wide range of pathogens in a single assay. These assays have improved the number of patients with a diagnosed pathogen but may identify colonizing pathogens that are not pathogenic. Studies are needed to inform the discrimination and optimal use of these newer assays.

SUMMARY

Diarrhea is a common complication in immunocompromised patients and is associated with greater morbidity and rare mortality. New diagnostics facilitate detection of recognized pathogens and may allow for improved outcomes through the use of pathogen-targeted therapy.

Simple lateral flow assays for microbial detection in stool

Diarrheal diseases claim the lives of 1300 children daily, mostly in the developing world. We have developed a simple lateral flow assay capable of detecting E. coli and EPEC DNA and RNA rapidly (<15 minutes) at the point-of-need, directly from stool without nucleic acid extraction or molecular amplification. The limit of detection of the method is 1 nM using synthetic DNA target substrates spiked into stool. However, due to the endogenous amplification of the 23S rRNA targets, we were able to detect the endogenous EPEC in pea-sized (5 mg) stool without labor-intensive and time-consuming nucleic acid purification or target amplification using enzymes. The significance of this method is that it is rapid (<15 minutes) and simple (without nucleic acid purification or molecular amplification) and does not require instrumentation, or access to a laboratory, cold chain or electric power. Thus, it is well-suited for point-of-need use in remote and/or resource-limited settings in the developing world where the mortality due to diarrheal diseases is especially high. The rapid testing of stool pathogens in real time at the point-of-need will decrease the loss of patients to follow-up, and enable patients to be treated earlier with the appropriate therapeutics in both the developed and developing world settings.