Multicenter comparison of MicroScan and BACTEC blood culture systems

Evaluation of BACTEC 9240 blood culture system by using high-volume aerobic resin media

The BACTEC 9240 blood culture system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Sparks, Md.) is one of three automated, continuous-monitoring systems that is widely used in clinical laboratories. The BACTEC 9240 was compared with the BACTEC NR 660 for the detection of organisms and bacteremic episodes; time to detection of positive cultures; number of false-positive and false-negative cultures; and time needed to load, process, and perform quality control functions by using high-volume aerobic media. Blood specimens (5,282) were inoculated in equal volumes (5 to 10 ml per bottle) into BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F (9240 system) and BACTEC Plus NR26 (660 system) bottles. Clinically significant isolates were detected in 6.6% of cultures, representing 348 microorganisms and 216 bacteremic episodes. Two hundred forty-eight microorganisms were detected by both systems, 48 by the 9240 only and 52 by the 660 only (P = not significant). Of the bacteremic episodes, 158 were detected by both systems, 27 by the 9240 only and 31 by the 660 only (P = not significant). Analysis of data by month revealed equivalent recovery rates for both systems, with the exception of a 30-day period at one study site during which the 660 system detected significantly more microorganisms. Following a proprietary hardware design retrofit of the 9240 instrument, detection rates were again equivalent for the remaining three months at this study site. Positive cultures detected by both systems were detected an average of 4.3 h faster by the 9240 system (21 versus 25.3 h). The numbers of false-positive cultures for the 9240 and 660 systems were 40 (1.0%) and 9 ( < 1.0%), respectively. The numbers of false-negative cultures were five for the 9240 system and three for the 660 system. The 9240 system required 23 s less technologist time per bottle to operate during the 5-day protocol. In conclusion, the BACTEC 9240 used with high-volume Aerobic/F medium is equivalent to the BACTEC 660 used with high volume NR26 medium for the detection of microorganisms and bacteremic episodes. In addition, the 9240 system detects positive cultures more rapidly than the 660 system but requires further evaluation to ensure reliability of instrument components.

Comparison of Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert continuous-monitoring blood culture systems

The Difco ESP and Organon Teknika BacT/Alert (BTA) systems were evaluated in a clinical study of 5,421 aerobic and 5,035 anaerobic blood cultures. Of 405 clinically significant positive cultures evaluated, 272 grew in both systems, 86 grew in ESP only, and 47 grew in BTA only (P < 0.005). Of 320 organisms detected in aerobic bottles, 208 grew in both systems, 68 grew in ESP only and 45 grew in BTA only (P < 0.05), with Staphylococcus aureus the only organism showing a statistically significant difference. The ESP anaerobic bottle also detected more anaerobes (16 of 17 versus 4 of 17, P < 0.005) and more organisms overall (57 versus 34, P < 0.05). However, with the exception of patients with anaerobic bacteremia (12 of 13 for ESP and 4 of 13 for BTA, P < 0.05), there was no statistical difference in the detection of patient episodes. Average detection time of matched aerobic bottles was 18.3 h for ESP and 22.0 h for BTA (P < 0.001). For matched pairs of anaerobic bottles, the average detection time was faster in the BTA bottles (P < 0.001), because of the growth of facultative organisms. To explore the differences in anaerobic detection more fully, 20 sets of anaerobic bottles were seeded with 12 anaerobic species mixed with human blood. ESP grew more organisms (17 of 20 versus 10 of 20, P < 0.025), and the average time to detection for the 10 paired positive cultures was 21.6 h for ESP and 50.8 h for BTA (P < 0.05). Times for loading and unloading bottles were similar for both systems.

Detection of bloodstream infections in children

A critical responsibility of the clinical microbiology laboratory serving clinicians who care for infected children is accurate and timely detection of bacteremia. Blood culture protocols which are suitable for processing adult specimens are not necessarily the first choice for processing pediatric specimens. In this review, the following aspects of detection of bacteremia in children are covered: obtaining blood culture specimens from children, including skin disinfection, specimen volume and timing of specimen collection; the array of blood culture methods available, focusing upon conventional, radiometric, infrared spectroscopic and manometric broth cultures, as well as biphasic agar/broth and lysis direct plating techniques: the strengths and weaknesses of the various methods; and recommendations to laboratories for selection of a blood culture method based upon the laboratory's staffing level.

Assessment of the BACTEC NR660 blood culture system for the detection of bacteremia in young children

The sensitivity of the BACTEC NR660 blood culture system was assessed by using paired bottles of anaerobic (NR7A) and resin-containing aerobic (NR16A) media and conditions and organisms which simulated those found in pediatric practice. Corresponding media (7D and 16B) of the established BACTEC 460 radiometric method served as controls. The performances of the two systems were similar with 50 isolates of 10 aerobic organisms (aerobic medium) and with 21 isolates of 15 strict anaerobes (anaerobic medium).