Comparison of agar disk diffusion, microdilution broth, and agar dilution for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci

Resistance to fusidic acid

Resistance to fusidic acid is determined by a number of mechanisms. The best described are alterations in elongation factor G, which appear in natural mutants that are harboured at low rates in normal populations of staphylococci (10(6) to 10(8)). Altered drug permeability has also been described, and appears to be plasmid-borne. Binding by chloramphenicol acetyltransferase type I and efflux are other described mechanisms of resistance whose prevalence is unclear. A large number of studies have examined rates of fusidic acid resistance in staphylococci. Most show low levels of resistance. Studies where high levels of resistance have been seen are from areas of the hospital where cross infection is common. Rates of resistance have tended to be slightly higher in methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Studies on the evolution of resistance have shown no major trends to the emergence of resistance. In one case this is despite increasing use of both systemic and topical fusidic acid over more than 24 years. Selection for resistant variants during treatment was recognised early in vitro and in vivo. However, evidence suggests that it does not occur at high frequency in clinical practice. Nevertheless, accumulated experience is that fusidic acid in combination with other agents results in less resistance emergence.

Measurement of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in pig feces with a hydrophobic grid membrane filter interpreter system

Hydrophobic grid membrane filter technology was used to measure resistance among Escherichia coli in pig fecal samples to ampicillin, sulfisoxazole, and tetracycline. The method accurately measured resistance, with sensitivities ranging from 96.5 to 99.5% and specificities ranging from 87.0 to 98.3%, and it identified E. coli with 96% confidence.

Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the bioMérieux Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing system with 11 antimicrobial agents versus members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

A four-center study in which a total of 1,082 recent clinical isolates of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were examined versus 11 antimicrobial agents with the bioMérieux Vitek susceptibility test system (Hazelwood, Mo.) and the GNS-F6 card was conducted. In addition, a challenge set consisting of the same 200 organisms was examined in each of the four participating laboratories. Results obtained with the Vitek system were compared to MICs determined by a standardized broth microdilution method. For purposes of comparison, susceptibility categories (susceptible, intermediate, or resistant) were assigned on the basis of the results of both methods. The result of the broth microdilution test was considered definitive. The total category error rate with the Vitek system and the recent clinical isolates (11,902 organism-antimicrobial comparisons) was 4.5%, i.e., 1.7% very major errors, 0.9% major errors, and 1.9% minor errors. The total category error rate calculated from tests performed with the challenge set (i.e., 8,800 organism-antimicrobial comparisons) was 5.9%, i.e., 2.2% very major errors, 1.1% major errors, and 2.6% minor errors. Very major error rates higher than the totals were noted with Enterobacter cloacae versus ampicillin-sulbactam, aztreonam, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin-clavulanate and with P. aeruginosa versus mezlocillin, ticarcillin, and ticarcillin-clavulanate. Major error rates higher than the averages were observed with Proteus mirabilis versus imipenem and with Klebsiella pneumoniae versus ofloxacin. Excellent overall interlaboratory reproducibility was observed with the Vitek system. The importance of inoculum size as a primary determinant in the accuracy of susceptibility test results with the Vitek system was clearly demonstrated in this study. Specifically, when an inoculum density fourfold higher than that recommended by the manufacturer was used, high rates of false resistance results were obtained with cell wall-active antimicrobial agents versus both the Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.

Evaluation of the E test by using selected gram-positive bacteria

The E test (AB Biodisk NA Inc.) was compared with standard reference methods using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards's recommendations for determining the MICs of four selected antibiotics against 208 clinical isolates of gram-positive bacteria. These bacteria included 32 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 25 strains of Enterococcus faecium, 20 strains of oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (OSSA), 96 strains of oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (ORSA), and 35 strains of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Evaluation included MIC accuracy within 1 dilution, reproducibility testing, and cost analysis. There was 94% agreement between the E test and the reference method in testing S. pneumoniae and penicillin G. There was 92% agreement with ampicillin and 100% agreement with vancomycin in testing E. faecium isolates. Accuracy of the oxacillin E test with staphylococci was significantly improved by the use of salt-supplemented Mueller-Hinton agar, for an agreement of 100% with coagulase-negative staphylococci and oxacillin-sensitive S. aureus and that of 85% with oxacillin-resistant S. aureus, with no major discrepancies. The E test with American Type Culture Collection isolates and clinical strains gave excellent reproducibility and was less costly than microdilution panels when used to test fewer than three antibiotics. The E test is a simple, reliable, reproducible, and cost-effective method for MIC determination for gram-positive organisms.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in coronary bypass surgery: a critical appraisal

The literature has been examined to assess the optimal prophylactic antimicrobial regimen for patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis should be based on the two main potential pathogens, Staphylococcus epidermidis and S. aureus. It is unclear whether the prophylactic use of antimicrobials can or should be guided by in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing; data from well-performed clinical trials should be evaluated. The data fail to demonstrate consistently a significant difference within the cephalosporin class of antimicrobials with regard to prevention of infectious complications. Although it does not reach statistical difference, the trend with respect to efficacy appears to be cefuroxime, then cefamandole, and then cefazolin. The lack of significant difference among antimicrobials suggests an institution-individualized approach to the selection of the optimal antimicrobial for prophylaxis. For our facilities we recommend the following regimen: cefazolin sodium 1-2 g iv q8h for two days. There are not enough data at this time to recommend less than two days of antimicrobial prophylaxis for this type of surgery. In addition, aminoglycosides provide no added benefit when added to cephalosporins.

Activities of daptomycin and teicoplanin against Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, including evaluation of susceptibility testing recommendations

The in vitro activities of daptomycin, teicoplanin, and three other antimicrobial agents were determined against 105 strains of Staphylococcus haemolyticus and 92 strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis. The MICs for 90% of strains tested (MIC90s) of fusidic acid and rifampin were less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml. The MIC90s of daptomycin and vancomycin were less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml. Teicoplanin had a comparable MIC90 of less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml for isolates of S. epidermidis. However, MIC90s were 8 and 16 micrograms/ml for oxacillin-susceptible and oxacillin-resistant S. haemolyticus, respectively. Disk diffusion tests were evaluated for daptomycin and teicoplanin. Disks with 30 micrograms of teicoplanin performed satisfactorily when S. epidermidis was tested, but when S. haemolyticus was tested, there was a very major error rate of 10% and a minor error rate of 38%.

Salt-supplemented medium for testing methicillin-resistant staphylococci with newer beta-lactams

The addition of 2% NaCl to cation-supplemented Mueller-Hinton broth (CSMHB) was evaluated for microdilution testing of the susceptibility of staphylococci to five cephalosporins, imipenem, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and ticarcillin-clavulanate. With Staphylococcus aureus, NaCl improved the recognition of methicillin (oxacillin) resistance to cefamandole, imipenem, or ticarcillin-clavulanate. Resistance to amoxicillin-clavulanate was readily determined, irrespective of the presence of added salt. The addition of 2% NaCl to CSMHB did not significantly improve detection of resistance to any of the beta-lactams among coagulase-negative staphylococci. Since the addition of NaCl did not have significant adverse effects on tests with coagulase-negative staphylococci, the routine addition of 2% NaCl to oxacillin or methicillin tests with staphylococci may be justifiable on the basis of convenience or standardization. However, addition of NaCl to susceptibility tests of other beta-lactams does not consistently improve recognition of resistance among staphylococci and thus cannot be recommended for routine use.