Evaluation of Vitek GPS-SA card for testing of oxacillin against borderline-susceptible staphylococci that lack mec

Expert systems in clinical microbiology

This review aims to discuss expert systems in general and how they may be used in medicine as a whole and clinical microbiology in particular (with the aid of interpretive reading). It considers rule-based systems, pattern-based systems, and data mining and introduces neural nets. A variety of noncommercial systems is described, and the central role played by the EUCAST is stressed. The need for expert rules in the environment of reset EUCAST breakpoints is also questioned. Commercial automated systems with on-board expert systems are considered, with emphasis being placed on the "big three": Vitek 2, BD Phoenix, and MicroScan. By necessity and in places, the review becomes a general review of automated system performances for the detection of specific resistance mechanisms rather than focusing solely on expert systems. Published performance evaluations of each system are drawn together and commented on critically.

Comparison of real-time PCR with disk diffusion, agar screen and E-test methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a nosocomial pathogen. Our main objective was to compare oxacillin disk test, oxacillin E-test, and oxacillin agar screen for detection of methicillin resistance in S. aureus, using real-time PCR for mecA as the "gold standard" comparison assay. 196 S. aureus isolates were identified out of 284 Staphylococcus isolates. These isolates were screened for MRSA with several methods: disk diffusion, agar screen (6.0 μg/ml), oxacillin E-test, and real-time PCR for detection of mecA gene. Of the 196 S. aureus isolates tested, 96 isolates (49%) were mecA-positive and 100 isolates (51%) mecA-negative. All methods tested had a statistically significant agreement with real-time PCR. E-test was 100% sensitive and specific for mecA presence. The sensitivity and specificity of oxacillin agar screen method were 98 and 99%, respectively and sensitivity and specificity of oxacillin disk diffusion method were 95 and 93%, respectively. In the present study, oxacillin E-test is proposed as the best phenotypic method. For economic reasons, the oxacillin agar screen method (6.0 μg/ml), which is suitable for the detection of MRSA, is recommended due to its accuracy and low cost.

Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to <or= 4 microg/ml and to >or= 6 microg/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-microg cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to <or= 21 mm for resistant slightly improved sensitivity but had no effect on specificity. It was therefore concluded that the use of more than one screening method is necessary to detect all MRSA isolates in clinical settings.

Analysis of the beta-lactamase plasmid of borderline methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: focus on bla complex genes and cadmium resistance determinants cadD and cadX

Borderline methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains are a rather homogeneous group, characterized by MICs of penicillinase-resistant penicillins (PRPs) at or just below the susceptibility breakpoint. Other features unique to this group include the presence of a pBW15-like beta-lactamase plasmid, the association with phage complex 94/96, and the production of a PRP-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase activity in addition to the classical penicillinase activity. The four HindIII fragments of pBORa53, a pBW15-like plasmid from the well-studied borderline S. aureus strain a53, were cloned in Escherichia coli, sequenced and analyzed. The plasmid (17,334 bp in size) contains 14 open reading frames (ORFs) and a complete copy of transposon Tn552, which harbors the three genes of the bla complex (blaZ, blaR1, and blaI) necessary for penicillinase production. Among the other 11 ORFs identified, two were homologous to cadmium resistance determinants of Staphylococcus lugdunensis and to the cadD and cadX genes recently detected in S. aureus. Consistent with this, strain a53 was found to be cadmium resistant. From a collection of 30 S. aureus isolates with borderline PRP MIC levels, 27 matched strain a53 in the positive amplification reactions with all of the four primer pairs targeting the cadD-cadX region, the presence of the 17.3-kb plasmid, and the level of cadmium resistance. The well-established S. aureus laboratory strain ATCC 29213 was also found to express cadD-cadX-mediated cadmium resistance. pBORa53 could be re-isolated from transformants obtained by transferring it into a PRP-susceptible recipient. However, while the transformants demonstrated levels of cadmium and penicillin resistance similar to those of strain a53, they remained fully susceptible to PRPs.

Optimal inoculation methods and quality control for the NCCLS oxacillin agar screen test for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

To define more precisely the inoculation methods to be used in the oxacillin screen test for Staphylococcus aureus, we tested agar screen plates prepared in house with 6 microg of oxacillin/ml and 4% NaCl using the four different inoculation methods that would most likely be used by clinical laboratories. The organisms selected for testing were 19 heteroresistant mecA-producing strains and 41 non-mecA-producing strains for which oxacillin MICs were near the susceptible breakpoint. The inoculation method that was preferred by all four readers and that resulted in the best combination of sensitivity and specificity was a 1-microl loopful of a 0.5 McFarland suspension. A second objective of the study was to then use this method to inoculate plates from five different manufacturers of commercially prepared media. Although all commercial media performed with acceptable sensitivity compared to the reference lot, one of the commercial lots demonstrated a lack of specificity. Those lots of oxacillin screen medium that fail to grow heteroresistant strains can be detected by using S. aureus ATCC 43300 as a positive control in the test and by using transmitted light to carefully examine the plates for any growth. However, lack of specificity with commercial lots may be difficult to detect using any of the current quality control organisms.

Performance of eight methods, including two new rapid methods, for detection of oxacillin resistance in a challenge set of Staphylococcus aureus organisms

Using a set of 55 Staphylococcus aureus challenge organisms, we evaluated six routine methods (broth microdilution, disk diffusion, oxacillin agar screen, MicroScan conventional panels, MicroScan rapid panels, and Vitek cards) currently used in many clinical laboratories and two new rapid methods, Velogene and the MRSA-Screen, that require less than a day to determine the susceptibility of S. aureus to oxacillin. The methods were evaluated by using the presence of the mecA gene, as detected by PCR, as the "gold standard." The strains included 19 mecA-positive heterogeneously resistant strains of expression class 1 or 2 (demonstrating oxacillin MICs of 4 to >16 microg/ml) and 36 mecA-negative strains. The oxacillin MICs of the latter strains were 0.25 to 4 microg/ml when tested by broth microdilution with 2% NaCl-supplemented cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth as specified by the NCCLS. However, when tested by agar dilution with 4% salt (the conditions used in the oxacillin agar screen method), the oxacillin MICs of 16 of the mecA-negative strains increased to 4 to 8 microg/ml. On initial testing, the percentages of correct results (% sensitivity/% specificity) were as follows: broth microdilution, 100/100; Velogene, 100/100; Vitek, 95/97; oxacillin agar screen, 90/92; disk diffusion, 100/89; MicroScan rapid panels, 90/86; MRSA-Screen, 90/100; and MicroScan conventional, 74/97. The MRSA-Screen sensitivity improved to 100% if agglutination reactions were read at 15 min. Repeat testing improved the performance of some but not all of the systems.

Comparison of the Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility 106 card and the MRSA-screen latex agglutination test for determining oxacillin resistance in clinical bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus aureus

The Vitek automated susceptibility testing system with a modified Gram-Positive Susceptibility (GPS) 106 Card (bioMerieux Vitek, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) and a rapid slide latex agglutination test (MRSA-Screen; Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were evaluated for their ability to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. The oxacillin-salt agar screen (OS) test, the reference broth microdilution method, and the detection of the mecA gene by PCR were compared with the commercial products. A total of 200 contemporary (1999) bloodstream infection isolates were collected from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, representing diverse geographic areas throughout the world. Among the 99 mecA-positive isolates, 3 isolates were found negative by the MRSA-Screen. Another two isolates did not grow on OS plates and had MICs of 0.5 and 2 microg/ml with the Vitek GPS card. All 101 mecA-negative isolates were also found negative by the MRSA-Screen and were categorized as susceptible by the GPS card. Overall, the MRSA-Screen, GPS card, and OS test had sensitivities of 96.9, 98.0, and 98.0% and specificities of 100.0, 100.0, and 98.0%, respectively. MRSA-Screen was a rapid (</=15 min) and simple test to perform, and the GPS card provided results in <8 h. Both methods were sensitive and specific for detecting staphylococcal oxacillin resistance in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Clinical impact of rapid oxacillin susceptibility testing using a PCR assay in Staphylococcus aureus bactaeremia

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to establish the clinical impact of rapid oxacillin susceptibility testing in nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

METHODS

This study was performed in 145 critically ill patients infected by S. aureus. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: patients for whom susceptibility testing was performed using a rapid same day multiplex PCR assay for detection of the staphylococcal mecA (mean delay of response: 6 h) and those for whom testing was accomplished using traditional overnight techniques (21 h).

RESULTS

The results of this study showed no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score, severity of infection, severity of underlying disease and clinical outcome (control vs. PCR): unfavourable outcome of infection, 12.32 vs. 12.5%; 95% CI for the difference = -11.49 to 11.09 (P = 0.975); unfavourable general outcome, 16.43 vs. 20.83%; 95% CI for the difference = -17.35 to 8.50 (P = 0.497). For the oxacillin-susceptible S. aureus bactaeraemia, results were: unfavourable outcome of infection = 13.04 vs. 11.11%; 95% CI for the difference = -11.38 to 16.18 (P = 0.767); unfavourable general outcome = 13.04 vs. 20.37%; 95% CI for the difference = -22.12 to 8.07 (P = 0.331).

CONCLUSION

This study seemed to demonstrate that rapid oxacillin susceptibility testing using a PCR assay did not have a major impact on the care and outcome of patients with S. aureus bactaeremia.

Pseudo-outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a high rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at our institution was due to laboratory misclassification and to evaluate the effect of this misclassification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We evaluated all S. aureus isolates identified at our institution during a 60-day period in 1997. Automated susceptibility test results (using the Vitek system) from our clinical microbiology laboratory and an independent laboratory were compared with oxacillin agar screen plate results at both laboratories. Isolates with discordant results for susceptibility to oxacillin were tested by broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations and for the presence of the mecA gene.

RESULTS

Eighteen (72%) of the 25 organisms (obtained from 17 patients) found to be resistant to oxacillin by the Vitek system at our institution were susceptible by the oxacillin agar screen. Discordant isolates tested by broth microdilution minimal inhibitory concentrations and for the mecA gene were found to be oxacillin susceptible and mecA gene negative. Thus, at our hospital, almost three fourths of the organisms initially identified as methicillin-resistant S. aureus by the Vitek system were actually susceptible to oxacillin. This misclassification resulted in needless infection control measures and unnecessary vancomycin use.

CONCLUSION

Hospitals that use only automated susceptibility testing for S. aureus should periodically validate their results with additional testing.

Rapid detection of the mecA gene in methicillin resistant staphylococci using a colorimetric cycling probe technology

A Cycling Probe Technology (CPT) assay was developed for the detection of the mecA gene from methicillin resistant staphylococcal cultures. The assay is based on a colorimetric enzyme-immuno-assay (EIA) and uses a mecA probe (DNA-RNA-DNA) labeled with fluorescein at the 5'-terminus and biotin at the 3'-terminus. The reaction occurs at a constant temperature that allows the target DNA to anneal to the probe. RNase H cuts the RNA portion, allowing the cut fragments to dissociate from the target, making it available for further cycling. CPT-EIA uses streptavidin-coated microplate wells to capture uncut probe followed by detection with horseradish-peroxidase conjugated anti-fluorescein antibody. The assay was compared to PCR and shown to accurately detect the presence or absence of the mecA gene in 159 staphylococcal clinical isolates. The CPT-EIA assay takes two hours starting from cultured cells compared with the 24-48 h required for detection of methicillin resistance by conventional susceptibility tests.

Evaluation of MRSA-Screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

The MRSA-Screen test (Denka Seiken Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), consisting of a slide latex agglutination kit that detects PBP 2a with a monoclonal antibody, was blindly compared to the oxacillin disk diffusion test, the oxacillin-salt agar screen, and PCR of the mecA gene for the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 120 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 80 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, defined by the absence or presence of the mecA gene, respectively, were tested. The MRSA-Screen test, the oxacillin disk diffusion test, and the oxacillin-salt agar screening test showed sensitivities of 100, 61.3, and 82.5% and specificities of 99.2, 96.7, and 98.3%, respectively. We conclude that the MRSA-Screen is a very accurate, reliable, and fast test (15 min) for differentiation of MRSA from MSSA colonies on agar plates.

Misclassification of susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus as methicillin-resistant S. aureus By a rapid automated susceptibility testing system

Eight Staphylococcus aureus strains initially identified by Vitek GPS-BS or GPS-SA cards as resistant to oxacillin, but susceptible to most non-beta-lactam antibiotics, were found on further testing to be susceptible to oxacillin and ceftizoxime by disk diffusion tests. For all these strains, the MICs of oxacillin were Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Methicillin Resistance
• Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods
• Oxacillin/pharmacology
• Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

J Ribeiro Hospital de Base, Brasilia, Brazil
F D Vieira
T King
J B D'Arezzo
J M Boyce

Collapse

Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Conventional and molecular techniques are being used in the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus but they do not always show concordant results. In this study, a mecA PCR-based amplification was compared with the 1 microg oxacillin disk diffusion test and the Epsilometer test (E-test) for detection of MICs. Among 31 isolates initially characterized as MRSA by the disk diffusion test, mecA was detected in only 13 (42%) isolates. The E-test showed a wide range of oxacillin MICs (0.5 - > 256 microg/ml) among these 31 MRSA isolates: seven isolates had an MIC of > 256 microg/ml, one had 64 microg/ml, two had 4 microg/ml, two had 3 microg/ml, one had 2.5 microg/ml, nine had 2 microg/ml, three had 1.5 microg/ml, five had 1 microg/ml and one had 0.5 microg/ml. Comparing the mecA PCR results with the E-test oxacillin MIC findings revealed that mecA was detected in seven of eight isolates (87.5%) with an MIC of > or = 64 microg/ml, in three of 14 isolates (21.4%) with an MIC of 2-4 microg/ml and in three of nine isolates (33.3%) with an MIC of < 2 microg/ml. Beta-lactamase production was positive in 28/31 isolates (90.3%). Because of this variation between tests and since several resistance mechanisms are known to mediate methicillin resistance in S. aureus, the reliable detection of MRSA cannot be solely based on detection of mecA gene in S. aureus. At this stage and until new guidelines are introduced by an official body, such as NCCLS, a combination of conventional methods alone or together with a molecular method should be used every time S. aureus is tested for detection of methicillin resistance.

Comparison of ATB staph, rapid ATB staph, Vitek, and E-test methods for detection of oxacillin heteroresistance in staphylococci possessing mecA

The performance characteristics of the E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden), the ATB Staph, the Rapid ATB Staph, and the Vitek GPS-503 card (bioMérieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France) methods for the detection of oxacillin resistance in a collection of staphylococci with a high proportion of troublesome strains were evaluated. Sixty-four Staphylococcus aureus strains and 76 coagulase-negative staphylococcal strains were tested. All strains were mecA positive and were characterized by the oxacillin agar screen plate test; 75 (53.6%) were found to be heterogeneous by a large-inoculum oxacillin disk diffusion assay, and oxacillin MICs for 89 (63.6%) were < or = 32 microg/ml. Three (4.7%) S. aureus strains and 25 (32.9%) coagulase-negative strains were classified as susceptible by the E-test, as defined by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) oxacillin breakpoint (MIC < or = 2 microg/ml). The ATB Staph method failed to detect oxacillin resistance in 7 (11%) S. aureus isolates and 32 (42.1%) coagulase-negative isolates. The MICs for all but six of these discrepant isolates were < or = 16 microg/ml. The Rapid ATB Staph method was tested against S. aureus strains only and yielded 15 (23.4%) false-susceptible results for strains for which the MICs were < or = 32 microg/ml. The Vitek system was the best-performing system, since it failed to detect oxacillin resistance in only 3 (4.7%) S. aureus strains and 15 (19.7%) coagulase-negative strains, the MICs for all of which were < or = 2 microg/ml. These data indicate that (i) the performance of the two ATB Staph systems can be limited when the prevalence of borderline-heteroresistant staphylococci is high and (ii) the unreliability of the E-test and the Vitek methods for detecting resistant coagulase-negative strains might be reduced by the potential revision of the oxacillin breakpoint currently recommended by the NCCLS.

Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications

Methicillin resistance in staphylococci is determined by mec, composed of 50 kb or more of DNA found only in methicillin-resistant strains. mec contains mecA, the gene for penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP 2a); mecI and mecR1, regulatory genes controlling mecA expression; and numerous other elements and resistance determinants. A distinctive feature of methicillin resistance is its heterogeneous expression. Borderline resistance, a low-level type of resistance to methicillin exhibited by strains lacking mecA, is associated with modifications in native PBPs, beta-lactamase hyperproduction, or possibly a methicillinase. The resistance phenotype is influenced by numerous factors, including mec and beta-lactamase (bla) regulatory elements, fem factors, and yet to be identified chromosomal loci. The heterogeneous nature of methicillin resistance confounds susceptibility testing. Methodologies based on the detection of mecA are the most accurate. Vancomycin is the drug of choice for treatment of infection caused by methicillin-resistant strains. PBP 2a confers cross-resistance to most currently available beta-lactam antibiotics. Investigational agents that bind PBP 2a at low concentrations appear promising but have not been tested in humans. Alternatives to vancomycin are few due to the multiple drug resistances typical of methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Imipenem and meropenem activity against mecA-positive homogeneously and heterogeneously oxacillin-resistant and mecA-negative oxacillin-borderline-susceptible staphylococci

Microbroth dilution and disk-diffusion testing of imipenem and meropenem was performed at 35 and 30 degrees C against 61 phenotypic expression class 3,4 and 9 phenotypic expression class 1,2 oxacillin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA), 51 oxacillin-borderline-susceptible isolates of S. aureus (BORSA), and 37 phenotypic expression class 3,4 and 9 phenotypic expression class 1,2 isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis (ORSE). Imipenem MIC ranges at 35 degree C were 0.6 to > 64 micrograms/ml for class 3,4 ORSA, 0.03 to 0.25 micrograms/ml for class 1,2 ORSA, 0.015 to 0.12 micrograms/ml for BORSA, 0.03 to 64 micrograms/ml for class 3,4 ORSE, and 0.12 to 8 micrograms/ml for class 1,2 ORSE. Corresponding values for meropenem were 0.5 to 64 micrograms/ml, 0.12 to 4 micrograms/ml, 0.06 to 1 microgram/ml, 0.5 to 64 micrograms/ml, and 1 to 8 microgram/ml. MIC ranges at 30 degrees C did not differ by more than 1 log2 dilution from those at 35 degrees C. After 24 h incubation of disk-diffusion tests at 35 degrees C, 44% of class 3,4 and 100% of class 1,2 ORSA isolates were imipenem-susceptible; after an additional 24 h at 25 degrees C, 39 and 100% of these isolates, respectively, remained susceptible to imipenem. Similar values were obtained with 24 h incubation at 30 degrees C followed by 24 h at 25 degrees C. All BORSA isolates were susceptible to imipenem. Of the ORSE isolates, 22 and 78% of isolates in classes 3,4 and 1,2, respectively, were susceptible at 24 h with little change after an additional 24 h at 25 degrees C. Similar trends were observed with meropenem. In parallel disk-diffusion studies with oxacillin, false-susceptibility rates of 5% of class 3,4 and 44% class 1,2 ORSA isolates after 24 h of incubation at 35 degrees C were reduced to 3 and 0%, respectively, after an additional 24 h of incubation at 25 degrees C. Imipenem- and meropenem-resistant subpopulations of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci did not seem to be detected by altered susceptibility testing conditions.