Chromosomal organization of Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in vivo

Epigenetic regulation of noncoding RNA transcription by mammalian RNA polymerase III

RNA polymerase III (Pol III) synthesizes a range of medium-sized noncoding RNAs (collectively 'Pol III genes') whose early established biological roles were so essential that they were considered 'housekeeping genes'. Besides these fundamental functions, diverse unconventional roles of mammalian Pol III genes have recently been recognized and their expression must be exquisitely controlled. In this review, we summarize the epigenetic regulation of Pol III genes by chromatin structure, histone modification and CpG DNA methylation. We also recapitulate the association between dysregulation of Pol III genes and diseases such as cancer and neurological disorders. Additionally, we will discuss why in-depth molecular studies of Pol III genes have not been attempted and how nc886, a Pol III gene, may resolve this issue.

Investigation of histone H4 hyperacetylation dynamics in the 5S rRNA genes family by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay

Oogenesis is a critical event in the formation of female gamete, whose role in development is to transfer genomic information to the next generation. During this process, the gene expression pattern changes dramatically concomitant with genome remodelling, while genomic information is stably maintained. The aim of the present study was to investigate the presence of H4 acetylation of the oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in Triturus cristatus, using chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP). Our findings suggest that some epigenetic mechanisms such as histone acetylation could be involved in the transcriptional regulation of 5S rRNA gene families.

A polar barrier to transcription can be circumvented by remodeler-induced nucleosome translocation

Many eukaryotic genes are regulated at the level of transcript elongation. Nucleosomes are likely targets for this regulation. Previously, we have shown that nucleosomes formed on very strong positioning sequences (601 and 603), present a high, orientation-dependent barrier to transcription by RNA polymerase II in vitro. The existence of this polar barrier correlates with the interaction of a 16-bp polar barrier signal (PBS) with the promoter-distal histone H3-H4 dimer. Here, we show that the polar barrier is relieved by ISW2, an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler, which translocates the nucleosome over a short distance, such that the PBS no longer interacts with the distal H3-H4 dimer, although it remains within the nucleosome. In vivo, insertion of the 603 positioning sequence into the yeast CUP1 gene results in a modest reduction in transcription, but this reduction is orientation-independent, indicating that the polar barrier can be circumvented. However, the 603-nucleosome is present at the expected position in only a small fraction of cells. Thus, the polar barrier is probably non-functional in vivo because the nucleosome is not positioned appropriately, presumably due to nucleosome sliding activities. We suggest that interactions between PBSs and chromatin remodelers might have significant regulatory potential.

Transcription of the 5S rRNA heterochromatic genes is epigenetically controlled in Arabidopsis thaliana and Xenopus laevis

5S ribosomal DNA is a highly conserved tandemly repeated multigenic family. As suggested for a long time, we have shown that only a fraction of the 5S rRNA genes are expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana. In Xenopus laevis, there is a developmental control of the expression of the 5S rRNA genes with only one of the two 5S rDNA families expressed during oogenesis. For both Arabidopsis and Xenopus, the strongest transcription of 5S rRNA, respectively in the seed and during oogenesis is correlated with heterogeneity in the transcribed 5S rRNAs. Epigenetic mechanisms such as modification of the chromatin structure are involved in the transcriptional regulation of the 5S rRNA genes in both organisms. In Arabidopsis, two silencing pathways, methylation-dependent (RNAi) and methylation-independent (MOM pathway), are involved in the silencing of a 5S rDNA fraction.

Xenopus transcription factor IIIA and the 5S nucleosome: development of a useful in vitro system

5S RNA genes in Xenopus are regulated during development via a complex interplay between assembly of repressive chromatin structures and productive transcription complexes. Interestingly, 5S genes have been found to harbor powerful nucleosome positioning elements and therefore have become an important model system for reconstitution of eukaryotic genes into nucleosomes in vitro. Moreover, the structure of the primary factor initiating transcription of 5S DNA, transcription factor IIIA, has been extensively characterized. This has allowed for numerous studies of the effect of nucleosome assembly and histone modifications on the DNA binding activity of a transcription factor in vitro. For example, linker histones bind 5S nucleosomes and repress TFIIIA binding in vitro in a similar manner to that observed in vivo. In addition, TFIIIA binding to nucleosomes assembled with 5S DNA is stimulated by acetylation or removal of the core histone tail domains. Here we review the development of the Xenopus 5S in vitro system and discuss recent results highlighting new aspects of transcription factor - nucleosome interactions,

Histone H1 diversity: bridging regulatory signals to linker histone function

Genes encoding linker histone variants have evolved to link their expression to signals controlling the proliferative capacities of cells, i.e. cycling and growth-arrested cells express distinct and specific H1 subtypes. In metazoan, these variants show a tripartite structure, with considerably divergent sequences in their amino and carboxyl terminus domains. The aim of this review is to show how specific regulatory signals control the expression of an individual H1 and to discuss the functional significance of the two variables associated with a linker histone: its primary sequence and the timing of its expression.

Synthetic zinc finger transcription factor action at an endogenous chromosomal site. Activation of the human erythropoietin gene

We have targeted the activation of an endogenous chromosomal locus including the human erythropoietin gene using synthetic transcription factors. These transcription factors are targeted to particular DNA sequences in the 5'-flanking region of the erythropoietin gene through engineering of a zinc finger DNA binding domain. The DNA binding domain is linked to a VP16 transcriptional activation domain. We find that these synthetic transcription factors invariably activate transiently transfected templates in which sequences within the 5' flank of the erythropoietin gene are fused to a luciferase reporter. The efficiency of activation under these circumstances at a defined site is dependent on DNA binding affinity. In contrast, only a subset of these same zinc finger proteins is able to activate the endogenous chromosomal locus. The activity of these proteins is influenced by their capacity to gain access to their recognition elements within the chromatin infrastructure. Zinc finger transcription factors will provide a powerful tool to probe the determinants of chromatin accessibility and remodeling within endogenous chromosomal loci.

Control of gene expression in Xenopus early development

We examine the control of gene expression before and through the MBT in Xenopus laevis. The generalized repression of transcription that occurs before the midblastula transition (MBT) is regulated by a dynamic competition between chromatin and transcription complex assembly. Conditions favoring the access of basal factors (TBP) or transactivators can overcome this transcriptional repression. Changes in DNase I hypersensitivity patterns of the chromatin during early development show that it is more accessible to DNase I before the MBT (and by extension to other DNA interacting proteins) than after the MBT. We also show that at the level of genomic domains, organization of the chromatin matrix attachment sites is random before MBT. We propose that these three components, chromatin domain structure, DNA accessibility, and the transcription complex-chromatin dynamic competition, combine to regulate transcription in the embryo before and through the MBT.

Rearrangement of chromatin domains during development in Xenopus

A dynamic change in the organization of different gene domains transcribed by RNA polymerase I, II, or III occurs during the progression from quiescent [pre-midblastula transition (pre-MBT)] to active (post-MBT) embryos during Xenopus development. In the rDNA, c-myc, and somatic 5S gene domains, a transition from random to specific anchorage to the nuclear matrix occurs when chromatin domains become active. The keratin gene domain was also randomly associated to the nuclear matrix before MBT, whereas a defined attachment site was found in keratinocytes. In agreement with this specification, ligation-mediated (LM)-PCR genomic footprinting carried out on the subpopulation of 5S domains specifically attached to the matrix reveals the hallmarks of determined chromatin after the midblastula transition. In contrast, the same analysis performed on the total 5S gene population does not reveal specific chromatin organization, validating the use of nuclear matrix fractionation to unveil active chromatin domains. These data provide a means for the determination of active chromosomal territories in the embryo and emphasize the role of nuclear architecture in regulated gene expression during development.

Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription

The nucleosome and chromatin fiber provide the common structural framework for transcriptional control in eukaryotes. The folding of DNA within these structures can both promote and impede transcription dependent on structural context. Importantly, neither the nucleosome nor the chromatin fiber is a static structure. Histone dissociation, histone modification, nucleosome mobility, and assorted allosteric transitions contribute to transcriptional control. Chromatin remodeling is associated with gene activation and repression. Energy-dependent processes mediate the assembly of both activating and repressive proteins into the nucleosomal infrastructure. Recent progress allows the structural consequences of these processes to be visualized at the chromosomal level. DNA and RNA polymerase, SWI/SNF complexes, histone deacetylases, and acetyltransferases are targeted by gene-specific regulators to mediate these structural transitions. The mistargeting of these enzymes contributes to human developmental abnormalities and tumorigenesis. These observations illuminate the roles of chromatin and chromosomal structural biology in human disease.

Phosphorylation of linker histone H1 regulates gene expression in vivo by mimicking H1 removal

Two Tetrahymena strains were created by gene replacement. One contained H1 with all phosphorylation sites mutated to alanine, preventing phosphorylation. The other had these sites changed to glutamic acid, mimicking the fully phosphorylated state. Global gene expression was not detectably changed in either strain. Instead, H1 phosphorylation activated or repressed specific genes in a manner that was remarkably similar to the effects of knocking out the gene encoding H1. These studies demonstrate a role for H1 phosphorylation in the regulation of transcription in vivo and suggest that it acts by mimicking the partial removal of H1.

Chromatin disruption and modification

Chromatin disruption and modification are associated with transcriptional regulation by diverse coactivators and corepressors. Here we discuss the possible structural basis and functional consequences of the observed alterations in chromatin associated with transcriptional activation and repression. Recent advances in defining the roles of individual histones and their domains in the assembly and maintenance of regulatory architectures provide a framework for understanding how chromatin remodelling machines, histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases function.

The nucleosome: a powerful regulator of transcription

Nucleosomes provide the architectural framework for transcription. Histones, DNA elements, and transcription factors are organized into precise regulatory complexes. Positioned nucleosomes can facilitate or impede the transcription process. These structures are dynamic, reflecting the capacity of chromatin to adopt different functional states. Histones are mobile with respect to DNA sequence. Individual histone domains are targeted for posttranslational modifications. Histone acetylation promotes transcription factor access to nucleosomal DNA and relieves inhibitory effects on transcriptional initiation and elongation. The nucleosomal infrastructure emerges as powerful contributor to the regulation of gene activity.

Differential nucleosome positioning on Xenopus oocyte and somatic 5 S RNA genes determines both TFIIIA and H1 binding: a mechanism for selective H1 repression

In Xenopus somatic cells histone H1 effects the transcriptional repression of oocyte type 5 S RNA genes, without altering the transcription of the somatic type 5 S RNA genes. Using an unambiguous nucleosome mapping method we find substantial differences between the multiple in vitro nucleosome positions on the two types of genes. These nucleosome positions determine both transcription factor and H1 binding, allowing TFIIIA to bind more efficiently to nucleosomes containing the somatic 5 S RNA gene than to nucleosomes on the oocyte 5 S RNA gene. Significantly, in a binding competition between TFIIIA and H1, TFIIIA preferentially binds to the somatic nucleosome whereas H1 preferentially binds to the oocyte nucleosome, excluding TFIIIA binding. These results strongly suggest that nucleosome positioning plays a key role in the regulation of transcription of 5 S RNA genes and provide a molecular mechanism for the selective repression of the oocyte 5 S RNA genes by H1.

Functionally relevant histone-DNA interactions extend beyond the classically defined nucleosome core region

We demonstrate that core histones can affect the accessibility of a DNA element positioned outside of the classically defined nucleosome core region. The distance between a well positioned nucleosome and the binding site for the 5 S-specific transcription factor TFIIIA was systematically varied and the relative binding affinity for TFIIIA determined. We found that core histone-DNA interactions attenuate the affinity of TFIIIA for its cognate DNA element by a factor of 50-100-fold even when the critical binding region lies well outside of the classically defined nucleosome core region. These results have implications for the validity of parallels drawn between the accessibility of general nucleases to DNA sequences in chromatin and the activity of actual sequence-specific DNA binding factors.

Transcriptionally active Xenopus laevis somatic 5 S ribosomal RNA genes are packaged with hyperacetylated histone H4, whereas transcriptionally silent oocyte genes are not

The relationship between histone acetylation and transcription of the Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5 S ribosomal RNA genes was investigated. Chromatin fragments from a X. laevis kidney cell line were immunoprecipitated with an antibody specific for hyperacetylated histone H4. The DNA from the hyperacetylated chromatin was probed with both oocyte- and somatic gene-specific sequences, and the results showed that the upstream, nontranscribed region of the transcriptionally active somatic genes is packaged with acetylated histone H4. In contrast, the corresponding region of the transcriptionally silent oocyte genes is packaged with hypoacetylated histone H4 in this cells line. Further study also showed that this region of the oocyte genes was less sensitive to digestion with the enzyme, micrococcal nuclease. Together these results suggest that, as described for both RNA polymerase I and II transcribed genes, there is a correlation between histone acetylation and transcription of the RNA polymerase III transcribed 5 S ribosomal RNA genes in X. laevis.

Histone H1 reduces the frequency of initiation in Xenopus egg extract by limiting the assembly of prereplication complexes on sperm chromatin

Somatic histone H1 reduces both the rate and extent of DNA replication in Xenopus egg extract. We show here that H1 inhibits replication directly by reducing the number of replication forks, but not the rate of fork progression, in Xenopus sperm nuclei. Density substitution experiments demonstrate that those forks that are active in H1 nuclei elongate to form large tracts of fully replicated DNA, indicating that inhibition is due to a reduction in the frequency of initiation and not the rate or extent of elongation. The observation that H1 dramatically reduces the number of replication foci in sperm nuclei supports this view. The establishment of replication competent DNA in egg extract requires the assembly of prereplication complexes (pre-RCs) on sperm chromatin. H1 reduces binding of the pre-RC proteins, XOrc2, XCdc6, and XMcm3, to chromatin. Replication competence can be restored in these nuclei, however, only under conditions that promote the loss of H1 from chromatin and licensing of the DNA. Thus, H1 inhibits replication in egg extract by preventing the assembly of pre-RCs on sperm chromatin, thereby reducing the frequency of initiation. These data raise the interesting possibility that H1 plays a role in regulating replication origin use during Xenopus development.

Chromatin remodeling regulated by steroid and nuclear receptors

Coactivators and corepressors regulate transcription by controlling interactions between sequence-specific transcription factors, the basal transcriptional machinery and the chromatin environment. This review consider the access of nuclear and steroid receptors to chromatin, their use of corepressors and coactivators to modify chromatin structure and the implications for transcriptional control. The assembly of specific nucleoprotein architectures and targeted histone modification emerge as central controlling elements for gene expression.

What do linker histones do in chromatin?

Knockout experiments in Tetrahymena show that linker histone H1 is not essential for nuclear assembly or cell viability. These results, together with a series of biochemical and cell biological observations, challenge the existing paradigm that requires linker histones to be a key organizing component of higher-order chromatin structure. The H1 knockouts also reveal a much more subtle role for H1. Instead of acting as a general transcriptional repressor, H1 is found to regulate a limited number of specific genes. Surprisingly, H1 can both activate and repress transcription. We discuss how this architectural protein might accomplish this important regulatory role.

Differential association of HMG1 and linker histones B4 and H1 with dinucleosomal DNA: structural transitions and transcriptional repression

We examined the structural and functional consequences of incorporating either histone H1, histone B4 or HMG1 into a synthetic dinucleosome containing two 5S rRNA genes. We found that all three proteins bind to linker DNA, stabilizing an additional 20 bp from micrococcal nuclease digestion and restrict nucleosome mobility. Histone H1 has the highest-affinity interaction with the dinucleosome; histone B4 and HMG1 associate with significantly reduced affinities. We found that histone H1 binds to the dinucleosome template with a dissociation constant (KD) of 7.4 nM, whereas the KD is 45 nM for histone B4 and 300 nM for HMG1. The KDs for the interaction of these proteins with naked DNA are 18 nM for H1, 80 nM for B4 and 300 nM for HMG1. The differences in association of these proteins with the dinucleosome are reflected in the efficiency with which the different proteins repress transcription from the 5S rRNA genes. Thus, although all three proteins can contribute to the organization of chromatin, the stability of the structures they assemble will vary. Our results provide a molecular explanation for the transcriptional promiscuity of Xenopus early embryonic chromatin, which is enriched in HMG1 and linker histone B4, but deficient in histone H1.

A single high affinity binding site for histone H1 in a nucleosome containing the Xenopus borealis 5 S ribosomal RNA gene

We have reconstituted nucleosomes containing the Xenopus borealis 5 S rRNA gene, a single histone octamer, and 1 or 2 molecules of histone H1. We determine that the 1st molecule of histone H1 to associate with the 5 S nucleosome binds with high affinity (KD approximately 2 nM), and the 2nd molecule of H1 binds with a reduced affinity (KD approximately 10 nM). This latter binding is comparable with the association of histone H1 with naked DNA. Neither molecule of histone H1 alters the helical periodicity of DNA in the nucleosome as revealed by hydroxyl radical cleavage. We conclude that although multiple molecules of histone H1 can associate with nucleosomal DNA, there is only a single high affinity binding site for histone H1 within the 5 S nucleosome.

A naturally occurring T14A11 tract blocks nucleosome formation over the human neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)-Alu element

The nature of chromatin organization over Alu repetitive elements is of interest with respect to the maintenance of their transcriptional silencing as well as their potential to influence local chromatin structure. We previously demonstrated that the pattern of nucleosomal organization over Alu elements in native chromatin is specific and similar to the pattern observed with an in vitro reconstituted Alu template. This pattern, distinguished by a nucleosome centered over the 5 -end of the Alu element, is associated with repression of polymerase III-dependent transcription in vitro (Englander, E. W., Wolffe, A. P., and Howard, B. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19565-19573; Englander, E. W., and Howard, B. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10091-10096). In the current study, additional templates representing both evolutionarily old and young Alu subfamilies were found to direct a similar pattern of nucleosome assembly, consistent with the view that nucleosome positioning in vitro is shared by a majority of Alus. We discovered however, that the specific nucleosome positioning pattern was disrupted over one member of a young Alu subfamily, which recently transposed immediately downstream to a T14A11 sequence in the neurofibromatosis type 1 locus (Wallace, M. R., Andersen, L. B., Saulino, A. M., Gregory, P. E., Glover, T. W., and Collins, F. S. (1991) Nature 353, 864-866). Upon removal of this sequence motif, the expected pattern of assembly was restored to the neurofibromatosis type 1-Alu template. This finding indicates that, at least in vitro, certain sequences can override the propensity for positioning nucleosomes that is inherent to Alu elements. The finding also raises the possibility that a similar situation may occur in vivo, with potential implications for understanding mechanisms by which certain Alu elements may evade chromatin-mediated transcriptional silencing.

Differential effect of H1 variant overexpression on cell cycle progression and gene expression

To identify functional differences among non-allelic variants of the mammalian H1 linker histones a system for the overexpression of individual H1 variants in vivo was developed. Mouse 3T3 cells were transformed with an expression vector containing the coding regions for the H1c or H10 variant under the control of an inducible promoter. Stable, single colony transformants, in which the normal stoichiometry of H1 variants was perturbed, displayed normal viability, unaltered morphology and no long-term growth arrest. However, upon release from synchronization at different points in the cell cycle transformants significantly overproducing H10 exhibited transient inhibition of both G1 and S phase progression. Overexpression of H1c to comparable levels had no effect on cell cycle progression. Analysis of transcript levels for several cell cycle-regulated and housekeeping genes indicated that overexpression of H10 resulted in significantly reduced expression of all genes tested. Surprisingly, overexpression of H1c to comparable levels resulted in either a negligible effect or, in some cases, a dramatic increase in transcript levels. These results support the suggestion that functional differences exist among H1 variants.

Nucleosome positioning by human Alu elements in chromatin

Alu sequences are interspersed throughout the genomes of primate cells, occurring singly and in clusters around RNA polymerase II-transcribed genes. Because these repeat elements are capable of positioning nucleosomes in in vitro reconstitutes (Englander, E. W., Wolffe, A. P., and Howard, B. H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 19565-19573), we investigated whether they also influence in vivo chromatin structure. When assayed collectively using consensus sequence probes and native chromatin as template, Alu family members were found to confer rotational positioning on nucleosomes or nucleosome-like particles. In particular, a 10-base pair pattern of DNase I nicking that spanned the RNA polymerase III box A promoter motif extended upstream to cover diverse 5'-flanking sequences, suggesting that Alu repeats may influence patterns of nucleosome formation over neighboring regions. Computational analysis of a set of naturally occurring Alu sequences indicated that nucleosome positioning information is intrinsic to these elements. Inasmuch as local chromatin organization influences gene expression, the capacity of Alu sequences to affect chromatin structure as demonstrated here may help to clarify some features of these elements.

Developmentally regulated expression of linker-histone variants in vertebrates

The identification of histone H1 variants in vertebrates suggests that these proteins may have specialized functions. During embryonic development, a correspondence between the expression of each of the linker-histone variants and the proliferative and transcriptional activity of embryonic cells can be observed. Analysis of the developmentally regulated expression of these variants leads to the subdivision of these variants into distinct classes. This subdivision may also provide insight into the significance of the differential expression of variants and the roles individual linker histones have in chromatin structure and function.

The role of transcription factors, chromatin structure and DNA replication in 5 S RNA gene regulation

Differential expression of the oocyte and somatic 5 S RNA genes during Xenopus development can be explained by changes in transcription factor and histone interactions with the two types of gene. Both factors and histones bind 5 S RNA genes with specificity. Protein-protein interactions determine the stability of potentially transcriptionally active or repressed nucleoprotein complexes. A decline in transcription factor abundance, differential binding of transcription factors to oocyte and somatic 5 S genes, and increased competition with the histones for association with DNA during early embryogenesis, can account for the developmental decision to selectively repress the oocyte genes, while retaining the somatic genes in the transcriptionally active state. The 5 S ribosomal genes of Xenopus are perhaps the simplest eukaryotic genes to show regulated expression during development. A large multigene family (oocyte 5 S DNA) is transcriptionally active in oocytes but is repressed in somatic cells, whereas a small multigene family (somatic 5 S DNA) is active in both cell types. A potential molecular mechanism to explain the developmental switch that turns off oocyte 5 S DNA transcription has been experimentally reconstructed in vitro and more recently tested in vivo. Central to this mechanism is the specific association of both transcription factors and histones with 5 S RNA genes. How the interplay of histones and transcription factors is thought to affect transcription, and how their respective contributions might change during development from an oocyte, to an embryo and eventually to a somatic cell is the focus of this review.

The transcription of chromatin templates

Genetic and biochemical approaches have recently been used to demonstrate the pivotal role of chromatin structure in gene regulation at two levels of organization. The three-dimensional folding of DNA mediated by chromatin structural proteins over several hundred base pairs has been shown to be critical for the local control of both transcriptional activation and repression. Nuclear domains also exist in which the further long-range organization of chromatin over 5-50 kb exerts a global control on the transcription process.

Hc1-mediated effects on DNA structure: a potential regulator of chlamydial development

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria which undergo a unique developmental cycle, alternating between non-replicative elementary bodies (EBs) and replicative reticulate bodies (RBs). The transition from RB to EB is characterized by condensation of the chromosome into a dense nucleoid structure. The chlamydial histone homologue Hc1 is sufficient to induce formation of a similar structure in Escherichia coli. High-level Hc1 expression in E. coli is self-limiting and down-regulates transcription, translation, and replication at concentrations similar to those observed in chlamydial elementary bodies. Expression of Hc1 at sub-structural levels may have specific regulatory functions through its interaction with chromosomal DNA. In E. coli this is reflected in a dramatic shift in the pattern of gene expression. The differential expression of the outer membrane porin proteins OmpC and OmpF and analysis of lacZ fusions with promoter regions sensitive to supercoiling suggests that low-level Hc1 expression results in a net relaxation of chromosomal DNA. Topological analysis of plasmid DNA from both E. coli and Chlamydia trachomatis supports a decrease in superhelicity preceding nucleoid formation. In vitro analysis of purified Hc1-DNA interactions supports preferential binding based upon DNA conformation. These results suggest a dual role in which Hc1-mediated changes in gene expression may precede metabolic inactivity.

Effects of plasmid length and positioned nucleosomes on chromatin assembly in vitro

Histone H5 induces extensive nucleosome alignment in vitro, with a 210 +/- 5 base pair (bp) average unit repeat, on some of the constructs derived from plasmid pBR327. Plasmid pBR327 itself aligns nucleosomes poorly, even though it possesses a chromatin organizing region which nucleates the alignment reaction [Jeong et al. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 222, 1131-1147]. Examination of various regions of pBR327 chromatin by Southern hybridization revealed no substantial regional differences, suggesting an essentially all-or-none alignment mechanism. Twenty-four pBR327 deletion constructs, with the chromatin organizing region intact, were analyzed for nucleosome alignment in vitro, in addition to the six previously described. Although nucleosome alignment on plasmids of size greater than 5 kb was not affected by small length changes, circular plasmids with total lengths between 2400 and 3600 bp generally permitted alignment only when their lengths were close to integer multiples of 210 +/- 3 bp. The measured repeat lengths for the large plasmids and the smaller ones that aligned nucleosomes were all 210 bp, within experimental precision. The failure of two approximately 3.2-kb plasmids to align nucleosomes, even though their lengths were close to 15 x 210 bp, could be attributed to the effects of four strongly positioned nucleosomes that form on pBR327 sequences. Evidence is provided that nucleosome arrays can be quasicrystalline and are capable of transmitting information over a distance of more than 2 kb.

Influence of chromatin folding on transcription initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase III

Nucleosomes were assembled onto either closed circular plasmids containing a single Xenopus 5S RNA gene or a linear tandemly repeated array of Lytechinus 5S RNA genes. Both chromatin templates were found to vary in their extent of compaction, depending upon the type and concentration of cation in solution. Compaction of these chromatin templates led to a significant inhibition of both transcription initiation and elongation by RNA polymerase III. Thus, the transcriptional repression observed after incorporation of genes into chromatin depends not only on occlusion of the promoter elements through direct contact with histones but also on compaction of nucleosomal arrays which occurs under the conditions of the transcription reactions.